
Hertz faces boycott over AI scanners that can slap $400 fines in minutes
By
Published: |
Hertz is facing a wave of online backlash. Critics are taking aim at the rental company after multiple customers say they were billed hundreds of dollars for minor damage flagged by new AI inspection scanning systems.
On Reddit and Facebook, car renters are now calling for a boycott, accusing the rental giant of using AI to detect trivial damage and charge steep fees — all while making it difficult to speak with a live agent. 'I'm just not comfortable with the new technology that can flag dirt or something that can be rubbed off as damage,' A customer posted on Reddit. Another Reddit user wrote: 'The flagging is half of the problem. The other problem is Hertz using AI to file the claim. What about traditional smaller-than-the-size-of-a-golf-ball dents or bill-size scratches? I can't even speak to a live agent.'
This week, the company confirmed to DailyMail.com it had charged a driver $440 for a one-inch scratch on a wheel. The scuff, commonly caused when a driver brushes a curb while parallel parking, was flagged by the scanner. The bill included $250 for the damage, $125 for processing, and a $65 administrative fee. Another driver claimed they got a $195 fee for a tiny dent when returning a Toyota Corolla. Each driver's experience is part of a larger tech rollout at Hertz, which recently partnered with UVeye , a startup that builds high-speed automated vehicle inspection systems.
Renters drive their cars through the scanners twice: once when they pick up the vehicle, and again when it's returned. Drivers will receive a copy of previously-scanned damage, the company confirmed to DailyMail.com. Hertz wants to use the scanners at 100 rental locations by the end of the year. In April, the rental firm told DailyMail.com that it was rolling out the tech to enhance vehicle safety, not charge customers for minor cosmetic damage .
The company said its policy hasn't changed, despite the $440 and $195 charges. It says most drivers who have used the UVeye scanners haven't received a charge. 'Over 97 percent of cars scanned with this technology have not detected any billable damage, proving a vast majority of rentals are incident-free,' a spokesperson for the company said. 'Vehicle damage has long been a common pain point across the car rental industry for customers and companies alike.
'At Hertz, we're using this technology to address this friction head-on and our goal is to always improve the customer experience while ensuring customers are not charged for damages they did not cause and by bringing greater transparency, precision, and speed to the process when they do.' In April, the company also told DailyMail.com that the systems will ensure their customers always receive safe cars. UVeye's scanners can more accurately assess underbody damage and tire tread degradation than human inspectors.
But independent analysts worry the tech solution isn't inspiring a ton of human trust. 'A line is crossed when AI applications become overly aggressive and prioritize efficiency over customer fairness and satisfaction,' David Linthicum, an AI analyst, previously told DailyMail.com. 'Customers value fairness and human interaction.' Hertz declined to comment on this article. Instead, the company pointed to its loss damage waiver, which typically costs between $20 and $30 per rental day, as a way to avoid surprising fees.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
10 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Home Bargains is selling ‘beautiful' Dubai air freshener that ‘smells just like holidays' for just £2.29
Bargain hunters are raving about these incredible sprays FRESH AIR Home Bargains is selling 'beautiful' Dubai air freshener that 'smells just like holidays' for just £2.29 HOME BARGAINS is selling a "beautiful" Dubai air freshener that "smells just like holidays". Shoppers are racing to get their hands on the air freshener after spotting the product at the bargain retailer. 1 Home Bargains is selling these "beautiful" Dubai air fresheners Credit: facebook/@couponmumuk Bargain hunters are raving about 'Dubai' sprays that smell out of this world - and they can be yours for a steal from Home Bargains. Not only are the scents incredible, but the viral buys are super affordable too. One savvy shopper spotted these Laylah Air Fresheners in store for just £2.29. They posted a picture of the items on the Facebook group Extreme Couponing and Bargains UK. The popular sprays, known as Nusuk Layali, are imported from the United Arab Emirates. They come in stunning 300ml bottles with an assortment of fragrances on offer. Smelling just like holiday these captivating sprays will rejuvenate any room and transport you back to those dreamy Arabian nights. The air fresheners are available in four scents - Arwa (blue), Oud Wood (black), Oud Romancia (red) and Haya (white). Home Bargains fans eagerly rushed to the comments, keen to share their rave reviews of the bargain buys. One impressed customer shared: "The only air freshener I have used where the smell actually stays - love them!" "The white one we got smells amazing and lasts forever," another added. Others shared which one was their favourite with another user saying: "The red one smells lovely and looks pretty on the shelf!" One even said: "I think it smells like some of the place I visited whilst in Dubai!" Shoppers have even claimed that one of the scents smells like Marc Jacobs Daisy, but without the jaw-dropping £79.20 price tag. I've made my home smell amazing with a £2 Home Bargains buy - I bought 4 & it's like a £79 Marc Jacobs Daisy explosion One TikTok user, a make up artist from the UK, previously gave her followers a close-up look of the sprays, racking up 341,000 views. But you'll need to get your shoes at the ready if you want to stock up, as Home Bargains have warned people that 'you need to be quick if you want these.' But if you're not looking for home fragrances, the store has a number of other bargains on offer. With temperatures soaring, the retailer has a cheap dog accessory for sale that is perfect for keeping your dog cool this summer. Selling at just 79p, this pet item is both useful for helping them in 30C heat, as well as being a stylish accessory that is cheap. And if you want to elevate your home in seconds, you may want to invest in their faux olive tree. Moving outdoors, Home Bargains is also selling an affordable garden ornament for just £9.99. And if you're jetting over to Dubai yourself this summer, parents are racing to their nearest store eager to nab these travel sets that kids will love.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ALEX BRUMMER: 'Genius Act' in US compared to Free Banking Era
There long has been something of the Wild West about American banking. The Bank of England has been the backstop for Britain's monetary system since it was founded in 1694. The Federal Reserve only came into being in 1913 to avert banking and financial panics and bring order to a chaotic dollar issuance. Donald Trump and free market advocates are not fond of a monetary system which imposes the same rules across all 50 states and is the sole source of fiat money backed by the government. It offends the idea of a libertarian commonwealth. Enthusiastic backing for crypto currencies, despite the susceptibility to fraud, is part of the mantra. Entryism by bitcoin into the investment firmament, through exchange-traded funds and the creation of the Trump family's own crypto currency, reflect dissonance with central controls. At present, Wall Street eyes are on the struggle over succession at the Federal Reserve when Jay Powell's term ends next year. On the horizon is a challenge for US central banking which reaches far beyond the next leader of the Fed. The 'Genius Act', currently before Congress, seeks to supplement the dollar through the creation of stable coins which would enable American firms to issue their own currencies. The US would be a place where there were dozens of stable coins, issued by the likes of Walmart, Amazon and Starbucks competing against each other. The plan is that a stable coin, tethered in some way to the dollar, also could be issued by federally insured banks such as JP Morgan Chase. Firms or banks issuing less than $10billion of stable coins would be regulated by each of the states of the union. Issue more, and federal regulators would be in charge. The outcome has been compared by Berkeley economics professor Barry Eichengreen to the Free Banking Era between 1830 and the US Civil War. An America deeply sceptical of elites allowed any person or business with surplus funds to open their own bank and issue their own dollars. Some 18 US states issued their own bank notes and triggered mayhem, with shopkeepers unsure of which dollars were safe to accept. In 21st-century Britain, there is a reluctance of merchants and consumers down South to accept the Scottish pound, even though it is fiat money accepted and backed by the Bank of England. Imagine then the bedlam in the 21st-century United States if there were dozens, or even hundreds, of stable coins circulating and no one was quite sure of the bona fides of issuers. How any central bank could be expected to control monetary policy or protect banks from failure is impossible to know. The Genius Act is not fanciful. MAGA Republicans on Capitol Hill might have the votes to pass it, or something like it, into law. The prospect is scary enough for the Bank for International Settlements in Basel to warn against the rise of stable coins, linked to the dollar, arguing they should not be permitted to become part of the global monetary system. It also notes that crypto assets, hidden in secret wallets, facilitate illicit use. Backers of the Genius Act are warned. The concern must be that libertarian fervour and distrust of global institutions is so embedded in American culture that caution will be thrown to the wind.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Magazines caught using AI and fake writers for online stories
Belgian editions of Elle, Marie Claire and other women's magazines are claimed to have been using artificial intelligence to write hundreds of online articles under the names of fake journalists, complete with photographs and profiles. 'Sophie Vermeulen', who has written an impressive 403 articles for Elle online this year, was, according to her profile, complete with photograph, 'always ready to inspire you with fascinating stories or practical tips. Her passion for fashion and beauty is complemented by a love of travel and literature. Offline, you can spot her on a long walk in nature,' her Elle online profile said. Her equally personable colleague 'Marta Peeters' was presented as a 'fashion and lifestyle journalist from Antwerp with a passion for stories that touch people', who has written 150 stories this year. 'She has a background in communication sciences and an inexhaustible curiosity about everything related to femininity, creativity and culture,' the profile said. • ChatGPT blocks Iranian network pushing Scottish independence Over on the Belgian Marie Claire website, owned by the same publisher, Ventures Media, almost half the online articles are by 'Claire De Wilde', who has 'developed a passion for travel, beauty and wellbeing'. None of the writers actually exist. Their photographs and articles are creations of AI, although the artificial journalists only appear online and not in the print editions. Perhaps more seriously, the online site of the magazine Psychologies, a publication dedicated to the 'personal development and wellbeing' of women, published the work of 'Femke'. Described as 'an editor specialising in psychology and well-being', the AI expert wrote articles describing herself as an 'experienced psychologist'. In the real world, the Commission of Psychologists, the ethics watchdog for the profession in Belgium, is up in arms. 'The example of Femke, who presents herself as a psychologist under a journalistic profile and provides advice from that role, is not only misleading but also legally and socially unacceptable,' Carl Defreyne, the body's chairman, said. Confronted by the Belgian public broadcaster VRT, the publisher has removed the fake names and profiles with articles now bylined 'Elle Belgium' or with a disclaimer that 'content was generated using AI and then reviewed and modified by our editorial team'. 'We understand that the use of aliases can lead to confusion and that is why we have now also adjusted this practice to make it clearer,' the publisher said. 'We generate articles that are entirely created by AI and have not been editorially reviewed. Aliases have been used within the framework of the test. It remains limited and is separate from the editorial team.' The magazines are published as the Belgian version of the brand franchises. In Britain, Elle is published by a different company Hearst Magazines and Marie Claire is produced by Future Plc. There is no suggestion that either company uses AI. The Dutch Elle is also published by Hearst. Gigi van der Zwaan, the company's digital editor in the Netherlands told the Dutch broadcaster NOS: 'They have very strict rules when it comes to AI. We are only allowed to use it to translate a word.' • Danish citizens to 'own their own faces' to prevent deepfakes Hearst publishes the US, Spanish and Italian editions of Elle and does not use machine or AI translation for shared content. Publishers of the British editions of Elle and of Marie Clare have been approached for comment.