How Much Should You Add to Your Emergency Savings To Keep Up With Inflation?
Saving three to six months of emergency savings is a must, especially during times of economic uncertainty. However, rising inflation means that a $10,000 safety net might not be able to buy as much tomorrow as it does today.
Learn More:
Try This:
GOBankingRates talked to financial experts to find out how much you should add to your emergency savings to keep up with inflation.
Carson McLean, founder of Altruist Wealth Management, said individuals should aim to increase their emergency fund by 3% to 4% annually, assuming average inflation.
'For example, if your emergency fund is $30,000, aim to add an extra $900 to $1,200 each year, just to maintain its purchasing power,' McLean said.
Individuals can find the inflation rate by using the annual Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
'Set an annual recurring calendar reminder to review the prior year's inflation data and top up your fund,' McLean said. 'Alternatively, set up an automatic savings transfer. For example, add $100 per month to your emergency account, which covers most inflation adjustments without much thought.'
Consider This:
William Bergmark, a personal finance expert at Credwise, recommended that individuals use the annual inflation rate to calculate how much they should add to their emergency savings.
'For example, if you've saved $20,000 and inflation is 5%, you'll have to put in at least $1,000 that year,' Bergmark said. 'Inflation gradually erodes the purchasing power of your money — just letting it sit in the bank. So, it is a must to continuously build your emergency fund.'
One easy formula to calculate how much should be added each year to offset inflation is:
Emergency Fund Balance x Annual Inflation Rate = Adjustment Amount
Therefore, if an individual saved $15,000 in their emergency fund and the annual inflation rate is 2.9%, they should aim to save $435 ($15,000 x 0.029).
'Over the years, rising prices — especially on essentials like rent, groceries, gas and healthcare — can quietly outpace your savings,' Bergmark said. 'Even if your fund was sufficient a few years ago, it might fall short today. It's a hidden risk that many people don't think about until it's too late.'
To maintain an emergency fund, Jay Zigmont, founder and CEO of Childfree Wealth, recommended keeping the cash in a high-yield savings account and monitoring it every six months to ensure that one's savings are keeping up with inflation.
'If your life and job are more stable, you can lean towards three months, if not go to six months,' Zigmont said. 'Since it is based on your expenses, the amount needed will shift based on inflation and changes in your life.'
He suggested a 'health check' on all your finances every six months. 'Some people like using the first of the year and mid-year — July 1. Others check their finances twice a year when they change clocks. The key is to set a reminder on your phone and make it a habit.'
Christine Lam, an investment advisor representative at the Financial Investment Team, said individuals should offset inflation by ensuring their emergency fund grows at a rate that matches inflation.
'This can be accomplished by utilizing vehicles such as high-yield savings accounts, certificates of deposit (CDs) or money market accounts,' Lam said. 'To determine how much to save, review your monthly expenses and ensure that your emergency fund holds enough to cover three to six months' worth of living costs.'
A simple way to keep track of savings goals is to earmark a percentage of one's paycheck to go directly into an emergency fund account.
'This ensures consistent growth, and as your income increases, your savings will automatically grow proportionately,' Lam said. 'At the end of each year, reassess your emergency fund, evaluate any changes in your financial situation and inflation rate, and adjust your savings goals if necessary.'
More From GOBankingRates
4 Things To Watch for as Elon Musk Takes on Social Security
These 10 Used Cars Will Last Longer Than an Average New Vehicle
Warren Buffett: 10 Things Poor People Waste Money On
5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: How Much Should You Add to Your Emergency Savings To Keep Up With Inflation?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump loyalty is now part of job application
More than six million Americans are still looking for work, according to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Amid ongoing economic uncertainty, the federal government remains one of the country's most active employers, with open roles for nurses, actuaries, physicists, engineers and IT professionals listed at But prospective applicants may notice something different about the application process in 2025. Alongside typical questions about experience and qualifications, some federal job forms now ask about an applicant's alignment with presidential policy priorities, raising concerns about political screening in what are supposed to be nonpartisan civil service roles. Under guidance issued by the Chief Human Capital Officers Council (CHCOC), part of a broader federal hiring overhaul, applicants may be asked to explain how they would help implement specific executive orders or initiatives. One question currently being used reads: 'How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.' This directive is connected to an executive order President Donald Trump that emphasizes 'merit-based' hiring over previous diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations. The administration stated that these changes are intended to root out political bias and ensure a more ideologically aligned workforce. Critics argue that these practices resemble loyalty tests, particularly as questions of commitment to the Constitution and the President's policies appeared in job applications. Earlier this year, multiple government agencies experienced layoffs of employees who were seen as insufficiently aligned with current leadership, even in traditionally apolitical roles. Historical parallels have been raised. During the McCarthy era in the 1950s, public servants and private citizens alike were pressured to prove their loyalty to the U.S. government to root out suspected communists. Accusations and investigations often targeted personal beliefs rather than actions, leading to widespread firings, blacklisting and surveillance. Civil service roles in the U.S. were originally designed to serve the Constitution and the public, not individual officeholders. Federal employees take an oath to uphold the Constitution, a foundational distinction meant to separate American governance from monarchic or authoritarian systems. Whether the latest hiring guidelines are a temporary shift or a lasting transformation of the federal workforce remains to be seen. For now, job seekers interested in federal positions may want to prepare answers not just about their skills but about their stance on presidential policy.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
America's 50 Richest Retirement Towns
Does it surprise you to hear that California is home to a sizable number of the nation's richest retirement towns? Already beloved for its warm weather and scenic beaches, the Golden State is home to 13 affluent retirement havens, according to new GOBankingRates data. See More: Learn More: To find the country's 50 richest retirement towns, GOBankingRates sourced the U.S. Census American Community Survey for all cities with populations above 15,000 and senior populations with a percentage of 25% or higher. Additional factors sourced include each city's median income and livability index. Saratoga, California, is the richest retirement town in America. The median household income in Saratoga is $241,348. An impressive 13 California towns ranked among the 50 wealthiest retirement metros, the most out of any state. The towns and respective ranks include Saratoga (1), Ranchos Palos Verdes (3), Laguna Beach (9), Walnut Creek (11), Cerritos (12), Fair Oaks (27), Rancho Mirage (29), Lincoln (30), Pacific Grove (33), Los Osos (41), Arroyo Grande (42), Cameron Park (45) and La Quinta (46). Nine affluent Florida retirement towns also cracked the top 50. These towns and ranks are as follows: Naples (8), Lakewood Ranch (15), Palm Valley (21), Palm City (22), Palm Beach Gardens (28), Marco Island (38), Palmer Ranch (39), Estero (43) and East Lake (49). Keep reading to find out which 50 retirement towns are among the richest in America. Learn More: Find Out: Population 65+ (%): 25.9% Median household income: $241,348 Livability: 81 Discover More: Population 65+ (%): 25.8% Median household income: $228,120 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 26.0% Median household income: $175,307 Livability: 58 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $159,882 Livability: 78 Population 65+ (%): 27.0% Median household income: $158,398 Livability: 87 Population 65+ (%): 27.3% Median household income: $155,675 Livability: 61 Read Next: Population 65+ (%): 25.6% Median household income: $155,321 Livability: 80 Population 65+ (%): 56.2% Median household income: $140,833 Livability: 79 Population 65+ (%): 27.8% Median household income: $140,508 Livability: 66 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $139,707 Livability: 82 Population 65+ (%): 29.0% Median household income: $135,665 Livability: 77 For You: Population 65+ (%): 25.3% Median household income: $133,953 Livability: 74 Population 65+ (%): 25.0% Median household income: $124,632 Livability: 72 Population 65+ (%): 25.9% Median household income: $124,123 Livability: 78 Population 65+ (%): 31.4% Median household income: $123,471 Livability: 63 Population 65+ (%): 29.9% Median household income: $120,685 Livability: 73 Trending Now: Population 65+ (%): 34.4% Median household income: $119,591 Livability: 82 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $119,454 Livability: 83 Population 65+ (%): 33.6% Median household income: $119,212 Livability: 61 Population 65+ (%): 29.9% Median household income: $118,462 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 26.4% Median household income: $118,280 Livability: 70 Explore Next: Population 65+ (%): 28.8% Median household income: $117,689 Livability: 81 Population 65+ (%): 25.7% Median household income: $114,682 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 25.6% Median household income: $113,844 Livability: 68 Population 65+ (%): 26.3% Median household income: $113,301 Livability: 66 Population 65+ (%): 34.9% Median household income: $113,201 Livability: 70 Try This: Population 65+ (%): 25.5% Median household income: $111,332 Livability: 57 Population 65+ (%): 30.6% Median household income: $110,563 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 49.9% Median household income: $109,943 Livability: 49 Population 65+ (%): 27.2% Median household income: $108,108 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 26.2% Median household income: $107,372 Livability: 82 Discover More: Population 65+ (%): 38.0% Median household income: $105,944 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 28.9% Median household income: $105,568 Livability: 84 Population 65+ (%): 25.2% Median household income: $105,535 Livability: 88 Population 65+ (%): 34.9% Median household income: $105,342 Livability: 81 Population 65+ (%): 39.4% Median household income: $104,955 Livability: 73 Check Out: Population 65+ (%): 39.6% Median household income: $104,788 Livability: 69 Population 65+ (%): 59.0% Median household income: $104,105 Livability: 70 Population 65+ (%): 51.1% Median household income: $103,682 Livability: 72 Population 65+ (%): 27.5% Median household income: $103,561 Livability: 79 Population 65+ (%): 26.5% Median household income: $103,504 Livability: 66 See Next: Population 65+ (%): 25.7% Median household income: $103,258 Livability: 77 Population 65+ (%): 50.7% Median household income: $100,459 Livability: 79 Population 65+ (%): 31.9% Median household income: $100,124 Livability: 65 Population 65+ (%): 25.3% Median household income: $97,786 Livability: 56 Population 65+ (%): 31.1% Median household income: $97,628 Livability: 57 Explore More: Population 65+ (%): 25.3% Median household income: $97,348 Livability: 67 Population 65+ (%): 39.2% Median household income: $96,715 Livability: 63 Population 65+ (%): 28.7% Median household income: $93,862 Livability: 65 Population 65+ (%): 25.8% Median household income: $92,746 Livability: 64 Editor's note: Photos are for representational purposes only and might not reflect the exact locations listed. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed cities to find the richest retirement towns. First, GOBankingRates found cities with populations above 15,000 and population percentages for 65+ age range of 25% or higher, as sourced from the U.S. Census American Community Survey. With these 142 cities isolated, the total households, population ages 65 and higher and household median income were also sourced from the American Community Survey for each location. The livability index was sourced from AreaVibes. The cities were sorted to show the highest median household income, representing the 'richest' cities. All data was collected on and is up to date as of Feb. 4, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on America's 50 Richest Retirement Towns
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
If You Invested Every Social Security Check for 10 Years, How Rich Would You Be?
One common criticism of Social Security is that Americans would be much better off financially if the money they paid into the retirement program through payroll taxes was instead invested into private investment accounts. That same argument can be applied to Social Security checks — seniors would have much more wealth if they invested their checks as soon as they got them. Be Aware: For You: But is this a reasonable request for most people, especially those on a fixed income? To help find the answer here is a closer look at how much you could earn by investing your Social Security checks over a decade. For those seniors who can afford to invest all of their Social Security checks, the potential payoff is considerable. The following table shows how much profit you would have made if you invested every Social Security check over the past 10 years into the S&P 500, from 2015 through the beginning of 2025. The data includes the average Social Security check by year as previously reported by GOBankingRates. It also includes the average annual return of the S&P 500 from 2015 to 2025, as cited by Macrotrends (other sources might reflect different returns). Up Next: A couple things to keep in mind: The figures below are based only on yearly averages, which means they don't include month-to-month fluctuations that happen with the stock market. They also don't include other types of investments — such as crypto or real estate — that would have produced very different returns. Year Avg. monthly SS check Total SS payments for year S&P 500 return Profit/loss for year 2015 $1,341.77 $16,101.24 -0.73% -$117.54 2016 $1,360.13 $16,321.56 +9.54% +1,557.08 2017 $1,404.15 $16,849.80 +19.42% +3,272.23 2018 $1,461.31 $17,535.72 -6.24% -$1,094.23 2019 $1,455.22 $17,462.64 +28.88% +5,043.21 2020 $1,489.30 $17,871.60 +16.26% +2,905.92 2021 $1,517.98 $18,215.76 +26.89% +4,898.22 2022 $1,615.96 $19,391.52 -19.44% -3,769.71 2023 $1,696.35 $20,356.20 +24.23% +4,932.31 2024 $1,909.01 $22,908.12 +23.31% +5,339.88 2025 $1,976 $23,712 +1.96% +$464.76 Total profit/loss +$23,432.33 According to the table above, if you invested all of your monthly Social Security checks in the S&P 500 over the past decade, your nest egg would have grown by over $20,000. That kind of return should bring cheer to financial gurus, like Dave Ramsey, who recommends applying for Social Security retirement benefits as early as possible. For example, you could start collecting benefits at age 62 instead of the full retirement age of 66 or 67 and then immediately invest every monthly payment. There's just one problem with that reasoning. A large percentage of seniors don't have the financial ability to put their Social Security checks into stocks, bonds, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, real estate, crypto or other investments. They need the money to pay the bills. For about half of U.S. seniors, Social Security provides at least 50% of their overall retirement income, according to research from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. For about one in four seniors, Social Security provides at least 90% of income. These folks have a hard enough time making ends meet, let alone tossing their Social Security checks into various investments that might or might not pay off. Nonetheless, for retirees who can afford to invest their benefit checks, there's a pretty good chance those investments will pay off and boost your retirement savings over the long haul. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money This article originally appeared on If You Invested Every Social Security Check for 10 Years, How Rich Would You Be? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
