Minnesota State Fair getting pay-by-mobile parking in 2025
The City of Falcon Heights is bringing pay-by-mobile parking to streets near the Minnesota State Fairgrounds in 2025.
Parking zones will cost $25 per day, and there will be about 1,000 spots available.
The measure passed 5-0 at a Falcon Heights City Council meeting Wednesday night.
FALCON HEIGHTS, Minn. (FOX 9) - The City of Falcon Heights on Wednesday voted unanimously to approve pay-by-mobile parking for the Minnesota State Fair starting this year.
The city council met Wednesday night and voted 5-0 to implement the program in time for the State Fair, one of the largest in the country.
What we know
If you plan on driving to the Great Minnesota Get-Together, there should be more parking options on streets near the State Fairgrounds. The measure creates paid parking zones in neighborhoods east of Snelling Avenue that provide about 1,000 spots near the State Fair.
Why you should care
City officials say the program will charge a flat fee of $25 per day for vehicles to park between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. during the 12 days of the Minnesota State Fair. Fees can be paid online through a web site, app or automated pay-by-phone line. Enforcement will be tied through a vehicle's license plate.
The program will also include hiring trained ambassadors to be in parking zones to direct traffic, answer questions and enhance public safety.
The city approved five actions related to the program, including a one-year agreement with ParkMobile to be the vendor. Under the agreement, the City of Falcon Heights will receive about 80% of the fees.
Dig deeper
City officials say residents who live on streets in the designated parking zone will receive one free parking pass in the mail starting in July. They'll have the option to request additional passes, and there will be up to 600 properties eligible for the passes.
What they're saying
Falcon Heights Mayor Randy Gustafson reacted to the vote Wednesday night.
"Pay-by-mobile parking provides an excellent solution to promote safety for our Falcon Heights residents and the hundreds of thousands of visitors we welcome to our city during the Minnesota State Fair," Gustafson said in a statement. "We heard from our residents during this process on how we could improve the plan, and we believe the version adopted by the City Council will meet the needs of our community."
Timeline
Temporary parking zone signs will be installed before the start of the Minnesota State Fair, and removed after Labor Day.
The Source
The measure was passed at the Falcon Heights City Council meeting Wednesday night.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Cruze's Midyear Money Reset
Spring cleaning gets all the attention, according to finance expert Rachel Cruze, but in a recent video, she proposed another seasonal habit worth adopting: 'a fall reset.' Find Out: Read Next: Of course, Cruze isn't talking about organizing your closets. This reset is largely financial, though it can apply to any area of your life. With kids heading back to school and the holiday season on the horizon, she said it's the perfect time for a 'fresh start' before year's end. It's also a chance to clean up any bad habits picked up over the summer or to reset goals you may have drifted away from earlier in the year. Here's how Cruze recommended going about it. Get Back on Budget Cruze is the first to admit that everyone falls off their goals and budget plans, herself included. But, she emphasized, 'Getting back on track and knowing where your paycheck is going [will] help you so much.' In a time when high prices are sticking around and tariff-driven cost increases are showing up, staying on top of your spending is even more essential. 'I firmly believe that budgeting is one of the non-negotiables when it comes to winning with money. So that needs to be a part of your plan,' she said. Cruze prefers using the EveryDollar budgeting app, but ultimately, the best tool is the one you'll actually use. Check Out: Review What's Changed Part of the reset involves reviewing your budget with fresh eyes to identify patterns that have been 'consistent for months and months and months.' Cleaning up even a few bad spending habits, she said, not only saves money but feels good because you're back in control. Reevaluate Your Budget Needs Don't just revert to your old budget — things may have changed since you last looked. Cruze recommended reevaluating big goals for saving, spending and investing to ensure they're still realistic. If you overshot, now is a great time to recalibrate. 'So, if last January you set out to save $1,000 a month, but are only saving half of that, you adjust your goal so that you know it can be achieved,' she said. 'Change some things, [but] be realistic about it, because we're halfway through the year.' Clear Your Data Another surprising way to reset? Remove your personal data from the internet. Cruze recommended using a service like Delete Me to wipe your information from sketchy data broker sites. She warned that your personal info is basically 'like a billboard with your name, your address, your email, even your kids' names … on sketchy data broker websites.' These companies sell your data for money and increase your risk for scams and fraud. Plan for Remaining Expenses Cruze also suggested planning ahead for all the remaining expenses in the year, especially those that creep up fast. Think: back-to-school shopping, Labor Day trips or parties and the long stretch of holidays from Halloween to New Year's Eve. 'The last half of the year just flies,' she warned. She said, ask yourself: 'What are line items [I] need to add to the budget so that we can be saving month after month to prepare for these things?' Re-Engage Routines Lastly, Cruze advised reengaging with routines that may have slipped during summer, whether that's bedtimes, screen time or impulse spending. For her own family, one habit that often falls by the wayside is meal planning. They end up ordering pizza instead of making something more affordable, she admitted. Getting back into routines, she said, sets you up to make better decisions with your money and your time. More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall 6 Popular SUVs That Aren't Worth the Cost -- and 6 Affordable Alternatives This article originally appeared on Rachel Cruze's Midyear Money Reset


Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. passed a $30 minimum wage for tourism workers. Then came the warring ballot measures
It's the summer of the burn-it-down ballot measure in Los Angeles. For the past three months, labor unions and business groups have been locked in a protracted fight over a law, approved by the City Council in May, hiking the minimum wage for hotel employees and workers at Los Angeles International Airport to $30 per hour by 2028. Both sides, in an attempt to gain the upper hand, have proposed ballot measures that, if approved, would disrupt the city in enormous ways, leaving an impact that would go well beyond the hourly pay of housekeepers, valets and LAX skycaps. Unite Here Local 11, the politically powerful union that represents hotel and restaurant workers, is looking to put four ballot proposals before voters that, according to critics, would wreak havoc on the city's economy. Business leaders, in turn, are under fire for filing a ballot petition to repeal the city's $800 million business tax — a move denounced by city officials, who say it would gut funding for police and other essential services. L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez said the arms race between business and labor is spinning out of control, in large part due to a lack of leadership at City Hall. As the battle intensifies, no one has been willing to broker a compromise between the two sides, said Rodriguez, who voted against the $30 minimum wage. 'We've entered this War of the Roses because we don't have anyone bringing the parties into a room to negotiate a balance that works for everybody, that can help sustain business and address the needs of the workers,' she said. 'In the absence of that, everyone is taking matters into their own hands — and that is reckless, sloppy and dangerous.' Asked about those assertions, aides to Mayor Karen Bass said she has 'brought new business investments' to L.A. and 'is in discussion with labor and business groups on a wide range of issues.' 'Maybe [Rodriguez] is referring to her own lack of leadership to move her council colleagues towards a legislative outcome,' said Zach Seidl, a Bass spokesperson. City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson was more diplomatic, saying in a brief statement: 'People are working hard to figure out solutions, stay tuned.' The ballot battle began with little fanfare in May, when a group representing airlines and the hotel industry filed paperwork for a voter referendum on the $30 per hour hotel and airport minimum wage, a few weeks after it was passed by the City Council. Business leaders had argued that the minimum wage hike, along with a healthcare payment that is expected to exceed $8 per hour next year, would trigger layoffs and the closure of restaurants, hotels and airport concessions. Organizers with Unite Here Local 11, who had fought for at least two years to secure the higher wage, responded with their own package of ballot proposals, including a plan to require a citywide election on the development or expansion of large hotels, concert halls, museums, sports facilities, convention center space and — according to city leaders — some 2028 Olympic venues. Unite Here, which has a history of knocking on doors for its ballot measures and favored candidates, also submitted a voter petition to expand the $30 minimum wage to every worker in L.A. And it filed two measures targeting outsize executive pay. One would require companies with a pay disparity of more than 100 to 1 between CEOs and their median worker in L.A. to secure voter approval to use space at the harbor, airport, convention center and other city agencies. The other would hike the city business tax on such companies. After Unite Here filed its four petitions, business leaders raised the stakes even further, turning in a proposed measure to repeal the city's business tax. That effort, if approved by voters, would provide financial relief for businesses but also strip more than $800 million from the city budget, or about 10% of the general fund, which pays for police and fire protection. Bass warned that the measure would eviscerate funding for public safety and other services. David Green, president of Service Employees International Union Local 721, called the move 'irresponsible' and 'retaliatory' — and said it would hit a city already reeling from a $1 billion budget shortfall. 'If you're part of this community ... why would you go to the voters on something that's going to hurt anybody that lives in and around the city of Los Angeles?' he asked. Business leaders have defended their efforts, saying a repeal would spur economic activity and generate income for the city. Christopher Thornberg, whose L.A.-based research firm produces economic studies for industry groups and government agencies, voiced skepticism about the repeal effort, saying there are other, much bigger issues holding the city's economy back. Still, he wasn't surprised to see business leaders start playing hardball. At City Hall, he said, they have been effectively locked out of the conversation for years — and desperately need a way to gain 'some sort of leverage' with elected officials. 'Perhaps the [business tax] is that leverage, to get someone on the council to pay attention to them,' the economist said. 'Because they're not. They're just not at the table.' Thornberg, whose firm has issued critical assessments of minimum wage hikes, voiced concern about each of the Unite Here proposals. He warned that the plan to force hotels, sports arenas and other projects to go before voters would hurt the city's ability to carry out 'basic economic development.' He predicted that the proposed citywide minimum wage hike would drive businesses and their customers to other parts of Los Angeles County. On top of that, Thornberg said, the proposal targeting exorbitant CEO pay would likely shut down location shoots in L.A., since it would apply to companies seeking film permits on city property. 'Unite Here has built a reputation on the idea that they are the most ... crazy people in the room and will blow up everything to get their way,' he said. 'What they're doing is clearly living up to that reputation.' Maria Hernandez, a spokesperson for Unite Here, pushed back on claims that the union is being reckless. With workers struggling to pay for food and housing and demoralized over President Trump's sweeping immigration crackdown, the fight to preserve the $30 per hour tourism minimum wage has received a groundswell of public support at a bleak time, she said. 'People might say it's crazy or insane, but it's actually courageous and bold, and it should be inspiring to people more than anything,' she said, adding: 'The community ... is looking to feel hopeful, to win something, when everything just feels like it's going to hell.' Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez, who championed the $30 tourism minimum wage, disagreed with the assertion that the ballot measure battle is out of control. A former Unite Here organizer, he said he is inclined to support the citywide $30 minimum wage. Soto-Martínez also voiced interest in the union's push for higher city taxes on companies with exorbitant CEO pay. He had a dim view of the push to repeal the tourism minimum wage, calling it 'despicable.' Airline companies, working alongside the hospitality industry, poured millions of dollars into its signature drive, gathering more than 140,000 signatures within 30 days, he said. 'It's just another example — and the public should know this — of corporations feeling like they can do whatever they want because they have those resources,' he said. The prospects for the repeal are uncertain. Officials with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk are still working to determine whether the measure has enough valid voter signatures to qualify for the ballot. Organizers with Unite Here, as well as Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West, which represents LAX employees, led a vigorous campaign to convince voters who regretted signing the petition, saying they had been misled by signature gatherers, to withdraw their names. Last week, county officials reported that they had analyzed a sample of 7,040 signatures, or 5% of the 140,774 submitted by the airline and hotel industry group. The officials found 4,373 valid signatures, shy of the roughly 4,600 needed to avoid a full hand count. Among the invalid signatures were 853 withdrawn by voters, making union leaders more confident about keeping the referendum from reaching the ballot. 'I wouldn't want to be in their shoes today. Their numbers are not in a comfortable range,' said Kurt Petersen, co-president of Unite Here Local 11. 'The odds are better that they are struck by lightning than get [their measure] ... on the ballot.' Even if the referendum fails to qualify, Unite Here Local 11 plans to press ahead with its four ballot initiatives. Petersen said his union's members have been invigorated by the fight to protect the $30 tourism minimum wage — and will soon begin gathering signatures for the other proposals. 'We know our issues are extremely popular. People really do believe workers need to make more money and CEOs need to pay more taxes,' he said. Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn., said he believes voters will reject those measures, once they learn the effect will be to 'force companies to leave L.A.' The proposals from Unite Here's leaders are less about supporting workers and more about sending a message, Waldman said. 'They want to exact retribution and revenge on anyone who challenges them ... and they don't care how many jobs it costs to do it,' he said.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fort Worth City Council Eyes $15M Tech Deal, Budget, And Zoning Decisions
The Fort Worth City Council will tackle budget planning, zoning cases, and a major economic development deal during two meetings on Tuesday, August 12. The meetings come as the city prepares its fiscal year 2026 budget and considers a potential $15 million agreement with a microelectronics manufacturer, according to meeting agendas. Council members will convene at noon on August 12 for a work session in City Hall's lower level. The session will focus on the recommended operating and capital budgets for fiscal year 2026. Budget discussions will include a wrap-up session and the adoption schedule. The regular council meeting begins at 6 p.m. in the Council Chamber. Members will vote on adopting the Eastside Transportation Plan and approving the city's annual action plan for $13.2 million in federal housing grants. The grants come from four federal programs: Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnership Program, Emergency Solutions Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program. Council will consider 19 zoning cases during the evening session. Members will also vote on the city's annual funding request to the Crime Control & Prevention District for $138.6 million. A five-year lease agreement with Cook Children's Health Care System is on the agenda. The agreement would provide office space for the Fort Worth Police at the Las Vegas Trail Neighborhood Health Center. The potential economic development agreement with Adom Industries Inc. would establish a prototyping and advanced microelectronics manufacturing facility in Fort Worth. The deal would not exceed $15 million. Residents can watch both meetings live on Fort Worth TV, either online or on TV, or through the city's YouTube channel. Those wishing to speak before the council can find instructions on the city's website. Solve the daily Crossword