Mystery of Reform's disappearing deputy: Party is accused of council 'shambles' as 22-year-old deputy leader is 'removed' after just three months without explanation
Joseph Boam had been seen as one of the party's rising stars when he was appointed to the role at Leicestershire county council following the party's election win in May.
But he has now been removed from his post and is also no longer cabinet lead member for adult social care and communities.
Mr Boam, who declared 'this is just the beginning' following his appointment, denied he had stepped down from his role or resigned, but did not comment on whether he had been sacked.
'I am no longer deputy leader or in cabinet, but have been offered a cabinet support role which I'm inclined to take,' he said.
He insisted in a Facebook post on Sunday that 'nothing's changed' and he'll 'keep fighting' for his constituents in Whitwick.
'Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister,' he wrote.
Mr Boam later posted a picture of himself sitting at a pub with two of his 'good friends' with a turquoise 'Make Britain Great Again' baseball cap positioned on the table.
He followed this up with another picture where he is seen holding a pint of lemonade. Mr Boam captioned the post 'cheers'.
He later posted on Facebook that 'nothing's changed' and said he would keep fighting for his constituents in Whitwick
It is unclear why he has been removed from both positions, with council leader Dan Harrison refusing to comment until the party group had met this week.
The leader of the main opposition to the authority, Ms Taylor, said in a statement released on social media that the Reform-led council is delivering a 'shambles'.
She said: 'The Reform Administration at Leicestershire County Council has lacked leadership and direction from the very start.
'So it comes as no surprise to us that Cllr Joseph Boam has been shown the door after just three months as Deputy Leader of Leicestershire County Council and Cabinet Lead Member for Adults.
'Frankly, he was wholly unqualified for such a critical role and lacked the experience or judgment to bring anything of value to the position.
'Adult Social Care and Communities is one of the most important and challenging portfolios in local government.
'It requires steady hands, long-term commitment and a depth of understanding.
'What it has been given instead is instability, poor judgment, and revolving-door appointments.
'At a time when Leicestershire needs stability, vision, and experienced leadership more than ever, residents are being served a plate of chaos.
'Reform promised change, what they're delivering is a shambles.'
A Reform UK source said: 'Joseph deserves thanks for his role in helping to establish the Reform Group at Leicestershire County Council and we wish him well as he moves into a new role where he will continue to support the group's efforts at County Hall.'
Ms Taylor said in a video posted on social media on Monday that the leader of the Reform-led county council, Dan Harrison, had 'sacked' Mr Boam over the weekend.
The Conservative group had previously told Mr Boam to 'educate himself' when an X post from an account named Lord Joseph Boam II said 'depression isn't real'.
Mr Boam dismissed the claims as 'fake news' and 'political smears' and said his 'focus remains on delivering for the people I was elected to serve'.
He has previously shared images on his X account posing and shaking the hand of Reform leader Nigel Farage.
Reform won 25 out of the 55 seats on the council and formed a minority administration after the local elections in May, taking control from the Conservatives.
Mr Boam was n ot the youngest Reform councillor with a senior county council position, as 19-year-old George Finch is currently the leader of Warwickshire County Council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
High court asylum hotels ruling leaves Cooper scrambling for alternatives
Yvette Cooper, thanks to Tuesday's high court ruling, is facing potentially explosive decisions over where to house asylum seekers if courts rule that they must leave hotels. The Home Office, usually under Conservative ministers, has been struggling for five years to find an alternative to hotels so they can house a growing number of asylum seekers reaching these shores. Labour has said that it expects to empty the 200-odd hotels housing asylum seekers by 2029. Ministers may be forced to rip up that plan and move at a rapid pace because of the ruling's implications. If councils take to the high court to complain about the use of a hotel for housing asylum seekers – and many will be under immense political pressure from the public to do so – it could force officials to find alternative housing for thousands of people. Legal sources believe that there will be similar grounds to launch applications for interim injunctions from a number of councils. This case has centred on an alleged breach of planning laws by owners of the Bell hotel, who it was claimed did not get permission to switch use from a hotel to hostel-style accommodation. Other hotel owners are thought to be in similar positions to Somani Hotels Limited, which originally housed families in the Bell, but faced a legal challenge after the asylum seekers were switched to single men. Ominously for the government, the Reform UK deputy leader, Richard Tice, said his party would look at pursuing similar cases regarding hotels within the 10 council areas it controls, which include both North and West Northamptonshire councils, Doncaster, and Kent and Staffordshire county councils. And the high court rulings can require a rapid response. Epping's application for an interim was launched on 12 August. By 4pm on 12 September, all asylum seekers will have to be removed from The Bell hotel. There may yet be a lifeline for the government. They could convince the court of appeal to overturn the decision. The fact that the Home Office was not allowed to intervene in a case which was directly related to the home secretary's duties to house asylum seekers could well be seized upon by government lawyers. If they fail to overturn the decision, they will face the same dilemma as successive Tory home secretaries going back to Priti Patel, who promised and failed to find alternatives to hotels to house asylum seekers. The number of asylum hotels soared to 400 under successive Tory home secretaries because of a shortage of housing, a growing backlog in asylum applications, and a failure to establish large accommodation sites in buildings such as disused military barracks. Since coming to power, Labour has increased the speed at which applications are processed, by using more 'dispersal accommodation' such as flats and housing in the community. Questions will no doubt be asked inside the department as to why it took the Home Office until Monday to try to intervene in the case. If it had done so last week, when the case came to court, it would have stood a better chance of preventing the injunction. The political implications of the ruling will continue to unsettle Cooper and No 10. Yet again, the government has been caught flat-footed on an immigration-related issue, as it struggles with soaring numbers of small boats crossing the Channel. Anti-asylum seeker protesters will see this as a victory in response to their demonstrations across the country this summer. Reform UK and its leader, Nigel Farage, currently leading in most polls, will be buoyed by the prospect of further embarrassment for the government.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Epping migrant protesters pop champagne after court victory sees asylum seekers face the boot from Bell Hotel
EPPING migrant protesters were seen popping champagne to celebrate a High Court ruling that will see asylum seekers booted out of the Bell Hotel. Just hours after the landmark ruling was handed down protesters were seen rejoicing over the news. 7 7 7 A High Court judge granted Epping Forest District Council a temporary injunction to block asylum seekers being housed in the Essex hotel. The landmark move was widely celebrated and could spell an end to every migrant hotel, which are funded by UK taxpayers. Protesters were seen rejoicing outside the hotel in Essex today, popping bottles of champagne, spraying the drink in the air and waving Union Jacks. Crowds of local families and activists gathered outside the hotel as the news was passed down that migrants would now be booted out of the premises. Families partying outside the hotel told The Sun the ruling will set a precedent for the other hotels across the UK. 'Send them home and protect our kids,' the growing crowd can be heard shouting and hundreds of cars have driven past honking their horns in support. Champagne was popped and sprayed across the hotel sign, but the protest still remained relatively peaceful. A few migrants made their way inside the hotel but not before anti- immigration protesters shouted at them to leave the area. Men, women, teens and children screamed 'pack your bags' at the blank faced migrants as they were escorted into the hotel by police officers. One jubilant protester told GB News: "I'm elated it has paid off. We've been protesting week after week and it's worked. I'm so happy. Migrants to be kicked out of hotel at centre of protests in landmark ruling after asylum seeker's 'sex attack' 'Keep us safe. That's all we ask for.' There were chants of "save our kids" as protesters waving Union Jacks and St George's Cross flags heard the ruling. Protesters held up signs and placards declaring "we want Epping safe" and "clear them out" as they celebrated what they saw as a victory. The ruling today was welcomed by Reform leader Nigel Farage, who said: "This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets. 7 7 7 "This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country. "Young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported. "I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country." Chris Whitbread, the leader of Epping Forest District Council, said he was "delighted" with the decision and called it "great news for our residents." It comes after weeks of protests were sparked when a migrant staying at the hotel was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Up to 2,000 activists had marched on the building in just one demonstration previously. Some far-Right thugs joined some of the unrest and launched themselves on riot vans, smashed windshields and ripped off wingmirrors in senseless displays of " hooliganism." A total of 28 people have been arrested in relation to disorder at the hotel, and 16 of them have been charged. The hotel housed migrants from May 2020 to March 2021, then from October 2022 to April 2024. The hotel's owners, Somani Hotels Limited, said the council never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use. In court Somani had argued that contracts to house asylum seekers had been a "financial lifeline." Lawyers for the firm also argued that political views were no grounds for an injunction and branded the ruling "draconian." The local authority argued that the Bell Hotel had breached planning regulations by failing to operate the premises for its designated purpose. The ruling from Judge Mr Justice Eyre will force the owners of the Bell Hotel to remove migrants from the accommodation within 14 days. 7
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prince Andrew book edited to remove Epstein claims about Melania Trump
A new book about the Duke of York has been edited to remove a claim that Jeffrey Epstein introduced Donald Trump to his wife Melania. The allegation was published in around 60,000 copies of Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, by Andrew Lownie, which paints a damning portrait of Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson. The retractions are being made after Melania Trump threatened to sue Hunter Biden for claiming that paedophile financier Epstein introduced her to her future husband. Lawyers for the US first lady wrote to Mr Biden, the son of the former US president Joe Biden, accusing him of making 'false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements' about her. The letter, sent on Aug 6, is said to have demanded that Mr Biden retract his comments and issue an apology or face a $1bn (£726m) legal action. Mr Trump said he had encouraged his wife to sue, insisting on Fox News Radio last week: 'Jeffrey Epstein had nothing to do with Melania and introducing.' He added: 'It was another person actually… but it wasn't Jeffrey Epstein.' Mr Lownie's book made a similar claim, quoting allegations said to have been made by Epstein to an unidentified author in 2007. The passage will be deleted from future print editions, while the ebook and audiobooks have been updated to reflect the changes. A HarperCollins UK spokesman told the Telegraph: 'We can confirm that several passages from Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie have been removed in consultation with the author. 'Entitled is published in the UK by HarperCollins. In the US, the book is self-published by Mr Lownie.' 'Easy prey for a rattlesnake' In the book Mr Lownie described Prince Andrew as 'easy prey for a rattlesnake like Epstein', adding: 'Epstein played Andrew. The prince was a useful idiot who gave him respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities. He found him easy to exploit.' Mr Biden claimed during a wide-ranging interview with the film-maker Andrew Callaghan, broadcast earlier this month, that unreleased documents relating to Epstein would 'implicate' Mr Trump. Mr Biden attributed the claim about how the Trumps met to Michael Wolff, a journalist who was given extraordinary access to the White House during Mr Trump's first term and has written four books about the president. Mr Wolff recently claimed in an interview with the Daily Beast podcast that the first lady was 'very involved' in Epstein's circle and met Mr Trump through a modelling agent with ties to both men. The news outlet also published an article on Mr Wolff's claim, but retracted it and issued an apology. Mr Biden has suggested he will not retract his claims. Mrs Trump described the moment she met her husband in her 2024 memoir, Melania. She revealed she was at a Fashion Week party at the Kit Kat Klub in New York in 1998 when she saw her friend wave to someone behind her. 'When I turned around, I noticed a man and an attractive blonde woman approaching us,' she wrote. ''Hi, I'm Donald Trump,' the man said when he reached my table.' She said that Mr Trump made her feel like 'the centre of his world' and that she was 'captivated by his charm and easy-going nature'. The Trump administration has come under pressure over its failure to release the Epstein files. The president has faced increased scrutiny about his personal connections to the late sex offender after the FBI and department of justice concluded last month that he died by suicide and did not possess a 'client list'.
