OpenAI fights back in NYT copyright lawsuit over ChatGPT data freeze
NEW YORK, June 6 — OpenAI is appealing an order in a copyright case brought by the New York Times that requires it to preserve ChatGPT output data indefinitely, arguing that the order conflicts with privacy commitments it has made with users.
Last month, a court said OpenAI had to preserve and segregate all output log data after the Times asked for the data to be preserved.
'We will fight any demand that compromises our users' privacy; this is a core principle,' OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in a post on X yesterday.
'We think this (the Times demand) was an inappropriate request that sets a bad precedent.'
US District Judge Sidney Stein was asked to vacate the May data preservation order on June 3, a court filing showed.
The New York Times did not immediately respond to a request for comment outside regular business hours.
The newspaper sued OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023, accusing them of using millions of its articles without permission to train the large language model behind its popular chatbot.
Stein said in an April court opinion that the Times had made a case that OpenAI and Microsoft were responsible for inducing users to infringe its copyrights.
The opinion explained an earlier order that rejected parts of an OpenAI and Microsoft motion to dismiss, saying that the Times' 'numerous' and 'widely publicised' examples of ChatGPT producing material from its articles justified allowing the claims to continue. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
24 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Trump-era ICE raids return: Migrants detained in dramatic LA, New York crackdowns
LOS ANGELES, June 7 — Masked and armed federal agents carried out sweeping immigration raids in Los Angeles yesterday, while others pounced on migrants at a New York courthouse, in forceful displays of US President Donald Trump's crackdown on people without papers. From courthouses to hardware store parking lots in two of the most diverse cities in the world, federal agents wrestled migrants into handcuffs and unmarked vehicles. Agents used extreme tactics, conducting unprecedented raids on at least three areas of Los Angeles to detain dozens of people. At one sweep less than two miles from Los Angeles City Hall, agents threw flash-bang grenades to disperse angry crowds of people following alongside a convoy of ICE vehicles, as protesters hurled eggs and epithets at the agents, media reported. 'Terror' 'As a Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' LA Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement. 'These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city.' White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who grew up in LA's Santa Monica community, responded on X, insisting that Bass had 'no say in this at all.' 'Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced.' Service Employees International Union leader David Huerta was among those briefly detained in Los Angeles. 'Hard-working people, and members of our family and our community, are being treated like criminals,' Huerta said in a statement after his release. Homeland Security Investigations spokesperson Yasmeen Pitts O'Keefe told the Los Angeles Times that federal agents were executing search warrants related to the harboring of people illegally in the country. As the sun set in Los Angeles, broadcaster ABC7 reported a growing standoff as hundreds of protesters marched downtown to demand the release of detainees, where police officers in riot gear ordered them to disperse. Federal agents are arresting immigrants outside of immigration court hearings, as ICE ramps up enforcement. — AFP pic NY courthouse arrests Across the country in New York, US agents in plainclothes pounced on two immigrants in the hallway of a New York courthouse Friday. AFP saw the officers yell for the men not to move before forcing them to lay face-down on the ground as they were cuffed and arrested. It was not immediately clear exactly why these two men were arrested. Trump was elected to a second term with broad support for his promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants. In recent weeks ICE agents have intensified such operations in and around American immigration courts. After Trump swept back into power in January, the Department of Homeland Security revoked regulations that limited agents' access to protected areas like the courts. One of the men arrested in New York was a 34-year-old Dominican named Joaquin Rosario who arrived in the United States a year ago, registered as he came in, and who had his first immigration hearing Friday, a relative named Julian Rosario said. 'He was at ease. He did not think anything was going to happen,' the relative said, adding that Rosario was so unworried he had not brought his lawyer with him. The other detainee looked to be Asian. He arrived accompanied only by one of many immigration advocacy group volunteers who walk immigrants to and from the courtroom. The volunteers screamed out as the agents arrested the two men, but it did nothing to halt the raid. A Dominican man is detained by plainclothes officers with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after his immigration court hearing at the Jacob K. Javitz Federal Building on June 6, 2025 in New York City. — AFP pic 'Sound the alarm' Human rights groups are outraged by these operations, arguing that they sap trust in the courts and make immigrants wary of showing up for appointments as they try to gain US residency. 'They're illegal abductions,' said Karen Ortiz, herself a court employee who was demonstrating Friday against these sudden arrests of migrants. 'We need to sound the alarm and show the public how serious this is and one way we can do that is actually physically putting ourselves between a masked ICE agent and someone they're trying to detain and send away,' she told AFP. Since returning to power Trump has dramatically tested the limits of executive power to crack down on foreigners without papers, arguing that the United States is being invaded by criminals and other undesirables. — AFP
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Singapore watching US tariff talks ‘very carefully', says foreign minister
SINGAPORE, June 7 — The United States' evolving tariff regime remains in flux and it will take time before the full picture becomes clear, said Singapore's Foreign Minister Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, following a five-day official visit to Washington. Speaking to The Straits Times, among other Singapore media, via Zoom today, Dr Balakrishnan said ongoing revisions, legal challenges and a likely series of bilateral negotiations with different trade partners mean the eventual shape of American tariffs is still being worked out. His meetings with senior US officials, senators and members of Congress revealed bipartisan agreement in the US on the importance of trade, investment, intellectual property, reliability, and secure supply chains. 'The relationship with the United States is a vital, critical one for Singapore — it spans the entire gamut... the economy, defence, security, and we're also pursuing emerging opportunities in areas like cyber security and energy,' he reportedly said. 'So it's a relationship which needs to be tended to, and attended to carefully.' Singapore and the US reaffirmed their strong bilateral ties during his visit, said Dr Balakrishnan, with both sides committed to deeper cooperation in areas such as defence and critical technologies, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. A key topic during discussions was the impact of US tariffs on global trade, especially for small, open economies like Singapore. 'Any impact on global trade, any friction in the system, will have an impact on an open economy like ours, where our trading volume is three times our GDP,' he reportedly said. Dr Balakrishnan noted the US has a trade surplus with Singapore and should not impose even the baseline 10 per cent tariff. He said sector-specific duties were more concerning and would be closely scrutinised. 'We're still in the early stages of our discussions and negotiations, so let's watch this space,' he added. His visit came as the US trade outlook remains uncertain. President Donald Trump's wide-ranging 'Liberation Day' tariffs, unveiled on April 2, have been paused for 90 days, but on June 4, he signed an order doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Singapore's manufacturing sector has already been feeling the strain. On June 2, purchasing managers' index figures showed a second straight month of contraction in factory activity, reflecting the drag from trade instability. Dr Balakrishnan also noted signs of openness from Washington. In May, Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said early talks were under way about ensuring semiconductor supply and potentially zero tariffs on pharmaceutical exports. Asked about challenges in engaging US officials, Dr Balakrishnan said: 'They were very welcoming, courteous... I have no anxiety on that front.' But he warned the global order that underpinned Singapore's success — based on free trade and capital flows — is shifting. 'The anxiety is that the world order that had prevailed for 80 years... is clearly changing, and this period of transition is the time of greatest danger.' Singapore must stay alert and ready to adapt quickly, he said. 'It is also important to interact frequently, candidly, openly and constructively with our interlocutors, and especially with a superpower which is of great strategic importance to us,' he added. Before Washington, Dr Balakrishnan visited London, where he met British Foreign Secretary David Lammy to discuss economic ties, strategic issues and potential cooperation.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Human coders are still better than AI, says this expert developer
Your team members may be tempted to rely on AI to help them write code for your company, either for cost or speed rationales or because they lack particular expertise. But you should be wary. — Pixabay In the complex 'will AI steal my job?' debate, software developers are among the workers most immediately at risk from powerful AI tools. It's certainly looking like the tech sector wants to reduce the number of humans working those jobs. Bold statements from the likes of Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and Anthropic's Dario Amodei support this since both of them say AI is already able to take over some code-writing roles. But a new blog post from a prominent coding expert strongly disputes their arguments, and supports some AI critics' position that AI really can't code. Salvatore Sanfilippo, an Italian developer who created Redis (an online database which calls itself the 'world's fastest data platform' and is beloved by coders building real-time apps), published a blog post this week, provocatively titled 'Human coders are still better than LLMs.' His title refers to large language model systems that power AI chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude. Sanfilippo said he's 'not anti-AI' and actually does 'use LLMs routinely,' and explained some specific interactions he'd had with Google's Gemini AI about writing code. These left him convinced that AIs are 'incredibly behind human intelligence,' so he wanted to make a point about it. The billions invested in the technology and the potential upending of the workforce mean it's 'impossible to have balanced conversations' on the matter, he wrote. Sanfilippo blogged that he was trying to 'fix a complicated bug' in Redis's systems. He made an attempt himself, and then asked Gemini, 'hey, what we can do here? Is there a super fast way' to implement his fix? Then, using detailed examples of the kind of software he was working with and the problem he was trying to fix, he blogged about the back-and-forth dialogue he had with Gemini as he tried to coax it toward an acceptable answer. After numerous interactions where the AI couldn't improve on his idea or really help much, he said he 'asked Gemini to do an analysis of (his last idea, and it was finally happy.' We can ignore the detailed code itself and just concentrate on Sanfilippo's final paragraph. 'All this to say: I just finished the analysis and stopped to write this blog post, I'm not sure if I'm going to use this system (but likely yes), but, the creativity of humans still have an edge, we are capable of really thinking out of the box, envisioning strange and imprecise solutions that can work better than others,' he wrote. 'This is something that is extremely hard for LLMs.' Gemini was useful, he admitted, to simply 'verify' his bug-fix ideas, but it couldn't outperform him and actually solve the problem itself. This stance from an expert coder goes up against some other pro-AI statements. Zuckerberg has said he plans to fire mid-level coders from Meta to save money, employing AI instead. In March, Amodei hit the headlines when he boldly predicted that all code would be written by AIs inside a year. Meanwhile, on the flip side, a February report from Microsoft warned that young coders coming out of college were already so reliant on AI to help them that they failed to understand the hard computer science behind the systems they were working on –something that may trip them up if they encountered a complex issue like Sanfilippo's bug. Commenters on a piece talking about Sanfilippo's blog post on coding news site Hacker News broadly agreed with his argument. One commenter likened the issue to a popular meme about social media: 'You know that saying that the best way to get an answer online is to post a wrong answer? That's what LLMs do for me.' Another writer noted that AIs were useful because even though they give pretty terrible coding advice, 'It still saves me time, because even 50 percent accuracy is still half that I don't have to write myself.' Lastly, another coder pointed out a very human benefit from using AI: 'I have ADHD and starting is the hardest part for me. With an LLM it gets me from 0 to 20% (or more) and I can nail it for the rest. It's way less stressful for me to start now.' Why should you care about this? At first glance, it looks like a very inside-baseball discussion about specific coding issues. You should care because your team members may be tempted to rely on AI to help them write code for your company, either for cost or speed rationales or because they lack particular expertise. But you should be wary. AIs are known to be unreliable, and Sanfilippo's argument, supported by other coders' comments, point out that AI really isn't capable of certain key coding tasks. For now, at least, coders' jobs may be safe… and if your team does use AI to code, they should double and triple check the AI's advice before implementing it in your IT system. – Inc./Tribune News Service
