
How Kyle and Jackie O were thrown into the centre of a huge political spat: 'Hypocritical'
The firestorm began after Brisbane City Council's Labor team pushed to prohibit council advertising on the Kyle and Jackie O Show was met with backlash.
The motion, introduced by Labor councillor Lucy Collier, called for the council to immediately stop buying advertising during the breakfast program.
Brisbane City Council is the nation's biggest local authority, representing more than 1.2million residents, a population larger than the ACT, Tasmania and the Northern Territory combined.
The council has been under Liberal National Party (LNP) control since 2004.
Collier accused the LNP of misusing ratepayer funds to 'sponsor shock jocks,' saying money should instead be directed to 'roads, footpaths and libraries.'
'Advertising is more than just a placement, it's an endorsement,' Collier argued.
'Residents expect better than their money being used to boost a show that is racist, sexist, mean, divisive and deeply disrespectful.'
But her attack quickly unravelled when LNP councillors pointed out Labor's own history of advertising with ARN, the network that airs the Kyle and Jackie O Show, particularly during election campaigns.
Deputy Mayor Fiona Cunningham branded Collier's move 'hypocritical' and politically motivated.
'This opposition is dominated by men who, week after week, disrespect women in this chamber,' Cunningham said.
'For Cr Collier to come in here lecturing us about Kyle and Jackie O while her own party advertises on the same network is transparently hypocritical.'
Cunningham also highlighted gender dynamics inside the chamber, pointing out that 65 per cent of LNP councillors are women, compared with a male-dominated Labor opposition.
'These [Labor] men have referred to female LNP councillors as dogs and grubs,' she said.
'They accuse female councillors of shouting and sniping. They mock their hobbies and they shout over them. In fact, I'm sure every single woman on this side of the chamber can think of a time when a male Labor councillor has shouted over them.'
She also noted that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has appeared on the Kyle and Jackie O Show 11 times, even attending host Kyle Sandilands' wedding.
'If it's good enough for the Prime Minister to appear on the program, how can Labor argue Brisbane City Council should boycott it? This is not about community standards, it's about politics,' Cunningham said.
She further rejected Collier's central claim the council was 'sponsoring' the show.
'We don't sponsor Kyle and Jackie O,' she said.
'We advertise with one of the largest commercial radio networks in Australia. That's all. Council does not regulate or censor content, that's the job of the federal communications minister.'
Collier refused to answer repeated questions about whether Labor itself had purchased advertising with ARN.
The chamber then descended into heated exchanges, with Collier citing the show's past controversies while LNP councillors accused her of cherry-picking.
In the end, the motion failed, with just five councillors supporting it and 16 voting against.
In her right of reply, Collier insisted the LNP was avoiding accountability.
'The best argument the LNP can make is that if someone else does it, then it's okay for them,' she said, maintaining that advertising during the Kyle and Jackie O program still amounted to an endorsement.
In March, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) found that the Kyle & Jackie O Show breached decency rules under the Commercial Radio Code of Practice, over two separate segments that discussed graphic sexual acts.
In 2024, the show faced backlash over a segment in which Kyle Sandilands and Jackie O Henderson ran a competition where female staff recorded themselves urinating, with the 'boys… trying to guess whose flaps made the sound.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Reform UK confirms new Leicestershire County Council deputy
Two new councillors have been appointed to Leicestershire County Council's cabinet after the authority's former deputy leader was removed from his UK's Joseph Boam was also removed from his position as cabinet member for adult social 22-year-old was one of 25 Reform councillors elected to the authority in May's local Crook, councillor for Glenfields, Kirby Muxloe and Leicester Forests, is the council's new deputy leader while Carl Abbott, who represents Stoney Stanton and Croft, has taken on the role of cabinet member for adult social care. Crook has also been appointed to lead the council's new heritage, libraries and adult learning portfolio. Council leader Dan Harrison said: "We're a new administration, in place for around three months, and finding the right people for the job is very important."I'd like to thank Joseph for his efforts and helping to establish our new team."Adult social care deserves its own focus and I'm delighted to welcome Carl to the cabinet."Kevin brings a lot of experience and I'm pleased he's joining our leadership team." 'Chaotic and costly' According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Boam previously said he had not "stepped down from any role", but had been offered "a cabinet support role which I'm inclined to take".The reason for Boam's departure has not been confirmed by Reform UK, but a party source previously said he would now be taking on an unspecified "new role".Posting on social media on Sunday, Boam said: "Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister."The Leicestershire Conservative group - the main opposition on the authority - has now branded Reform UK's local leadership a "shambles".Michael Mullaney, leader of the Liberal Democrat group at the authority, said: "This Reform cabinet reshuffle so soon after they took office has been chaotic and costly for the people of Leicestershire at a time when they need effective leadership from the county council." Additional reporting by Hannah Richardson, Local Democracy Reporting Service


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Third council asked to investigate hotels used by asylum seekers
A third council in Northern Ireland has been asked to investigate the legal planning status of hotels housing asylum and TUV councillors on Causeway Coast and Glens Borough Council have asked officers to establish whether any change of use had been sought for hotels in the council area and for enforcement action to be considered where they do comes after Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council began an enforcement investigation into the planning status of a hotel where asylum seekers are being Coast and Glens Borough Council said it would inquire into the matters raised by the DUP and the TUV (Traditional Unionist Voice). Unionists raised concerns after a court in England granted a council a temporary injunction to block asylum seekers from lodging at a hotel in DUP councillor John McAuley said that ruling made it clear that hotels "cannot simply be repurposed into immigration accommodation centres" without going through the proper planning process. The DUP group said it was not only about compliance with planning regulations but also about what they considered the "wider lack of oversight in the immigration system". "Communities have been left in the dark while hotels are converted into accommodation centres without consultation or due process, and this situation cannot be allowed to continue," McAuley said. Asylum seekers in Northern Ireland According to Home Office statistics, as of 30 June 2025, 246 asylum seekers were being housed in hotels in Northern is down from 301 in June 2024 and compares to more than 1,000 in September are 2,228 people in "dispersal accommodation" which is longer-term temporary housing managed on behalf of the Home numbers in dispersal accommodation is largely unchanged from June 2024 and compared to 2,075 in September total number of asylum seekers in NI in receipt of support in June was 2,535, unchanged from June 2024 and down from 3,220 in September 2023. On Wednesday, Trevor Clarke, a South Antrim MLA, and the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) MP for the area, Robin Swann said Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council had opened a planning enforcement investigation into the status of the Chimney Corner hotel has been the subject of some anti-immigration protests over the past 12 MLA Stephen Dunne has also written to Ards and North Down Borough Council's planning office "regarding the ongoing use of the Marine Court Hotel in Bangor to house asylum seekers". SDLP leader and South Belfast MP Claire Hanna said some politicians were "bandwagon jumping"."Of course, hotels aren't suitable accommodation in anything more than short term, it's not ideal for the person whether that's an asylum seeker or somebody who has been living here for a long time, who is in emergency accommodation, because they are used for that purpose as well," she told BBC Radio Ulster's Good Morning Ulster said housing asylum seekers in hotels also came at an enormous cost to the public purse."The solution to me would appear to efficiently and speedily process people's applications that they're not languishing in the system for years and years, and also it feeds into our wider and chronic lack of available social housing," she assembly member Andrew Muir said that the DUP intervention on the issue lacked compassion."What we are talking about here are people who are seeking asylum after perhaps enduring some of the most horrific events," he said solutions such as legal roots, faster processing and the right to work should be the focus.


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
UK houses 32,000 asylum seekers in hotels, data shows, as critics decry policy
LONDON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - More than 32,000 asylum seekers were housed in hotels in Britain at the end of June 2025 with asylum claims hitting a record, official data showed on Thursday, as the housing issue becomes a major headache for Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Starmer's government is facing increasing pressure over housing asylum seekers in hotels after a council won a temporary court injunction earlier this week meaning all the migrants living in one hotel had to be removed. Figures released by the government showed there had been an 8% increase in the number of migrants being housed in hotels in the year ending June 30. However, the total figure of just over 32,000 was 43% lower than the peak of 56,042 recorded in September 2023, and slightly down compared to the previous quarterly figures in March. Starmer has vowed to end the use of hotels to house thousands of asylum seekers before the next election in 2029. A regular tracker of voters' concerns showed immigration has overtaken the economy as the biggest issue. Thursday's data also showed 111,000 people claimed asylum in the year to June 2025, up 14% from the previous year and surpassing the previous peak of 103,000 recorded in 2002. Starmer has pledged to stop thousands of migrants arriving in Britain via small boats. More than 27,000 have arrived by that means so far this year.