The priority must be to end poverty, not worsen it
It is important to be clear about what that means. More people being pushed into making decisions between heating their home or paying their rent. More people forced into using foodbanks. More children growing up with their lives constrained by poverty.
Keir Starmer described the UK's social security system as 'fundamentally broken'. And he is right, but not for the reasons he thinks. It is broken because it pulls people into, rather than protects them from, poverty. It is broken because it robs people of their dignity and respect. And it is broken because it violates people's human rights on a daily basis.
Isla told us: 'I didn't choose to be a carer and struggle on social security, but when my son was born, I didn't have a choice.' But UK ministers do have a choice. They can choose to take the urgent decisions needed to protect people from harm; reversing the proposed cuts, ending the sanctions regime, and abolishing the disgraceful two-child limit. And they can choose to overhaul the system by establishing a Social Security Commission with the power to build the UK social security system we need; one rooted in dignity, respect and human rights.
And the Scottish Government must also listen to voices like Isla's. While it has taken a different and welcome approach to its own social security powers, over one million people in Scotland are living in poverty, and Scotland's interim child poverty targets were recently missed. Scottish ministers could choose to increase the Scottish Child Payment, and to drive forward with plans for a new Human Rights Bill that would enshrine all of our economic and social rights in law.
In a country like ours, all levels of government must prioritise ending poverty, not worsening it. That is the choice that must be made.
Neil Cowan is Scotland Director, Amnesty International UK
Agenda is a column for outside contributors. Contact: agenda@theherald.co.uk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
8 minutes ago
- Spectator
Labour is incapable of fixing the migrant crisis
The news that over 50,000 migrants have arrived on small boats since Labour took office last year is of no surprise. If things don't change soon another 50,000 are sure to follow and then another. The causes of the Channel migrant crisis are quite clear. Yet public frustration is at fever pitch partly because none of our political elites – red, blue or turquoise – have any idea how to solve the problem. Both establishment parties reacted to the migrant crisis in the same way – not with substantial change but with slogans and ineffective schemes. Just as the Rwanda plan was, essentially, a publicity stunt, so is Keir Starmer's 'Smash the Gangs' catchphrase. Virtually all of the countermeasures Labour offered voters at the 2024 general election already being done by the Home Office, UK Border Force, Border Security Command and the National Crime Agency. The badly drafted, unsecure and unscalable 'one in one out' treaty with France is quite risible. Meanwhile, Reform UK's 'push back the boats' proposals would not survive the first major boat sinking – and quite righty. Channel asylum migrants are acting rationally. For as little as 5,000 euros they are buying the prospect of gaining permanent access to the British 'social wage' which entitles them to health, housing, education and other benefits, without having made any contributions to the system. And through later family reunion routes, their loved ones are likely to join them in a peaceful western jurisdiction with long established embedded rights such as freedom of religion and freedom of both speech and association. The prize is huge. Why wouldn't anyone living in a war zone or a simply corrupt, poverty-stricken state want to come here? Those who claim that the illegal migrants' principal partner is not the smuggling gangs but, rather, the British government are not entirely wrong. Labour – like the Tories before them – are making the world's poor an offer they can't and won't refuse. So the flow continues. While the benefits of this type of migration are obvious to the asylum seeker, the costs to the recipient state have, until recently, been rather opaque. Thankfully, right across Europe this is changing. In a 2023 paper called 'Borderless Welfare State' Jan van de Beek and his colleagues at the University of Amsterdam calculated the net cost to the Dutch State's public finances by migration category. It found that asylum migration from Africa cost an astonishing 625,000 euros per person on average. Van de Beek's team rated labour migration as more productive than asylum migration in all categories. Even the UK's own Office for Budget Responsibility has belatedly discovered that a 'low wage migrant worker' wave is hugely fiscally negative. At some stage it will occur to the ruling elite of a country currently borrowing billions to pay interest on its national debt that we can't afford this. The cost to social trust and solidarity are rather more difficult to calculate but very substantial. Solving the crisis requires two things. First, Britain needs to part from the international legal architecture which supports the present outdated system. Namely, the 1951 Refugee Convention (and the 1967 protocol) and the 1953 European Convention on Human Rights. Secondly, all unsolicited arrivals must be intercepted, transported and secured in an offshore detention facility within a British Overseas Territory – such as Ascension Island or South Georgia – and then returned to their country of origin or a third country. As the Australians have already proved, the flow would cease. Overnight. Can Labour deliver? I doubt it. The means to solve the crisis outlined above are, politically, well beyond the parameters of what Labour could ever implement. Labour's frontbench is comprised of post-national progressive politicians whose concern is global welfare rather than the particular interests of British citizens. Such misguided attitudes are baked into their mentality and shambolic episodes like the Chagos giveaway prove it. Labour's backbenchers are no better – they are unable to agree even a modest reform of the disability welfare system without widespread revolt. The idea that they would contemplate withdrawal from the post-war legal asylum system is for the birds. It will not happen. Which is why, from the country's point of view, the Labour government is now an absolute impediment to border security. The migrant flow will continue and grow across the world until the generous offer made by western states is closed down. The public is gasping for help on this – but they won't find it in Downing Street.
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C12%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
How the HS2 shambles could have been avoided – if we'd copied the Swiss
'Eighteen years in, we still don't have a design for Euston,' laments Thomas Ableman. 'And then we wondered why the cost ballooned.' He is, of course, talking about HS2: the high-speed railway linking London Euston with Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. Regrettably, you can forget about the last two cities; those crucial spurs were scrapped under the last government in an attempt to save money amid ballooning costs, while seeking votes from motorists. You can also forget for now about trains starting and ending at Euston in central London. With no design for the terminus station (and currently no cash to build it), when HS2 finally opens a decade or more from now, it will be a shuttle between a place called Old Oak Common in west London and Birmingham. Whether you are a passenger, a taxpayer or a resident of one of the locations being dug up for ever-diminishing national benefits, you have the right to be furious at a succession of politicians who have created the world's greatest example of how not to manage a vast infrastructure project. Within the transport world, everyone has an opinion on who is to blame. But Mr Ableman is different. He has had a distinguished career with Transport for London, Chiltern Railways and National Express, and created an intercity start-up named Sn-ap. He writes and podcasts about delivering better mobility. And his best blog this summer is called: ' This is how the Swiss would have done HS2 '. They wouldn't start with a grandiose project with 'a glossy brand or separate company', says Mr Ableman. 'No HS2 Ltd with its own culture and operating model and interface challenges. Just a series of connected but self-contained projects, each delivered by Network Rail as part of normal business. 'They pick a year in the future – 2045, say – and ask: what should the national train timetable look like then, if we want to meet our national objectives as a country? They work out what a good timetable looks like in that future. Then they build backwards from there. 'It sounds simple – even obvious – but it leads you to a very different way of working.' What is also crucial: a fund that guarantees a certain amount of spending on rail infrastructure every year, rather than a hand-to-mouth dependence on the Treasury and volatile politicians. Mr Ableman contemplates how the Swiss approach would have worked in the UK. Planners would have identified that key regional hubs – Birmingham New Street, Leeds, Manchester Piccadilly – are desperately short of decent rail connections from the suburbs because they don't have enough platform space. They would understand that the line between Coventry and Birmingham has a hopelessly inadequate timetable for the many prospective passengers who live along the route, because suburban trains must share the pair of tracks with intercity expresses. Across the whole country, to improve the service for millions: 'The fast tracks need to be used by slower trains, so the fastest trains need to run somewhere else.' The Swiss would take those problems and create a timetable that solves them. 'And then they'd ask: what infrastructure do we need to make this timetable possible?' Guess what: the solution to Britain's rail needs looks rather like HS2. 'However, because they know exactly what they can afford, every year, forever, they could immediately identify that it's too expensive. 'Because they know what they can afford, they can now value-engineer a version that fits. In the UK, no one really knows how much money the Treasury will be willing to release, or when. In Switzerland, there's a budget envelope. It's predictable. 'So having come up with an unaffordable infrastructure plan to deliver a perfect timetable, they'd go back, iterate the timetable, tweak the infrastructure plan and adjust things until it all fits. And then they'd start building.' Rather than a big bang, a rolling programme of cumulative upgrades would deliver key benefits early along the way to that timetable tuned for the needs of the nation. 'I can't promise every part will be delivered on-time and on-budget but it's much more likely,' he writes. 'And if something isn't late, it doesn't mean that the whole shebang is late – just that one project.' Mr Ableman's conclusion is chilling: that the Treasury's refusal to commit to long-term funding 'creates exactly the conditions that make infrastructure expensive'. Unintentionally, he says, the Treasury is 'the biggest driver of waste and inefficiency in UK infrastructure'. Politicians who really care about mobility – the economic and social benefits it unlocks – should accept that the problems of Britain's decrepit rail network are rooted in a timetable that works for almost nobody. Swiss railways work for everyone.
Scotsman
8 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Fury as Russell Findlay's Suffragette aunts' historic medals are lost to Scotland
Russell Findlay's Suffragette great aunts have not been honoured by Glasgow | PA Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The family of two Glasgow Suffragette sisters has criticised the city for once again failing to honour the women's memory. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay had called on Glasgow City Council to step in and save an archive of rare memorabilia linked to his great-aunts, Frances and Margaret McPhun. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The sisters endured hunger strikes and brutal treatment during detention in London's Holloway prison in an attempt to secure votes for women. Russell Findlay's Suffragette great aunts have not been honoured by Glasgow | PA Their father - who was a local councillor - is honoured with a memorial and gate in Glasgow Green but there is nothing to commemorate his daughters. It had been hoped a Scottish university or the council would step in to purchase an auction lot containing two exceptionally rare Hunger Strike medals awarded to the McPhuns as well as the women's diaries and letters from Holloway. However, it has now emerged the collection - which went under the hammer for a guide price of around £30,000 - has been bought by the University of Manchester's John Rylands Library. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr Findlay said he was relieved the items were remaining in the UK but said it was 'disappointing' they are leaving Scotland. 'It's disappointing that these important items once owned by my great-grandmother's Suffragette sisters have left Scotland but a relief that they remain in the UK,' he said. 'It's also hard to understand why Glasgow City Council showed zero interest in acquiring these historic medals and documents. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's just as perplexing that Glasgow University sat back and did nothing instead of seizing the opportunity to celebrate these two brave and pioneering former students.' A University of Glasgow spokeswoman said: "This wasn't a collection we were aware of until it was sold. However we are pleased to hear that this collection has been acquired by an institution where it will be preserved and available to study and learn from." 'Gallant action' The medals, preserved in their original purple boxes with green velvet lining, bear the inscription printed in gold on white silk: "Presented by the Women's Social and Political Union in recognition of a gallant action, whereby through endurance to the last extremity of hunger and hardship a great principle of political justice was vindicated." The acquisition includes a significant body of correspondence, including letters giving intimate insight into the personal sacrifices made by these pioneering women's rights activists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Rylands already holds internationally significant collections of archives, periodicals, and ephemera on the Women's Suffrage Movement. 'The collection is testament to the bravery of Edwardian women who fought for their political rights, enduring the indignities of forcible feeding and imprisonment in dark, stuffy cells,' said the Library's Dr Janette Martin, Research and Learning Manager. 'Today women in many parts of the world continue to fight for basic human rights and these objects are a powerful reminder that the battle for gender equality is still to be won.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dr Martin said the medals hold particular significance for Manchester, as the suffragettes were formed in the city in 1903. The Women's Social and Political Union, which presented these medals, was founded by the suffragettes and maintains a direct historical connection to these artifacts. "These medals represent not just individual acts of courage, but the broader struggle for women's political rights that began right here in Manchester," added Professor Christopher Pressler, University Librarian and Director of The John Rylands Library. "The correspondence adds an invaluable personal dimension to our understanding of the suffragette movement." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The newly acquired items will form part of a major exhibition planned for Manchester in 2028, marking 125 years since the suffragette movement began in the city. Frances and Margaret, both university-educated women in their 40s, travelled from their Scottish home to London to take part in a window-smashing campaign in March 1912. The pair were arrested and sentenced to two months' hard labour in Holloway jail.
