logo
Kevin Kiley rips Newsom's redistricting plan, says governor's out for personal gain

Kevin Kiley rips Newsom's redistricting plan, says governor's out for personal gain

Yahoo3 hours ago
Rep. Kevin Kiley's rise as a Republican congressional force could be threatened by Gov. Gavin Newsom's redistricting plan — and Kiley Thursday fought the proposal with both personal and policy weapons.
The Roseville Republican talked about how he's asking House Speaker Mike Johnson to set up a bipartisan commission on redistricting reform.
Kiley is also pushing legislation that would bar mid-decade redrawing of congressional district lines, a plan that has some bipartisan support.
There was also a personal touch from Kiley at his news conference following the Newsom-led rally promoting the creation of new California congressional districts.
Currently Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats but see the potential to pick up a net of five more seats in the state, including Kiley's.
Redrawing his district to make it more likely to elect a Democrat, Kiley said Thursday, is 'no surprise. Governor Newsom has been targeting me for some time.'
The reason for that, Kiley said, is 'he is trying to silence and indeed eliminate political opposition.'
The congressman said that if his district is redrawn 'I would nevertheless be in a position to win whatever district they create,' he said.
A solid Republican district
Kiley's district includes part of the eastern Sacramento area and winds from Lake Tahoe to Death Valley. He won by 11 percentage points last year, and independent analysts regard his seat as 'likely Republican' if the lines remain the same.
Newsom wants the Legislature to pass an amendment that would set a special election Nov. 4. Voters would be asked to approve new congressional lines that would be used in the next three congressional election cycles, starting next year.
Currently, those decisions are up to a nonpartisan Citizen Redistricting Commission, approved by voters in 2010. It would get its power back after the 2030 census.
Newsom's action is a reaction to the fast-developing effort by President Donald Trump and lawmakers in Texas, and possibly other Republican-run states, to redraw their maps to give the GOP advantages in the 2026 election.
Currently Democrats need a net gain of three seats to win control of the House, and typically in mid-term elections the party running the White House loses seats. In 2018, during Trump's first term, Republicans had a net loss of 40 seats and Democrats regained control.
'An attack on the voters'
Kiley, speaking from his district office in Rocklin, explained that redrawing lines, no matter who they favor, is a bad idea.
Because California's line-drawing commission was approved by voters, he said, trying to overturn its decision is 'an attack on the voters of California, an attack on democracy in California and across the country.'
He cited a POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll taken in late July and early August showing state voters favored the independent commission as line-drawers by a 2 to 1 margin.
'That should be the end of the story, right?' asked Kiley.
Kiley vs. Newsom
He also maintained that Newsom was using the issue for personal gain.
The governor 'has been posturing to run for president since his very first day in office as our governor. The problem is he doesn't have any record to run on,' said Kiley.
'He's trying to find some issue, any issue to create a spectacle' to center attention on himself, Kiley said. 'That's what it's all about.'
The redistricting fight is the latest chapter in a bitter series of skirmishes between the ambitious up and coming Republican and a governor who appears to have his sights on bigger things himself.
Before being elected to the House in 2022, Kiley was a leader in the ultimately unsuccessful bid to recall Newsom, authoring a book titled, 'Recall Newsom: The Case against America's Most Corrupt Governor.'
Once he arrived at the Capitol in 2023, Kiley kept firing away in floor speeches, tweets and whatever form of communication he could find.
Pouring gas on the political fire
Kiley got his biggest win this spring, when Congress passed legislation that overturned California's bid to phase out gasoline-powered vehicles.
After final passage of the bill, Kiley told reporters, 'This is a very clear example of one person in this case, the governor, Gavin Newsom, issuing an order trying to dictate the choice of an automobile for millions and millions of Californians, actually tens of millions across the country,'
Kiley, 40, could move quickly into positions of influence because House Republicans are not as closely tied to the seniority system for promotion as Democrats. The median age of House member is 57.5.
He chairs the Education and Workforce Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education Subcommittee, a watchdog on those issues.
Kiley maintained that his own ambitions are not what's driving his efforts on redistricting.
Whatever happens, he said, 'I feel at the end of the day we'll be fine.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption
New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption

New York Times

time10 minutes ago

  • New York Times

New Orleans Mayor Joins Long Line of Louisiana Politicians Accused of Corruption

Hundred-dollar bills stashed in a freezer. Riverboat casino licenses sold to the highest bidder. Truckloads of granite traded in a quid pro quo. Louisiana has a long and colorful history of political corruption allegations, which for decades have ensnared lawmakers at many levels of government. The most recent was Mayor LaToya Cantrell of New Orleans, who was indicted on Friday after a lengthy federal investigation. According to the charges laid out in the indictment, Ms. Cantrell abused public funds to facilitate a romantic relationship with her bodyguard, a city police officer, and then sought to cover up the personal time they spent together in New Orleans and on out-of-state trips while he claimed to be on duty. Ms. Cantrell's lawyer said on Friday that he needed to review the indictment before commenting; he declined to comment again on Saturday. Here's a look back at some of the most significant corruption scandals in Louisiana history: Richard Leche After the assassination of Huey Long, a popular Louisiana governor turned United States senator, in 1935, Richard Leche emerged as his successor. But Mr. Leche's single term as governor came to an early end when he resigned in 1939 amid corruption allegations. His resignation failed to stave off charges, and in 1940, he was convicted of mail fraud in a plot that prosecutors said involved a dealer selling trucks to the state's Highway Department at excessively high prices, and then giving Mr. Leche a kickback. He served five years in prison before President Harry S. Truman pardoned him in 1953. Huey and Earl Long Earl Long, the lieutenant governor under Leche in 1939, was swept into the state's highest office when his predecessor resigned. Mr. Leche's scandals loomed over Mr. Long's first term, and in 1940, Long was himself charged with embezzlement. The charges didn't stick, however, and Mr. Long would go on to win the governorship in two elections, holding office from 1948 to 1952 and from 1956 to 1960, in a career defined by personal excess and eccentric behavior. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?
Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?

Forbes

time10 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Urban Deployments Raise Questions: What Is Our Military For?

As noted in a recent report by the Center for American Progress, in 2022 Donald Trump stated that 'the next President should use every power at his disposal to restore order — and, if necessary, that includes sending in the National Guard or the troops' to conduct law enforcement activities on U.S. soil. In 2023, said that if restored to office, that he he would send troops to U.S. cities to combat crime: 'The next time, I'm not waiting. … We don't have to wait any longer.' Ominously, the president has talked of using troops to combat 'the enemy within." That time has come. Earlier this year the Trump administration deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles to deal with immigration protests. At the time, California Attorney General Rob Bonta said 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilizing California National Guard troops.' The new target of troops deploying to a U.S. city is in Washington, DC. On Saturday August 16th West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrissey annnounced a plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard member of his state's National Guard to Washington, DC, stating that 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President [Donald]The question is why? Violent crime in Washington, DC is projected to be down 26% this year from 2024. The demonstrations in Los Angeles were overwhelmingly peacaful until the show of force – police, National Guard and Marines – prompted clashes between protesters and military and law enforcement officials. Local law enforcement officers have gone so far as to fire munitions that have left both protesters and journalists injured. Many veterans have taken exception to the deployments, and some have filed an amicus brief in support of California Governor Gavin Newsom's opposition to the troop presence. One of them, Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton, said 'This is the politicisation of the armed forces. It casts the military in a terrible light." President Trump's rationale for sending troops into U.S. cities is the Insurrection Act of 1807, which does indeed allow the president to deploy troops for domestic law enforcement in the event of an insurrection. But neither the immigration protests in Los Angeles nor the crime rate in DC qualify as an insurrection, by any stretch of the imagination. The deployments are deeply disturbing, and should be questioned by our elected leaders across the spectrum, along with veterans and average citizens concerned about federal overreach. Questions about the troop deployments need to be louder and more persistent. This is not a partisan issue. It is a basic issue about the role of the. military in a democracy. We can't afford to ignore it and go about business as usual.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store