&w=3840&q=100)
US, China hold trade talks in London after Trump-Xi Jinping's phone call
High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy.
A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city.
The talks are due to last at least a day.
They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100 per cent-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession.
Since then, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, rare earths that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities.
President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London.
The UK government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks.
We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks, the British government said in a statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Went for the country and spoke for the country: Tharoor on Op Sindoor outreach
New Delhi: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, who led a nine-member Indian delegation including MPs from different political parties as part of Operation Sindoor outreach to five countries, including the US and Brazil, on Tuesday said that the tour was hugely successful. "I went for the country and spoke for the country," said Tharoor while interacting with the Malayalam media here on Tuesday in response to a question about his party's outlook on the venture. Apart from Tharoor, the team included Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ganti Harish Madhur, Shashank Mani Tripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, Tejasvi Surya, and former Ambassador Taranjit Singh Sandhu, and it also visited Panama, Guyana, and Colombia. "The whole purpose of the visit was to interact with think tanks, Presidents, Vice Presidents, parliamentarians and also former top political leaders and to brief them on what had happened,' said Tharoor. About his American visit, he said nothing about trade issues or about who 'intervened' to stop the aggression was raised during their interactions, in a reference to President Donald Trump's statements. "After explaining the Indian position, all have understood things, as Pakistan had presented a weak case, as terrorists had attacked tourists," he added. Asked about what he intends to do following the visit, he said: "I am going to submit a detailed report to the Prime Minister, and it will be my report." "The trip was very hectic as we were travelling at night and hardly got time to sleep," Tharoor added. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had selected Tharoor to be part of the delegation and lead it, after it was found out that the Congress party's list did not have the name of Tharoor. Ever since Tharoor decided to contest against the official party high command's nominee, Malikarjuna Kharge, for the post of Congress president, a majority in the Congress leadership was unhappy with him, but knowing his popularity, he managed to get support from a section of the party in Kerala. Tharoor is a four-time Congress MP from the Thiruvananthapuram Lok Sabha constituency since 2009.
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Israel detains Gaza Flotilla, deports Greta Thunberg: Recalling the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident
Israel's Foreign Ministry on Tuesday (June 10) announced it had deported Swedish activist Greta Thunberg a day after seizing the Madleen, the ship she was on. In a post on X, the Foreign Ministry wrote, 'Greta Thunberg just departed Israel on a flight to Sweden (via France).' Greta Thunberg just departed Israel on a flight to Sweden (via France). — Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) June 10, 2025 A British-flagged vessel, the Madleen set sail from Italy last week and carried aid for the people of war-torn Gaza. Twelve passengers, including Thunberg, were on board. It was backed by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC), an international movement aiming to end 'the illegal Israeli blockade of Gaza'. Israel's relative restraint in detaining the passengers and moving to deport them marks a sharp contrast to what ensued when another FFC-backed ship, the Conscience, set out to deliver aid to Gaza last month. The ship faced a drone attack in international waters near Malta on May 2, and held Israel responsible. These actions are not unprecedented. In 2010, Israeli commandos shot dead 10 activists aboard the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara, part of a 'freedom flotilla' carrying aid to Gaza in a similar effort. The news triggered international condemnation and strained relations between Israel and Turkey, who were allies at the time. Turkey condemned the Israeli detention of the Madleen on Monday, calling Israel a 'terrorist state', and the move a 'clear violation of international law'. The Mavi Marmara was one of six civilian ships which had set sail towards Gaza as part of the 'Gaza Freedom Flotilla': three of these, including the Mavi Marmara, were passenger ships carrying 748 people of 40 nationalities. The other three carried aid meant for Palestine, aiming to breach an Israeli and Egyptian blockade on Gaza. (The flotilla originally included two more ships, which faced engine issues ahead of their start, spurring rumours of Israeli sabotage.) The Israeli blockade has existed since the '90s, but these restrictions were intensified after Hamas gained control of Gaza in 2007. Egypt closed the Rafah crossing with Gaza that year. Physical barriers were erected around the 365 sq km Gaza Strip in Palestine's southwestern region. Additionally, Israel had maintained a naval blockade, preventing international ships from entering Gaza or local vessels from leaving the coastal waters. This was intensified in October 2023, following the Hamas attacks on Israel. Soon, Israel stopped the supply of food, water, fuel and electricity into Gaza. Israel briefly loosened the blockade this January following a US-brokered ceasefire, only to reinstate it in March, alleging ceasefire violations by Hamas. The Freedom Flotilla carried 10,000 tonnes of goods, including school supplies, building materials and two large electricity generators, according to a BBC report. This defied an Israeli directive banning the entry of a wide variety of goods to keep the pressure on Hamas. The flotilla sought to draw international attention to the blockade, which it described as illegal. The effort was spearheaded by the Free Gaza Movement, a coalition of pro-Palestinian groups challenging the Israeli blockade of Gaza, as well as the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH). Notably, Israel had identified the IHH as a terrorist organisation, closely linked to Hamas. Turkey refuted this view, treating it as a bona fide charity, and had urged Israel to allow the flotilla passage. Israel also wished to verify that the ships did not carry construction materials, weapons or cash. It reportedly asked the flotilla to dock at the Israeli port of Ashdod, and offered to transport all approved goods by road, according to the BBC report. So what happened on May 31, 2010? Before dawn broke on May 31, 2010, Israeli naval forces descended on the flotilla from helicopters and warships in international waters between Cyprus and the Gaza Coast. While the timeline is disputed, Israeli officials claimed their troops opened fire after first being attacked by some of the passengers, who 'charged them with knives and sticks and allegedly fired live rounds,' according to a 2010 report of the Financial Times. In the ensuing melee, nine activists aboard the Mavi Marmara were shot dead, and at least 50 other passengers were wounded, according to the 2010 UN Human Rights Council report, which investigated the incident. One of the wounded remained in a coma for four years before dying. All the deceased were Turkish nationals. Ten commandos were also reportedly injured in the attack. Israel-Turkey relations After Israel was carved out of then-Mandatory Palestine in 1948, Turkey became the first Muslim-majority country to recognise the nation a year later. However, the relations between the two have progressed in waves, with Turkey periodically expressing its support for Palestine's right to self-determination. The 2010 attack came during a fraught diplomatic period and saw bilateral relations devolve within just hours. Turkey recalled its ambassador from Israel, while Recep Tayyip Erdogan, then the Prime Minister, accused Israel of overseeing 'inhuman state terror'. Both countries hurled accusations over the following years, with Turkey demanding an apology from Israel, and Israel claiming it had a right to defend itself. However, efforts towards normalising relations unexpectedly commenced in 2013, with Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu tendering an apology, and the two countries agreeing to a system of compensation for the victims' families. Relations were normalised in 2016. The two countries have since faced a very rocky relationship, with Israel's policy on Palestine remaining a flashpoint. In 2024, Turkey severed all diplomatic ties with Israel over its unwillingness to end its war in Gaza.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
How China's car makers inflate sales numbers by selling 'zero-mileage, used cars'
China's companies are in a war over electric vehicles (EVs). Automakers are slashing prices to win over the public, and top executives are trading barbs. Now, the People's Daily newspaper – controlled by the Chinese Communist Party – has added its voice by warning against the practice of selling 'zero-mileage' cars read more In May, automaker BYD cut the prices of nearly two dozen electric and plug-in models by up to 34 per cent – a move that left its competitors stunned and sent share prices of companies including its own tumbling. Reuters China's companies are in a war over electric vehicles (EVs). Automakers are slashing prices to win over the public and top executives are trading barbs. Now, the People's Daily newspaper – controlled by the Chinese Communist Party – is adding its voice to the fray. The newspaper has warned carmakers to desist from the practice of selling 'zero-mileage' used cars. The development comes a month after a car company founder first brought up these 'zero-mileage' cars in an interview. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It also came after the country's commerce ministry in May met automakers including BYD and Dongfeng Motor and industry groups such as the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) and the China Automobile Dealers Association (CADA) to discuss the matter. But what do we know about this practice and these cars? What about the tussle over EV sales? Let's take a closer look What do we know about this practice and these cars? Under this practice, EV companies essentially sell brand new cars at heavily discounted rates. This is done to get rid of excess inventory sitting with car dealers. These 'zero-mileage cars' are usually sold to second-hand dealers or financing companies. These vehicles then turn up on the resale market with zero kilometres on their odometers. Many car makers are now struggling to meet their sales targets and are offering heavy discounts to try to lure customers. Representational image. Pexels Meanwhile, manufacturers get to claim these cars are sold despite them not being in the hands of a customer – which helps them put a better spin on their sales numbers. The issue was first brought up by Great Wall Motor Company chairman Wei Jianjun last month. Wei, during the interview, referring to the practice, claimed that the auto industry had 'its own Evergrande' — a pointed reference to the real estate giant that went out of business. Wei said between 3000 and 4000 vendors on China's used-car platforms were selling such 'zero-mileage' vehicles. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why is this happening? Wei claimed this development was a result of the long-standing price wars between China's EV makers. The Chinese auto industry in recent years has struggled due to domestic consumption declining while producing cars at an excess capacity. Many car makers are now struggling to meet their sales targets and are offering heavy discounts to try to lure customers. In May, automaker BYD cut the prices of nearly two dozen electric and plug-in models by up to 34 per cent – a move that left its competitors stunned and sent share prices of companies including its own tumbling. 'We expect BYD's vehicle margin would be under pressure in the short term as I think this move by them is driven by the need to hit their sales targets,' Victor Sun, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, told CNBC. Bloomberg analyst Tim Hsiao added that the move may result in a 'prolonged price war' between EV firms. All this comes in the backdrop of China, which is already experiencing growing deflationary pressures, now having to deal with US tariffs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The world's second largest economy is already seeing a number of industries cutting prices including fashion, fast food and lifestyle. What did the newspaper say? The People's Daily newspaper – which is a mouthpiece of the CPC and reflects the opinions of its top officials – has strongly come out against this practice. The newspaper in its editorial demanded 'tough regulatory action' from officials. 'This disguised form of price cutting disrupts normal market order and is a striking example of the auto industry's 'involution',' the People's Daily said. The term is often used in China to define a race to the bottom driven brought on by excessive competition. 'Once market competition rules are properly enforced, 'zero-mileage used cars' won't be able to run far — or for long,' the editorial added. Wei claimed this development was a result of the long-standing price wars between China's EV makers. 'For manufacturers, this sales tactic may help reduce inventory in the short term but compresses profit margins, increases losses, and hinders investment in product quality and innovation — ultimately harming sustainable development,' the article added. 'For consumers, what seems like a good deal in terms of price comes with hidden risks: the loss of first-owner benefits, potential battery degradation, and steeper depreciation when reselling.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The newspaper demanded that EV makers move past 'data worship' and churning out cars. It urged them to focus on quality products and innovating technologically. However, It stopped short of naming and shaming any specific automakers. It also called on authorities to undertake a number of measures to counter this practice. This included more control over the process of registering second-hand vehicles, establishing a vehicle lifecycle tracking system, and strictly controlling the practice of immediate resale after registration. With inputs from agencies
