Pennsylvania man accused of beheading father and posting video of his severed head to stand trial
Justin D. Mohn, 33, faces charges of murder, abuse of a corpse, terrorism related crimes and other offenses for the 2024 killing of Michael F. Mohn at the Levittown home where they lived with the defendant's mother. She found her husband's body in a bathroom.
Prosecutors have said Justin Mohn shot his father with a newly purchased pistol, then decapitated him with a kitchen knife and machete. The 14-minute YouTube video was live for several hours before it was removed.
Mohn was armed with a handgun when arrested later that day after allegedly climbing a 20-foot (6-meter) fence at Fort Indiantown Gap, the state's National Guard headquarters. He had hoped to get the soldiers to 'mobilize the Pennsylvania National Guard to raise arms against the federal government,' Bucks County District Attorney Jennifer Schorn said at a news conference last year.
Mohn had a USB device containing photos of federal buildings and apparent instructions for making explosives when arrested, authorities have said.
He also had expressed violent anti-government rhetoric in writings he published online, and the YouTube video included rants about the government, immigration and the border, fiscal policy, urban crime and the war in Ukraine.
Mohn's defense attorney, Steven M. Jones, said last week he did not anticipate the case being resolved with a plea deal.
Michael Mohn, who was 68, had been an engineer with the geoenvironmental section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In the video, Justin Mohn described his father as a 20-year federal employee and called him a traitor.
During a competency hearing last year, a defense expert said Mohn wrote a letter to Russia's ambassador to the United States seeking a deal to give Mohn refuge and apologizing to President Vladimir Putin for claiming to be the czar of Russia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
25 minutes ago
- CBS News
2 LA County deputies agree to guilty pleas for helping businessman target his rivals
Two deputies from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department have agreed to plead guilty in federal court for allegedly helping a cryptocurrency businessman intimidate his rivals. Deputy Christopher Michael Cadman, 33, agreed to plead guilty in the coming days to conspiracy against rights and subscribing to a false tax return, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Prosecutors said another deputy, David Anthony Rodriguez, 43, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy against rights on Monday. The two deputies allegedly helped track, threaten and intimidate people disputing with businessman Adam Iza, who also pleaded guilty to similar charges. In August 2021, Cadman and an unidentified deputy allegedly held a man at gunpoint during a meeting at Iza's Bel Air mansion until he wired about $25,000 to Iza, prosecutors said. About a month later, Iza allegedly paid Cadman to pull over and arrest the same victim in Paramount, according to the Justice Department. In July 2022, Rodriguez allegedly lied to a judge to obtain a search warrant that allowed him to track another victim's cell phone location via GPS, according to the DOJ. Rodriguez allegedly handed over the GPS tracking to other co-conspirators, including LASD detective Eric Chase Saavedra, who ran a private security company hired by Iza. Saavedra's company employed LASD deputies and other law enforcement. The Justice Department said LASD deputies and other co-conspirators used the information to harass, threaten and intimidate the victim. Saavedra also agreed to plead guilty to similar charges. The Sheriff's Department said they fired Rodriguez in October 2023. The agency fired Cadman a year later in 2024. "These alleged actions, as detailed in federal court documents, are deeply disturbing and do not reflect the values of our Department or the dedicated work of the vast majority of our deputies who serve with integrity," LASD wrote in a statement. "The Department has fully cooperated with the ongoing federal investigation."
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
Players' associations urge Congress to reject proposed bill granting NCAA antitrust exemption
Players' associations for the NFL, NBA, Major League Baseball, NHL and MLS issued a joint statement Monday urging Congress to reject proposed legislation that would grant the NCAA and its members an antitrust exemption to address NIL issues. The statement was in response to the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act, introduced last week by members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. A markup on the bill is scheduled for Tuesday morning. Advertisement In their letter, the players' associations warned that an antitrust exemption would permit the NCAA and its members to 'collude to harm athletes.' 'Whatever progress the athletes have made has been a result of their use of the antitrust laws,' they wrote. 'The SCORE Act would take that weapon away from them.' The proposed legislation from seven Republican and two Democratic sponsors prevents athletes from obtaining employment status and mirrors many of the terms from the recent House vs. NCAA settlement. It would officially end most administrative restrictions on athletes' NIL compensation, but it allows schools and conferences to establish what is and isn't permissible. Should the federal legislation pass, it would override current state NIL laws, which vary from state to state. Earlier Monday, two members of Congress from the state of Washington, Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, and Republican Rep. Michael Baumgartner, issued a similar statement urging the House committee to delay the markup until there are significant changes. 'The bill appears to be a product of the richest conferences to cement into place the current power structure in college athletics that would leave only the wealthiest schools able to compete at the highest levels of college athletics,' the statement said. If you thought the dissolution of the Pac-12 was a heist, the SCORE Act is the National Championship of all heists. This legislation is a power grab by the two biggest conferences that will leave athletes, coaches, and small and mid-sized institutions behind. My letter with… — Sen. Maria Cantwell (@SenatorCantwell) July 14, 2025 All of the Power 5 conferences previously issued a statement endorsing the SCORE Act. 'In the absence of federal standards, student-athletes and schools have been forced to navigate a fractured regulatory framework for too long,' they wrote. 'Following the historic House settlement, this bill represents a very encouraging step toward delivering the national clarity and accountability that college athletics desperately needs.' Advertisement Last week, the NCAA said in a statement that it 'has made long overdue changes, mandating health and wellness benefits and ushering in a new system for Division I programs to provide up to 50 percent of athletic department revenue to student-athletes, but some of the most important changes can only come from Congress.' 'This bill reflects many student-athletes' priorities, and the NCAA is committed to working with Congress to build a bipartisan path forward that ensures the long-term success of college sports and the ongoing opportunities they provide to young people,' wrote Tim Buckley, the NCAA's senior vice president of external affairs. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey also praised the bill Monday. 'I think what's happening in college athletics is a nonpartisan issue, but using the typical nomenclature, to have members of both of our major political parties willing to step out and introduce the SCORE Act, is a positive step,' he said. The players' associations' letter noted that only two industries in the United States have antitrust law exemptions: railroads and Major League Baseball (partially). 'The NCAA should not have a blank check to impose (its) will on the financial future of over 500,000 college athletes,' they wrote. Justin Williams contributed to this story. (Photo of Capitol Building: Al Drago / Getty Images)
Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
John Elway won't be charged after friend's death is ruled an accident
John Elway will not face charges following a law enforcement investigation into the death of Jeff Sperbeck, the Hall of Fame quarterback's former business partner and longtime friend. Sperbeck died in April at age 62 after he fell from a golf cart that reportedly was being driven by Elway, 65. On Monday, the Riverside County (Calif.) Sheriff's Office announced that it 'determined that the incident was a tragic accident with no evidence of criminal activity or intent.'
