logo
Elon Musk's Department of Government Inefficiency

Elon Musk's Department of Government Inefficiency

Yahoo01-03-2025

Elon Musk showed up in Washington in January on a promise to streamline the federal government and make it run more efficiently. But over the course of just five weeks, he's accomplished precisely the opposite: a massive and unnecessary time suck that's pulled federal employees away from their duties on a daily basis.
Firing essential workers who need to then be rehired. Distracting agencies with directives that are reversed and then reversed again. Forcing workers back into offices where they don't have enough desks. And provoking countless agency meetings where managers are unable to answer basic questions about the White House's latest move. On and on it goes.
'The meetings are as clear as mud,' said Sheria Smith, a civil rights attorney at the Department of Education in Texas and president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. 'No one knows anything. … People are being released from duty, then returned to duty. We don't know who's calling the shots. It's just wildly inefficient.'
She added, 'How can you be on task when you don't even know from hour to hour whether you're going to [have a job]?'
President Donald Trump vowed on the campaign trail to fire a lot of people and shrink the federal workforce, which numbers around 2.4 million, excluding the U.S. Postal Service. So far the administration has terminated thousands of people through legally dubious layoffs and tried to push out tens of thousands more through the also legally dubious deferred resignation program known as 'Fork in the Road.'
In more than a dozen interviews, federal workers described lost hours and days as they tried to navigate an endless stream of unclear guidance as their jobs hang in the balance. Most of them spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of being fired or retaliated against.
A mental health provider at the Department of Veterans Affairs said in the wake of the 'Fork' proposal they'd had four impromptu staff meetings, each up to a half-hour long, 'pulling us away from veteran care.'
'In response to Saturday's 'what did you do last week?' email, leadership scheduled yet another meeting first thing Monday morning — forcing me to reschedule a veteran's appointment just to receive guidance from my leadership on how to respond,' they said.
Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, should instead be called a department of 'inefficiency or ineptitude,' said Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit organization that advocates for a more effective federal government.
'They have caused unbelievable waste, unbelievable distraction from the mission, unbelievable loss of critical talent,' Stier said. 'They've done nothing to understand the systems they're trying to change or learn from those around them who know better.'
He added, 'The federal government isn't, in fact, a tech startup.'
Much of the wasted time stems from the White House's hostile and confusing directives.
Some of the most critical information isn't coming from federal agency leaders — it's coming from the previously obscure Office of Personnel Management, and from Musk, the unelected head of a not-real federal agency. (Trump has formally renamed the U.S. Digital Service the U.S. DOGE Service, but DOGE is better understood as a White House government-cutting initiative.)
Late last week, more than 2 million workers received an email from OPM instructing them to reply with a list of five bullet points explaining what they'd accomplished during the previous week. The insulting demand was paired with a threat from Musk on X, his private social-media platform formerly known as Twitter, where he said a failure to reply would be considered 'a resignation.'
Workers, union representatives and agency managers spent the weekend trying to figure out whether people actually needed to respond. Many employees got little done on Monday as unscheduled meetings were called and agency heads gave conflicting guidance on what to do.
OPM later said replying to Musk's demand was voluntary, suggesting there would be no repercussions for ignoring it. But Trump contradicted that guidance by saying those who didn't reply would be 'fired' or 'sort of semi-fired.'
Such chaos ends up having a real-world impact, said an employee of the Veterans Benefits Administration who processes disability claims. The worker receives a daily report on her productivity rate, which is based on the number of claims processed and their complexity, and she saw a roughly 20% drop on Monday as she and others were dealing with the Musk ultimatum.
In other words, veterans with disabilities stemming from their service to the country were waiting longer to have their claims processed because of confusing threats from the White House.
'People are stressed out, and that's going to get in the way,' she explained. 'We have to focus. These claims are very complex. It requires a lot of attention. We're definitely being taken away from the focus we should be putting on the veterans.'
Another VA worker said their superiors had been 'mired in daily meetings to discuss what little information we had, how it was affecting employees and overall morale, and addressing whether or not any of this is legal.'
'To estimate time loss over the course of one week, I'd say it cost us at least a full day's productivity, if not more,' they said.
Nothing may be more wasteful than firing workers who must then be rehired. After the Trump administration's sloppy firing of probationary employees, agencies had to try to hastily reinstate workers who oversee nuclear weapons, manage the power grid and fight bird flu.
Among them were more than two dozen workers at the Bonneville Power Administration, a federal power supplier in the Pacific Northwest managed under the Energy Department.
Mike Braden, a Bonneville Power Administration employee and president of its employee union, said that by the time the workers were rehired they had already lost their access to the IT systems and their clearance to enter buildings. The advice from management upon their return was to 'pretend like nothing happened.'
'There's no thought to this, no coordination with the agencies,' Braden said of the White House. 'We have all this disruption, and we can't figure out how things are going to work moving forward.'
He said his phone is buzzing nonstop with questions from members about emails or memos from OPM or posts online from Musk.
'I'm getting hit up all through the weekend, all throughout the evening,' he said. 'Somebody will ping me, 'Hey I just saw this — what does this mean?' I'm like, 'Aw shit.''
Paul Dobias, a Department of Navy engineer and president of his union, said agency managers are so afraid of appearing hostile to the Trump administration's goals that they seem to pass along guidance without review. Many of those managers, he noted, could lose their civil service protections under Trump's Schedule F scheme.
'It just goes right through their doors where nobody takes the time to go and sit down and figure out, ′Does this all add up and make sense?′' Dobias said. 'I've seen a number of documents where it [appears] there's like five or six different people generating the documents … and they're not talking with each other.'
The turbulence has created an enormous amount of work for federal employees who also are union representatives and help enforce collective bargaining agreements. Coworkers are coming to them more than ever for clarity — and in many cases managers are steering them to the union representatives because the managers themselves don't have answers.
Smith, the union president at the Education Department, said supervisors seem to be at a loss when they're peppered with questions in online staff meetings about the administration's latest directive. She said she's heard a variation of one particular nonanswer more than once.
'They'll say, 'We all got the same email,'' Smith said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bloomberg Surveillance: Market Optimism
Bloomberg Surveillance: Market Optimism

Bloomberg

time29 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bloomberg Surveillance: Market Optimism

Watch Tom and Paul LIVE every day on YouTube: Bloomberg Surveillance hosted by Tom Keene & Paul Sweeney June 9th, 2025 Featuring: 1) Ben Laidler, Head of Equity Strategy at Bradesco BBI, joins for an extended discussion on equity bullishness and where he believes the S&P can land in 2025. The S&P 500 benchmark is nearing all-time highs, but traders are searching for catalysts for sustained advances amid ongoing trade uncertainty. 2) Henrietta Treyz, co-founder at Veda Partners, joins to discuss DC headlines including the riots in LA and latest on the tax bill after Elon Musk's White House fallout. Senate Republicans plan to propose revised tax and health-care provisions to President Trump's $3 trillion economic package, despite criticism from Elon Musk. 3) Charles Kantor, Senior Portfolio Manager at Neuberger Berman, talks about why history rhymes between now and the 2000 .com bubble and the potential for a consumer crunch. Markets are focusing on a $22 billion auction of 30-year bonds on Thursday and Wednesday's US inflation report for May, which may show a slightly faster pace of price increases. 4) Lisa Mateo joins with the latest headlines in newspapers across the US, including Bloomberg reporting on baseball's TV deal and WSJ's look at Father's Day gifts.

Trump threatens to revoke SpaceX contracts amid Musk feud
Trump threatens to revoke SpaceX contracts amid Musk feud

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump threatens to revoke SpaceX contracts amid Musk feud

CHARLOTTE (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — President Trump threatened to revoke Elon Musk's government contracts amid their public feud, prompting Musk to suggest he might decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft briefly. With SpaceX serving as NASA's primary transport to the ISS and a key player in upcoming Moon and Mars missions, experts warn that losing the company would leave the U.S. space program scrambling for alternatives. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Donald Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Suffers Blow
Donald Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Suffers Blow

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Donald Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Suffers Blow

A new poll found that most people believe that President Donald Trump's signature spending bill will primarily benefit wealthy individuals while harming middle-class and low-income individuals. The more than 1,000-page One Big Beautiful Bill, which includes about $4.9 trillion in tax breaks, budget cuts, and new work requirements for Medicaid, among other budgetary changes, passed 215-214 in the House last month following weeks of negotiations. RepublicansThomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio voted against it, joining every House Democrat. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the bill will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. national debt. It also stated that the legislation reduces taxes by $3.75 trillion. The poll comes as the bill is being debated in the Senate and as Elon Musk spoke out against it, sparking a feud with Trump. According to the CBS News/YouGov poll, 47 percent of respondents believe the One Big Beautiful Bill will hurt middle-class individuals, while 31 percent think it will benefit them. The poll also found that 54 percent of those surveyed believe the bill will hurt poor people, while 31 percent think it will help them. At the same time, 60 percent of respondents believe the bill will benefit wealthy individuals, and 7 percent think it will hurt them. The poll of 2,428 adults was conducted between June 4 and June 6 and has a margin of error of +/- 2.4 percentage points. Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, told Fox News at the end of May: "We will get it done. Now, it's going to be bumpy, it's going to be messy. But we will get it done because it is the main vehicle for us to deliver on the mandate from the voters." Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, said in a statement: "The Congressional Budget Office just confirmed that Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is, in Elon Musk's words, a 'disgusting abomination.' This independent analysis blows a hole through Congressional Republicans' lies—this bill will rip health care away from millions of people and still jack up the debt to fund trillions in tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations." President Donald Trump, on Truth Social: "It's time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!" House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries called the bill a "reckless, regressive and reprehensible GOP tax scam," and vowed to use it against Republicans in the upcoming midterm election cycle. House Speaker Mike Johnson, at a press conference: "This is a big day. We said on the House floor: It's finally morning in America again." He added: "Today, the House has passed generational, truly nation-shaping legislation to reduce spending and permanently lower taxes for families and job-creators, secure the border, unleash American energy dominance, restore peace through strength and make government work more efficiently and effectively for all Americans." The bill is headed to the Senate, where changes are expected as legislators aim for a July 4 deadline. The chamber has a 53-47 Republican majority, so it needs near unanimity for the bill to pass. Related Articles The 1600: Hot Trump SummerMore 'No Kings' Protests Are Planned Nationwide on June 14: What to KnowIran Trolls US Over LA RiotsThe Trump Administration's Fossil Fuels Decisions Are Taking America-and the Rest of the World-Backward | Opinion 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store