Queen City Sports & Entertainment Group to take full ownership of Regina Red Sox
Queen City Sports & Entertainment Group has acquired full ownership of the Regina Red Sox with the deal expected to close Oct. 1. (DonovanMaess/CTVNews)
The Regina Red Sox will soon have new owners in the Queen City Sports & Entertainment Group (QCSEG).
On Friday morning it was announced that Regina's WCBL team will be fully owned by the subsidiary of the Brandt Group of Companies, with the deal expected to close Oct. 1.
'The Red Sox have been an important part of our hometown's sports scene for over 100 years. Making this vote of confidence in their future success was an absolute must-do for us and is a reflection of our unwavering commitment to delivering world-class sports and entertainment experiences for the people of Regina,' CEO of QCSEG Shaun Semple said in a news release.
Red Sox president Gary Brotzel said having QCSEG take over ownership is a big positive for the organization.
'This announcement is a huge shot in the arm for the Red Sox,' Brotzel said in the release. 'It ensures our long-term viability here in Regina and means that we can focus 100 per cent on entertaining fans and adding to our championship legacy.'
Semple says QCSEG is looking forward to finding new ways to grow the Red Sox's fan base and bring exciting entertainment options to fans across Regina.
With the acquisition, the Red Sox join a growing group of other local sports organizations owned by QCSEG, that has included the Regina Pats.
The Red Sox were founded in Regina in 1913 and are Canada's oldest baseball franchise. The team has won six Southern Baseball League championships, two Saskatchewan Major Baseball League championships and two titles in the Western Canadian Baseball League, where they currently compete.
More to come…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Liberals see a need for speed on major projects bill. Critics warn that's risky
Social Sharing Liberals are attempting to bulldoze their mega projects bill through Parliament, according to critics who say the legislation interferes with Indigenous rights, environmental protection and democracy itself. The government's One Canadian Economy Act is generating controversy inside and outside the House of Commons, with some arguing it confers king-like powers to rush projects deemed in the national interest to completion. The Liberals say the bill is intended to fast-track major projects as Canada faces the urgency of a disruptive Donald Trump presidency. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadian jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk and, quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," said Tim Hodgson, the natural resources and energy minister, at a news conference Thursday. "We need to do things that we have not done in a long time, in time frames we have not done since the end of World War II." What's in the bill? The One Canadian Economy Act, or Bill C-5, will create a list of major nation-building projects. After a designated project is added to the list, the government will publish a document outlining all the conditions that builders must follow. A single designated minister — likely Dominic LeBlanc in this government — would be responsible for listing the projects and issuing the conditions document. "For far too long major projects, whether energy transmission lines, critical mineral developments, pipelines or clean technology projects, have been stalled by assessments, challenges and overlapping and duplicative regulations," said Leblanc on Friday during a procedural debate in the House Friday. What gets on the list? The prime minister has provided examples of projects that could be included on the list based on recommendations from Canada's premiers. Ports, mines, renewable energy and oil and gas pipelines could make the list, he said. The legislation offers the following criteria: Strengthening Canada's autonomy, resilience and security. Providing economic or other benefits to Canada. Having a high likelihood of successful execution. Advancing the interests of Indigenous Peoples. Contributing to clean growth and to meeting Canada's climate objectives. The legislation gives the government broad discretion to apply all or none of these criteria, which worries Conservatives who still seem generally supportive of the bill. "These concepts are broad enough that any interpretation or any argument could be made about each factor either way for each project," said Shannon Stubbs, the Conservative critic for energy and natural resources, during debate on the bill on Friday. 'Leap before you look' assessments Some academics are concerned about what happens if the bill's broad powers to speed up projects aren't used carefully. "That could be good for the economy if it is used wisely," said University of Ottawa law and economics professor Stewart Elgie. "But it could be bad for the environment if it is used poorly." For major infrastructure and development projects on the list, such as hydroelectric dams, ports and large-scale mines, the bill removes the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada's authority to limit them. But it does place limits on the minister's ability to fast-track cross-border pipelines and nuclear reactors. It states the minister cannot issue the approval document until both the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and the Canada Energy Regulator are "satisfied that issuing the document will not compromise the health or safety of persons." However, the bill suggests the power of all federal regulators and departments is constrained, as it states that every opinion and decision formed about a project once listed must be "in favour of permitting the project to be carried out in whole or in part." This creates what some academics are calling a "leap before you look" approach that turns the federal environmental review's informed decision-making "on its head." Henry VIII clauses Those same researchers also note that a legislative tool — Henry VIII clauses, named after the autocratic King Henry VIII of England — are tucked into the bill. WATCH | PM Mark Carney says 'more will be done' on energy: Carney says 'more will be done' on energy, but conversation isn't all about pipelines 17 days ago Duration 3:52 Asked by CBC's Power & Politics host David Cochrane about the separatist sentiment in Alberta, Prime Minister Mark Carney says his government is 'committed' to working with Canadians across the country. Proposed legislation grants the Carney government, or future governments, the authority to exempt pipelines, mines or other listed projects from any law or government regulation. Near the very end of the 18-page bill, it states that cabinet can exempt national-interest projects from not only environmental laws but also acts of Parliament. "The combined effect of Sections 21, 22 and 23 gives cabinet an unconstrained ability to make regulations that not only alter the application of other federal regulations … but also to alter the operation of virtually all laws duly passed by Parliament, including outright exemption," as noted in a post co-authored by University of Calgary law professors David Wright and Martin Olszynski. What about Indigenous rights? The proposed law commits to consulting with provincial and territorial governments, as well as Indigenous Peoples, before a project is listed and a conditions document is issued or altered. Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty on Thursday told reporters that the bill does not "do away with impact assessments" and there are "multiple points" where First Nations and other groups can bring forward their concerns. "The prime minister has been clear: these projects will be selected if the communities wish to participate," she said. Nevertheless, a national Indigenous group has raised concerns about a lack of consultation on the bill itself and what that could mean for the prospect of ongoing consultation. "Unfortunately, the government provided First Nations only seven days to respond to an outline of the bill and did not provide the full text (a consultative draft) in advance," the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, said in a statement. Likely Conservative backing Conservatives have signalled that they are open to backing the bill, proposing some changes during the House of Commons debate. Stubbs said the party would like to see it go further and faster while calling for a repeal of regulations like the Trudeau-era law that banned the oil tankers from ports or marine installations along British Columbia's north coast. "Canadians deserve a government that backs them. Not a government that blocks them," Stubbs said. However, with C-5's broad powers to sidestep existing laws for approved projects, the tanker ban could be overriden without repealing anything. The Bloc Québécois has said the bill, in theory, could exempt a company building a major project from a range of laws, including the Labour Code, Criminal Code and language laws. The party is calling for more scrutiny of the bill. "How could we go forward with such a huge bill, with huge consequences for Quebec and Canada, without at least doing what we have been elected to do — and that means studying effectively this bill in committee," Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet said. Concerns over bad-faith use The Liberals intend to send the bill to committee for two days of study before hoping to get it passed on Friday. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May takes issue with what she calls an "abbreviated bulldozer time frame." At least one Liberal is calling for changes to the bill, which is supposed to terminate in five years. Vancouver MP Patrick Weiler wants the government to shorten the bill's five-year sunset clause, which he noted would go beyond Trump's term and "at least one more federal election." "We need to consider how this legislation could be used in bad faith by a future government," he said.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Bike Share Toronto says it's a victim of its own success. It's looking to NYC for help
In the latest part of our series 'Toronto Explained,' CBC's Chris Glover breaks down flaws within Bike Share Toronto's program amid high demand — and how New York City's popular bike sharing program might pave the way for solutions.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Toronto muralist straddles 2 male-dominated industries in 1 weekend
Kirsten McCrea doesn't mind being the only woman in the room, but it does get old sometimes. That's why the opportunity to design the livery for a female race car driver in a series meant to accelerate the careers of women in motorsports is so exciting. "When I started out in murals and street art it was 16 years ago. It was very male-dominated," she said. The Toronto muralist designed the wrap for the car that 18-year-old British driver Alisha Palmowski will race in F1 Academy, which will compete in support of Formula 1 during the Canadian Grand Prix weekend in Montreal. F1 Academy was launched in 2023 as a female-only, single-seater racing series that is part of the ladder to Formula 1. All of the drivers are women and many of the team executives and mechanics are women, too. McCrea has been active as a muralist in Toronto for more than a decade. Her many works can be seen throughout the city: in underpasses in the Riverdale community, on downtown patios on King Street and even in Meta's main Canadian office hub. Working on unique surfaces is something she looks for in new projects. "This is the coolest canvas I've ever had an opportunity to be a part of and the fact that it's going to be in motion has been really incredible. I'm just happy to be a part of it," McCrea said. McCrea says her work in designing the look of this race car felt deeply personal. "I really wanted to create a design that would smash the stereotypes of what women can achieve in motorsports and put all eyes on Alisha," she said. "It's inspired by the Expo 67 logo because the race track in Montreal is right next to that site," McCrea said. "I just loved this logo and how it looks like a dandelion. I thought about dandelion seeds, how they spread out, totally unfettered, and they really represent ambition to me." Palmowski said McCrea did "an incredible job" in designing the race car's livery, adding she feels privileged to race it in front of the fans in Montreal. "It's a really bold design. Lots of bright, vibrant colours, which I absolutely love," she said. Breaking barriers in art and motorsport McCrea and Palmowski have both broken barriers in male-dominated industries. While women are more accepted in motorsport now, Palmowski has faced her share of ups and downs. "Rising through the ranks being a female within the male-dominated sport of motorsport has been difficult," she said. "It's got its challenges, but I think F1 Academy has really changed the landscape of motorsport. I think it's doing an amazing job at inspiring the next generation." Palmowski's financial backers are breaking their own kind of barriers, too. 1Password, a Toronto-based cybersecurity company, sponsors Palmowski. Its chief operating officer is a woman in another male-dominated industry. "When we think of 15 years ago, when you think about motorsport, when you think about artists, when you think about cybersecurity, you don't think it's women-dominated." said Jeannie De Guzman, COO of 1Password. "It's a testament to show the progress we've made." Palmowski is part of the Red Bull Academy, a talent pipeline that has produced drivers such as four-time Formula 1 champions Max Verstappen and Sebastian Vettel. She's one of only a handful of women who have ever belonged to the program, bringing a sense of pressure and privilege. "Nobody wants me to succeed more than me. If anything it just gives me more motivation and more determination to put the hard work in behind the scenes," Palmowski said. She has already won once this year and sits fourth in the points standings. Palmowski hopes she can win again in Montreal in one of the series' three races this weekend and stand on the top step of the podium, this time with McCrea's special livery.
