Guyana Says Soldiers Attacked In Disputed Border Region With Venezuela
Armed men in civilian clothing carried out three separate attacks on troops conducting patrols on the Cuyuni River in the disputed Essequibo region, the Guyana Defence Force (GDF) said.
"On each occasion, the Guyana Defence Force executed a measured response, and no rank sustained any injuries," it said in a statement, vowing to "continue to respond to acts of aggression along the Guyana-Venezuela border."
Both countries lay claim to Essequibo, which makes up two-thirds of Guyana's territory and is home to 125,000 of its 800,000 citizens.
Guyana has administered the region for decades, and insists Essequibo's frontiers were determined by an arbitration panel in 1899.
The Guyanese foreign ministry said it had condemned the attacks in a diplomatic note to Venezuelan authorities and asked that it launch an investigation "so that the perpetrators are arrested and brought to justice."
Venezuela claims the Essequibo River to the region's east forms a natural border recognized as far back as 1777.
The long-running squabble was revived in 2015 after US energy giant ExxonMobil discovered huge crude reserves in Essequibo and reached fever pitch in 2023 when Georgetown started auctioning off oil blocks in the region.
The find gave Guyana, a small English-speaking former British and Dutch colony, the largest crude oil reserves per capita in the world.
Caracas has since held a referendum asserting its claim to the territory, and has threatened to annex most of the region and make it Venezuela's 24th state.
It has also announced Essequibo will be included in gubernatorial elections planned for May 25, despite the UN's top court ordering it not to organize a vote there.
The GDF said Thursday it "remains resolute in its mission to protect Guyana's territorial integrity" and was taking "all necessary measures to safeguard the nation's borders and maintain peace and security within our beloved country."
Tensions calmed after the two countries' presidents agreed in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines last December 2023 to avoid any use of force, but were fanned again in February when Guyana said six of its soldiers were wounded in an ambush in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
21 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Israel Approves Major West Bank Settlement Project
Israel approved a major settlement project on Wednesday in an area of the occupied West Bank that the international community has warned threatens the viability of a future Palestinian state. Israel has long had ambitions to build on the roughly 12-square-kilometre (five-square-mile) parcel known as E1 just east of Jerusalem, but the plan had been stalled for years amid international opposition. The latest announcement also drew condemnation, with UN chief Antonio Guterres saying the settlement would effectively cleave the West Bank in two and pose an "existential threat" to a contiguous Palestinian state. Last week, Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich backed plans to build around 3,400 homes on the ultra-sensitive tract of land, which lies between Jerusalem and the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim. "I am pleased to announce that just a short while ago, the civil administration approved the planning for the construction of the E1 neighbourhood," the mayor of Maale Adumim, Guy Yifrach, said in a statement on Wednesday. All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA) slammed the latest move. "This undermines the chances of implementing the two-state solution, establishing a Palestinian state on the ground, and fragments its geographic and demographic unity," the PA's foreign ministry said in a statement. It added the move would entrench "division of the occupied West Bank into isolated areas and cantons that are disconnected from one another, turning them into something akin to real prisons, where movement is only possible through Israeli checkpoints and under the terror of armed settler militias". Israel heavily restricts the movement of West Bank Palestinians, who must obtain permits from authorities to travel through checkpoints to cross into east Jerusalem or Israel. Guterres repeated a call for Israel to "immediately halt all settlement activity", warning that the E1 project would be "an existential threat to the two-State solution", his spokesperson said. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy also rejected the plans, saying it would "divide a Palestinian state in two (and) mark a flagrant breach of international law". Jordan's King Abdullah II denounced the project as well, adding that "the two-state solution is the only way to achieve a just and comprehensive peace". Violence in the West Bank has soared since the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that triggered the Gaza war. Since then, Israeli troops and settlers have killed at least 971 Palestinians in the West Bank, including many militants, according to health ministry figures. Over the same period, at least 36 Israelis, including security forces, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military operations, according to official figures. Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO focusing on Jerusalem within the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, condemned the greenlighting of the E1 project. "Today's approval demonstrates how determined Israel is in pursuing what Minister Smotrich has described as a strategic programme to bury the possibility of a Palestinian state and to effectively annex the West Bank," he said. "This is a conscious Israeli choice to implement an apartheid regime," he added, calling on the international community to take urgent and effective measures against the move. Far-right Israeli ministers have in recent months openly called for Israel's annexation of the territory. Israeli NGO Peace Now, which monitors settlement activity in the West Bank, said last week that infrastructure work in E1 could begin within a few months, and housing construction within about a year. Excluding east Jerusalem, the West Bank is home to around three million Palestinians, as well as about 500,000 Israeli settlers.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Which European countries might send troops to Ukraine? – DW – 08/20/2025
US President Donald Trump is urging EU allies to send ground troops to Ukraine to secure a ceasefire and guarantee security there. Not every European state is prepared to do so though. Following talks about Ukraine in Washington early this week, Western states are working to fine tune the details of the much-discussed "security guarantees" for Ukraine. One important question is how a possible ceasefire could be secured along the more than 1,000-kilometer-long (621 miles) front line in eastern Ukraine. Another is which countries would be prepared to send soldiers to Ukraine? And how many, and with what sort of mandate? US President Donald Trump has spoken positively about supporting security guarantees for Ukraine but has left open exactly what they should look like. He has categorically ruled out the deployment of US troops on the ground in Ukraine. He seems to assume that Germany, France and the UK are prepared to send troops to Ukraine to secure peace, as he told US broadcaster Fox News after the talks in Washington. He suggested that the US would be prepared to provide air support. The German government does not seem to be as far advanced in its decision-making as Trump might like. "Germany's contribution tosecurity guarantees hasnot yet beendetermined and this issue will be decided at the political and military levels," German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday. He added that there were still too many uncertainties, for example, regarding further negotiations as well as the contribution of the US and other allies. "This will have to be discussed carefully. And these talks are currently taking place," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told DW. "So far Germany and its willingness to take responsibility in this conflict" cannot be described as lacking, he noted. What remains unclear is what mandate any international peacekeeping force might have. Germany's opposition Left Party (Die Linke) has expressed preference for a UN blue helmet deployment instead of a NATO-led mission so as to avoid any direct confrontation between NATO and Russia. Some members of Germany's Social Democrats, who are part of the country's ruling coalition, are also critical about NATO troops being deployed in Ukraine. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has shown himself to be open to sending a peacekeeping force to Ukraine in principle, but only in the event of a permanent ceasefire. Should this occur, London would be prepared to take a leading role in enforcing security guarantees for Ukraine, Starmer has said. This could also include the deployment of troops to monitor the ceasefire, for example. In February, British newspaper reported on a plan by London that would send 30,000 European troops to police a ceasefire. These would be deployed to guard Ukraine's cities and ports, as well as critical infrastructure such as nuclear power plants, far from the front line. The mission would also rely heavily on technical surveillance. The use of drones, satellites, reconnaissance aircraft and naval patrols in the Black Sea were all possibilities. In a virtual meeting with other leaders on Tuesday, Starmer said that, "Coalition of the Willing planning teams would meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended." French President Emmanuel Macron recently warned against rushing into a deal without safeguards. "This peace must not be rushed and must be backed by solid guarantees, otherwise we will be starting over again," he told French broadcaster TF1. In the past, Macron has not ruled out sending French troops to Ukraine as part of a peacekeeping force. In March, he presented a plan to send a "reassurance force" suggesting this might involve "a few thousand troops" per country, which would be stationed in "certain strategic locations" such as Kyiv, Odessa and Lviv. The mission would be defensive in nature, not for direct combat operations, and would act as a deterrent and for stabilization and training. France has already carried out exercises in which conditions in Ukraine were simulated. During the maneuvers, soldiers received training on how to behave in the event of a Russian attack via Belarus. Drone defense, electronic warfare and tactical coordination were also part of the training. Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal and the Baltic states have also signaled their willingness to participate in a possible peacekeeping force in Ukraine. However other European states are more cautious. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk rejects the deployment of Polish soldiers, which he says, would be extremely unpopular with the Polish population. Polls say that 85% of Poles reject the deployment of their own soldiers, even for a peacekeeping mission. Hungary and Slovakia are also opposed to the deployment of European troops. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has even described the possible deployment of Western troops as "warmongering." Austria and Italy are also cautious. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is particularly skeptical about the deployment of NATO troops and would prefer a UN-led mission. Meloni has so far avoided making any clear commitments. In any case, nothing will happen without a prior agreement with Russia. But Moscow has so far categorically rejected the deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine and there is little indication that would change, even if there are signs that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy could soon meet in person. German Foreign Minister Wadephul remains skeptical. "I would advise that we first wait and see whether there are any talks at all," he told DW. "And secondly, if there are talks, whether there is an agreement that is resilient. And there, we are all waiting for Russia."To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
2 days ago
- DW
The significance of the Donbas in Russia's war in Ukraine – DW – 08/20/2025
At a recent meeting with his US counterpart, Russian President Vladimir Putin once again suggested that full control of Donbas was a central criterion for ending the war in Ukraine. Why is the region so important to him? In their meeting in Alaska on Monday,Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, are reported to have agreed that Ukraine should cede Donetsk and Luhansk. Putin wants Ukraine's armed forces to withdraw completely from the areas. In exchange, he would freeze the fighting along the rest of the front line — particularly in the southern Ukrainian regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, which are currently largely occupied by Russian forces. In recent years, Putin has repeatedly emphasized the importance of Donetsk and Luhansk, which together make up the Donbas. He says the region is historically linked to Russia and part of the legacy of the Soviet Union. In terms of constitutional law, however, the region belongs to Ukraine — a fact that was already undisputed in the Soviet era. Though the Crimean Peninsula was only transferred from Russia to Ukraine in 1954 by the Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev — a source of dispute in Russia to this day — the Donetsk and Luhansk regions have been part of Ukraine since the founding of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1919. And, for a long time, this was undisputed. The Donbas has long had a strong Russian character. As early as the 19th century, and in Soviet times later, it was an industrial heartland, rich in natural resources. As the coal-mining, steel and chemical sectors were developed in the 20th century, people from all over the Soviet Union, above all from Russia, moved here in search of work. Even before 2014, a clear majority of the population spoke Russian; while many people in the more western parts of Ukraine wanted closer ties to the European Union than to the Kremlin, this part of eastern Ukraine maintained close ties with Moscow. The former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, who was supported by the Kremlin, was born in Donetsk, and it was in this region that most of his base lived. It was when he was overthrown during the Maidan revolution of 2014 and fled to Russia that the Donbas became a bone of contention between Moscow and Kyiv. Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula, and unrest spread in eastern Ukraine. Armed groups, supported by Russian weapons and paramilitaries, announced the establishment of self-proclaimed "people's republics" in Donetsk and Luhansk. If the Kremlin was hoping for wide support from Russian-speaking Ukrainians, it was soon to be proved wrong. In fact, the separatist war in eastern Ukraine fueled resentment of the Kremlin. Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who grew up speaking Russian, won a landslide victory in the 2019 presidential election, winning in the areas of eastern Ukraine still held by Kyiv. His approach to end the conflict without giving up Ukrainian sovereignty met with broad approval. The Donbas was a leitmotif for Putin when he launched Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In a televised speech, he justified his "special military operation" by saying that the self-proclaimed people's republics had asked Russia for help. He even claimed that the Russian-speaking residents in the areas of eastern Ukraine that were controlled by Kyiv faced "genocide." Today, all of the Luhansk region and about 70% of Donetsk are under the Kremlin's control. Thus, about 88% of the Donbas is occupied by Russia. More than 4 million people are estimated to live in the two regions, which boast not only rich deposits of coal and iron ore, but also lithium, cobalt, titanium and other rare earths that are key for high-tech goods. The two regions are also vital for the Kremlin to maintain a land connection to the Crimean Peninsula, which can only be reached from Russian territory via the Kerch bridge. Should the Kremlin be granted control of the Donbas and the front line in the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions be frozen, it effectively would mean that Russia's occupation of these areas would continue, Crimea would be accessible via land. And Ukraine would have no access to the Sea of Azov, an inlet connected to the Black Sea that is currently bordered by Ukraine and Russia. For Ukraine, too, the significance of the Donbas goes beyond economics. The government has established a "fortress belt" in the areas that it still holds. It is the military's most important line of defense, and it has made it so far impossible for Russia to advance further into central Ukraine. The fortress belt comprises several key cities and fortified positions, including Kramatorsk, Sloviansk and Kostyantynivka, which Ukraine has held onto doggedly despite heavy losses. Behind this belt lie the open plains of central Ukraine, which would be extremely vulnerable to a Russian offensive without a line of defense. Thus, Zelenskyy will do his best to not give up the remaining areas of Donbas without far-reaching and reliable security guarantees. This would in any case be hard for him to do from a domestic point of view. The constitution does not allow the president to make such a concession, which would be extremely unpopular in Ukraine. According to a survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, about 75% of Ukrainians are against territorial concessions to view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
