Israel-Hamas war: Israel recovers bodies of 2 hostages from Gaza; over 50 still held captive
Israel recovers bodies of 2 hostages from southern Gaza (AP)
Israeli military confirmed the recovery of the bodies of two hostages from Gaza on Thursday. One of them was identified as Yair Yaakov, aged 59, who was killed during the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023.
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz described the recovery operation in Khan Younis, southern Gaza, as 'complex.'
Yaakov's body was taken into Gaza after the October 7 attack. His partner and two children were also captured but were later released as part of a ceasefire deal.
According to reports from the Associated Press, 148 hostages had been released through various exchanges and deals between Israel and Hamas.
However, eight of those released were already dead. In addition, Israeli forces had retrieved the bodies of 46 hostages and successfully rescued eight others alive.
The first phase of the ceasefire began on January 19 and involved several rounds of hostage-prisoner exchanges, but it collapsed after two months. On March 18, Israel resumed airstrikes in Gaza, effectively ending the truce.
Currently, 53 hostages are still believed to be in captivity in Gaza. Of these, 30 are already dead according to Israeli officials.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had acknowledged uncertainty about the fate of several others. Among the hostages still held were four non-Israelis, two Thai nationals, one Tanzanian, and one Nepalese, three of whom had been confirmed dead.
The war began after Hamas launched an attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli government figures.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mapped, marked, and hit: How precise was Israel's strike on Iran? 10 images show how it hit the bull's eye
Under the cover of darkness, at least 200 Israeli aircraft pierced Iranian skies on Friday in a surprise assault that didn't just begin from the air, but from within. What made the strikes unlike any in recent history was not just their scale, but their surgical precision, aided by months of covert planning, smuggled weapons, and internal sabotage. Israel's strike wasn't just a show of military might - it was a display of staggering precision, executed with a level of planning and coordination that is only now beginning to come into focus. Here are 10 images that show how precise the strike was: According to two Israeli security officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to Associated Press, the operation was aided by months of covert groundwork laid by the country's Mossad spy agency. Ahead of the assault, Mossad reportedly smuggled drones and precision-guided weapons into Iran. These were not simply stored and left — they were positioned with surgical care, near key Iranian surface-to-air missile systems and radar installations. As Israeli aircraft began their 2,000-kilometre journey toward Iranian airspace, with nearly 200 jets launching simultaneously, these internal strike assets were activated. Explosive drones launched from within Iran targeted missile launchers near Tehran, disrupting Iran's ability to respond even as the first bombs fell. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Vaastu Complaint: 2/3/4 BHK Homes: Hiranandani Fortune City Hiranandani Fortune City Enquire Now Undo Meanwhile, mobile strike systems hidden inside civilian vehicles attacked radar and air defence positions from the ground, offering air superiority to Israeli jets before they even arrived. The result: explosions erupted almost simultaneously in multiple high-security locations, including military and nuclear sites in Tehran, Isfahan and Qom. Iran's most fortified facilities — like Natanz and Fordo — were struck with a precision that suggested long-term surveillance and exact targeting data. These underground enrichment sites, previously thought to be secure, suffered visible damage. Intelligence officials say bunker-penetrating munitions and internal sabotage combined to breach even their toughest defenses. The Israeli air assault focused on disabling ballistic missile production plants, destroying launch-ready missiles, and eliminating radar networks across central Iran. Footage from the capital showed blinding flashes lighting up the night sky in unison, implying a highly coordinated strike. Iran's state media reported the deaths of several high-ranking officials, including the commander of its Revolutionary Guard, the head of its missile program, and two nuclear scientists. Though Iran launched over 100 retaliatory drones, Israel says the majority were intercepted. The operation marks a major escalation in the shadow war that has simmered for years between the two nations. But what made Friday's strike extraordinary wasn't just the scale or speed — it was how the first wave of damage came from inside Iran itself, a testament to Israel's deep infiltration and strategic foresight. Officials in Israel claim the attacks were a necessary step to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions, particularly after Tehran vowed to accelerate uranium enrichment following a recent censure by the UN's nuclear watchdog. (Image credits: AP) Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that if left unchecked, Iran could move 'within a very short time' to produce a nuclear weapon — although international experts maintain it would take months.
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Karnataka Caste Census U-Turn Sparks Row; SDPI Terms Move a ‘Betrayal' of Backward Classes
Bengaluru: The Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) has launched a sharp attack on the Congress-led Karnataka government for its decision to scrap the caste census conducted in 2015, terming the move a 'betrayal' of the state's backward classes, Dalits, SC/STs, and minorities. The original survey, conducted by the Kempanna Commission, involved 1.6 lakh government officials and cost the exchequer ₹165 crore. Though the final report was submitted earlier this year, the government has now declared it unusable on grounds of 'inaccuracy' and 'outdated data.' Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has instead ordered a new caste census, to be completed in 90 days. Calling the explanation 'vague and unconvincing,' SDPI accused the Congress of succumbing to pressure from dominant caste leaders, particularly from the Lingayat and Vokkaliga communities, who, the party alleges, have no strong electoral loyalty to Congress. 'Those who stood with the Congress since its inception are now being ignored,' SDPI said, demanding a judicial inquiry into the failure of the previous survey and the immediate public release of the report. 'Public money and administrative resources are not meant for political experiments,' the party added, reaffirming its commitment to the cause of genuine social justice and transparency.
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
With Israel-Iran conflict, a dilemma grows for stakeholders in the region
In the early hours of June 13, Israel announced it had launched a large-scale airstrike against Iran, targeting key nuclear and military sites across the country. The operation, named 'Rising Lion,' reportedly involved over 200 Israeli aircraft executing multiple waves of attacks on approximately 100 targets. Alongside the strikes meant to debilitate strategic infrastructure, the operation also killed Major General Hossein Salami, the commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and other senior military officials and nuclear scientists. Iran immediately called the attack a 'declaration of war' and launched a retaliatory drone strike, which was intercepted by Israeli air defences. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the military operation on Iran would 'continue for as many days as it takes' to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival.' The international community has expressed concern over the escalation, with calls for restraint from various states. What can account for the nature and timing of the Israeli offensive? And what are the implications for ongoing regional security dialogues, and for India's own interests in the region? First, the motivations for the operation, and especially for its timing, are mixed. The strikes were driven by a combination of long-term and more immediate security concerns, as well as strategic and political calculations. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasised that Iran's capability to produce nuclear weapons within months posed a direct danger to Israel's survival. The operation targeted Iran's main uranium enrichment facility in Natanz (but interestingly not the Fordo or Isfahan sites). The operation also aimed to degrade Iran's ballistic missile production capabilities and air defence systems, including the Russian-made S-300, which was reportedly destroyed in the attacks. By targeting these assets, Israel sought to diminish Iran's ability to retaliate effectively. It is also possible that the Netanyahu government felt the window for the strikes was closing, given the ongoing US-Iran nuclear negotiations, which were scheduled to resume in Oman on Sunday. In addition, these strikes also happened in the run-up to the UN conference scheduled for June 17–20 and sponsored by Saudi Arabia and France. The gathering's agenda, which includes discussions on regional security and economic cooperation, aims to deliver a practical action document for the establishment of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. However, the most immediate consideration is to be found in Israel's own domestic compulsions. Internally, the Netanyahu government has been increasingly facing pressures related to military conscription and public opinion. The preemptive action may have been partially motivated by a desire to consolidate political support and demonstrate strong leadership in the face of external threats. On June 11, the Israeli Knesset narrowly voted against a motion to dissolve the parliament, a move that would have forced early elections and posed a significant challenge to Netanyahu's government. This episode underscores the fragility of Netanyahu's coalition, which relies heavily on ultra-Orthodox parties. The Israeli airstrikes on Iran will most likely lead to heightened tensions and uncertainty in the region. Iran perceives the Israeli actions as a direct affront, especially given the US's prior knowledge of the operation, and has warned of severe consequences for American personnel and interests in the region. This has complicated the US's position, as it seeks to balance its commitment to Israel's security with the need to engage Iran diplomatically. The heightened uncertainty and risks of a military escalation, as well as increased oil prices and concerns about global economic repercussions, also directly affect the US long-term strategy of disengaging its military from the region and pivoting to other security theatres in East Asia and the Indo-Pacific. The Israeli strikes could also complicate ties with states with which Tel Aviv aimed to normalise relations. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which have some of the closest links with Israel of any country in West Asia, have strongly condemned the strikes, labelling them a breach of Iran's sovereignty and a serious threat to regional stability. Despite often being at odds with Shiite Iran, the largely Sunni Arab countries have been trying to avoid a regional war that could also prove damaging to their economies and see them caught in the crossfire. Not surprisingly, India has also expressed deep concern regarding the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. The Ministry of External Affairs issued a statement urging both nations to exercise restraint and avoid further escalation. This reaction is similar to India's official response to the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran in April 2024. However, the conflict raises concerns over regional stability, especially considering India's significant energy imports from West Asia and the safety of over nine million Indians living in the region. Furthermore, India still has close ties with Iran, notably through its investments in the Chabahar port. India's broader regional connectivity strategy is at risk of derailment given its strong commercial stakes in the development of the India-Middle East Economic Corridor. A deepening Israel-Iran conflict will therefore put India into an acute geopolitical dilemma when it has been successful in balancing ties with Israel, Iran and the Gulf Arab states for the past decade. India's shifting statements on the Gaza crisis had already led to some questions in the region over its positioning on important West Asian security issues. While one cannot expect an active mediating role, India, which historically has good relations with both Israel and Iran, could play a more immediate part in providing a channel of communication and ensuring a dialogue, along with regional players like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, to ensure a de-escalation of the current crisis. The writer is Associate Professor of International Relations at the Institute of Political Science, Leiden University in the Netherlands. He studies India's foreign and security policy-making, the politics of migration governance, the international politics of South Asia, and India's relations with the Middle East
