Government ‘dragging its feet' over harassment act, says MP
Tunbridge Wells MP Mike Martin has accused the government of "dragging its feet" over the implementation of a law to criminalise public sexual harassment.MPs passed the Protection from Sex Based Harassment in Public Act in 2023, which was introduced by the previous Conservative Tunbridge Wells MP Greg Clark following a campaign from his constituents.But the law is yet to come into force because the government is required to pass a "statutory instrument". The previous Conservative government's plans to do this last year were interrupted by the general election.On Wednesday, MPs rejected an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, proposed by Martin, which would have enforced the act.
The act created a new specific offence for harassment in public on account of an individual's sex, including intrusive or persistent staring or questioning, following someone, sexual or obscene comments, propositions or gestures and non-consensual physical contact.The Liberal Democrat MP said he had met or received communication from the government five times over the last eight months.Each time they had "failed to say when the act will be implemented", he added.Martin said: "This act is an extremely important building block in our campaign to reduce Violence Against Women and Girls in this Parliament – a goal I feel incredibly strongly about."I would have thought the Government – with its aim to halve Violence Against Women and Girls – would want to see this act enforced quickly."The Home Office has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
LIZ SMITH: SNP's shameful betrayal over winter fuel will not be forgotten - or forgiven
Yesterday's latest U-turn by John Swinney over his government's policy on the universal winter fuel payment was, if anything, even more humiliating, unprincipled and deceitful than the one Rachel Reeves performed last week. The SNP furiously protested after the UK Chancellor's shameful decision to abolish the allowance last year that they had no option but to follow suit. That is always the first rule in the Nationalists' playbook – blame someone, anyone, else rather than accept responsibility for unpopular decisions. The reality is that the SNP had the money to make the payment this year. They had the devolved power for future years to continue providing a winter fuel payment – just as they do with a number of other benefits. The fact that some of them are financially irresponsible and place an unsustainable strain on public spending doesn't seem to hold them back. But provided with Labour's example, they had no hesitation in following suit. Then, when the impact of their policy on the most vulnerable pensioners became clear and – more importantly, from their point of view – it also became apparent just how unpopular it was, the Nats suddenly announced that they would reintroduce payments. And, John Swinney declared with great fanfare, it would be universal. Though he made less noise about the fact that some people would see the payment cut by £200. Now, in a broken promise which is breathtaking even by the First Minister's standards, he's changed his mind about that. We learned yesterday that hundreds of thousands of pensioners will not, after all, qualify for the SNP's version of the allowance. At the same time, he's announced two separate rates, at £203.40 and £305.10 – figures which seem to have been picked solely so that the SNP can claim that they are being more generous than the UK government. That childish and cynical attempt at one-upmanship and deliberately misleading rates is exactly the sleight-of-hand approach that the Nationalists took with income tax, when they made Scotland the highest taxed part of the country. Mr Swinney constantly claims most Scots pay less, but never mentions those sums are a few pounds, while the majority of working Scots, who are hit by their punitive rates, are often paying several thousands more. The Labour government's decision to abolish the universal winter fuel payment was, of course, a straight betrayal of their election promises. It was a cruel and vindictive assault on vulnerable pensioners. And, as we've learned from its reversal in Rachel Reeves' spending review, it was all completely unnecessary. We were told at the time that it was essential to plug an unexpected 'black hole' in the public finances. That contradicted what Rachel Reeves said before the election, when she accepted that there couldn't be any surprises because of the Office for Budget Review's (OBR) figures. And the OBR, it turned out, couldn't find any sign of the black hole she blamed. Now the Chancellor claims that she has fixed this imaginary shortfall and put the economy on a sound footing, so she can afford to reverse the cut. It is impossible to find a single credible economic analyst who does not say that this is obvious nonsense. The economy is stalling. Economic inactivity is worsening. Borrowing is going through the roof. All the economic experts are united in the view that the Chancellor will be back in the autumn, and that she will be announcing very substantial tax rises. But in SNP-run Scotland – where the government has already made emergency budgets an annual event – things will be even worse. The economic pain will be amplified by the SNP's wasteful and irresponsible spending which, even with the Union dividend and John Swinney's punitive higher taxes, greatly exceeds their income. Over the course of this disgraceful policy shambles, Labour's approach has been dishonest and needlessly created real suffering and anxiety for pensioners. But, if anything, the SNP have managed to make matters worse. The constant chopping and changing by ministers is causing more needless anxiety for Scottish pensioners. Their latest announcement is confusing. But one point is clear – hundreds of thousands of Scots will not have the payment even partially restored – despite John Swinney's promise that they would. It's a shameful betrayal that will not be forgotten or forgiven by Scotland's pensioners.
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's migration promises have failed to materialise
The weather is fine and warm, the seas are calm and the small boats crisis is getting worse by the day. Record numbers of immigrants are crossing the Channel to such an extent that even Sir Keir Starmer appears to have noticed. After meeting Emmanuel Macron at the G7 summit in Canada, the Prime Minister conceded that the crisis was 'deteriorating'. Yet he came to power blithely denouncing the last government for failing to 'stop the boats' while junking the one deterrent available to the authorities, namely to remove asylum seekers to Rwanda. He is now reaping the whirlwind of his complacency. If the small boats crisis cast a pall over the last months of Rishi Sunak's premiership it is doing the same for Sir Keir's first year in power. 'Smashing the gangs', like stopping the boats, was a central pledge that has not only failed to materialise but has made the Prime Minister look weak and ineffectual. He made a promise he was unable to keep, a pattern of behaviour among recent political leaders that is more responsible than any for the rise of Reform UK. The latest attempt to salvage this policy involves a vague promise by France to allow its police to enter the water to stop migrants boarding boats. They are not allowed to at the moment and stand by watching the boats being loaded, but a long-promised legal reform could change that. Of course, if migrants were prevented from getting on boats that might well act as a deterrent. But with thousands already waiting on the other side of the Channel, what motive is there for the French to keep them on their shores when they can pass the problem to the British?
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Disability benefit claimants to rise by 750,000 despite Starmer reforms
The number of people claiming disability benefits in Britain will jump by 750,000 over the next five years despite Sir Keir Starmer's attempt to reduce the welfare bill, the Government has admitted. An official impact assessment of Labour's benefits reforms found that the total cost of two disability benefits would increase by £8 billion by 2030 as the number of claimants continued to soar. The rate will rise despite a crackdown on the criteria for some benefits by Sir Keir that prompted a rebellion from Labour backbenchers. There are around five million people currently claiming disability benefits in England and Wales, including 3.7 million on PIP (personal independence payment) and a further 1.4 million on disability living allowance (DLA). The Government had warned that figure was set to spiral in the coming years without reform to the benefits system, because of a large increase in claimants with mental health conditions and a rise in fraud. But even with Labour's changes, the number will increase by 750,000 people by 2030, while costs will increase from £23 billion to £31 billion a year. Labour's changes include a new, tougher criteria for PIP, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC). Ministers estimate that these reforms will save £5 billion a year by the end of this Parliament. Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, previously said there were 1,000 new PIP awards every day, which she described as adding a city the size of Leicester to the welfare books every year. On Wednesday, the Government laid the legislation to enact its welfare reforms, which Ms Kendall said marked 'the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity'. But Labour rebels pointed to the Government's own figures showing that 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, are likely to fall into poverty by 2030 because of the changes. The impact assessment on Wednesday confirmed previously published estimates that changes to PIP entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. The changes to UC are expected to mean an estimated 2.25 million people lose an average of £500 per year. The UC losses are to people claiming an additional rate of the benefit because they have a 'limited capacity to work', which the Government says encourages jobless people not to go back into employment. Ministers argue that 3.9 million households who do not claim the extra allowance will gain an average of £265 each year from an increase to the standard allowance. Rebel MPs have secured a concession from ministers that PIP and UC claimants losing some benefits will be given a 13-week financial support package, up from a planned four-week package. But documents show the Government has ignited fury from Labour MPs without securing an overall reduction in the cost of welfare, while the number of people claiming disability benefits will rise by around 15 per cent. The £8 billion cost increase under the new system is equivalent to around five times the annual revenue that Labour says it will receive from imposing VAT on private schools, and more than the cost of building Britain's two aircraft carriers. The impact assessment said that without reform, the cost of working-age sickness and disability benefits would have increased by £18 billion a year to a total £70 billion. 'The increase alone is more than the entire police budget,' the document said. Ms Kendall told MPs that Britain's social security system was 'at a crossroads' as a result of rising costs since the pandemic. She said: 'Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot.' Sir Keir said he was 'determined' to ensure the reforms go through because he feels the welfare system 'doesn't work for anyone'. 'It doesn't work for those that want to get back to work, and it certainly doesn't work for the taxpayer,' the Prime Minister told ITV, adding that 'those that need to be protected should be protected'.
