Anxious parents face tough choices on AI, from concern at what it might do to fear of their kids missing out
Yet some parents are still trying to remain gatekeepers to the technology.
'In my circle of friends and family, I'm the only one exploring AI with my child,' remarked Melissa Franklin, mother of a 7-year-old boy and a law student in Kentucky.
'I don't understand the technology behind AI,' she said, 'but I know it's inevitable, and I'd rather give my son a head start than leave him overwhelmed.'
'Benefits and risks'
The path is all the more difficult for parents given the lack of scientific research on AI's effects on users.
Several parents cite a study published in June by MIT, showing that brain activity and memory were more stimulated in individuals not using generative AI than in those who had access to it.
'I'm afraid it will become a shortcut,' explained a father-of-three who preferred to remain anonymous. 'After this MIT study, I want them to use it only to deepen their knowledge.'
This caution shapes many parents' approaches.
Tal prefers to wait before letting his sons use AI tools. Melissa Franklin only allows her son to use AI with her supervision to find information 'we can't find in a book, through Google, or on YouTube'.
For her, children must be encouraged to 'think for themselves', with or without AI.
But one father – a computer engineer with a 15-year-old – doesn't believe kids will learn AI skills from their parents anyway.
'That would be like claiming that kids learn how to use TikTok from their parents,' he said. It's usually 'the other way around'.
Watkins, himself a father, says he is 'very concerned' about the new forms that generative AI is taking, but considers it necessary to read about the subject and 'have in-depth conversations about it with our children'.
'They're going to use artificial intelligence,' he said, 'so I want them to know the potential benefits and risks.'
The chief executive of AI chip giant Nvidia, Jensen Huang, often speaks of AI as 'the greatest equalisation force that we have ever known', democratising learning and knowledge.
But Watkins fears a different reality: 'Parents will view this as a technology that will be used if you can afford it, to get your kid ahead of everyone else'.
The computer scientist father readily acknowledged this disparity, saying: 'My son has an advantage because he has two parents with PhDs in computer science'.
'But that's 90% due to the fact that we are more affluent than average' – not their AI knowledge.
'That does have some pretty big implications,' Watkins said.
-Agence France-Presse

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
Why NZ should be clamping down on deepfake images
technology 42 minutes ago Denmark is set to clamp down on deepfake images, giving citizens copyright over their likeness and voice. A deepfake is an image, video or audio recording which has been digitally altered to appear to be someone else. They have become increasingly sophisticated with the rapid advancement of AI, and recent studies have shown that the vast majority of people can't distinguish between deepfake and real images So are New Zealand laws fit for purpose? Jesse finds out.

1News
a day ago
- 1News
YouTube threatens to sue Aus govt if roped into social media ban
Google has been warned its threats to sue won't sway the potential late inclusion of YouTube in Australia's world-first social media ban for children. The tech giant wrote to Communications Minister Anika Wells declaring it was considering its legal position if its video sharing platform was included in the ban for children 16 and under. The letter, first reported by the Daily Telegraph, flagged the ban could be challenged on the grounds it restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Signals the Australian government was contemplating an "abrupt policy reversal" prompted Google to seek further clarity. "YouTube is a video sharing platform, not a social media service, that offers benefit and value to younger Australians," a YouTube spokesperson said. ADVERTISEMENT "We have written directly to the government, urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process and protect the age-appropriate experiences and safeguards we provide for young Australians." The social media ban is due to come into effect in December. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Snapchat were among platforms covered when legislation passed parliament. YouTube was exempted, in a move TikTok described as a "sweetheart deal". "The government was firm in its decision that YouTube would be excluded because it is different and because of its value to younger Australians," a YouTube spokesperson told AAP. "This intention was repeatedly made clear in its public statements, including to the Australian parliament." But e-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has recommended a rethink, citing research showing children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than any other platform. ADVERTISEMENT "The new law will only restrict children under the age of 16 from having their own accounts — not accessing content on YouTube or any other service through links from the school or in a 'logged-out' state," she told the National Press Club in June. "There is nothing in the legislation that prevents educators with their own accounts from continuing to incorporate school-approved educational content on YouTube or any other service just as they do now." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese took a dim view of Google's attempt to muscle in on the decision-making process. "The minister will make these assessments... independent of any these threats that are made by the social media companies," he told ABC TV on Sunday. "I say to them that social media has a social responsibility. "There is no doubt that young people are being impacted adversely in their mental health by some of the engagement with social media and that is why the government has acted." The early findings of an age-verification trial found technologies could block young kids from social media platforms, but not without loopholes. ADVERTISEMENT Platforms will face penalties worth up to AUS$50 million (NZ$54.5 million) if caught not taking reasonable steps to prevent children 16 and under from creating accounts.


Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Observatory opens to the sky
PHOTO: IAN GRIFFIN After months of preparation, trips to the hardware store, more than a few late-night YouTube tutorials, and a memorable encounter with a Middlemarch nor'wester that sent all hundred kilograms of my first roof cartwheeling more than 30m across my paddock, I'm delighted to report that my dream has finally taken shape. I'm now the proud owner of an observatory. It sits out there now, squat and sturdy, in a corner of a Middlemarch field where the sky still feels wild and the view is to die for. I am pleased to report that the roof rolls off smoothly, powered by a garage door opener that makes a satisfyingly industrial clunk when it opens and closes. A Dunedin firm helped with the design, and after a few hard-earned lessons in wind dynamics, we seem to have got it right. Last week, I experienced first light, that magical moment when a telescope in a new home gets to do what it was made for. As the sky faded to velvet, I aligned the mount to the south celestial pole, checked the cables, took a deep breath, and aimed upwards. One after another, the familiar jewels of the southern sky appeared on my screen — Canopus and Achernar, the Magellanic Clouds smeared like silver brushstrokes across the darkness, the Tarantula Nebula quietly flexing its luminous muscles in the Large Cloud. Inside the warm room I'd built — a refuge against frosty nights — my coffee sat untouched. At 2am, I was lying flat on the floor of the observatory, staring up through the gap in the roof, entranced by the raw, unfiltered night sky and the whispering glow of our galaxy. It was quiet, cold, and absolutely perfect. And now, I face the pleasant dilemma of every new parent: what to name this latest arrival — something fitting, something that speaks to Middlemarch and the sky above it. I'm open to suggestions — if you've got an idea for a name, drop me a line. The only rule is that it must sound good echoing across a frosty paddock at midnight.