San Rechal's Death Reflects The Realities Of The Modelling Industry
A 22-year-old model, Zeeba Shaikh reflects on how the industry has evolved and not always for the better. 'There was a time when modelling was a path to freedom and independence. Today, it feels like a playground for the privileged. Budgets have shrunk, but expectations haven't.'
With the rise of influencer culture and fast-paced digital content, she says, professional models often find themselves replaced or undervalued.
Show director Vahbiz Mehta agrees that ramp modelling isn't as financially rewarding as other verticals like shoots or films, especially for newcomers. 'Like in any field, the pay grows with experience. But yes, runway work doesn't fall in the highest pay bracket,' she shares.
Zeeba also highlights how the algorithm-driven internet economy has blurred the lines between modelling and content creation. Many models are now expected to double as influencers to stay relevant. Meanwhile, AI has begun to eat into basic e-commerce assignments - jobs that once kept portfolios and bank accounts afloat.
ALSO READ: Who Was Model San Rechal, Who Died By Suicide In Puducherry?
On casting and opportunity, Vahbiz recalls directing the Vivienne Westwood show. 'Over 480 models auditioned - some with no ramp experience. The final 50 were chosen purely on merit, and many were fresh faces. There was no bias - just a focus on what worked for the show.'
While Zeeba speaks about the pressure to conform to unrealistic beauty standards, Vahbiz notes that the global fashion industry is also pushing for more inclusivity. 'At fashion weeks like Lakmé, we ensure representation across body types and skin tones. Designers are recognising the value of relatability.'
Together, their voices reflect the many sides of a complex industry - where dreams, pressure, opportunity, and change coexist every day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Do you have problem with social media successes like Dolly Chaiwalla? Just sit back and enjoy reels
Two days ago, there was an announcement on social media from a person planning to expand their business through a franchise model, opening tea shops and cafes across the country. In a country that has witnessed a boom of homegrown brands offering freshly brewed tea and coffee over the last decade or so, this could have been a regular announcement, easily lost among the crowd of businesses opening and shutting every day. Except, this entrepreneur wasn't the usual businessman or 'start-up' bro. He is a humble, semi-literate Nagpur-based tea seller who goes by the name Dolly Chaiwalla and has amassed over 5 million Instagram followers with his flamboyant style and a chai that has the endorsement of Microsoft founder Bill Gates. While some wished him well and others offered him business advice, there were a few who seemed to have a meltdown. 'Education is a scam in India', went one comment – a not-so-veiled dig at Dolly Chaiwalla's lack of formal education. Barely 10 days before this, an X user targeted popular content creator Apoorva Mukhija, better known as The Rebel Kid, lamenting how the 24-year-old has built a 'Rs 41 crore empire' with 'reels and red lipsticks' while 'not even 100 people know me' despite a 14-hour study schedule and an IIT background. While it is not clear if Mukhija's net worth is actually Rs 41 crore, the rant and personal attack on her and Dolly, for making it despite an IIT-IIM background, reeks of the contempt that many from so-called top-tier educational institutions have for people who they think are not so 'bright'. Who is to decide what being smart actually is? Is it only about confining yourself to a room for hours on end to crack a highly competitive exam? What about those who don't have the resources or the neurotypicality required for such education but are smart enough to know what works in the era they live in and are willing to reinvent themselves accordingly? And is being academically bright the only skill that counts? What about being funny, relatable, innovative, resilient and empathetic? For far too long, people from elite institutions have believed themselves to be a cut above the rest. Businesses and services have also tapped into the craze, with at least one matrimonial website catering to only IIT-IIM graduates. Recently, a leading bank issued a card accessible only to those who have studied in elite institutes of the country. But the world is changing. At a time when many from coveted engineering branches are having sleepless nights about the possibility of losing their jobs to automation, there are countless people from the country's big and small towns making it big by creating content. Do they deserve the fame and money? Absolutely. Like any other job, content creation is honest work. It requires effort and a thick skin. You need to be sharp and funny. And, of course, smart. To know what is going to work, what will be relatable, and what will be counted as funny. To be able to do so without a market research firm at your disposal requires some smarts, doesn't it? Those who take issue with the social media success stories must ask themselves: Why do they think that only a few people, those who either come from money or who have had an elite education, have the right to access the good things in life? Why does an IITian setting up a Chaayos or a NYU graduate establishing a Blue Tokai not rattle them, but a Dolly Chaiwalla does? Thankfully, Dolly and Mukhija don't really care for the naysayers. While Dolly has received over 1,600 applications for his business, Mukhija clapped back at the X user. With the world rapidly changing and once-coveted careers losing their relevance, it is about time that we come to terms with the changing nature of employment. Increasingly, it seems that being relevant and resilient are what the world needs. And if that's too much to stomach, just sit back and enjoy a few of their reels.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Pup da Vinci: She was tied up and left alone; 'India's First Painter Dog' now paints to save lives
At just 45 days old, a Labrador named Dali was found tied up and abandoned — a fate that many stray animals face across India. But her story took a remarkable turn after she was adopted by Hyderabad-based couple Hoi Choudhury and Snehangshu Debnath. What began as a rescued pup's playful antics soon transformed into something much more unexpected: a painting journey that would not only win hearts but also raise funds for other strays in need. According to PTI, the couple first noticed Dali's unusual fascination with art supplies when she repeatedly snatched paintbrushes from Debnath, an artist by profession. Amused and intrigued, they eventually decided to let her try painting. Her first stroke on canvas left them astonished — it was clear Dali wanted to participate in the creative process. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category others Data Science MBA Public Policy Project Management Others healthcare Healthcare Digital Marketing Cybersecurity Leadership Product Management Finance Technology Management CXO Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence MCA Operations Management Degree PGDM Data Analytics Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details Custom-Made Brush and a Budding Talent Realising the potential, Choudhury and Debnath set out to make a brush that Dali could safely use. After some research, they crafted a dog-friendly version from a wooden block, shaped specifically to fit in her mouth. This tool became the key to Dali's artistic expression. By the age of nine months, Dali had already completed her first painting. Since then, she has created over three dozen abstract works marked by vibrant strokes, playful textures, and a surprising sense of composition. These aren't just random splashes — her work reflects a curious, instinctive grasp of form. Art For A Cause To channel her growing popularity into something meaningful, the couple selected twelve of her most striking pieces and released them as a limited-edition calendar. Buyers were given the option to select the colour palette for their commissioned paintings, with all proceeds dedicated to rescuing and treating injured stray animals. So far, the initiative has raised Rs 35,000, which has gone directly into medical care and shelter work. The couple stressed that their goal was always to use the attention Dali received to benefit animals who have not been as lucky. Debnath explained that they never expected people to respond so warmly, but they were heartened by the global support for Dali's mission. Online Fame and Community Support Dali's Instagram account, which describes her as 'India's 1st Painter Dog,' has garnered nearly 50,000 followers. Her feed is filled with behind-the-scenes clips, messy paws in action, and finished pieces proudly displayed. Supporters from around the world leave heartfelt comments, praising both her art and the compassion behind the initiative. One user expressed disbelief at how anyone could abandon such a loving animal, while another thanked the couple for giving her a second chance. Buyers of the calendar described her work as both beautiful and meaningful, saying they were proud to support the cause. What makes Dali truly unique is that she's reportedly the only dog in India creating watercolour art. In a world where many stray animals are overlooked, Dali stands out — not just as a painter, but as a symbol of how compassion and creativity can come together to make a difference.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Will SC's push for online content rules bring clarity or stifle free speech?
The spotlight has returned to the limits of free speech for content creators in India, as the Supreme Court recently asked the government to frame a set of guidelines to curb obscenity and vulgarity in online content without curtailing freedom of expression. Multiple benches of the court, while hearing different cases on 15 July involving comedians and influencers, stressed the need for clear guidelines to curb objectionable content while protecting Constitutional rights. The apex court's directive has left content creators divided. While some welcome the move, hoping it will define clear boundaries for permissible online behaviour and reduce legal uncertainties and arbitrary measures, others fear it could threaten their creative freedom and lead to self-censorship. 'I'm open to guidelines that promote responsible content creation without stifling creative expression. As a roast comedy content creator, I already self-censor to avoid offence, but clarity on what's acceptable would help," said Shivamsingh Rajput, a Surat-based YouTuber who has close to 10.5 million subscribers across his five YouTube channels. 'A content classification system would be great. It would let audiences choose what they watch and take the pressure off creators. Dark humour has its audience worldwide and I believe India could benefit from a more open approach. This would allow our content economy to grow and evolve," Rajput added. Rohan Cariappa, a Bangalore-based creator who creates short comedy skits on Instagram and content about India's growing hip-hop and rap culture on YouTube, expresses skepticism on executing such guidelines. He has close to 500,000 followers across platforms. 'The idea of having a set of guidelines for creators doesn't sound bad to me, but the real problem lies in the execution. With the kind of population and the number of creators we have in this country, it is really difficult to fast-track anything," Cariappa highlighted, adding that as per the latest data, India is home to over 8 million active content creators. 'I also fear that such rules can be misused to arm-twist creators with different ideologies and affinities, be they religious, political, or any other kind. I have personally faced this when a comedy video of mine attracted a legal notice last year after a few complaints and my phone was confiscated only for the case to be quashed by the court later. People have also tended to try to pull down creators who have grown very fast. So, as much as the proposal sounds good, I am unsure whether it is feasible given the size of our community and country," Cariappa further added. The influencer marketing industry in India is expected to grow to ₹3,375 crore in 2026 from ₹2,344 crore last year, as per EY data reported by Mint earlier. The fresh debate on the creation of such guidelines for creators began with India's Got Latent controversy, where Cure SMA India Foundation accused five stand-up comedians, including Samay Raina, of making insensitive remarks about persons with disabilities. While hearing a plea, Justice Surya Kant verbally asked Attorney General R. Venkataramani to draft guidelines in consultation with stakeholders to ensure they align with Constitutional principles. 'What we would like is guidelines in conformity with Constitutional principles, balancing freedom and the limits of that freedom where rights and duties start. We want it to be comprehensive and debated openly," remarked Justice Kant. Justice Kant clarified that Article 21 (right to live with human dignity) of Indian Constitution overrides Article 19 (freedom of speech), especially in cases involving insensitive comments against vulnerable groups. On the same day, another bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and K.V. Vishwanathan discussed ways to curb 'divisive tendencies" on social media while hearing West Bengal-based Wazahat Khan's plea to club FIRs against him for posts on Hindu deities. The bench called for detailed deliberations to frame guidelines that balance objectionable content with Constitutional rights. Meanwhile, a third bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar expressed concern over the tendency of citizens to post 'anything and everything" online while hearing cartoonist Hemant Malviya's plea for protection against a case filed for posting a 'revolting" cartoon on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 'What is happening today is people say and write all kinds of things without caring about the language they use online and on their shows," Justice Dhulia remarked. Mint spoke to lawyers practising technology law in India's top courts. They noted that the court's discussions and the government's plan to bring new rules align with existing laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, they cautioned that new rules should not create vague or subjective definitions for terms like vulgarity and obscenity, as this could lead to misuse. 'The Intermediary Guidelines to follow already define such content under existing law to allow takedown. New rules shouldn't create separate or vague standards that risk curbing legitimate online expression," said Sidhant Kumar Marwah, Partner at Unum Law. The guidelines mentioned by Marwah refer to The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 that are a set of rules that require digital intermediaries such as YouTube, X, Instagram and Facebook to respond to user grievances expeditiously and remove harmful content. Nakul Gandhi, founding partner of NG Law Chambers, said the framework must begin by recognising that freedom of expression is deeply subjective. 'What's vulgar to one may be satire to another. The danger lies in converting personal offence into legal prohibition. Instead of rigid definitions, the law should focus on principled thresholds, such as: Does the content incite violence? Does it exploit or endanger a specific group? These are measurable parameters. But matters of taste, tone, or personal offence should remain outside the scope of legal sanction." Lawyers also stressed the need for safeguards under new rules to prevent arbitrary takedowns by platforms. According to Ankit Sahni, partner at Ajay Sahni & Associates, any government takedown request must have a written order with legal grounds and give creators a chance to respond. 'Transparency reports, time-bound reviews, and oversight by an independent grievance body can build trust." Marwah from Unum Law suggested setting up an independent regulatory body manned by experts, similar to the UK's Online Safety Act, to issue takedown orders based on clear, well-defined standards. However, legal experts warned of what overregulation can do. 'Vague or broad rules may stifle creativity, comedy, and critical commentary. Guidelines must be clear, transparent, and proportionate to protect free expression," noted Anupam Shukla, technology law and privacy practice at Pioneer Legal. Gandhi from NG Law Chambers further cautions that 'the direction seems more cautionary than empowering for creators. Seen in that light, moves towards broad guidelines, without any defined limits, risk becoming tools against creators, especially the independent ones who don't have the backing of big platforms or studios."
