A personal finance expert saw her friends leaving 'tens of thousands' on the table with money mistakes — but it wasn't their $5-a-day coffees
Young professionals are leaving thousands of dollars of their hard-earned money on the table, a personal finance expert says.
But, she said, their money mistakes have nothing to do with their daily purchases.
As a New Yorker, Yuval Shuminer, the founder and CEO of the fintech app Piere, was used to expensive coffees and brunches.
"It is an absurdly expensive city," Shuminer told Business Insider. "As you go about day-to-day life, you start to rack up a lot of these expenses across coffee that costs $7, an avocado toast that costs $12."
But in 2022, when the economy started to turn, Shuminer saw some of her friends get laid off and look at their finances more critically.
"The conclusion that we came to is that we're taking so much brainpower to think about the $5 that we spend on coffee every day," Shuminer said. "It is so constricting to our lives."
Young professionals do make a lot of financial missteps. But the biggest one is holding their savings — sometimes tens of thousands of dollars — in accounts with 0.02% interest when market rates for high-yield savings accounts were more like 4.5%, said Shuminer.
"That alone is $10,000 they're leaving on the table," Shuminer said.
Shuminer, who studied behavioral economics, launched Piere in December 2023 in response to what she saw. She thought traditional budgeting apps focused too much on constraining spending rather than automating financial optimization. She realized that so many people weren't aware of how much money they could easily put in their pockets while instead focusing on these $5 purchases that shape their lifestyle.
"Instead of working with all these tools that focus on constraining people's budgets and limiting the amount that you're spending on these fun things, the way that we built Pierre is to say, those things are fine," Shuminer said. "But if you're leaving your money in savings without earning yield on it, or you're paying fees that you shouldn't be paying, those are the things that aren't OK."
Piere's ethos is to make your money work for you in the background, Shuminer said.
Most of Piere's users are lower or middle class, Shuminer said, who didn't necessarily learn early on how to manage money.
"Consumers are just so overwhelmed with the financial choices that they have to make that oftentimes they just don't do them," Shuminer said. "Because of inertia, because of anxiety, because of the frictions that they need to overcome in order to make some of these decisions."
She said Piere does the hard work for them, keeping track of the financial marketplace, which changes daily.
"Every single day, something is changing," Shuminer said, such as a new savings account with a better rate.
"Money is a tool — you're not collecting money just to collect money," she added. "You're collecting money for it to create more value in your life so that you can allocate it to the things that are going to make you happier or better off."
Shuminer said the biggest financial oversight she sees people in their 20s making is not realizing the impact that even small investments can make.
"$10 a month, $100 a month, has a lot of compounding effect," she said, which can turn into a healthy savings pot by age 40, and certainly by 70.
"It's like it's some hidden secret that I think a lot of people realize when it's a little bit too late," Shuminer said. "Our goal is to help people."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Drone overload: Too many people want to sell drones to the US military
A lot of US defense companies are building similar small aerial drones, saturating the market. The Ukraine war and demand signals from the Pentagon have incited the competitive environment. But there are concerns the products are too alike and the military won't buy enough, industry insiders said. Drones are in high demand at the Petagon, but insiders say the market is already jammed with too many lookalike quadcopters and startups chasing the same investments and military dollars. "We're seeing a lot of companies in the space," one defense industry investor, who requested anonymity to speak freely on the topic, told Business Insider, noting that in many cases, there may not be significant differences in capability between the products that these companies are delivering. The relatively niche small uncrewed aerial vehicle market has seen a boom in competition in recent years, with many companies developing the actual uncrewed aircraft, as well as software programs and modular payloads. The Department of Defense has long used large drones like the MQ-9 Reaper built for reconnaissance and combat strike missions, but there is a growing recognition as a result of the Ukraine war and engagements in the Middle East that low-cost, attritable first-person-view (FPV) drones have a place in modern warfare. Heightened interest in these capabilities is, in turn, fueling the drone market and creating new research and development pathways even without programs of record. The yearslong war in Ukraine has driven significant advancements in aerial drones but also uncrewed ground and surface vehicles, sensors, electronic warfare, reconnaissance and intelligence systems, and more. "In the last five years, new technologies that are on display in Ukraine, they have a pretty big impact on warfare," Michael Brown, a partner with venture capital firm Shield Capital, told BI. Within the US market, a lot of new drones are in technology demonstration programs. DoD is effectively putting out information on the types of systems and capabilities it wants. Various industry partners are applying with their solutions. Eventually, these will evolve into programs of record, and the competition will thin down dramatically when awards are granted to specific companies. Melissa Johnson, US Special Operations Command's acquisition executive, said the acquisitions, technology, and logistics team was "transparent with industry when issuing solicitations to communicate the needs of Special Operations Forces." She said that this process involves looking at a variety of factors, including "performance, manufacturability, operational considerations, and affordability." As the market becomes oversaturated with drone makers producing similar products, companies are increasingly trying to distinguish themselves in capability, as well as adaptability to countermeasures, such as electronic warfare. Not all of the companies rushing in are going to be competitive in the long run. Some won't be able to create a great product; others may not be able to scale up production to meet military demand. One drone maker, who requested anonymity to speak openly on the topic, said the current situation is comparable to the early automobile industry. "100 years ago, you had a bunch of companies trying to produce cars, and at the end of the day, the strong survived. I think that's what you're starting to see now." Drones are not exactly a new focus for American defense companies. In the mid- to late-2010s, a small but still substantial number of businesses were developing drones like small UAVs amid the growth of commercial drone development. Costs, mass production, and capabilities weren't clear, though, and many of these companies were unsuccessful or shifted focus. That could be shaping how investors think about where to put — or not put — money into the market even if there are many more companies to work with. "I think investors are a little scared about investing into an industry that historically, for small drones, has not been very profitable," the drone maker said. The nuance there, he said, is that Ukraine's use of drones and its sprawling defense industry have demonstrated a different look at the modern battlefield and the industries needed to sustain a war. Kyiv's drone makers are pumping hundreds of thousands of them, many with Chinese drone parts, out each month at relatively low costs. The US situation is a one-for-one, though. Chinese parts are a definite no-go, increasing the need for domestic supply chains. That said, there isn't a wartime demand for millions of combat drones the way there is in Ukraine. One of the biggest questions is whether the Defense Department will buy enough small drones to make these business endeavors profitable in the near term. Looking at small drones, "if the US continues to only purchase 12- to 15,000 drones a year, having 300 vendors is probably not going to satisfy market dynamics of returning the majority to those vendors," Sarah Pearson, deputy director for commercial operations at DIU, told BI. DIU's perspective is that competition in the market can push vendors to build better capabilities and ultimately lead to the best possible product. Concerns, however, remain over whether DoD would continually buy enough drones to keep businesses going. "If we buy, call it 10,000 drones, unless we're in high-intensity conflict," the industry investor said, "I don't necessarily know that I see a world where we're replacing 10,000 drones every year." And if that's not the case, it is an issue for the drone business. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Drone overload: Too many people want to sell drones to the US military
Drones are in high demand at the Petagon, but insiders say the market is already jammed with too many lookalike quadcopters and startups chasing the same investments and military dollars. "We're seeing a lot of companies in the space," one defense industry investor, who requested anonymity to speak freely on the topic, told Business Insider, noting that in many cases, there may not be significant differences in capability between the products that these companies are delivering. The relatively niche small uncrewed aerial vehicle market has seen a boom in competition in recent years, with many companies developing the actual uncrewed aircraft, as well as software programs and modular payloads. Lessons from new fights The Department of Defense has long used large drones like the MQ-9 Reaper built for reconnaissance and combat strike missions, but there is a growing recognition as a result of the Ukraine war and engagements in the Middle East that low-cost, attritable first-person-view (FPV) drones have a place in modern warfare. Heightened interest in these capabilities is, in turn, fueling the drone market and creating new research and development pathways even without programs of record. The yearslong war in Ukraine has driven significant advancements in aerial drones but also uncrewed ground and surface vehicles, sensors, electronic warfare, reconnaissance and intelligence systems, and more. "In the last five years, new technologies that are on display in Ukraine, they have a pretty big impact on warfare," Michael Brown, a partner with venture capital firm Shield Capital, told BI. Only the strong are likely to survive Within the US market, a lot of new drones are in technology demonstration programs. DoD is effectively putting out information on the types of systems and capabilities it wants. Various industry partners are applying with their solutions. Eventually, these will evolve into programs of record, and the competition will thin down dramatically when awards are granted to specific companies. Melissa Johnson, US Special Operations Command's acquisition executive, said the acquisitions, technology, and logistics team was "transparent with industry when issuing solicitations to communicate the needs of Special Operations Forces." She said that this process involves looking at a variety of factors, including "performance, manufacturability, operational considerations, and affordability." As the market becomes oversaturated with drone makers producing similar products, companies are increasingly trying to distinguish themselves in capability, as well as adaptability to countermeasures, such as electronic warfare. Not all of the companies rushing in are going to be competitive in the long run. Some won't be able to create a great product; others may not be able to scale up production to meet military demand. One drone maker, who requested anonymity to speak openly on the topic, said the current situation is comparable to the early automobile industry. "100 years ago, you had a bunch of companies trying to produce cars, and at the end of the day, the strong survived. I think that's what you're starting to see now." Cautious investing Drones are not exactly a new focus for American defense companies. In the mid- to late-2010s, a small but still substantial number of businesses were developing drones like small UAVs amid the growth of commercial drone development. Costs, mass production, and capabilities weren't clear, though, and many of these companies were unsuccessful or shifted focus. That could be shaping how investors think about where to put — or not put — money into the market even if there are many more companies to work with. "I think investors are a little scared about investing into an industry that historically, for small drones, has not been very profitable," the drone maker said. The nuance there, he said, is that Ukraine's use of drones and its sprawling defense industry have demonstrated a different look at the modern battlefield and the industries needed to sustain a war. Kyiv's drone makers are pumping hundreds of thousands of them, many with Chinese drone parts, out each month at relatively low costs. The US situation is a one-for-one, though. Chinese parts are a definite no-go, increasing the need for domestic supply chains. That said, there isn't a wartime demand for millions of combat drones the way there is in Ukraine. One of the biggest questions is whether the Defense Department will buy enough small drones to make these business endeavors profitable in the near term. Looking at small drones, "if the US continues to only purchase 12- to 15,000 drones a year, having 300 vendors is probably not going to satisfy market dynamics of returning the majority to those vendors," Sarah Pearson, deputy director for commercial operations at DIU, told BI. DIU's perspective is that competition in the market can push vendors to build better capabilities and ultimately lead to the best possible product. Concerns, however, remain over whether DoD would continually buy enough drones to keep businesses going. "If we buy, call it 10,000 drones, unless we're in high-intensity conflict," the industry investor said, "I don't necessarily know that I see a world where we're replacing 10,000 drones every year." And if that's not the case, it is an issue for the drone business.
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Rare earth minerals are the biggest card China can play in its negotiations with Trump
China has a significant card to play in its trade negotiations with the US, which could not only put the Trump administration in a bind but also impact a wide range of consumer goods. Rare earth minerals, namely scandium, yttrium, and 15 types of lanthanides, usually sit unnoticed at the bottom of the periodic table. But experts in rare earths have told Business Insider that a shortage of these minerals — which mainly come from China — could induce a shortage in everything from aircraft parts to TV remotes. "It's not industry agnostic because rare earths are used in everything from TVs and laptops and phones to cancer treatments and MRI scanners to automotives to defense," said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Especially as a bedrock to the automotive industry, it is really critical because our automotive manufacturing industry was getting to a point where it had to halt operations and close manufacturing plants without access to these rare earths," Baskaran added. The importance of critical minerals came into focus when China cut off its supply to the US after Trump imposed tariffs, as high as 245% for some goods, on the manufacturing hub in a trade war that escalated between February and May. The two countries have since de-escalated tensions through trade talks after Trump agreed to lower duties on China to 30% for 90 days starting from May 14. After the latest trade talks in London in mid-June, China has agreed to reopen export channels of its critical minerals to the US — at least for now. "China built up its industry in a cheap and not necessarily ecologically refined manner, and the US said, 'That's very inexpensive, so we do not need to have this kind of industry in our country,'" Laura Lewis, professor of chemical engineering at the Northwestern University College of Engineering, saud. "And that was the case for many years." Bilateral relations with China remain fragile According to data from the 2024 US Geological Survey, 70% of critical mineral imports to the US came from China, followed by 13% from Malaysia. China also processes nearly 90% of the world's rare earth minerals, according to the International Energy Agency. Though the Chinese Embassy in Washington, DC, did not directly confirm how long rare earth licenses will remain issued to US manufacturers, a spokesperson told BI in a statement that "China has reviewed and approved a certain number of export license applications for rare-earth-related items." "Rare-earth-related items have dual-use attributes, with both military and civilian purposes, imposing export controls on such items is in line with international practices," the spokesperson added. Drew DeLong, lead in geopolitical dynamics practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm, told BI that manufacturers are going to stockpile as much rare earth material as possible during the brief reprieve in US-China relations, in anticipation of more supply chain disruptions. DeLong said that by August, when the tariff suspension expires, the US-China relation would reach a critical decision point where it "must either coalesce or collapse." "Markets now wait to see whether Beijing actually resumes outbound shipments, and whether Washington delivers on its part of the rollback, " DeLong added. "There already appears to be hedging on trade tensions flaring up again." America may need to work with what it has The US once had a single operating rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, but it went bankrupt in 2015. Molycorp, its operator, filed for bankruptcy protection due to slumping rare earth prices and ballooning costs. Meanwhile, China has spent decades building its capacity to process rare earths. Other countries, like Japan, have diversified where they get their rare earth metals to avoid relying on China. Lewis, of Northwestern University, told BI that the US not only has a long way to go, but it may simply lack certain types of metals, even if it could extract others. Lewis said that the US lacks a category of heavy rare earths necessary for magnets to endure hot environments like motors. "We're going to have to work with our allies and nature to get what we need," said Lewis, "Because I cannot possibly imagine that the investment it would take to get our rare minerals from asteroids is going to be less than what we can already achieve on earth through recycling and a thoughtful use of resources." "The philosophy in Silicon Valley is just throw enough time and money at it, and you'll get it and fast, but nothing that we can do to get the rare earth industry healthy is going to happen fast," Lewis added. "Nature's smarter than we are."
