Militia targets Syrians in Iraq accused of supporting HTS crackdown
Iraq's prime minister on Wednesday ordered the formation of a security team to pursue a Shiite militia that has been targeting Syrians in Iraq for allegedly supporting the killing of hundreds of people in a security campaign across the border. The previously unknown militia, which calls itself Ya Ali Popular Formations, said it has been following the activities of Syrians on social media who have been 'praising' the rule of new president Ahmad Al Shara and the security forces campaign in Syria's coastal areas. In one recent incident in Iraq, three black-clad masked men were filmed breaking into a bakery, slapping one of its two workers and searching their phones. One of the men was carrying a pistol. A statement issued by Ya Ali called on the Iraqi government to act against Syrians supporting Mr Al Shara. The new Syrian president was based in Iraq as a fighter for al Qaeda before he broke ties with the extremist group in 2016 and created Hayat Tahrir Al Sham, which took power in Damascus last December in a rebel offensive that toppled former president Bashar Al Assad. Memories are still raw among many Iraqis of a Sunni-led insurgency in which Mr Al Shara took part that plagued Iraq after the US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein in 2003. Ya Ali has denounced the recent killings in Syria, saying 'we will not tolerate the glorification of terrorism in our country as we have been burned by its fire more than anyone else'. The Iraqi government was a staunch supporter of Mr Al Assad's regime. He is from Syria's minority Alawite community that has been targeted in the security campaign over the past week. Baghdad has condemned the targeting of 'innocent civilians' in Syria. But in an apparent move to calm tensions, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani on Wednesday denounced the assault filmed in the Iraqi bakery as 'shameful acts of violence against a number of Syrian brothers working in Iraq'. He ordered the 'formation of a specialised security team to pursue those who commit these illegal acts that have nothing to do with the morals of Iraqis', said a statement. The Syrian Foreign Ministry also denounced what it called 'violations of human rights and international law' against Syrians in Iraq. 'We call on the Iraqi government to hold accountable the perpetrators of these crimes and take all necessary measures to ensure the security and safety of Syrians residing in Iraq,' it said in a statement. Earlier this month, Iraqi security forces arrested three Syrian refugees reportedly for posting content in support of the Syrian government's military operations and publishing video appearing to show members of Hayat Tahrir Al Sham vowing to fight Shiites in Iraq. Since Thursday, more than 1,300 people, including 973 civilians, mostly Alawites, have been killed in a wave of sectarian violence in areas along Syria's Mediterranean coast, according to figures compiled by the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. The UK war monitor said 'killings and field executions' were recorded in Tartus, Banias and areas of Latakia. The fighting broke out after gunmen loyal to Mr Al Assad attacked Syrian security forces. On Monday, troops with Syria's new government announced the end of the large-scale offensive but said they would continue chasing remnants of the Assad regime. Mr Al Shara pledged in a video released on Sunday that his government would hold anyone involved in the killing of civilians accountable. The presidency announced an 'independent committee' had been formed to 'investigate the violations and identify those responsible'. Unlike other countries in the region, Iraq is thought to view the new rulers in Damascus with suspicion, despite officially welcoming the regime change. It has called for an inclusive political process in Syria and expressed concern over the danger posed by a resurgent ISIS. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians have found shelter in Iraq since the outbreak of Syria's civil war in 2011. Many have been settled as refugees in camps in the autonomous region of Kurdistan, but some have sneaked into other parts of Iraq to work illegally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear
US President Donald Trump's decision to allow Israel to attack Iran is the worst miscalculation a US president has made since George W Bush invaded Iraq. Bush's decision heralded eight years of conflict in Iraq, killed at least 655,000 people, according to The Lancet, spawned an extreme group of Takfiri militants in the Islamic State group and brought a major state to the verge of collapse from which it has yet to recover 14 years on. Trump's decision could yet prove to be more calamitous. Allowing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Iran, when US envoys were engaged in negotiations with Tehran, places the US presidency on the same level of trustworthiness as Al Capone or Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman. This is the way you behave if you are in charge of a drug cartel, not a global power. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Who now will trust the word of America? Sooner or later, a power in decline like the US will find it needs the trust of others. True to form, Trump and his coterie have no inkling of what they have just done. They are gloating in the act of deceit they have just performed, laughing about duping Iranian diplomats while rushing hundreds of Hellfire missiles to the Israeli army and supplying it with real-time intelligence. Israel's drones caught their targets at home in bed or lured them to their headquarters, where they were wiped out. This is regarded in Tel Aviv and Washington as a coup. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington provided Israel with "exquisite intel". After bragging about their act of deception, Trump lectured Iranians to get back to the negotiating table or face even worse. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!" Trump wrote on Truth Social. This is the dumbest thing the US president could say to a nation 92 million-strong with thousands of years of history behind them. Yesterday Saddam, today Netanyahu It is even more stupid if you consider what Iran went through for eight years when it was attacked by the late Iraqi President Saddam Hussein with western support. It is this bitter experience, no less than the Islamic Republic's ideology, that has fashioned Iran's foreign policy. Its nuclear enrichment programme and its rocket arsenal were all burnished in the fire of the Iran-Iraq war. Like Netanyahu, the Iraqi dictator launched a war when he deemed his neighbour to be at its most vulnerable. On 22 September 1980, Iran's then-supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, was still grappling with the post-revolutionary chaos. He did not have an army, much of which was dissolved when the Shah was toppled. These questions are often ignored in the Israel-Iran story. We asked a panel of experts Read More » Iran had a combination of regular forces and the newly formed, untested Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), but it was so short of weapons that they were passed from one soldier to another as they fell in waves on the front line. Saddam's forces initially made rapid advances, but they were slowly pushed back at a huge cost in lives. Like Netanyahu today, Saddam was supported by the US and Europe. He got the means to manufacture the chemical weapons from German companies, which provided the technology and precursor chemicals needed to manufacture mustard gas, sarin, tabun and other chemical agents. Western cover for Saddam continued even after the gassing of Kurds in Halabja. My late and much-missed colleague Richard Beeston of The Times recounted how two British diplomats attempted to persuade him that nothing really happened there. Three years into the war, late US President Ronald Reagan sent his then-bright young thing, Donald Rumsfeld, to shake hands with Saddam. National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114 of 26 November 1983 stated the US objective. It only wanted to protect its military forces and its oil supplies in the Gulf. Saddam's chemical weapons were of no concern to Rumsfeld or Reagan. But an entire generation of Iranians will never forget those gas attacks from which veterans suffer to this day. Deep defence strategy And it was this bloody and savage war, which Iran eventually won, that forged the determination of Tehran to train and build a network of armed groups from the Mediterranean to its borders as a form of deep defence. Plainly, Iran's "axis of resistance" may be weaker today than it was two years ago. The senior leadership of the Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah, along with their homes and families, were mapped and selected for targets by Mossad long before the Hamas attack on 7 October. Neither Iran nor Hezbollah's leadership wanted to get into a full-blown war with Israel after the Hamas attack... Their moderation was interpreted by Netanyahu as weakness Some of that took place in Syria, where Hezbollah exposed its ranks to agents working for Israel in the Syrian and Russian military intelligence. But not all of it. The fact that Hezbollah is today unable to come to Iran's aid in the darkest hour of the mother ship is the clearest testimony to the defeat it suffered at Israel's hands. Its units on the border fought bravely and kept the elite Israeli commando units like the Golani Brigade pegged down to a few kilometres of the border. Nonetheless, the ceasefire it signed in November of last year signalled a defeat unlike anything it has suffered before. But by the same token, what has come to be viewed in Lebanon today as Hezbollah's and Iran's strategic mistakes - by not replying to Israel's attacks earlier and more forcibly, or by maintaining the belief that Hezbollah could achieve some sort of balance of power with Israel - could equally be read now as strategic restraint. Neither Iran nor Hezbollah leadership wanted to get into a full-blown war with Israel after the Hamas attack, and its leaders said so plainly. Their moderation was interpreted by Netanyahu as weakness. The lack of a heavy response by Iran was read as an encouragement to go for the jugular. Which is where we are now. A long war? Like Saddam in 1980 or Bush in 2003, Netanyahu is placing all his bets on a short war and an early capitulation by Iran. But unlike any war Israel has fought since 1973, Israeli warplanes are attacking a real army and a real state. Iran has strategic depth. It has its enrichment centrifuges buried half a mile underground at some of its five sites. It could close the Straits of Hormuz, through which 21 percent of the global petroleum liquids transit, within the blink of an eye. It also has powerful allies in Russia and China. Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran Read More » The Ukrainians say that Russia has launched over 8,000 Iranian Shahed drones since the war broke out in February 2022. The time may soon come when the Iranian leadership asks Russia to return the favour by supplying it with S-400 air defence batteries, especially in light of statements by the Israeli army declaring its jets had operational freedom over the skies of western Iran. Russian President Vladimir Putin already believes he is at war with the West, his relationship with Trump notwithstanding, and that MI6 was responsible for the Ukrainian attack on Russian long-range bombers. Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, all but said as much. Putin's relationship with Netanyahu, which was once so close that the Israelis stopped the supply of Russian air defence systems to Iran, is shot to pieces. When a delegation from Hamas arrived in Moscow after the 7 October attacks, Putin passed a message of thanks for this "birthday gift", my sources tell me. Putin was born on the same day in 1952. Would Russia allow Israel, supplied by the US, to topple Iran after the loss of Bashar al-Assad in Syria? It's a question that Netanyahu and Trump should consider. Trump had a 50-minute talk with Putin over the weekend. Netanyahu should also consider what he would do if the war lasts more than two weeks and Iran does not wave the white flag. So should those Gulf states that spent $4.5 trillion on US arms contracts and bungs into Trump's own pockets, thinking they had dissuaded America from attacking Ansar Allah (the Houthi movement) in Yemen. The longer the war goes on, the greater the risk of the fire spreading throughout the supremely vulnerable oil and gas installations of the Gulf. Israel has just attacked Iran's installations at Fajr Jam Gas Refinery and South Pars gas field in Bushehr province. Iran replied by hitting the oil refineries around Haifa. Dragging the US into war In Israel itself, a mood of euphoria at having wiped out Iranian military and nuclear leadership has quickly dissipated, as Iran has inflicted on parts of central Israel the sort of destruction Israel has visited on Gaza and Lebanon. For the second night running, Israelis have been experiencing the sort of terror they have inflicted on their neighbours. They are quickly discovering what it is like to lose the impunity they have assumed was their birthright. Even if this war stops, the price of peace and the stabilisation of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme has just gone up If Israel continues to be battered by Iranian missiles night after night, Netanyahu will increasingly think of how he can get the US directly involved in the war. A false flag drone attack on a US base in Iraq would be a tempting option for Netanyahu and one which he has doubtless already considered. Trump so far has been putty in his hands. As far as the future of nuclear enrichment in Iran is concerned, Netanyahu and Trump's unilateral attack, if successful, will provide the biggest incentive Iran can possibly have to get a viable bomb as quickly as possible. The relative weakness of Tehran's conventional arms and its vulnerability to F-35s will provide the same logic to a battered Iran, as it did to Putin, who thought - at one stage in the war in Ukraine - he was on the verge of losing Crimea. He threatened to use a tactical nuclear missile, and Joe Biden's team took that threat seriously. If Trump and Netanyahu think they are dissuading Iran from getting a bomb by dismantling their conventional means of self-defence, they are sorely mistaken. Any nuclear strategist who has war-gamed these scenarios will tell you that the weaker and less reliable conventional forces are, the more reliant a nuclear power is on its nuclear bombs and the readier it is to use them as a weapon of first resort. There is no indication yet that this is the thinking of Iran's supreme leader or the government, but public opinion in Iran - even before the attack - is turning to a clear majority in favour of getting the bomb. Trump said the US would not tolerate a North Korea in the Gulf, but that is what he might achieve by allowing Israel to bomb Iran. Even if this war stops, the price of peace and the stabilisation of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme has just gone up. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Gulf Today
a day ago
- Gulf Today
US judge rejects release of pro-Palestinian activist Khalil
A US judge denied Mahmoud Khalil's request to be released from detention, after federal prosecutors changed their rationale for holding the Columbia graduate student as part of their crackdown on pro-Palestinian activists. Newark, New Jersey-based US District Judge Michael Farbiarz on Wednesday said the government could not use foreign policy interests to justify Khalil's detention. On Friday the government said it was also holding Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the United States, on a charge of immigration fraud. In response, Farbiarz said Khalil's lawyers had not successfully argued why it was unlawful for the government to hold him on the charge, which he has denied. The ruling marked the latest turn in Khalil's fight to be freed from a Louisiana detention center after his March arrest for involvement in the pro-Palestinian protest movement, which President Donald Trump has called antisemitic. His detention was condemned by civil rights groups as an attack on protected political speech. Marc Van Der Hout, a lawyer for Khalil, said the government practically never detained people for immigration fraud and the Syrian-born student was being punished for opposing Israel's U.S.-backed war in Gaza following Hamas' October 2023 attack. "Detaining someone on a charge like this is highly unusual and frankly outrageous," said Van Der Hout. "There continues to be no constitutional basis for his detention." Farbiarz had previously suggested legal residents like Khalil were rarely detained on the basis of immigration fraud. On Friday he said Khalil should seek bail from the immigration lawyer in his case. As lawyers for the Syrian-born activist sought his release, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, another immigrant targeted by the Trump administration, pleaded not guilty to migrant smuggling charges after his wrongful deportation. Khalil, a graduate student at Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. His US citizen wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, gave birth to the couple's first child while Khalil was detained in April. Ahead of Father's Day in the US, a group of celebrities including actors Mahershala Ali, Mark Ruffalo and Mo Amer, called for Khalil to be freed. They also sent him a video showing the celebrities reading aloud a letter that the activist had sent to his infant son. Reuters
The National
a day ago
- The National
Iraq and Syria strengthen ties with reopening of key border crossing
Iraq and Syria reopened the main border crossing for travellers and goods on Saturday, Iraqi authorities announced. The move is the latest sign of warming relations between Baghdad and Damascus, after months of strained ties following the ousting of the Bashar Al Assad regime from Syria. Al Qaim border crossing, about 400km west of Baghdad, in Anbar province, was closed when Hayat Tahrir Al Sham-led Syrian rebels took control of Damascus in December. 'The crossing has been reopened after obtaining the necessary approvals from the high-ranking authorities,' the Iraqi Border Points Commission said in a statement. It added that the first Syrian lorry and passengers had entered Iraq. Resuming traffic at Al Qaim border crossing 'marks a significant step in enhancing economic co-operation, which will meet the needs of both countries and contribute to achieving economic stability and development', the statement added. When HTS took over, Iraq cautiously welcomed the regime change in Damascus and called for an inclusive political process. It has since expressed concern over the situation in Syria, warning of the danger of a resurgent ISIS. Iraqi officials have said the number of extremist group militants has increased and they have seized more weapons. ISIS overran large parts of Iraq and Syria in the summer of 2014, declaring a caliphate that took in substantial areas in both countries. During that time, it led a campaign of widespread and systematic abuse of international human rights and humanitarian law. Iraqi troops, backed by a US-led international coalition, reclaimed all ISIS-held territory in Iraq in late 2017, after three years of fighting. However, ISIS fighters still carry out sporadic attacks, mainly in rural areas. In recent weeks, relations have warmed with senior delegations visiting Baghdad and Damascus. The Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani invited Syria's President Ahmad Al Shara to the Arab Summit meeting in Baghdad last month. However, Mr Al Shara did not attend due to widespread objections from Iraqis for his past links to Al Qaeda in Iraq. He served as a field leader for the extremist group fighting American and Iraqi troops after the 2003 US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.
