logo
Almost 40% of world's glaciers already doomed due to climate crisis

Almost 40% of world's glaciers already doomed due to climate crisis

The Guardian2 days ago

Almost 40% of glaciers in existence today are already doomed to melt due to climate-heating emissions from fossil fuels, a study has found.
The loss will soar to 75% if global heating reaches the 2.7C rise for which the world is currently on track.
The massive loss of glaciers would push up sea levels, endangering millions of people and driving mass migration, profoundly affecting the billions reliant on glaciers to regulate the water used to grow food, the researchers said.
However, slashing carbon emissions and limiting heating to the internationally agreed 1.5C target would save half of glacier ice. That goal is looking increasingly out of reach as emissions continue to rise, but the scientists said that every tenth-of-a-degree rise that was avoided would save 2.7tn tonnes of ice.
Glaciers in the western US and Canada were severely affected, the study found, with 75% already doomed to melt. Those in the high, cold mountains of the Hindu Kush and Karakoram ranges are more resilient but will still shrink significantly as global temperatures rise.
Unlike previous studies, the research uses multiple models of glaciers to examine their fate well beyond the end of the century. About 20% of glaciers were already known to be doomed to melt by 2100, but the longer term view revealed that the total glacier loss that is already inevitable is 39%.
As well as sea level rise, glacier loss will increase ice lake collapses that devastate downstream communities and the loss of wild ecosystems, while regions dependent on glacier tourism will also suffer.
'Our study makes it painfully clear that every fraction of a degree matters,' said Dr Harry Zekollari at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium, who co-led the research. 'The choices we make today will resonate for centuries, determining how much of our glaciers can be preserved.'
Dr Lilian Schuster, at the University of Innsbruck, Switzerland, and co-lead author, said: 'Glaciers are good indicators of climate change because their retreat allows us to see with our own eyes how climate is changing. However, since they adjust over longer timescales, the situation for glaciers is actually far worse than visible in the mountains today.'
Schuster added that it was 'not too late to act now, because this study shows every tenth of a degree less of global warming matters', potentially reducing the human suffering caused by glacier loss. 'We hope the message gives people some hope that we can still do something.'
The baseline year for the analysis was 2020, but glaciers had already lost huge amounts of ice before this due to global heating over the last century. Quantifying this loss is difficult, however, due to the scarcity of historical data. 'Glaciers were way bigger [in 1850] than they are today,' said Zekollari.
The study, published in the journal Science, used eight different glacier models, each calibrated using real-world observations. These estimated the ice loss of the world's 200,000 glaciers outside Greenland and Antarctica under a range of global temperature scenarios, with that temperature remaining constant for thousands of years.
The researchers acknowledged significant uncertainties in the models but said glaciers are certain to lose significant ice and this could be a lot higher than the average estimate. For example, the average prediction that 40% of glaciers are doomed at today's level of global heating could be as high as 55% in the worst case.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
The proportion of doomed glaciers varies widely around the world, with 80% of glaciers in the southern part of Arctic Canada already destined to melt, while only 5% of the glaciers in the western part of the Hindu Kush-Karakoram-Himalaya mountain chain are currently consigned to history.
The situation is grim at 2.7C of global heating: all but seven of the 19 major glacier regions of the world eventually lose at least 80% of glaciers, from central Europe to the eastern Himalaya chain. Glaciers would vanish from the Russian Arctic, the western US and Iceland.
Glaciers currently contribute about a quarter of sea level rise and those already doomed will lead to another 11cm. If global heating reaches 2.7C, it will result in 23cm of sea level rise from glaciers alone. Limiting global heating to 1.5C limits reduces that to 14cm.
Prof Andrew Shepherd, at Northumbria University in the UK, said the study brought together all of the glacier model projections into a single assessment. 'Glaciers are the most iconic example of the impacts of climate change, and they are in all corners of our planet,' he said.
'This study shows that glacier melting will continue for centuries, even if climate warming stops today, and that's a sobering thought – dramatic changes will take place in our lifetimes. Our mountain landscapes will be unrecognisable if we continue to burn fossil fuels as we are today.'
Glaciers could seem remote, said Zekollari, but their loss mattered to everyone. 'Everything is connected. If you drive around in your car in the UK, you're emitting greenhouse gases and this helps melt a glacier maybe 10,000km away,' he said. 'The oceans then rise, so you'll have to have better coastal defences and that will cost a lot of taxpayers money.'
The UN's High-Level International Conference on Glaciers' Preservation begins on Wednesday in Tajikistan, part of the International Year of Glaciers' Preservation.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Business Matters  Trump doubles tariffs on steel imports to 50%
Business Matters  Trump doubles tariffs on steel imports to 50%

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Business Matters Trump doubles tariffs on steel imports to 50%

American President Donald Trump has announced at a rally in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that the US will double tariffs on steel imports from 25% to 50% to boost the local steel industry. The announcement is the latest turn in Trump's rollercoaster approach to tariffs since re-entering office in January. Meanwhile, it was the last day at the White House for tech billionaire Elon Musk who has departed from his role at DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency.) We examine what he has achieved in the role, what his priorities will be at Tesla and Space X, and whether he and President Trump can remain friends And with the Indian economy showing a growth of 7.4% between January and March, beating analyst expectations, we analyse what's behind the numbers and if the growth can continue To discuss these and the big global business news of the day, presenter Devina Gupta, is joined by Andy Uhler, journalism fellow at University of Texas Energy Institute in the US and Rachel Cartland, author and commentator based in Hong Kong.

Trump claimed ‘tariffs are easy' – he's learning the hard way that's not the case
Trump claimed ‘tariffs are easy' – he's learning the hard way that's not the case

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump claimed ‘tariffs are easy' – he's learning the hard way that's not the case

'Tariffs are easy,' Donald Trump claimed in March. For his administration, and the world, they have proven anything but. Now an obscure New York court has blocked his signature trade policy, setting up a battle that looks sure to end up in the supreme court. The plan was simple. For decades, Trump has made the case for tariffs. Now, in his second term, he would dramatically hike them on the world; raise trillions of dollars for the federal government; cut taxes for Americans; and lure manufacturers to the country's industrial heartlands, creating millions of jobs. But this drastic bid to overhaul the global economy has proved far more and again over the past four months, reality failed to match the rhetoric. Threats were followed by delays. Exemptions were carved out of supposedly universal tariff waves. Even when they were imposed, it was days, if not hours, before pauses were announced. Trump returned to office determined to ignore all the warnings that led his first administration to hold back from executing his most extreme ideas. Long before the president had returned to the White House, he had pledged to hike duties on his country's two biggest trading partners and launch a trade war with the world's second largest economy. Sweeping levies on dozens of other countries ensued. Each significant economic assault has set the stage for a swift retreat. Tariffs on Canada and Mexico were all but halted. Steep individual tariffs calculated for a string of trading partners were reduced to 10%. An eye-watering 145% tariff on Chinese goods was drastically cut, having been in place for a matter of weeks. Trump's mind in each case was not changed. His arm was twisted. Panic in the markets prompted his administration, after initially making a show of defiance, to back down. And warnings that the very people who voted Trump back into power would bear the brunt of his tariffs prompted the president, after initially playing down the risks, to reconsider. Trump's economic agenda, which is aides are trying to ram through without guardrails, has so far been curbed by real-world consequences that failed to match his narrative. And on Wednesday, a further twist threatened to derail the core of his plan. To impose blanket tariffs on nations from Mexico and Mauritius to China and Chad, the administration declared a national emergency and used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law, as legal justification. The flow of fentanyl across borders, and the fact the US imports more than it exports, are emergencies that warrant tariffs under IEEPA, according to the White House. A little-known federal court disagreed. IEEPA 'does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders', the US court of international trade concluded in a ruling. Most of Trump's tariffs – including a 10% rate on all imports, introduced last month – 'exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs', a panel of three federal judges wrote. An appeals court on Thursday ruled the decision was 'temporarily stayed until further notice while this court considers the motions papers.' But there is no doubt that this was a significant setback. Rather than reluctantly walk back his tariffs himself, and present it as some kind of negotiating coup, as Trump has repeatedly done in recent months, for the first time figures outside his administration were pulling the plug. 'This was a novel and expansive use of IEEPA, and an untested one,' said Greta Peisch, former general counsel at the Office of the US Trade Representative under Joe Biden. 'It was brand new,' she added. 'They were really testing the limits of that power, and the ability of the executive branch to use it to impose tariffs.' The administration's appeal alleged the ruling was an example of 'judicial tyranny' in the US. But a narrower decision on Thursday, when a second US court issued a preliminary ruling against Trump's tariffs in a case brought by two Illinois toy companies, Learning Resources and hand2mind, presented another legal obstacle. Whatever happens, this process is unlikely to force Trump to fundamentally rethink his economic agenda. The US court of international trade ruling was not about whether the White House should launch a series of tariff assaults on the world, but how. 'We've got a very strong case with IEEPA,' White House trade adviser Peter Navarro claimed during a Bloomberg interview on Thursday. 'But the court basically tells us, if we lose that, we just do some other things,' he said. 'So nothing's really changed.' After months of uncertainty, these latest legal spats add another layer of confusion, rather than provide clarity, to businesses trying to navigate the world economy under Trump. 'We will leave this decision to work its way through the United States courts system,' said Candace Laing, president and CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. 'Ultimately, the end of this trade war with the US will not come through the courts.' Despite Trump's promises, most Americans are not as 'rich as hell,' thanks to the tariffs. Nor have tariffs raised trillions of dollars, or created millions of jobs. But Trump's view has also not changed. They remain beautiful, at least in his eyes. 'Don't project that this is going to be where we end up,' Peisch, now an attorney at law firm Wiley, said of the current legal limbo. 'There's going to be lots of ups and downs before we get to wherever the final resting place is for tariffs under this administration.'

Kentucky Senator who served as Democrat for 27 years defects to Republican Party in stunning move
Kentucky Senator who served as Democrat for 27 years defects to Republican Party in stunning move

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kentucky Senator who served as Democrat for 27 years defects to Republican Party in stunning move

A longtime state lawmaker who has served as a Democrat for the past 27 years announced on Friday that she is switching parties, joining Republican supermajorities in the latest setback for Democrats trying to rebuild support across rural Kentucky. State Senator Robin Webb, who was first elected to the Kentucky House of Representatives in 1998, revealed she will join the ranks of GOP lawmakers who control the flow of legislation in the state. The defection leaves Kentucky Democrats even more isolated in rural America. Webb was one of the last rural Democrats in Kentucky's legislature, and her defection means her former party will be instead tethered to urban and suburban districts in a state with large stretches of rural territory controlled by the GOP. Webb felt increasingly disconnected from the Democratic Party and could no longer stomach its 'lurch to the left.' 'It has become untenable and counterproductive to the best interests of my constituents for me to remain a Democrat,' Webb said. 'I will continue to be a fearless advocate for rural Kentucky and for the residents of eastern Kentucky who have been so good to me and my family.' The departure of Webb, who represents a four-county district, is more than symbolic: it underscores the near-total GOP takeover of Kentucky's rural political map. Democrats, already reduced to urban and suburban strongholds, now find themselves with virtually no foothold in the state's sprawling countryside. Kentucky Democratic Party Chair Colmon Elridge said that Webb chose to align with a political party attempting to fund tax breaks for the wealthy 'off the backs of vulnerable' people. It was a barbed reference to the multitrillion-dollar tax breaks package passed recently by US House Republicans. To make up for some of the lost tax revenue, Republicans focused on changes to Medicaid and the food stamps program. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates 8.6 million fewer people would have health care coverage and 3 million fewer people a month would have SNAP food stamps benefits with the proposed changes. 'If those are her priorities, then we agree: she isn't a Democrat,' Elridge said. Webb stressed that her core values have not changed. 'The only difference today is the letter next to my name,' she said. Webb has compiled a personal and professional resume deeply ingrained in Kentucky culture. She's a hunter, a horse enthusiast, and a former coal miner who changed career paths to become an attorney. Webb first joined the Kentucky House in 1999, when Democrats controlled the chamber. She spent a decade as a state representative before joining the GOP-led Senate in 2009. Republicans seized total control of the legislature in the 2016 election, when they rode Donald Trump's coattails to win the Kentucky House. Republicans padded their legislative numbers in subsequent elections, giving them their overwhelming majorities. Republicans attained that dominance by winning in rural districts previously held by Democrats, but Webb's district had remained a blue dot on the map until Friday. Her party switch leaves Democrats mostly devoid of a rural presence in the legislature. One exception is Democratic state Rep. Ashley Tackett Laferty, who represents an Appalachian district. The state's two-term governor, Democrat Andy Beshear, won a number of rural counties and shrank GOP margins in others in his 2023 reelection. His popularity was built on the state's robust economic growth during his tenure and his handling of disasters, from tornadoes and floods to the COVID-19 pandemic. Kentucky Democrats are trying to spark a rural comeback with a grassroots strategy, evidenced by the state party's ongoing 'listening tour' with stops in culturally conservative towns across the state. State Republican Party Chairman Robert Benvenuti said Webb's party switch reflects a broader political trend. In 2022, the GOP overtook the Democratic Party in statewide voter registration. 'Like countless other Kentuckians, she has recognized that the policies and objectives of today´s Democratic Party are simply not what they once were, and do not align with the vast majority of Kentuckians,' he said. Lawmakers will begin their 2026 session in early January, but Beshear has said he will likely call lawmakers back for a special session sometime this year to take up storm-relief funding. Parts of southeastern Kentucky were devastated by deadly tornadoes earlier this month, while other parts of the Bluegrass State were inundated by flooding in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store