
Your legal rights explained if you aren't offered face-to-face GP appointment
The GP Patient Survey, released by NHS England, has highlighted the difficulties patients experience when wanting an in-person GP appointment.
What are my legal rights to an in-person GP appointment?
(Image: Getty )
A medical negligence solicitor has weighed in on common concerns Brits have about consulting their GP, shedding light on patients' rights. This comes as the GP Patient Survey , released by NHS, highlighted the difficulties patients face when seeking in-person appointments with their GP.
According to the survey, one in three participants found contacting their GP by phone to be fairly or very difficult. Over a quarter of patients had their GP appointment conducted remotely, and over two-fifths rarely get to speak to or see their preferred healthcare professional when they ask.
Sophie McGarry, a solicitor at Patient Claim Line , has clarified patients' legal rights to in-person appointments. She has also provided guidance on what to do if you suspect you've been misdiagnosed during a phone or video GP appointment, reports the Mirror.
Are patients legally entitled to an in-person appointment with their GP?
As of now, GP patients are entitled to be offered face-to-face appointments if that is their preference. NHS GP says: "According to new NHS guidance, practices in England must offer face-to-face appointments if requested. GPs who fail to make the necessary arrangements for patients to make an appointment without having to spend hours on the phone or who are not available for face-to-face appointments are, in the strictest terms, breaking the law."
NHS England has issued guidelines to GP practices, stating that they must ensure the availability of face-to-face appointments. Practices should respect patient preferences for in-person care unless there are valid clinical reasons not to, such as the patient exhibiting COVID symptoms.
GP practices must ensure they are offering face-to-face appointments
(Image: Getty )
Article continues below
In England, NHS guidelines stipulate that GP practices should offer face-to-face appointments upon request. However, there is no strict legal entitlement to an in-person visit if the GP deems a remote consultation appropriate.
Nevertheless, patients do have the right to see a healthcare professional within 48 hours if necessary. If you feel a face-to-face appointment is required, don't hesitate to request one and explain your reasons. If your request is denied, you can escalate the matter to the practice manager or lodge a formal complaint. Find out more about the choices available to you in the NHS on its website.
NHS England says: "While the expanded use of video, online and telephone consultations can be maintained where patients find benefit from them, this should be done alongside a clear offer of appointments in person." You can read more about the choices available to you in the NHS on its website.
What can be done if an in-person appointment isn't offered?
In a letter dated 13 May 2021, NHS England advised GP Practices to provide clear advice on their websites about how to contact the GP and request assistance, and how to access face-to-face or walk-in services. Ms McGarry suggests checking your practice's website for information on how to access face-to-face or walk-in services. If this information is not readily available on the website, you could ask the practice to provide it.
She also suggested that, should you meet with resistance from the practice, it might be useful to refer them to NHS England's directive, which mandates that such information be accessible on their website at the very least. It is important to request an in-person meeting at your GP Practice for an assessment, examination, or any tests, making clear the reasons you believe a face-to-face consultation is imperative.
You should communicate your preference for an in-person appointment, citing the NHS England guidelines that state all GP Practices must offer face-to-face appointments, and your preference for such should be honoured. Information on the options available to NHS patients can be found in the NHS Choice Framework.
She advised: "If the GPs or receptionists continue to refuse to examine you in person, you could escalate the matter to the Practice Manager and ask them to explain why your wish and request for a face-to-face examination are being refused."
Before booking an appointment, your GP surgery may ask what you need help with
(Image: Getty )
A statement on the Gov.uk website reads: "Your practice must make every effort to meet your preferences to see the doctor, nurse or other healthcare professional you've asked for when you need an appointment, although there are some occasions when this might not be possible."
It adds: "If you're referred for consultant-led treatment, or to a mental health professional, you can decide which provider you would like to receive care from as an outpatient and choose the clinical team who will be in charge of your care within that provider organisation."
How can you book, change or cancel an appointment?
When you feel the need for an appointment with your GP surgery, reach out to them:
using a form on your GP surgery's website (many surgeries also have a form you can access if you use the NHS App or log into your account on the NHS website)
by phone
in person, by going into the surgery and talking to the receptionist
Your GP surgery might inquire about the nature of your health issue before arranging an appointment. This helps them determine the urgency of your situation and enables them to select the most appropriate healthcare professional for your needs.
Are in-person appointments 'better'?
Ms McGarry emphasises the importance of face-to-face consultations, saying: "Telephone and remote assessments have their place for certain minor issues, but overall, I believe in-person appointments are safer, and you are less likely to be misdiagnosed than if you had a remote assessment."
She explains the limitations of phone consultations: "If a GP is assessing someone by telephone, there is no opportunity for them to conduct any tests or examinations. If a GP is assessing someone in person, even if they just want to perform the examinations as a precautionary measure, this is more likely to identify an abnormality than a telephone appointment."
Ms McGarry also points out the benefits of physical appointments: "An in-person appointment also lends itself to any incidental findings which would not be spotted during a telephone assessment. During a remote assessment, a GP is completely reliant on asking the right questions and the patient providing the right answers."
Clear advice should be provided and maintained on all practice websites
She adds that discussing sensitive matters can be easier in person: "People are also discussing difficult and sensitive personal issues. It may be easier for them to open up to a GP in an in-person appointment, where they are receiving face-to-face, hands-on, human care, which is much more personable, rather than speaking to a voice asking questions on the phone."
Finally, she touches on the emotional aspect of healthcare: "Remote appointments can leave patients feeling like there is a disconnect between them and their GP, and like there is less 'care'. In stressful and emotional situations, patients will find comfort in the GP's physical presence and human touch.
"During an in-person appointment, patients are in the room with their GP, solely focusing on the consultation and discussing their symptoms. Telephone GP appointments can catch patients whilst they are at work, driving, or doing the shopping, so the patient may not be able to give the appointment their full, undivided attention."
What are the potential pitfalls of remote assessments?
NHS England has highlighted several potential pitfalls of remote assessments without proper training, support, and process development, which could lead to staff struggling to deliver optimal patient care. These issues include:
delayed or missed diagnoses
over or under investigation of patients
increasing the burden on clinicians to make judgements remotely
reduction in the therapeutic relationship between patients and clinicians
increase in the transactional aspect of care over personalisation, where patients experience limited interactions remotely or feel they are unable to see their doctor face-to-face
missed opportunities to pick up on subtle cues during a face-to-face consultation
digital exclusion of certain patient groups
increasing complexity for reception staff when booking in patients to different consultation types
Barriers to technology or simple blockers, such as a poor phone signal, can become problematic for patients being asked to consult remotely
Are there any people who are more difficult to assess remotely?
The solicitor went on to highlight the challenges of remote medical assessments, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children, the elderly, and those with mental health issues or communication difficulties. She said: "Generally speaking, children, the elderly and those with mental health issues or communication difficulties, can be more difficult to assess remotely. Children can have difficulties expressing themselves and their symptoms so this may require more careful assessment.
"The elderly may be hard of hearing and struggle to hear on the phone, and therefore may be less likely or able to give a full account of their symptoms. They may also be less technologically skilled and be unable to share photographs to evidence issues. I believe older people value the face-to-face and human touch more. GPs may be more likely to find incidental findings, conditions and symptoms in older people during an in-person appointment.
"Some people do not feel comfortable speaking on the phone and may find it difficult to express themselves or may benefit from an in-person appointment to feel able to open up about their mental health symptoms. However, it's important to remember that every demographic is vulnerable to health issues, which can be difficult to assess remotely."
Additionally, patients have the right to choose their preferred hospital or service if referred by a GP for a physical or mental health condition, including some private hospitals that provide services to the NHS without incurring additional costs. You also have the option to select a clinical team led by a consultant or specified healthcare professional, provided that they offer the treatment you need.
Did you know?
If a GP needs to refer you for a physical or mental health condition, in most cases, you have the legal right to choose the hospital or service you'd like to go to. This will include many private hospitals if they provide services to the NHS and it does not cost the NHS any more than a referral to a standard NHS hospital.
You can also choose a clinical team led by a consultant or named healthcare professional, as long as that team provides the treatment you require. Find out more about choosing a hospital or consultant and choosing a mental health service.
You can book your appointment via the NHS e-Referral service. It can be done while you're at the GP surgery, or online, using the shortlist of hospitals or services provided in your appointment request letter. The shortlist is selected by your GP, so make sure you tell them about your preferences during the appointment. You have the legal right to ask for your appointment to be moved to a different provider if you're likely to wait longer than the maximum waiting time specified for your treatment.
The hospital or integrated care board (ICB) will have to investigate and offer you a range of suitable alternative hospitals or clinics that would be able to see you sooner. Read the guide to waiting times for more information.
Are conditions trickier to diagnose when appointments are remote?
Ms McGarry says any condition that requires visual assessment or physical touch is more difficult to assess and diagnose correctly when an appointment is carried out remotely. This can include infections, chest pain, and abdominal pain. It is important for a patient to be able to show the GP exactly where the pain is and for the GP to palpate the area to establish exactly where the pain is.
Assessment of a lump or changes to the skin
The solicitor says it is important to visualise and feel the lump to ascertain where it is located, its size, whether it is hard or soft, and whether it is painful when touched. Then, the solicitor says it is important to compare the visualisation and feel of the affected side of the body with the unaffected side of the body.
All guidance for early detection of cancers revolves around knowing your body, feeling your body and noticing changes, not to look at photographs. The GPs need to see and feel a lump to decipher whether or not it is suspicious and requires further investigation / onward referral, and on what basis that referral should be made, either routine or an urgent two-week suspected cancer pathway.
Visual or physical internal assessments
Ms McGarry said: "An example is a digital rectal examination to assist in diagnosing prostate cancer, or vaginal examinations with a speculum to visualise cervical abnormalities, assisting in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. GPs need to see and feel the prostate or cervix to decipher whether or not there are suspicious features which require further investigation / onward referral. They need to consider on what basis the referral should be made, either routine or an urgent two week suspected cancer pathway."
Do any conditions require intimate examinations?
NHS England says: "It is not advisable to encourage patients to send clinical images of intimate regions or reveal or self-examine intimate areas during a remote consultation. The GMC is clear that all patients should be offered a chaperone. Patients who require an intimate examination should, therefore, be encouraged to attend for a face-to-face assessment."
Limb ischaemia requires assessment of peripheral pulses to determine whether they are weak or absent. Limb ischemia refers to a reduced blood supply to the limbs, potentially affecting the arms or legs. Other conditions that require intimate examination can include:
Any condition requiring the assessment of temperature or blood pressure.
Visual assessment of eyes, ears or mouth.
Assessment of any orifice or skin abnormalities.
What if you feel you've been misdiagnosed over the phone or in a video consultation?
Ms McGarry adds: "If you believe that you have been misdiagnosed over the telephone or in a video consultation at the time of your assessment, you can ask your GP to arrange an in-person appointment for further assessment, examination or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.
Article continues below
"If that particular GP will not arrange an in-person appointment with you, you can call the surgery to make a further appointment and request an in-person appointment for a second opinion and further assessment, examination or testing and explain why you feel a face-to-face appointment is necessary.
"For example, you could advise that you are very concerned that the lump you have located is suspicious and you feel a physical appointment is necessary so that the GP can see and feel a lump to decipher whether or not it is suspicious and requires further investigation / onward referral and on what basis that referral should be made. If the GPs continue to refuse to examine you in person, you could ask for the matter to be escalated to the Practice Manager."
If your condition is urgent or deteriorating after a telephone or video consultation, you should take appropriate action by attending a walk-in centre, urgent care centre or A&E, depending on the severity of your condition and your level of concern.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Ear infection death leads to calls for reviews at three hospitals
Three hospitals in Devon and Somerset have been urged to review procedures for sharing files and managing patients being treated at different sites after the death of a inquest in March heard Andrew Tizard-Varcoe died at home in Croyde on 11 May, 2022 due to complications from necrotising otitis externa - a severe ear infection.A report from coroner Philip Spinney said Mr Tizard-Varcoe's treatment at three hospitals - the Royal Devon and Exeter, North Devon District in Barnstaple, and Taunton's Musgrove Park - between April 2021 and May 2022 had been "less than optimal".The BBC has contacted the Royal Devon University NHS Foundation Trust and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust for comment. 'Not followed-up' In a prevention of future deaths report, Mr Spinney said Mr Tizard-Varcoe had a "complex past medical history" and was also being treated at Musgrove Park for a vascular said evidence at the inquest had highlighted occasions where Mr Tizard-Varcoe had been treated without the full clinical picture being available due to the inability of the trusts to access each other's medical Spinney said there had also been three occasions when Mr Tizard-Varcoe was not followed-up as an outpatient in a timely added on 1 November, 2021, Mr Tizard-Varcoe left hospital in Exeter - which is run by Royal Devon University NHS Foundation Trust along with North Devon District - without an oral antibiotic prescription despite advice from microbiologists to have inquest heard this was a clinical decision made by a junior ear, nose and throat (ENT) doctor and the discharge was overseen by a consultant from a different specialism due to Mr Tizard-Varcoe's health needs at the the inquest, an ENT consultant indicated he probably would have prescribed antibiotics based on the microbiologists' advice. Three recommendations Mr Spinney said: "Due to the progression of the infection from the ear canal into the bone at the base of the skull, there is a real possibility that the clinical presentation did not reflect the true situation and this was a missed opportunity to provide continuity of treatment."Mr Spinney made three recommendations for action to be taken following Mr Tizard-Varcoe's included that the trusts involved should consider reviewing their processes for managing patients with multiple health conditions being treated at different said this could help "ensure greater co-ordination, collaboration and optimal treatment".Mr Spinney also recommended a review into arrangements for follow-up outpatient appointments in the ENT departments at both final recommendation said Royal Devon University NHS Foundation Trust should review its arrangements for patients' discharge in circumstances where a patient is being treated across different specialisms to ensure there is consultant oversight in all areas of treatment.


ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
'We wish we'd never asked for help': Family's hurt as thousands with learning disabilities locked up
Josh Standish loves riding his bike. Everyday for an hour he's allowed to leave the hospital in Hull, where he's locked away, and ride around the nearby park with his dad, who struggles to keep up. It's the highlight of each day for him. Josh is 21 and has severe learning disabilities and autism. For the past four years he's been locked away in secure units. Josh's needs became more complex when he was 17. Desperate for help, his parents, Garry and Sara, turned to social services. He was admitted to an inpatient unit and his parents were told it would just be for three months while he was assessed. But he never came home. "It's the biggest regret of our lives," Garry and Sara said. "We wish we'd never asked for help. "He was taken from us and locked up." Josh was detained under the Mental Health Act and moved to a different hospital 100 miles from their home. According to his parents, he suffered physical and mental abuse at the hospital which was eventually closed down. "He's gone through absolute hell," Sara said. "I don't think anybody will ever realise unless they've actually seen it. "For one person to go through that much trauma in his life; it's so sad." When ITV News first met Josh nearly two years ago, he was at a hospital closer to home. Staff declared he was ready to be discharged but there was no adequate community care in place and Josh became trapped in the system. His parents told ITV News that Josh had deteriorated significantly since. He had been repeatedly physically restrained and injected with drugs to sedate him."Sometimes I'd go in and he was laid in his own urine because he just couldn't be bothered to get up," his mother Sara told ITV News. "I've had to hold him while changing his sheets because he couldn't stand up. "He was slurring his words, it was absolutely heartbreaking. "No mother wants to walk out, leaving her child like that but you have no choice." His father, Garry, said doctors at the facility had told him that Josh was "over medicated" most of the time."In the first meeting that we had, we were told that it was well over the limits of roughly around 80 per cent over drugged, over medicated," he said. Josh has continued to be in long term segregation and spent almost two months isolated in a room with nothing but a toilet in the corner. Any communication was through a small hatch in the door. That's where he spent his 21st birthday, with his parents forced to pass presents through that hatch. Last year, Josh's parents were told he would be moved to a forensic unit which houses people involved with the criminal justice system. "I was just ready to give up," Sara said. "I was so close to just having a breakdown and saying, 'I don't feel like I can be a mum right now' because I was just in such a bad place but then who would fight for Josh?" Garry and Sara were told it was the only option. But it wasn't. Melissa, an occupational therapist and specialist practitioner from HOPES, arrived. HOPES is a NHS programme which has been running for three years to support people like Josh come out of long term segregation. Staff are trained to work intensely with the patient and family. The model focuses on compassion and dignity and avoids using any kind of restraint, except as a last resort for a short amount of time. Exclusive analysis by Mencap for ITV News has revealed people with learning disabilities and autism locked up in mental health units are disproportionally restrained. They make up about 16 per cent of patients in mental health units, but receive more than a third of the total restraints used. Melissa worked intensively with Josh helping him to come off his medication. "I remember when Josh first came to the hospital and, obviously, he was on so many drugs they had to wean him off slowly and he did have some ups and downs while coming off them and it resulted in Josh needed to go in seclusion," Sara said. "Melissa sat on the floor with him at the other side of the hatch and she was holding his hand and Josh said to her, 'why can't I come out?'" About 70 per cent of people who have been supported by HOPES have come out of long term segregation. But funding for the HOPES programme was only ever allocated for three years. Now, it's up to local trusts to decide if they can afford the programme and the services of practioners like Melissa . Funding for Melissa to continue working with Josh stopped a few weeks ago. Josh's parents say he's struggling without her help. "It's cruel," Sara said. "For Josh, she was here and then gone. "She was amazing and helped him so much; we're terrified he'll regress and never come out." Former Care Minister Norman Lamb, who chaired the HOPES project, told ITV News priority needed to be given to people like Josh. "It is an enduring scandal to continue with the practice of long term segregation," he said. "It's a truly inhuman treatment and it's usually because of a lack of understanding. "The NHS has a moral obligation to maintain this programme; it's clearly working." Josh's case is not rare. Hundreds of others like him are trapped in hospital, detained under the Mental Health Act and unable to leave because there is nowhere for them to go. ITV News has been investigating the continuing scandal of people with learning difficulties being locked away in segregated hospital units. Currently, more than 200,000 people with learning disabilities and autism are detained in inpatient units in England. NHS figures show 40 per cent of those people do not need to be there. Since 2011 successive governments have pledged to reduce the numbers of people with learning disabilities and autism in hospital by 50 per cent. That target has never been met. Exclusive analysis by Mencap for ITV News revealed it would take eight years to achieve. In April, the government introduced a new, much lower target – a 10 per cent in year reduction by March 2026. Garry and Sara have a very clear message for the Health Secretary Wes Streeting. "I would ask him why they're locking away people who have got learning disabilities?" "Would they lock a five year old child away? Because that's what Josh is mentally. "If it was his family, if it was their child, would they be happy with him being locked up?" ITV News put that question to the Health Secretary. Wes Streeting MP admitted the treatment for people like Josh was unwarranted and cruel. "In our ten year plan, the emphasis shifts from hospital to community," he said. "So those adults who are hospitalised for no reason, care could be provided within the safety and dignity of their homes. "I want that for everyone, particularly this group in society who have poor health outcomes. "I take the challenge from the family on the chin. If this was my mum, dad, brother would I tolerate it? No. "I'm here as Health Secretary to be a voice and a champion for patients and care users, so when parents put those challenges to me I'll able to take those challenges on." Mr Streeting insisted the Mental Health Act Bill would stop people with learning disabilities and autism being inappropriately detained. But Dan Scorer, Mencap's Head of Policy, said it was not so simple. "The Government has said clearly that this change in the law will only get 'switched on' when there is sufficient community support in place," Mr Scorer said. "However, there is no plan for making sure sufficient community support will be in place any time soon. "This is a serious flaw. There is a serious risk that the key law change for people with a learning disability and or autistic people will never be activated." Garry and Sara said Josh was excited about a future outside of hospital."He wants a job, he wants to work with bikes, he wants to go to college to learn to read and write," Sara said. "He wants a life that's not locked away in a hospital. "Surely he deserves that?" Josh asks his parents daily when he can come out but they can't give him an answer. Until there is proper community support in place Josh continues to be locked up."It's easy to lock people like Josh away and just forget about them rather than get them out there," Sara said. "It's an easy life to lock them away, drug them, keep that one quiet. "It's only when they've got someone who will actually speak up for them and say, no, this isn't right. "Obviously, we are there for Josh all the time, so we know what's going on. "But not every patient in them hospitals has someone to look out for them. So then people that are just stuck there and being drugged and nobody's seen it.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
GB Energy could fund solar panels on religious buildings, Miliband suggests
A scheme which will see solar panels placed on the roofs of hundreds of schools and hospitals could be expanded to include religious buildings, Ed Miliband has suggested. The Energy Secretary told the Commons he is 'enthusiastic' about widening the scope of Great British Energy's first major project, following an influx of requests to do so. A £200 million investment to put rooftop solar on schools and NHS sites was announced by the Government earlier this year, with the aim of saving hundreds of millions of pounds on energy bills and to free up cash to reinvest in frontline services. Councils and community groups will also receive funding to build local clean power projects, such as community-owned onshore wind, rooftop solar and hydropower in rivers, as part of the scheme. Speaking during a statement on climate and nature, Labour MP Sarah Owen (Luton North) said 'there is a huge part of our communities, the faith communities' who want to 'tackle' the climate and nature crisis. She added: 'So while we welcome Great British Energy's roll out of solar panels on hospitals and on schools, could he outline any support for religious buildings that also want to do the same?' Mr Miliband replied: 'Following the successful roll out to schools and hospitals, we've now got a lot of requests to expand this scheme, and I'm very enthusiastic about doing so, and it's something we're looking at.' Under the scheme, around £80 million will support 200 schools and £100 million will go to 200 NHS sites in England. Scotland will get £4.85 million, Wales £2.88 million and Northern Ireland £1.62 million for power projects including community energy and rooftop solar for public buildings. During the statement on Monday, Mr Miliband also pledged to deal with the 'grid zombies'. This came in response to Labour MP Ruth Cadbury (Brentford and Isleworth), who asked: 'What steps is the Energy Secretary making to prioritise grid connections, and will he commit to reforming the grid queuing system so that projects essential to decarbonise our transport sector are brought forward more quickly?' He replied: 'We are dealing with the zombies, the grid zombies, the zombie queue, and that reordering of the queue is precisely designed to open up the queue to projects like the ones she talked about. 'And my honourable friend, the energy minister, is having a series of round tables with DfT (Department for Transport) on precisely this subject.'