Dire wolves brought back: See photos of Romulus, Remus and Khaleesi
Four-legged creatures known as dire wolves who were prominent in HBO's "Game of Thrones" series no longer belong solely to the realm of fantasy.
Colossal Biosciences, the genetic engineering company working to bring back a few different extinct animals, announced this week the successful resurrection of the Ice Age-era species. The recent birth of three dire wolf puppies marks the first time Colossal has successfully "de-extincted" a species, the company said Monday in a press release.
Colossal, a biotech company based in Dallas, Texas, is famous for its efforts to bring back the wooly mammoth and the Tasmanian tiger. DNA recovered from a 13,000-year-old tooth and a 72,000-year-old skull is what propelled scientists at Colossal to bring back the dire wolf.
The creatures, who have regularly appeared in pop culture as mythical animals, are most famously featured in "Game of Thrones" and George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" fantasy novels that the show is based upon. Fans of the series will remember that dire wolves are the sigil of House Stark, and a litter of abandoned pups becomes loyal companions to Stark children in the storyline.
But dire wolves are real-world predators that once roamed North America before going extinct about 13,000 years ago. The animals are larger than modern-day gray wolves with a wider head and snout and larger jaws and teeth.
If you want more details on just how Colossal pulled off the feat, we've got you covered here. But if you're just looking for some photos of the fluffy predators, you came to the right place.
Here's a look at Colossal's dire wolves:
Dire wolves: Dire wolf returns from extinction? Company reveals 'magic' it's using to bring back species
This article originally appeared on Standard-Times: Dire wolves of 'Game of Thrones' fame brought back to life: See photos
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun
The latest entry in a genre one wishes weren't so burgeoning is HBO's Surviving Ohio State, following in the sadly necessary footsteps of documentaries about sexual abuse in the athletic departments at Michigan State (Athlete A and At the Heart of Gold) and Penn State (Happy Valley). When Surviving Ohio State was announced, anticipation hinged on the participation of producer George Clooney and the possibility that exploring the abuses of Dr. Richard Strauss and alleged negligence by authority figures at Ohio State might topple Jim Jordan, Ohio Congressman and Trump lapdog. More from The Hollywood Reporter Broadway Box Office: 'Good Night, and Good Luck' and 'Othello' End Runs on New Highs 'A Tree Fell in the Woods' Review: Josh Gad and Alexandra Daddario in an Uneven, Occasionally Insightful Relationship Dramedy Jim Sheridan's 'Re-creation' Puts One of Ireland's Most Troubling Murder Cases Back on Trial If your interest in Surviving Ohio State revolves entirely around Jim Jordan-related schadenfreude, you can probably skip it. Jordan, who refused to participate in the documentary for self-evident reasons, comes across as heartless and negligent, but the doc lacks any sort of smoking gun likely to dissuade his dedicated constituents, who have known about all of these allegations for each of the last three times they've voted for him. Jordan, unfortunately, also proves to be a distraction to the filmmakers, especially in the documentary's second half. Caught up in the they-said/he-said-in-previous-statements disagreements, director Eva Orner largely fails to explore the institutional side of the scandal. I shouldn't come away from a documentary like this fixated on the name of a single assistant wrestling coach (one who was not and has not been accused of anything criminal) and completely unable to name the Ohio State president, athletic director and key administrators under whose watch these abuses occurred. For the first half of its 108-minute running time, Surviving Ohio State is, as its title suggests, a compelling examination of the survivors of abuse and the mechanisms through which large-scale abuse can occur at a major university. Per a 2019 independent investigation, from 1978 to 1998 Dr. Richard Strauss abused at least 177 male students at Ohio State. Strauss had particularly close ties to a number of Buckeyes sports programs, including fencing, hockey and the wrestling team, coached by Russ Hellickson, with two-time NCAA champ Jordan as his primary assistant. The accusations from athletes involved Strauss' inappropriate examinations, his tendency to take regular, extended showers in several athletic locker rooms, and grooming behavior escalating ultimately into rape. For some of that time, Strauss worked at the Student Health Center and thus had access to the entire student body, and although he was relieved of certain of those duties after complaints, he retired from Ohio State entirely on his own terms. A group of wrestlers from the mid-90s are Orner's primary points of entry, and this group of survivors proves crucial to both the strongest aspects of the documentary and the distraction that leaves it less effective than it could be. At least a half dozen of those wrestlers tell their stories to the camera, accompanied by filler re-enactments — a shower head spurting water, the hallway leading to a medical examination room — that add very little. The stories themselves are candid and graphic, the haunted men today contrasted with vintage footage of wrestling matches and the various athletes in their high-achieving youth. Well aware of skepticism from online trolls who have wondered how veterans of a combat sport could allow this sort of 'victimization,' the men talk about the surprise and shame that led them not to respond in the moment and to remain silent about the incidents for decades. It's the film's way of setting up the psychology of male survivors and, perhaps more than that, of explaining why the OSU scandal hasn't received the instant attention and sympathy that greeted revelations from generations of female gymnasts about Michigan State and United States national team doctor Larry Nassar. The truth is that Jordan's involvement has contributed to what visibility the Ohio State situation has had. All of the wrestlers present in this documentary have made it clear that Strauss' behavior wasn't a secret, and that the coaches all knew about the inappropriate showers and concerns about the examinations, taking little action in Hellickson's case and no action in Jordan's case. Jordan has belligerently and vehemently denied that he knew anything at all, which makes him at best an oblivious caretaker of young men. The wrestlers, plus at least one referee with a story of his own, are completely persuasive, and Orner is able to give a sense of pervasive rumors about Strauss' creepiness. But that's been the story since these allegations against Strauss came out back in 2018 — and other than one small, thoroughly speculative detail about Jordan's actions well after the scandal broke, no new information is provided and no dots connected regarding Jordan or Hellickson or anything else. The frustration of Surviving Ohio State is how fixated it becomes on Hellickson and Jordan and unnamed figures at the university — Hellickson and the board of trustees, like Jordan, declined to provide any response — without that smoking gun or that key piece of dot-connecting. Given how potent the survivor interviews are and how negligible the details are on the systemic failures, Surviving Ohio State would have been better with more focus on the former and less unsubstantiated insinuation — however persuasive — about the latter. The documentary is extremely effective at giving voice to those survivors and providing context and understanding for their silence — and that's extremely important, especially alongside those documentaries about what happened at Penn State and Michigan State. It may not be as sensational and buzzy as bringing down a major university or a sitting congressman, but since Surviving Ohio State won't do either thing, it's worth praising the potency of what it does well. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts Hollywood Stars Who Are One Award Away From an EGOT 'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Walton Goggins' Wife Nadia Conners Breaks Silence on Aimee Lou Wood Speculation
Walton Goggins' wife, Nadia Conners, addressed speculation about his relationship to White Lotus costar Aimee Lou Wood. 'It's odd to see [the speculation], but it's an indication of how much people were invested in the fictional characters,' Conners, 55, said in an interview with Hello! Magazine published on Friday, May 16. 'I take it as a sign that he's become quite popular.' Goggins, 53, and Wood, 31, played doomed lovers Rick and Chelsea in the third season of the HBO Emmy-winning anthology series. The costars took part in promotion of the show together, but fans noticed they soon stopped following one another on social media. Goggins reacted to Saturday Night Live's April parody of The White Lotus via Instagram by calling the sketch 'amazzzingggg' whereas Wood found the spoof 'mean and unfunny' due to SNL cast member Sarah Sherman depicting her with fake teeth to resemble her gap. (Sherman later offered a mea culpa by sending Wood flowers and Wood insisted she never personally blamed the comedian.) Walton Goggins and Aimee Lou Wood's Sweetest Friendship Moments: From 'The White Lotus' and Beyond Speculation about the pair reached a fever pitch earlier this month when Goggins walked out of an interview with the London Times due to repeated questions about his relationship with Wood. Goggins initially told the reporter he wasn't 'going to have that conversation' before ending the interview when Wood was brought up again. 'There's no conversation to be had about that. [It's like] sharing politics on social media — it's in a vacuum,' he insisted. However, the two White Lotus stars started following each other again on Instagram shortly after. Wood also offered her support for Goggins hosting SNL on May 10 while attending the Met Gala in New York City on May 5. '[Working with Walton] was the best thing ever,' Wood added. 'He's going to be incredible doing SNL. It's the perfect thing for him to do. It's going to be hilarious. I'm so excited to see it.' Fans hoping to see Wood reunite with Goggins on Saturday Night Live were likely disappointed since she didn't appear — though White Lotus cast member Sam Rockwell did cameo alongside Goggins on the NBC sketch show last weekend. As for Goggins' marriage, he was first wed to Leanne Kaun in 2001 but she tragically died in 2004. He married Conners in 2011 and they share a son, Augustus, born 2011. Walton Goggins Says He Would Call Pedro Pascal If He 'Needed an Intervention' Amid 'White Lotus' Fame In her new interview with Hello!, Conners spoke about writing and directing The Uninvited, a comedy-drama about a dinner party gone horribly wrong. Goggins starred in the movie as a drug-addicted Hollywood talent agent, but Conners insisted her marriage did not inspire the film. "Walton was reading through the script with me at home and I was like, 'Oh my God.' What he brings to the character, it was sharp, almost killer energy,' she said. 'I wrote it about a marriage, but not my marriage, which concerned him – he was like: 'But I'm not this guy.' It was really important for him to say that he was not this guy. I said: 'I know, but you're a great actor, so you can pretend.'' The Uninvited is now playing in theaters.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
WBD split: What will Warner Bros. Discovery look like as two separate companies?
Warner Bros. Discovery is saying That's all, folks. No Kings Day: June 14 protests set to be biggest yet, will counter Trump military parade in locations nationwide. Here's what to know How to get the most out of Google's free AI Studio China is arming its space station with 'guard dogs.' They have good reason for it On Monday, the media and entertainment conglomerate announced that it would break into two separate companies, one for its cable TV networks and the other for its streaming services and studio business. The split is expected to complete sometime next year, and each company will be publicly traded. In effect, the breakup will separate WBD's flagship streaming service, HBO Max, along with its movie and television production operations, from its cable networks and news offerings, which include CNN, TNT, and many other networks. When it's all said and done, the separation will more or less undo the merger between Warner and Discovery that occurred in 2022, when WarnerMedia was spun off from the mobile and wireless giant AT&T. Here's how it'll all break down once the dust settles in 2026: 'Global Networks,' as company management refers to it, will include many of WBD's entertainment, news, and sports brands. That includes TV networks like CNN, Discovery, and TNT Sports in the United States. But there will be differences depending on international regions and countries, and depending on specific rights agreements. Global Networks will also house Bleacher Report and certain digital products, like the Discovery+ streaming service. Gunnar Wiedenfels, WBD's current CFO, will become the president and CEO of Global Networks. 'Streaming and Studios' will become the home of the company's development and production assets, and more. It will include Warner Bros. Television, Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group, DC Studios, HBO, HBO Max, and their respective film and television libraries. David Zaslav, WBD's current CEO, will remain CEO of WBD Streaming & Studios. During a conference call on Monday morning, Zaslav said 'we're focusing on the next stage of transformation' of WBD, and that the separation will 'allow each of these strong companies to achieve their maximum potential.' 'Each company will have its own dedicated management team and board,' Zaslav said, with 'unique objectives and priorities.' He added that 'we expect all the factors to come together to unlock value—these companies will be better aligned with shareholders.' Wiedenfels, joining Zaslav on the call, said that 'the whole concept of the separation is to create two strong and well positioned companies—we feel very confident about the compelling nature about both portfolios,' adding that he saw the separation as 'a natural progression of WBD.' Both companies will be publicly traded. Moreover, the global networks business will hold up to a 20% retained stake in the streaming business. In the short term, Warner Bros Discovery stock (Nasdaq: WBD) was up about 7.59% in late-morning trading on Monday after the announcement. But the stock is flat year to date. Last week, shareholders voted to reject pay packages for top executives including Zaslav, although the vote was largely symbolic. WBD, since its merger a few years ago, has struggled with debt, rounds of layoffs and rebranding. (Notably, HBO Go became HBO Max, then Max, and is now back to HBO Max again). But Zaslav sounds upbeat about the future, and said the two companies coexisting should help each prosper. 'When we put these businesses together in the last three years, we built them out, and we paid down debt,' Zaslav said. 'We believe [the separation] gives us a lot more flexibility in the future.' This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
