PUC seeks input on proposed settlement in Carbondale transformer fire
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission will seek public comment on a proposed settlement with PPL related to a transformer fire in Carbondale.
Commission members voted unanimously Thursday to publish the proposed settlement in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, beginning a 25-day public comment period.
The settlement stems from a transformer fire Dec. 9, 2022, when a 'hot leg' wire on the secondary side of a transformer burned open and fell onto a lower communications line, causing a fire at 22 Shannon St., according to the commission. It resulted in a power outage that affected more than 2,500 PPL customers for several hours.
The commission's Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement concluded that sufficient evidence existed to support allegations that PPL violated the commission's electric safety regulations and two provisions of the National Electric Safety Code.
Under the terms of the proposed settlement, PPL will pay a $4,500 civil penalty; inspect work completed over the past five years in Lackawanna and Luzerne counties involving conductor connections between transformer primary leads and secondary connections; provide a listing of the completed work; document and analyze any defects discovered during inspections; develop appropriate corrective measures and modify procedures where necessary; share its findings at the conclusion of its inspection efforts; and review and update its overhead transformer installation procedures.
For information, visit www.puc.pa.gov.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
PUC seeks input on proposed settlement in Carbondale transformer fire
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission will seek public comment on a proposed settlement with PPL related to a transformer fire in Carbondale. Commission members voted unanimously Thursday to publish the proposed settlement in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, beginning a 25-day public comment period. The settlement stems from a transformer fire Dec. 9, 2022, when a 'hot leg' wire on the secondary side of a transformer burned open and fell onto a lower communications line, causing a fire at 22 Shannon St., according to the commission. It resulted in a power outage that affected more than 2,500 PPL customers for several hours. The commission's Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement concluded that sufficient evidence existed to support allegations that PPL violated the commission's electric safety regulations and two provisions of the National Electric Safety Code. Under the terms of the proposed settlement, PPL will pay a $4,500 civil penalty; inspect work completed over the past five years in Lackawanna and Luzerne counties involving conductor connections between transformer primary leads and secondary connections; provide a listing of the completed work; document and analyze any defects discovered during inspections; develop appropriate corrective measures and modify procedures where necessary; share its findings at the conclusion of its inspection efforts; and review and update its overhead transformer installation procedures. For information, visit
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Complaint: Oakland County Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig created 'climate of fear'
This is a breaking news story and will be updated. An Oakland County district court judge is facing a public misconduct complaint with accusations that she failed for months to produce a report on a psychological exam she underwent, bullied court staff, created a climate of fear and improperly dismissed cases. Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig of 52-4 District Court in Troy was formally accused in a complaint announced June 4 by the Judicial Tenure Commission, the state's judicial oversight body. The complaint is the first step in a court-like process, after which the Michigan Supreme Court could decide to suspend or remove a judge, at the most severe. Hartig could not immediately be reached for comment, but a spokesperson, Daniel Cherrin of Royal Oak-based public affairs and communications firm North Coast Strategies, issued a statement on her behalf, saying the judge respects the 'important role' of the commission and has patiently waited for the chance to address the allegations against her. 'After years of inquiry, the Commission has produced a complaint based on disputed claims and a flawed process," he said in the statement, later adding: "The public deserves confidence in both the judiciary and its oversight. That confidence depends on transparency grounded in fact, not fiction. 'Judge Hartig has served the public and the bench for more than a decade with integrity, transparency, and a commitment to justice. The Commission is expected to do the same.' Hartig has 14 days to issue a formal response to the commission. A public complaint itself is a rarity for the tenure commission. Even when judges are found to be at fault, their misconduct cases are most often resolved behind closed doors. The process can also take years. Hartig, however, is the third Michigan judge in recent months to have a formal, public complaint issued against them. The 52-4 District Court handles cases in Troy and Clawson. More: Taylor judge called chief judge names, flipped off security cameras, complaint says The chief judge of Hartig's court ordered that she be restricted to civil, landlord-tenant and small claims cases as of May 27. Following the chief judge's order but before the announcement by the commission, Bill Mullan, public information officer for Oakland County, said in an email that it would let the order speak for itself. "The order was issued to ensure fairness in the courtroom," Mullan said at the time. "We refer any future questions to the Judicial Tenure Commission." Hartig had been under scrutiny by the commission in recent years, the Free Press previously reported. A former chief judge asked the commission to investigate in 2020, according to a filing in federal court by the county amid a lawsuit by a former court administrator. The court administrator in the lawsuit claimed she had been wrongfully terminated after making complaints about Hartig mistreating staff and the public. It came after she cooperated with the commission amid interviews of more than 40 people, she said in the lawsuit. More: Troy court worker who claimed judge was bully, abusive accepts $100K secret settlement More: 'No teeth': Cases of 2 embattled Michigan judges highlight concerns with accountability More: Visitors from Norway, fan pages, gifts: How judges' online fame affects Michigan courts Though Hartig denied the allegations of creating a hostile work environment and said the administrator was doing a poor job, the county settled the lawsuit in 2023 with a $100,000 payout. Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald also sparred with the judge in recent years, accusing her in 2022 of dismissing criminal cases because of a grudge with prosecutors regarding scheduling. In a court filing, the prosecutor's office said Hartig was frequently reversed on appeal and 'has a long-standing practice of seeking to impose her own personal view of what the law should be via the criminal cases before her.' Hartig, at the time, said prosecutors knew she wanted them to appear in person, and they did not heed the law. "They didn't do their job and now they'd like to blame the judge for enforcing the law,' she said. Hartig was first elected to the bench in 2010 and was elected to her third six-year term in November 2022. Reporter Dave Boucher contributed to this story. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Complaint: Oakland County Judge Hartig created 'climate of fear'
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Maxine Waters campaign to pay $68K for violating campaign finance laws
Progressive California Rep. Maxine Waters' campaign has agreed to pay a $68,000 fine after an investigation found it violated multiple election rules. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) said the longtime House lawmaker's 2020 campaign committee, Citizens for Waters, ran afoul of several campaign finance laws in a tranche of documents released Friday. The FEC accused Citizens for Waters of "failing to accurately report receipts and disbursements in calendar year 2020," "knowingly accepting excessive contributions" and "making prohibited cash disbursements," according to one document that appears to be a legally binding agreement that allows both parties to avoid going to court. Dems Fume Over 'Due Process' For Abrego Garcia Despite Long History Of Party Bucking The Legal Principle Waters' committee agreed to pay the civil fine as well as "send its treasurer to a Commission-sponsored training program for political committees within one year of the effective date of this Agreement." "Respondent shall submit evidence of the required registration and attendance at such event to the Commission," the document said. Read On The Fox News App Citizens for Waters had accepted excessive campaign contributions from seven people totaling $19,000 in 2019 and 2020, the investigation found, despite the maximum legal individual contribution being capped at $2,800. The committee offloaded those excessive donations, albeit in an "untimely" fashion, the document said. Waters' campaign committee also "made four prohibited cash disbursements that were each in excess of $100, totaling $7,000," the FEC said. The campaign committee "contends that it retained legal counsel to provide advice and guidance to the treasurer and implemented procedures to ensure the disbursements comply with the requirements of the Act." Leilani Beaver, who was listed as Citizens for Waters' attorney, sent the FEC a letter last year that maintained the campaign finance violations were "errors" that "were not willful or purposeful." Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, has served in Congress since 1991. The new movements in the probe were first reported by OpenSecrets. Maxine Waters Floats Deporting Melania Trump In Anti-doge Diatribe It is not the first time, however, that Waters has generated public scrutiny. In 2023, a Fox News Digital investigation found that Waters' campaign paid her daughter $192,300 to pay for a "slate mailer" operation between Jan. 2021 and Dec. 2022. It was reportedly just one sum out of thousands that Waters had paid her daughter for campaign work. A complaint that Waters' campaign had accepted illegal campaign contributions in 2018 was overwhelmingly dismissed by the FEC in a 5-1 vote. Fox News Digital reached out to Beavers, Waters' congressional office and Citizens for Waters for article source: Maxine Waters campaign to pay $68K for violating campaign finance laws
