Liberty Personal Loans Help Australians Fund Energy-Efficient Home Upgrades
As Australians seek to reduce gas and electricity usage, Liberty says personal loans could help make efficient-home upgrades a possibility.
MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA / / May 25, 2025 / The Australian Government committed $1.8 billion to extending the Energy Relief Fund in the 2025-26 Federal Budget - an initiative providing rebates on household energy bills until December 2025.
While this support is welcome, particularly during the colder months, many may be seeking long-term strategies to improve the efficiency and comfort of their homes.
From replacing outdated appliances to installing double-glazed windows and new insulation, improving a home's energy performance often involves a combination of upgrades. However, the upfront costs are a barrier for many.
Non-bank lender Liberty offers personal loans as a practical way to manage the upfront expenses involved with these upgrade projects, allowing homeowners to spread the cost of materials and labour over time.
According to Communications Manager Bernadine Pantarotto, personal loans support Australians in achieving their goals while staying on top of their budget.
"Making your home more energy efficient could deliver many benefits, from year-round comfort to potential long-term savings," Ms Pantarotto said.
"Liberty personal loans are designed with flexibility in mind, helping you bring your plans to life sooner."
Liberty says consumers could also use a personal loan for other purposes, including for travel, wedding planning, medical expenses, and debt consolidation.
With loan amounts of up to $80,000 and an easy online application process, Liberty offers a fast and convenient way for customers to access the finance they need. In some cases, approved applicants may even receive funds on the same day.
"As free thinkers, we champion inclusive lending practises to help everyone access the support they need."
Liberty takes a holistic approach to credit assessment, considering a range of customer circumstances - including those with variable income and less-than-perfect credit histories.
"We believe people are more than their circumstances and find innovative ways to support them," Ms Pantarotto said.
Along with personal loans, the leading lender offers flexible home, car, business, commercial and SMSF loans.
About LibertyAs one of Australia's leading non-bank lenders, Liberty offers innovative solutions to support customers with greater choice. Over more than 27 years, this free-thinking approach to loan solutions has seen more than 900,000 customers across a wide range of home, car, business and personal loans, as well as SMSF lending and insurance. Liberty remains the only non-bank lender with an investment-grade credit rating offering custom and prime solutions to help more people get financial.
Approved applicants only. Lending criteria apply. Fees and charges are payable. Liberty Financial Pty Ltd ACN 077 248 983 and Secure Funding Pty Ltd ABN 25 081 982 872 Australian Credit Licence 388133, together trading as Liberty Financial.
ContactLaura OrchardMedia CoordinatorP: +61 3 8635 8888E: mediaenquiries@liberty.com.au
SOURCE: Liberty
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Potential federal cuts could lead Interfaith Housing Alliance to shrink services
Jodie Ostoich, the president and CEO of the Interfaith Housing Alliance, said it's hard to say how much of the organization's funding is in jeopardy due to possible federal funding cuts for fiscal year 2026. About 30% of the alliance's funding comes directly from the federal government, but the nonprofit also gets state 'pass-through' grants with federal money. 'We have deep concern about the proposed federal budget cuts to housing programs, which will have devastating effects on families across the nation,' Ostoich wrote in an email in May to community members asking for donations. 'The recent budget proposal includes significant reductions to essential housing assistance programs, which are critical for the well-being of millions of Americans.' The federal fiscal year begins Oct. 1. President Donald Trump's proposed budget was submitted to the U.S. Senate's Appropriations Committee on May 2. The administration released an appendix to the proposed budget on May 30. The Senate Appropriations Committee is still reviewing Trump's proposal, with several subcommittee hearings scheduled for next week. 'The recommended funding levels result from a rigorous, line-by-line review of FY 2025 spending, which was found to be laden with spending contrary to the needs of ordinary working Americans and tilted toward funding niche non-governmental organizations and institutions of higher education committed to radical gender and climate ideologies antithetical to the American way of life,' Russell Vought, director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, wrote in a letter to Appropriations Committee Chair Sen. Susan Collins introducing the budget proposal. The Interfaith Housing Alliance (IHA), founded in 1990, develops affordable housing and offers educational programs and social services in parts of Maryland and Pennsylvania to low- and moderate-income communities. Some educational programs include the organization's 'Credit Café,' through which people can better understand their credit and credit reports, and a financial freedom bootcamp. The IHA also offers a purchase-repair homeownership program, with free technical assistance to participants in Frederick, Carroll and Washington counties throughout the homeownership process. The organization also manages affordable rental communities throughout central and western Maryland, as well as southcentral Pennsylvania. Ostoich said in an interview that in 2024, over 200 people participated in IHA workshops. At the end of last year, 15 people were in the homeownership program. Additionally, she said, about 270 households are living in the properties IHA manages. CUTS AND IMPACTS In her May email asking for donations, Ostoich outlined possible reductions to housing assistance programs proposed in the federal budget that would impact the IHA or were used by the organization to develop housing. Those cuts include: * A reduction of $26.7 billion from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's State Rental Assistance Block Grant. Rental assistance programs will be restructured into a block grant system with capped financial support for able-bodied adults. * Eliminating $3.3 billion in flexible funding through the Community Development Block Grant that supports housing rehabilitation, infrastructure and neighborhood revitalization * Cutting $1.25 billion from the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which supports building and preserving affordable housing * A reduction of $721 million in rural development housing programs, pulling back federal engagement with housing in underserved rural areas In an interview Wednesday, Ostoich said that if the cuts are approved, the IHA would have to shrink, and it would have to reassess what other programs it could offer. 'It certainly would open the door to many more collaborations, I think, that potentially hadn't happened before,' she said. '... Obviously, I don't have a crystal ball of what could happen.' Ostoich wrote in her email that the IHA has used Community Development Block Grant money to fund repairs and deliver supportive services throughout Frederick County and has used HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding to partially finance four tax credit projects with a total of 129 housing units. Additionally, the IHA has used the State Rental Assistance Block Grant at an apartment community it manages on North Market Street. Ostoich said that every two years, the IHA has received a rural development grant, and the organization usually states how many housing units it will complete in that two-year grant period. 'What that relies on is those mortgages that [the USDA's] Rural Development makes available to low- and moderate-income households. They are special mortgages that make the mortgage affordable, so there's no other product quite like them,' she said. These mortgages are made more affordable through things like extended payment terms. There's more leniency, and these mortgages help people who want to buy homes begin to build generational wealth for their families. Ostoich said there isn't money for these Rural Development mortgages in the fiscal year 2026 budget proposal. She said getting this mortgage funding has been an issue since February 2024. The IHA is working on a new homeownership program that isn't limited to rural areas and would open up more homeownership opportunities to people in urban areas. That way, the program wouldn't have to depend on funding from Rural Development and could get money from other sources. Since last year, the IHA has felt more urgency to develop this new program, Ostoich said. The reduction of the IHA's programs and workshops would impact other local nonprofits, such as the United Way of Frederick County, that collaborate with the organization. United Way serves individuals who are ALICE, which stands for Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed. People who are ALICE make above the federal poverty line but still struggle to afford basic necessities, including housing. Ken Oldham, United Way's CEO, said that his organization frequently partners with the IHA to help financially struggling families begin the journey to homeownership. He said United Way pairs people with the IHA's purchase-repair homeownership program. It also uses the Credit Café workshops in its own 'Pathway to Homeownership' program to effectively educate people and help them repair their credit. Pairing with other programs like the IHA's homeownership program 'really opens the door for ALICE households to make a generational-changing financial move on behalf of themselves and their families,' Oldham said. If the IHA has to shrink its program offerings, that could exacerbate the challenges ALICE households face trying to buy homes, such as poor credit and expensive mortgages. 'It would put United Way in a position where we would have to figure out that credit piece [of Pathway to Homeownership] on our own. ... The IHA does such a great job with it. That would be painful. That would be very difficult,' Oldham said. 'The lack of that rural purchase program would take a very significant tool out of the toolbox for ALICE households to purchase a home.' Ostoich said she's still looking for projects for the IHA to do at the direction of the nonprofit's Board of Directors. 'I am still pounding that pavement and trying to move forward in ways that will deliver on the mission we're committed to,' she said. '... There's a lot of concern about being able to serve people and knowing that nonprofits often fill the gaps for government programming, really wondering what is going to happen to people if nonprofits cannot continue to serve the number of people they do.'
Associated Press
2 days ago
- Associated Press
Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain
WASHINGTON (AP) — The tax cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would likely gouge a hole in the federal budget. The president has a patch handy, though: his sweeping import taxes — tariffs. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's nonpartisan arbiter of tax and spending matters, says the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House last month and now under consideration in the Senate, would increase federal budget deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. That is because its tax cuts would drain the government's coffers faster than its spending cuts would save money. By bringing in revenue for the Treasury, on the other hand, the tariffs that Trump announced through May 13 — including his so-called reciprocal levies of up to 50% on countries with which the United States has a trade deficit — would offset the budget impact of the tax-cut bill and reduce deficits over the next decade by $2.5 trillion. So it's basically a wash. That's the budget math anyway. The real answer is more complicated. Actually using tariffs to finance a big chunk of the federal government would be a painful and perilous undertaking, budget wonks say. 'It's a very dangerous way to try to raise revenue,' said Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model, who served in President George W. Bush's Treasury Department. Trump has long advocated tariffs as an economic elixir. He says they can protect American industries, bring factories back to the United States, give him leverage to win concessions over foreign governments — and raise a lot of money. He's even suggested that they could replace the federal income tax, which now brings in about half of federal revenue. 'It's possible we'll do a complete tax cut,'' he told reporters in April. 'I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax.'' Economists and budget analysts do not share the president's enthusiasm for using tariffs to finance the government or to replace other taxes. 'It's a really bad trade,'' said Erica York, the Tax Foundation's vice president of federal tax policy. 'It's perhaps the dumbest tax reform you could design.'' For one thing, Trump's tariffs are an unstable source of revenue. He bypassed Congress and imposed his biggest import tax hikes through executive orders. That means a future president could simply reverse them. 'Or political whims in Congress could change, and they could decide, 'Hey, we're going revoke this authority because we don't think it's a good thing that the president can just unilaterally impose a $2 trillion tax hike,' '' York said. Or the courts could kill his tariffs before Congress or future presidents do. A federal court in New York has already struck down the centerpiece of his tariff program — the reciprocal and other levies he announced on what he called 'Liberation Day'' April 2 — saying he'd overstepped his authority. An appeals court has allowed the government to keep collecting the levies while the legal challenge winds its way through the court system. Economists also say that tariffs damage the economy. They are a tax on foreign products, paid by importers in the United States and usually passed along to their customers via higher prices. They raise costs for U.S. manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials, components and equipment, making them less competitive than foreign rivals that don't have to pay Trump's tariffs. Tariffs also invite retaliatory taxes on U.S. exports by foreign countries. Indeed, the European Union this week threatened 'countermeasures'' against Trump's unexpected move to raise his tariff on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. 'You're not just getting the effect of a tax on the U.S. economy,' York said. 'You're also getting the effect of foreign taxes on U.S. exports.'' She said the tariffs will basically wipe out all economic benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts. Smetters at the Penn Wharton Budget Model said that tariffs also isolate the United States and discourage foreigners from investing in its economy. Foreigners see U.S. Treasurys as a super-safe investment and now own about 30% of the federal government's debt. If they cut back, the federal government would have to pay higher interest rates on Treasury debt to attract a smaller number of potential investors domestically. Higher borrowing costs and reduced investment would wallop the economy, making tariffs the most economically destructive tax available, Smetters said — more than twice as costly in reduced economic growth and wages as what he sees as the next-most damaging: the tax on corporate earnings. Tariffs also hit the poor hardest. They end up being a tax on consumers, and the poor spend more of their income than wealthier people do. Even without the tariffs, the One Big Beautiful Bill slams the poorest because it makes deep cuts to federal food programs and to Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income Americans. After the bill's tax and spending cuts, an analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model found, the poorest fifth of American households earning less than $17,000 a year would see their incomes drop by $820 next year. The richest 0.1% earning more than $4.3 million a year would come out ahead by $390,070 in 2026. 'If you layer a regressive tax increase like tariffs on top of that, you make a lot of low- and middle-income households substantially worse off,'' said the Tax Foundation's York. Overall, she said, tariffs are 'a very unreliable source of revenue for the legal reasons, the political reasons as well as the economic reasons. They're a very, very inefficient way to raise revenue. If you raise a dollar of a revenue with tariffs, that's going to cause a lot more economic harm than raising revenue any other way.''
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Aussie multi-millionaire reveals property strategy that made him rich: 'Don't sacrifice'
Ever dreamed of living by the beach, in the inner-city buzz, or nestled in a leafy suburb that feeds your soul, however, felt that doing so would kill your chances of building wealth? You're not alone. And the good news is that you don't have to choose between lifestyle and financial freedom. In fact, for over a decade now, I've built my personal wealth, and helped thousands of Australians do the same, through a strategy called 'rentvesting', which is renting where you want to live, and investing where your money will work hardest. RELATED Buying a home still a 'stretch' so young Aussies seize on 'rentvesting' property trend $4,400 ATO car tax deduction that most Aussies miss: 'Easy win' Centrelink $1,011 cash boost for Aussie farmers doing it tough: 'Get back on track' Let's say you want to live in Bondi, Byron or Brighton. The cost of buying in these blue-chip areas is sky-high, and with the majority of homes owner-occupied, the rental yields are often extremely low - sometimes just 1-2 per cent. That means if you purchase, you're sinking hundreds of thousands in a deposit and absorbing a massive mortgage for a property that's probably underperforming from an investment standpoint. But what if you flipped the script? Instead of tying up your capital in a lifestyle property, rent in the area you love and invest in high-yield commercial or regional residential real estate. At Rethink Group, this is our bread and butter. We're talking 5-6 per cent plus yields, strong tenant demand, and, in many cases, net cash flow positive properties that actually cover your rent and still leave surplus income to reinvest. It's a wealth-building flywheel that, when set in motion early, can dramatically fast-track your journey to financial freedom. I started my own journey this way. My wife and I wanted to enjoy the lifestyle we loved, but we didn't want to sacrifice our future. We began investing in strong-yielding residential property and later moved into commercial, an area where we've helped many of our clients truly accelerate their portfolios. The result? A multi-million-dollar portfolio, flexibility to live where we want, and most importantly choice. One of the underrated benefits of rentvesting is agility. You're not locked into one market or one lifestyle location. You can move for work, lifestyle, or family without the friction of buying and selling. Meanwhile, your investments can remain in high-growth, high-yield areas across Australia, whether that's an industrial property in Brisbane, a regional centre in WA, or a medical tenancy in Adelaide. You're also less likely to make emotional decisions. Buying your 'forever home' too early often means compromising your investment strategy. Rentvesting keeps you focused on returns, not renovations. At Rethink Group, we work with clients every day who want it all; lifestyle and legacy. And the truth is, with the right strategy, you can absolutely have both. Our approach is tailored. We build high-performance property portfolios using both residential and commercial assets, engineered to deliver strong yields, smart tax outcomes, and future-proof wealth, all while our clients live exactly where they want to be. Rentvesting isn't for everyone, but if you're serious about wealth and value lifestyle, it's a strategy worth exploring. Because the best time to build wealth is now and the best place to live is wherever makes you feel most alive. Scott O'Neill is a prominent Australian property investor featured in AFR's Young Rich List three years in a row. He is an entrepreneur and Founder & CEO of Rethink Group a premium property investment group, host of the top commercial property podcast "Rethink Investing's Inside Commercial Property'', co-author of "Rethink Property Investing'' Australia's number one commercial property investing book.
