Minister pressed on tax after report in The Herald
'I know in my constituency of Edinburgh West, the wellbeing of our four universities in Edinburgh are vital not just to the economy but to the livelihoods of many of my constituents.
'International students in turn are vital to the wellbeing of those universities, and Universities Scotland say that the measures proposed this week by the Government on immigration could cost universities in Scotland £85 million a year in terms of the levy (as reported in The Herald).
READ MORE:
Scottish universities face £85m bill from new UK tax on international students
Ministers to consider writing off domestic abuse victims' council tax debt
Swinney under fire over '£1bn SNP ferry fiasco' as costs and delays mount
'There's a great deal of concern about this, so can the Leader arrange for me to have a meeting with the relevant minister to see how we can address this issue and perhaps reassure our university sector?'
Commons Leader Lucy Powell replied: 'Look, it's important to say that international students play a really important part to our country and bring with them skills and make a great contribution to our country. I think that's why (Universities UK) said this week that actually our measures will keep us very competitive in these areas, but I do take on board what she's saying.'
Under a proposal unveiled on Monday as part of the UK Government's drive to curb immigration, a new 6% tax would be imposed on universities on their income from foreign students.
Calculations by university sources in Scotland based on the number of overseas students at 19 institutions in the sector north of the border during 2023/24 estimated the bill would come to around £85m a year if the tax is introduced north of the Border.
The additional potential cost comes on top of existing acute financial challenges and major job losses at a number of Scottish universities.
Claire McPherson, Director of Universities Scotland, told The Herald last night the international students tax could exacerbate budget problems in the sector and urged the Prime Minister to reconsider its introduction.
'We urge the UK Government to think carefully about the impact that a levy on international student fees will have on universities and the attractiveness of the UK as a study destination," she said.
"Universities' financial and operating environment is already very challenging. We cannot understand the logic behind a levy that would move resource away from universities. It risks making a bad situation worse.'
She also called for the UK ministers to allow the Scottish Government to decide whether to introduce the levy.
'Within the UK, we'd hope to see the UK Government defer a decision on the applicability of any levy in Scotland to the Scottish Government, reflecting the fact that university funding is devolved," she said.
"We'd then hope that the Scottish Government will see this as an opportunity to differentiate Scotland's higher education sector from the rest of the UK, in terms of strengthening Scotland's appeal when recruiting internationally. That would be one way to create an opportunity for Scotland from amongst a suite of immigration policy measures that Scotland does not otherwise have the powers to control.'
Scotland's higher education minister Graeme Dey said he was 'as a matter of urgency" seeking clarity from the UK government on whether "the proposed levy on international students is intended to only apply to universities in England."
A UK Government spokesman told The Herald last night: 'We will fully consult all the devolved governments, including the Scottish Government, on the implementation of the international student levy and will be setting out more details around this in the Autumn Budget.
'The analysis we've given so far of the potential impacts is based on the levy applying to English higher education providers only.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
18 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Hamilton by-election prompts rethink of assumptions about 2026 Holyrood elections
John Swinney said it was a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform UK; some commentators claimed Reform might just sneak it; and Labour was tipped to finish third. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But when the votes were counted in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, it was Labour who emerged as the winners with a majority of 602, overturning the SNP's majority of more than 4,500 in 2021 - a swing of 7.42 per cent from the SNP to Labour. Amid poor poll ratings,and after the party's humiliation in last month's Runcorn and Helsby by-election, where it lost the seat to Reform, this was a major boost for Labour. Labour's Davy Russell celebrates with Anas Sarwar, Jackie Ballie and Monica Lennon after winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. Picture: Jeff| Getty Images Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And with the Scottish Parliament elections less than a year away, it prompts a rethink of the assumption that the SNP is on course for a fifth term in power at Holyrood. Labour's landslide general election victory last July encouraged hopes that Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar could oust John Swinney as First Minister and end nearly two decades of SNP rule next May. But a series of unpopular decisions by the new Labour government at Westminster, including means-testing winter fuel payments, led to plummeting poll figures and seemed to put paid to the party's chances in Scotland. Reacting to the Hamitlon result, Mr Sarwar claimed it showed a rejection of the SNP because of its record in Government, as well as a rejection of Nigel Farage and Reform. But he also acknowledged people wanted the UK Labour government to 'go further and faster in making a difference to people's lives'. The SNP's continuing poll lead after18 years in government cannot be easily dismissed and Reform's 26 per cent of the vote shows it is a serious threat, but Labour nevertheless has good reason to be heartened by the Hamilton victory. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Commentators have warned against reading too much into the win and rightly point out the parties' performances in Hamilton were roughly in line with Scotland-wide polling which shows SNP support 15 points down on the 2021 Holyrood election and Labour support two points down. But the fact remains that Labour has won a fiercely-fought by-election which they were widely expected to lose badly and have taken a seat from the SNP who were seen as more or less certain victors next year. And that gives Labour a new momentum in their drive to win power at Holyrood.
Rhyl Journal
20 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Geologists unveil UK ‘super regions' with best potential for transition projects
The findings, published by the British Geological Survey (BGS), show the UK has an incredibly diverse subsurface, which can play a key role in supporting efforts to reach the country's legally binding climate goals. Many areas have geology that is well suited to certain net zero technologies, including shallow geothermal installations or critical minerals occurrences. But BGS scientists say eight super regions contain subsurface formations and conditions that are favourable to multiple different technologies within a relatively small area. These are Northern Ireland, the Scottish Central Belt, north-east England, north-west England, the South Yorkshire and Humber region, the East Midlands and East Anglia, South Wales and south-west England. Here, the subsurfaces can provide a sustainable heat source for geothermal energy, geological formations for secure storage of energy and carbon dioxide (CO2), rocks containing important resources for mineral extraction, and suitable geological foundation conditions for onshore and offshore wind infrastructure projects, the scientists said. For example, south-west England has significant deep geothermal resources offering opportunities for sustainable heat and power generation while its sedimentary basins provide potential sites for CCS and energy storage, they added. Meanwhile, the Scottish Central Belt boasts a complex geology, including sedimentary reservoir rocks and significant igneous intrusions, abundant geothermal resources, abandoned coal mines and a legacy of subsurface data, they said. The BGS said its findings offer crucial insights and a road map for decision makers, ministers and land managers looking to maximise return on investment in the energy transition. The geologists assessed that strategic spatial planning for such technologies in these areas can help unlock an estimated £40 billion of annual investment and support the Government's target of creating 650,000 jobs through renewable energy by 2030. But they added that further investigation will be required to fully establish each of the super region's true potential, ensure safe deployment of each technology, and understand environmental impact. Michelle Bentham, BGS chief scientist for decarbonisation and resource management, said: 'The UK is incredibly diverse in its geology. 'Because it's out of sight, geology gets a little bit forgotten about. 'And I don't think people realise how blessed we are in the UK, if you like, in terms of the geology that could really help us have a sustainable future. 'But you can really see the difference that geology could make to reaching Government goals in terms of net zero, energy provision, clean energy.' Ms Bentham said funding and the policy landscape may have been barriers to rolling out technologies such as CCS and geothermal energy across the UK. 'In Europe, geothermal energy is used much more widely. In the UK, we don't use it as widely and it's always been a bit of a Cinderella of clean energy technologies,' she said. 'And in the North Sea, we could potentially become a hub for carbon storage in Europe for countries that don't have the right geology who are trying to decarbonise,' she added. The BGS contributed to the consultation on the Government's upcoming land use framework, which looks at how England's finite land can meet the escalating demands of food security, clean energy, nature restoration and new homes. But the framework is focusing more on surface demands, with some scope for shallow subsurface areas such as geothermal infrastructure. Ms Bentham said strategic spatial planning for the subsurface could also help optimise the UK's resources for the energy transition. For example, it could stop decision makers from locking into one technology – such as wind farms or CCS – in one area where another could have yielded more benefits, or where multiple technologies could have been deployed. 'Like the map, it's not one technology that's going to be the answer,' she said. 'That's why we need this combination to give us flexibility.' The BGS highlighted that the data underpinning its research has been shaped by geologists' current understanding of the subsurface, adding that a few parts of the country have been less extensively surveyed than others, and more research is required to fully assess their potential.
Daily Record
34 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Chancellor's U-turn restoring winter fuel payments to millions of pensioners is the correct decision
Setting the new cut-off point at £35,000 seems reasonable and allows the UK Government to claw black cash given to the wealthiest. But the original policy last year to slash the WFP to all but the poorest pensioners should never have happened. Labour should always be the party that looks out for people on low and modest incomes. They should never be taking money from people who need it and linking the WFP to pension credit was appalling. Voters had waited a long time for a Labour government to pursue bold policies. They wanted Keir Starmer to dismantle the Tory legacy on welfare, not undo the policies of Gordon Brown. But this disastrous mis-step overshadowed the early days of the Government and triggered a loss of trust in Starmer. The Starmer administration has steadily improved from its rocky early period and progress is being made on a range of fronts. The package on employment rights is excellent and trade deals with the US and EU should boost growth. Starmer has also proven himself to be a serious politician who thinks carefully before acting. But his Government has to learn lessons from the WFP debacle. It opened the door to Nigel Farage and allowed him to falsely portray himself as a man of the people. This Labour government can be a resounding success but it must close the door on future blunders. Sextortion fight Social media has much to commend it, connecting like-minded people with shared interests across the globe. But there is often a significant downside to the platforms we all use. They can be a tool for bullies and the unscrupulous who seek to exploit vulnerable or impressionable people for their own gain. Sextortion, a form of online blackmail using real or fake images taken from social media, has been used by criminals to terrify young people into parting with cash or be publicly shamed. A campaign to raise awareness of sextortion and how to deal with it has been launched by the youth service Fearless. It urges young people not to panic, not to pay and to seek help. It is sad that in this day and age such a campaign is necessary. And much like our own Our Kids... Our Future campaign, it acknowledges the pressures young people are under in today's Scotland. But while youngsters are becoming more aware of sextortion, perhaps the social media companies could do more to keep them safe online.
