logo
What to Know About the Protests Outside U.K. Hotels Housing Asylum Seekers

What to Know About the Protests Outside U.K. Hotels Housing Asylum Seekers

New York Times17 hours ago
On Tuesday, a judge in England is set to decide whether to block a hotel in Epping, northeast of London, from being used as accommodation for asylum seekers.
In recent weeks, the hotel, The Bell, had become the center of repeated protests, which have at times become violent, after an asylum seeker staying there was charged last month with sexually assaulting a teenage girl, which he denies.
The district council applied for an injunction barring the hotel from housing asylum seekers, stating that doing so violates planning rules and 'poses a clear risk of further escalating community tensions already at a high, and the risk of irreparable harm to the local community.'
If the council's case is successful, it may provide a template for other places in Britain seeking to prevent hotels from being used as accommodation for asylum seekers.
But how did this issue begin, and why does it pose such a challenge to the government?
Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels?
Under British law, the government has a longstanding legal obligation to provide accommodation for asylum seekers who would otherwise be homeless while their applications are being considered. Most asylum seekers have been barred from working in Britain since the early 2000s, when the Labour government at the time wanted to prevent people from using the asylum system to gain access to work opportunities in Britain.
As a result, unless asylum seekers have family or friends willing to provide accommodation, or significant funds, the government must give them accommodation.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Star Wars' actor Mark Hamill reveals he considered leaving the US when Trump won reelection
‘Star Wars' actor Mark Hamill reveals he considered leaving the US when Trump won reelection

Fox News

time38 minutes ago

  • Fox News

‘Star Wars' actor Mark Hamill reveals he considered leaving the US when Trump won reelection

"Star Wars" actor Mark Hamill revealed to a UK newspaper that President Donald Trump's election nearly convinced him to leave America, telling his wife their options were moving to London or Ireland. Hamill is known for playing Luke Skywalker in the "Star Wars" films and for voicing the Joker in many "Batman" adaptations. He is also one of Hollywood's most outspoken liberal actors — a fact The Times' contributing editor Matt Rudd observed amid his lengthy interview. "Today he fights not with a lightsaber but with a keyboard," Rudd wrote. "Having left Facebook because he was mad at Zuckerberg and Twitter because he was mad at Musk, he now expresses his horror at the state of America via Bluesky." The writer noted further, "I avoid mentioning Trump until the end of our conversation because it's a subject that risks hijacking an entire afternoon. Sure enough, my late request for Hamill's state of the union results in a lengthy monologue." During the extensive interview with the British daily newspaper, Hamill was candid about the struggles he endured after Trump won the election in November. He was an outspoken supporter of then-President Joe Biden and also supported former Vice President Kamala Harris as Biden's appointed successor for the Democratic Party's nomination. The reality of the Trump administration, he says, is only something he can cope with by imagining it as a political thriller. "The bullying, the incompetence, the people in place… The only way I can deal with it without going crazy and wanting to open my veins in a warm tub is to look at it like a thick, sprawling political novel," the 'Star Wars' actor said. "It's entertaining in a way because this could actually be the end. Our status in the world has been crippled and that will reverberate for decades. Making Canada a 51st state? Do you know how offensive that is? And then taking over Greenland and renaming the Gulf of Mexico. The distractions are hilarious." "I still believe there are more honest, decent people than there are the Maga crowd," he says. "If I didn't, I'd move back to England," Hamill added. The actor noted that he indeed considered moving elsewhere in the English-speaking world as other famous liberal actors have done. The Times noted that "when Trump was re-elected, [Hamill] gave his wife a choice: London or Ireland." "She's very clever," Hamill said, recalling the conversation. "She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.' That son of a b----, I thought. I'm not leaving." Fox News Digital reached out to the White House, and a spokeswoman blasted the actor."Since Mark has decided to stay in the United States, he will get to enjoy the many wins President Trump is securing for the American people — and really, who can blame him for seconding guessing a plan to move to the same place as Rosie O'Donnell…" the White House spokeswoman replied.

Council leaders weigh up legal challenges to migrant hotels after Epping ruling
Council leaders weigh up legal challenges to migrant hotels after Epping ruling

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Council leaders weigh up legal challenges to migrant hotels after Epping ruling

Councils across England are considering launching their own legal actions after a district council in Essex secured a High Court victory temporarily blocking asylum seekers from being housed in a hotel in the area. Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage indicated the 12 councils where Reform UK was the largest party would consider legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Mr Farage said the local authorities would do 'everything in their power to follow Epping's lead'. On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12. Mr Farage added: 'The good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.' The area had seen thousands of people turn out in protest about the housing of migrants in the Bell Hotel. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. In a post on Facebook, Broxbourne Council said: 'Broxbourne Council will now take legal advice as a matter of urgency about whether it could take similar action.' Meanwhile, the leader of South Norfolk District Council, which covers the town of Diss where a hotel housing asylum seekers has also been the subject of protests, said the council would not go down the same route. Conservative leader Daniel Elmer said the council was using planning rules to try to ensure it was families being housed in the area rather than single adult males. He said to do so, which would effectively convert the hotels into hostels, should require a change of use. Two men have been arrested and charged in connection with a protest in July outside the hotel in Diss, which houses more than 40 children. Cllr Elmer told the PA news agency: 'We make a big play about integration, and to replace families who have children in the local school system and have integrated into the local community would make no sense.' He added: 'If we can punish people who have put up sheds in their gardens without permission, then we can take action against hotels being converted into hostels without planning consent.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in Epping since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment.

Kneecap rapper to appear in court for alleged support of terrorist group
Kneecap rapper to appear in court for alleged support of terrorist group

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kneecap rapper to appear in court for alleged support of terrorist group

A member of rap group Kneecap is due to appear in court for allegedly supporting a proscribed terror organisation. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year. Demonstrations in support of the rapper have been organised outside Westminster Magistrates' Court in London where he is due to appear on Wednesday, as well as in Dublin. The Metropolitan Police has imposed conditions limiting where the demonstration outside the court can take place on Wednesday, saying they were needed to 'prevent serious disruption'. In response the rap group described this move as a 'calculated political decision' that was 'designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome' and 'asked supporters to go out of your way to be compliant with all instructions issued, irrespective of how pitiful'. O hAnnaidh received a rockstar welcome when he appeared at the same court in June, supported by fellow bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and J J O Dochartaigh. He was greeted by a festival-like atmosphere for his first court appearance, with dozens of fans waving flags, playing drums and one supporter setting off a smoke canister. The court previously heard the 27-year-old defendant is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, was a 'wholly different thing'. O hAnnaidh is yet to enter a plea to the charge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store