logo
MAGA-style makes a move in Japan: Sanseito party increases seats in upper house

MAGA-style makes a move in Japan: Sanseito party increases seats in upper house

News24a day ago
The populist Sanseito party increased its representation in Japan.
It is modelled on Donald Trump's MAGA movement.
Surveys have put immigration far down the list of voters' concerns.
Populist ideals are gaining traction in Japan, spurred by right-wing politicians running rampant elsewhere railing against 'elitism', 'globalism' and immigration.
While Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's coalition lost its upper house majority in an election on Sunday, the 'Japanese first' Sanseito party, created only five years ago, increased its seats from two to 15.
Sanseito's agenda comes straight from the copybook of right-wing movements such as US President Donald Trump's 'Make America Great Again', the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and Nigel Farage's Reform party in Britain.
This includes 'stricter rules and limits' on immigration and foreign capital, opposition to 'globalism' and 'radical' gender policies, and a rethink on decarbonisation and vaccines, and pesticide-free agriculture.
Founded on YouTube, Sanseito will 'bring power back to the people', party leader Sohei Kamiya, a 47-year-old former teacher and supermarket manager, wrote in the Japan Times.
Surveys have put immigration far down the list of voters' concerns, who are much more worried about inflation and the economy.
But for Sanseito, the influx of newcomers into Japan - where the immigration its economy badly needs is far lower than in other developed countries - is to blame for a host of ills from crime to rising property prices to dangerous driving.
'It's fine if they visit as tourists, but if you take in more and more foreigners, saying they're cheap labour, then Japanese people's wages won't rise,' Kamiya said at a campaign.
We are not exclusionary. We have never called to drive out foreigners.
Sohei Kamiya
Meanwhile online platforms have been flooded with disinformation, some of which Japanese fact-checking groups and the government have debunked.
Some posts falsely claimed that foreigners leave almost $3 billion of medical bills unpaid a year, or that Chinese residents on welfare doubled in five years.
At a Sanseito election rally in front of Tokyo's Shinagawa station, where orange T-shirted party workers handed out 'Stop destroying Japan!' flyers, one voter told AFP she was finally being heard.
'They put into words what I had been thinking about but couldn't put into words for many years,' said the 44-year-old IT worker on a precarious short-term contract.
'When foreigners go to university, the Japanese government provides subsidies to them, but when we were going to university, everyone had huge debts.'
Russian bot accounts have been responsible for 'large-scale information manipulation', according to a much-read blog post by Ichiro Yamamoto from the Japan Institute of Law and Information Systems think-tank.
This has been helped by artificial intelligence enabling better translation of material into Japanese.
More understanding toward Russia - something which was long anathema for Japanese right-wingers - is also a theme for Kamiya.
'Russia's military invasion (of Ukraine) was of course bad, but there are forces in the United States that drove Russia into doing that,' Kamiya told AFP, denying he is 'pro-Russia'.
He was forced during his campaign to deny receiving support from Moscow - which has been accused of backing similar parties in other countries - after a Sanseito candidate was interviewed by Russian state media.
As in other countries, the rise of Sanseito and its success has prompted the government to announce new immigration policies, and other parties to make promises during the election campaign.
Ishiba's LDP proclaimed the goal of achieving 'zero illegal foreign nationals' and said the government will strengthen the management system for immigration and residency status.
Eight NGOs issued a joint statement last week, since backed by over 1 000 groups, raising the alarm on 'rapidly spreading xenophobia'.
'The argument that 'foreigners are prioritised' is totally unfounded demagoguery,' the statement said.
Hidehiro Yamamoto, politics and sociology professor at the University of Tsukuba, said that populism has not caught hold before because the LDP, unlike established parties elsewhere, has remained a 'catch-all party'.
'The LDP has taken care of lower middle-class residents in cities, farmers in the countryside, and small- and mid-sized companies,' Yamamoto said.
And pointing to the rise and decline of other new parties in Japan in the past, he isn't sure Sanseito will last.
'You can't continue gaining support only with a temporary mood among the public,' Yamamoto said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to sign off on Britain-India trade deal
Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to sign off on Britain-India trade deal

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Keir Starmer and Narendra Modi set to sign off on Britain-India trade deal

Sir Keir Starmer and India's Narendra Modi are set to sign off on a trade deal worth £6 billion in investment for the British economy. The Prime Minister and his Indian counterpart also agreed ahead of their meeting on Thursday to ramp up joint efforts to tackle illegal migration and organised crime. The UK-India trade deal is understood to be the largest of its kind for its economic impact on Britain. It will see tariffs on an array of British goods reduced from an average of 15% to 3%, with the aim of boosting the £11 billion of imports into the south Asian nation. Whisky tariffs will be slashed in half, according to the Government, and will fall further over successive years, while other industries including soft drinks, cars and cosmetics are also expected to see cheaper duties. Before his meeting with Mr Modi to confirm the deal, Sir Keir said: 'Our landmark trade deal with India is a major win for Britain. It will create thousands of British jobs across the UK, unlock new opportunities for businesses and drive growth in every corner of the country, delivering on our Plan for Change. 'We're putting more money in the pockets of hardworking Brits and helping families with the cost of living, and we're determined to go further and faster to grow the economy and raise living standards across the UK.' The deal is expected to result in 2,200 jobs across the country and £6 billion investment by British and Indian businesses. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the investment will 'reach all regions and nations of the UK so working people in every community can feel the benefits'. He added: 'The almost £6 billion in new investment and export wins announced today will deliver thousands of jobs and shows the strength of our partnership with India as we ensure the UK is the best place in the world to invest and do business.' The UK and India are also bolstering co-operation on tackling corruption, fraud, organised crime and illegal migration, by sharing criminal records and other intelligence. The deal has not given the UK as much access as it would have liked to India's financial and legal services industries. The agreement promises some benefits for the UK's financial services, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves understood to have pushed on behalf of the sector in discussions with her Indian counterpart. But more wide-ranging access was not agreed, and talks continue on a bilateral investment treaty aimed at protecting British investments in India and vice versa. The two nations also continue to discuss UK plans for a tax on high-carbon industries, which India believes could hit its imports unfairly. Negotiations on the deal began when Boris Johnson was prime minister in 2022, and were concluded in May this year. Labour sought to portray closing the deal, as well as trade agreements with the US and the EU, as evidence of the Government's pragmatism and global outlook. But shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it had only been made possible 'because of Brexit delivered by the Conservatives'. He added: 'Any trade deal that can successfully cut regulation which stops Britain's makers from creating new jobs and wealth will be a step in the right direction. 'But the irony should not be lost on anyone that any gains from this trade deal will be blown out of the water by (Deputy Prime Minister) Angela Rayner's union charter, stifling business with red tape, the jobs tax and, come autumn, Rachel Reeves' inevitable tax hikes that will punish Britain's makers just to reward those who do not contribute.' The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has said that the signing 'sends a powerful signal that the UK is open for business and remains resolute in its commitment to free and fair trade'. Chief executive Rain Newton-Smith added: 'A trade agreement with India – one of the world's fastest-growing economies – is a springboard for long-term partnership and prosperity. UK firms can take advantage of this new platform to scale, diversify and compete on the global stage.' Elsewhere, Sir Keir is facing calls to raise the case of Jagtar Singh Johal, a British citizen who has been detained in India since 2017, when the Prime Minister meets Mr Modi. The Scottish Sikh is accused of being a member of the Khalistan Liberation Force, which is banned as a terror group in India. His family say he is being arbitrarily detained, with his brother Gurpreet Singh Johal insisting the matter should be 'high on the agenda when the prime ministers meet'.

Bondi briefed Trump that his name was in Epstein files
Bondi briefed Trump that his name was in Epstein files

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

Bondi briefed Trump that his name was in Epstein files

When Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Donald Trump in May on the Justice Department's review of the documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, she told him that his name appeared in the files, sources familiar with the discussion told CNN. The conversation, which also included Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, was characterized by two White House officials as a 'routine briefing' that covered the scope of the Justice Department's findings. Trump's name appearing in the files, they said, was not the sole focus of the discussions. Bondi also raised in the meeting that several names of high-profile figures were also mentioned, and that investigators did not find evidence of a so-called client list or evidence refuting that Epstein died by suicide, the officials said. The sources familiar with the department's review said the files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims that the Justice Department found not to be credible, including those relating to Trump. It wasn't clear in what context Trump's name appeared in the files. Like many high-powered people in 1990s New York, Trump was an associate of Epstein's, who worked to cultivate celebrities to burnish his business. The revelation that his name appears in the documents does little to advance previous knowledge about his ties to the late sex offender. 'The White House is not surprised by this – Trump's name was present in the binders that Bondi produced and handed out,' one of the White House officials said, adding that many of the materials already released by the Justice Department had included mention of the president's name. 'The White House does not view this as groundbreaking or new or surprising at all,' the official said, adding that there is no evidence that Trump was involved in any wrongdoing. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep,' White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement to CNN, referring to Epstein. 'This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media, just like the Obama Russiagate scandal, which President Trump was right about.' The Wall Street Journal first reported that Bondi informed Trump in May about his name appearing in the documents. The revelations about the meeting contradict Trump's more recent denials that he was told he was in the files. Pressed last week on whether Bondi had told him he was named in the documents, he said, 'No, no. She's given us just a very quick briefing.' Trump has struggled to tamp down weeks of backlash over the administration's decision not to release more documents related to the Epstein investigation — a move that infuriated a vocal segment of the MAGA base and put the president at odds with some of his most ardent supporters. Inside the White House, officials were outraged that Bondi did not redact Trump's name from publicly available materials contained in Epstein binders distributed to influencers in February, sources said. Her failure to protect the president during the episode has been a longstanding point of contention between the DOJ and the White House. 'The DOJ and FBI reviewed the Epstein Files and reached the conclusion set out in the July 6 memo,' Bondi and Blanche said in a statement. 'Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts. As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings.' The White House has dismissed the ongoing focus on the Epstein files, arguing that it's distracting from the administration's accomplishments and aiding Democrats' efforts to damage the president. But a growing and bipartisan chorus of lawmakers have since called for a full release of the documents, forcing Republican leaders on Capitol Hill to cut short their legislative session to avoid taking a series of votes on the matter. A Wall Street Journal report last week – about a letter bearing Trump's name and the outline of a naked woman that was included in an album given to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2023 – has also ratcheted up the pressure on Trump. Trump denied writing the letter and has since sued the Wall Street Journal over its publication of that article.

Trump illegally held up funding for Head Start preschool program, watchdog says
Trump illegally held up funding for Head Start preschool program, watchdog says

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump illegally held up funding for Head Start preschool program, watchdog says

The Health and Human Services Department disputed the findings. WASHINGTON – The Trump administration spent three months illegally holding up federal funding for Head Start, a preschool and early childhood education program that hundreds of thousands of low-income families rely on, according to an independent government watchdog. The conclusion came in a July 23 decision from the Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan oversight group. The GAO found that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees Head Start, broke the law by withholding previously approved funds for the program between January and mid-April. In doing so, the administration violated the Impoundment Control Act, which requires presidents to spend money allocated by Congress. Read more: A 'constitutional crisis?' Democrats, Republicans spar over Donald Trump's spending order HHS slashed Head Start's funding by more than $825 million compared to the same period last year, the GAO said, amounting to a 65% funding cut. It's the third such violation uncovered by the watchdog since the start of President Donald Trump's second term in the White House in January. In April, the Trump administration was considering zeroing out funding for Head Start altogether for the next fiscal year, USA TODAY first reported. After nationwide backlash and legal challenges, HHS reversed course on the budget proposal in May. Read more: Dem AGs sue White House to counter cuts to Head Start, Medicaid for immigrants Andrew Nixon, the chief spokesman for HHS, said the agency disputes the GAO's findings but did not explain why. "HHS did not impound Head Start funds," he said in a statement to USA TODAY. Despite the earlier issues, recent disbursements for Head Start have improved and are now comparable to the same time last year, said Yasmina Vinci, executive director for the National Head Start Association. In a statement, she did not comment directly on the GAO's impoundment accusations. "We're grateful that so many are standing up for Head Start, recognizing the vital role it plays in communities across the country," she said. Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store