Sudiksha Konanki missing: Dominican AG grills key witness Joshua Riibe
The Dominican Republic's Attorney General personally interrogated Joshua Riibe, the last known person seen with missing Virginia student Sudiksha Konanki.
Riibe gave varying accounts of the night Konanki vanished, first claiming they were hit by a wave, then saying he passed out while she was still in the water.
Officials confiscated Riibe's passport and called him a "key element" in the case, though he has not been named a suspect or charged.
Investigators are using helicopters, drones, dive teams, and K9 units to locate Konanki, as U.S. officials monitor the case.
The top prosecutor in the Dominican Republic personally questioned Joshua Riibe Saturday, the last known person seen with missing Virginia college student Sudiksha Konanki, as authorities intensify their investigation into her disappearance.
Attorney General Yeni Berenice Reynoso spent hours Saturday interviewing Riibe, 22, of Iowa, in his Punta Cana hotel room, according to his attorneys.
The interrogation follows multiple interviews with local police and Loudoun County, Virginia, investigators throughout the past week.
Riibe, a senior at St. Cloud State University in Minnesota, was on spring break at the Riu República resort with friends, including Konanki, 20, a University of Pittsburgh student from Loudoun County. She vanished early March 6 after being seen on the beach with Riibe.
While Riibe has not been named a suspect or charged with a crime, authorities have labeled him a "key element" in the case. Dominican officials confiscated his passport several days ago when he attempted to check out of the hotel.
Riibe's parents, Albert and Tina Riibe, have criticized the treatment of their son, saying he has been subjected to "irregular conditions" and repeated questioning without legal counsel or official translators for days.
"He has remained in his hotel room under police surveillance and has been repeatedly taken to the police station since March 6," the family said in a statement through their attorneys.
Investigators are scrutinizing conflicting statements Riibe has given about Konanki's disappearance.
According to a leaked police transcript obtained by Fox News, Riibe initially claimed they were swept offshore by a strong wave, but he managed to bring Konanki back to land. He said he then last saw her walking away in knee-deep water toward her belongings.
In another version, Riibe reportedly said he fell ill and passed out on a beach chair while Konanki was still in the water.
Surveillance footage confirms that six of the friends left the beach around 6 a.m., while Riibe returned alone just before 10 a.m. Konanki's friends reported her missing at 4 p.m. that day.
Authorities have launched an extensive search effort along the coastline using boats, planes, helicopters, dive teams, K9 units, and AI-equipped drones.
Konanki's disappearance comes two months after four European tourists drowned at the same resort.
Their bodies were recovered within 48 hours.
U.S. authorities, including the State Department, are monitoring the case but have not commented publicly due to privacy concerns.
What they're saying
Riibe's parents said their son is fully cooperating and deeply dismayed by Konanki's disappearance.
"Above all, we wish to contribute to the search efforts," they said Friday. "Joshua is deeply dismayed by her disappearance and has fully cooperated from the very beginning."
Authorities are also examining phone records from Konanki and other witnesses. The investigation remains active.
The Source
FOX News Digital
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Erdogan calls it an anticorruption drive. His rivals call it a political crackdown.
The arrests come at a time of uncertainty about the political future of Turkey and Erdogan, who has dominated the country's politics for more than two decades. He cannot legally run again when his current, third presidential term ends in 2028 but could seek another mandate if parliament were to call early elections, an outcome many analysts expect him to pursue. The arrests began last year but have accelerated since March, when the police arrested Ekrem Imamoglu, the mayor of Istanbul, citing allegations of corruption, which he denies. Advertisement In the months since, the government has arrested at least 390 people in connection with investigations of alleged corruption in the Istanbul municipal government and other opposition-run cities, according to a New York Times tally based on Turkish media reports. The opposition says those arrested include current and former mayors and other municipal officials as well as representatives of companies that have worked with opposition-run city governments. Although these arrests have not led to any convictions, Erdogan said in a speech last month that government investigators were exposing 'the biggest gang of robbers in the history of the Republic.' Advertisement Opposition leaders have denied the charges and accuse Erdogan's government of weaponizing the judiciary to weaken its opponents and silence critics, some of whom have faced legal action for opposing the arrests. 'My confidence in justice, in the law, in how it is executed and investigated is gone,' said Cem Yigit Uzumoglu, an actor who played Mehmed the Conqueror in the Netflix docudrama 'Rise of Empires: Ottoman.' In an interview, he described how the police had arrested him at his home in the middle of the night in April after he posted support on social media for a boycott of government-linked companies. Prosecutors are now seeking prison sentences up to about seven years on charges that include instigating hatred in society, an accusation he called 'ridiculous.' Erdogan's governing Justice and Development Party fared poorly in nationwide municipal elections last year, largely because of anger over high inflation. Yet his geopolitical position appears strong. The civil war in neighboring Syria ended with a Turkish-friendly administration in Damascus. European countries count on his help to curb migration. And he has a warm relationship with President Donald Trump, whose secretary of state, Marco Rubio, recently ordered American diplomats to limit their comments about how other countries practice democracy. Few Western governments have spoken publicly about the arrests. Imamoglu, a star in the opposition Republican People's Party, had beat candidates backed by Erdogan for mayor of Istanbul three times, and some polls suggested he could beat Erdogan in a presidential race. The mayor's arrest came days before he officially began his presidential campaign and one day after his university suddenly annulled his undergraduate diploma, citing a decades-old irregularity. That alone could keep him from becoming the president, who is required by law to have completed higher education. Advertisement The timing of those events, which followed other cases that could temporarily bar Imamoglu from politics, led his supporters to accuse the government of seeking to knock him out of the running. The Turkish government insists that its prosecutors and courts are independent and has called on citizens to trust the authorities and not prejudge investigations. Interrogation notes and other information shared with Turkish news outlets indicate that investigators are pursuing allegations that include bribery, fraud, improper distribution of municipal contracts and solicitation of favors in exchange for construction permits. The New York Times has not been able to independently verify these details. In his address in July, Erdogan said that the investigations were free of politics and were uncovering great criminality. As this year's arrests have progressed, the government has also taken legal action against critics, using laws that rights groups say restrict freedom of speech. Last month, a student, Doruk Dorucu, tore up his diploma during a university graduation ceremony to protest the annulment of Imamoglu's diploma and what he called undue government interference in Turkish universities. In an interview, Dorucu said that the police arrested him at his home later that night. He said that he has been barred from traveling abroad while being investigated for inciting hatred among the public. 'In terms of oppression, we are in such a bad period,' he said. 'Everyone is afraid that they can be taken from their homes at dawn over one tweet or one joke they made in daily chitchat with friends.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Hertz AI Charges Family $195 Even After Employee Found No Damage To Returned Car
Hertz is in the news again because of the AI-powered scanners the rental car company now uses to find damage on cars after they're returned in order to charged customers for that alleged damage. Of course, you can't forget about the processing and administrative fees, either. After all, why shouldn't a $250 charge actually cost you $440? The bad news is, it doesn't sound like Hertz plans to stop with this AI nonsense. Now, if you screw up and actually damage a rental car, that's one thing. You or your insurance should expect to pay for that. But that also doesn't sound like what happened to Kelly Rogers when she and her husband rented a minivan in Atlanta recently. As the New York Times explains: When they returned the car in Atlanta, they inspected it and saw no damage. A Hertz employee inspected the vehicle upon its return as well, they said, and did not flag any damage. But once the couple had passed through airport security, they received a notification via the Hertz app that its automated system had detected a dent in the passenger-side front door. They were charged $195: $80 for the damage and $115 in fees, including those incurred "as a result of processing" the damage claim and the "cost to detect and estimate the damage" that occurred during the rental. Hertz offered to reduce the charge to $130 if they paid within one day. That's a lot of money for "damage" an employee had already said they didn't see, but at least they were offered a discount if they paid quickly. A Hertz spokesperson also told the Times the company had reviewed the incident and confirmed the dent was new. Rogers, however, reportedly still finds it difficult to believe, telling the newspaper, "It could have been a shadow. We were pulling it up on the app, and we're like, 'This is so bananas.'" Read more: The Least Reliable Cars, Trucks And SUVs You Can Buy In 2025, According To Consumer Reports You Have Other Options Maybe Rogers or her husband really did return the minivan with an imperceptibly small ding in it. Maybe they didn't. But it still sucks to be told there's no damage, only to get charged for damage some computer program allegedly found after the fact. Especially since we know AI is wildly unreliable and regularly gets even the most basic stuff wrong. Just look at what happened to the MyPillow guy's lawyers when they used AI to do their jobs for them. And that's far from the only story about faulty AI software getting people in trouble. Heck, if you ask Google, its AI thinks my name "appears to be a typo." Hertz isn't the only rental car company toying with the most annoying new technology. Sixt uses an AI software called Car Gate, the Times reports. Avis has also been toying with AI since 2019, but told the Times the process remains "human-led." Hertz has had a rough few years in the customer satisfaction department. It almost had a customer arrested for putting too many miles on an "unlimited mileage" rental. It's also the same Hertz that had customers wrongly arrested on charges of stealing rental cars they didn't actually steal. Then, after getting a new CEO, Hertz got sued again for having customers wrongly arrested. Eventually, Hertz agreed to a $168 million settlement over those wrongful arrests. I've reached out to Hertz for a comment, but I have yet to hear back from them. I'll be sure to update this post with their statement. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
As Scammers Up Their Fraud Game, Consumers, Banks, And Law Enforcement Must Respond
Technology may make fraud easier—thanks to social media—but it may also be the way to stop it. getty Fraud schemes and scammers are increasingly making headlines, with some scratching their heads to figure out why—and how to stop it. A recent study conducted by BioCatch, a global company focused on solving next-generation digital identity challenges through examining behavioral biometrics, might offer some clarity. The survey found that 81% of Americans cited artificial intelligence (AI) as contributing to more sophisticated financial crimes, with social media (75%) and the dark web (73%) playing key roles in the equation. That data was pulled from a BioCatch survey of 800 senior fraud, anti-money laundering (AML), and risk and compliance professionals across 17 countries on five continents. The survey was an attempt to better understand how financial institutions are fighting fraud and financial crime, the impact of emerging technologies on the dark economy, and the level of collaboration among competing institutions, law enforcement, and governments. The impact on consumer wallets is significant. Nasdaq's Global Financial Crime Report estimates that $3.1 trillion in illicit funds moved through the world's financial system in 2023. Scams and fraud added up to $485.6 billion in projected losses. Of those moves, U.S. victims have taken a beating: the U.S. ranks second globally for major fraud losses. That likely explains why, in the U.S., almost all of those surveyed agree that combating activities that encompass the dark economy is important. So what can be done to stop it? Many professionals aren't quite sure. Most of those surveyed (83%) believe that their financial institutions are winning the fight against fraudsters, while only 56% believe their individual efforts have an impact on combating financial crime. That may not tell the whole story. Matt O'Neill, a former Secret Service agent, says there's a real disconnect between losses and what banks are prioritizing. Fraud losses hit individuals in the pocketbook, not banks. The banks aren't materially affected, and there hasn't been a real push to pivot from the status quo. While U.S. banks may trust technology, they don't trust each other, O'Neill explains. That means there's no meaningful sharing of information. That's a break from behaviors other countries where statistics suggest that when other countries share at scale, their losses are decreasing. (Part of the reluctance to share information may come from consumers. While 32% of those surveyed in the U.S. consider data privacy regulation as one of the main inhibitors to sharing data with other banks, 30% worry about the potential for misuse. These numbers are higher than global averages.) Nearly all (93%) of those surveyed consider their organization to be effective in fighting financial crime, and four in five of those surveyed say their banks have incorporated behavioral analysis into their technology stack to detect financial crime. Those numbers may sound impressive, but O'Neill says that criminal networks are actually outpacing banks while banks are still playing catch-up. The Role Of Law Enforcement Despite an increase in reports of fraud, law enforcement agencies are reaching out to banks less often. That means there may not be a unified effort to stop scammers. And, tellingly, it makes a real difference where the fraud happens—even when banks do contact local law enforcement, not all law enforcement have the means, ability, and time to respond to sophisticated scams and attacks. The majority of Americans working in financial crime prevention believe that law enforcement should do more when a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is filed. By law, national banks are required to report known or suspected criminal offenses, transactions over $5,000 suspected to involve money laundering or violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), and transactions of $25,000 or more involving a criminal violation, even if no suspect is identified. The level of follow-up from those SARs may be inconsistent across banks and across demographics. Banks also report that they don't receive regular contact from law enforcement about their investigations into criminal activity. When it does happen, the contact tends to be less frequent than on a monthly basis. Customer-Focused Communications On the consumer side, banks and other financial institutions have tried to boost awareness about the potential for fraud, often by creating awareness campaigns. But Seth Ruden, Senior Director of Global Advisory at BioCatch, notes that can only go so far. 'Social engineering is so compelling,' he says, and efforts to combat it are not as effective as the tactics exercised by bad actors. Social engineering is a form of manipulation which relies on human psychology to direct behaviors. In this context, scammers may spend significant resources to convince potential victims to take certain steps like revealing personally identifiable information or transferring assets to a third party. To combat that manipulation, institutions need new controls to fight scammers, including those to alert potential victims. Oftentimes, banks may notice the potential fraud before the victim does, or before third parties do. But it may be too difficult to break the spell. Creating some friction at the consumer level could delay funds from being released. That, combined with the sharing of information between financial institutions, could be a difference maker. When funds leave an account, there's a narrow window of time before they're captured at the receiver bank. 'What if,' Ruden asks, 'we could connect in real time?' That could present an opportunity to stop or mitigate the damage. O'Neill agrees, suggesting that while precision analytics can be a real game-changer for banks, additional resources—including a human touch—can also make a difference. For example, when a potential victim is determined to send funds to a new payee, like a new romantic interest, asking the right questions could result in a pause in activity. Asking a question as simple as, 'Why would send money to someone you have never met before?' could trigger a conversation that could result in enough information to reveal that the payment is very suspicious. The key, of course, is to create friction without making it a competitive disadvantage. That, says Ruden, requires resources. Those on the other side of the equation—the fraudsters—are sophisticated actors and are willing to dedicate time and money to see a scam through. Fighting will require the same dedication from financial institutions. But it may well be the case that those spends are welcome since nearly two-thirds of those surveyed say they'd like to increase their investment in technology (those in the U.S. said so at a much higher rate than the global average). What Can Consumers Do? So much of fighting fraud still rests with the consumer. So, what can consumers do to protect themselves? O'Neill is quick to offer his advice, emphasizing, 'Never ever send money to anyone that you've never seen or touched before.' If you make a mistake, 'The cavalry isn't coming,' he says, noting that the likelihood is slim to recover the funds. 'There isn't a magic button to recover those funds,' so it's important to think it through. 'If it's going to hurt you to lose it, don't send it,' he warns. Ruden says that it's going to take a technology revolution to protect consumers. He thinks such a move should be welcomed, noting that it's in the interest of financial institutions and fiduciaries to help protect their customers. Some do a better job than others—and those are the organizations that consumers should seek out. 'Look for a culture of protection,' he advises, saying that consumers should keep an eye out for institutions that place an emphasis on fraud-fighting. This can mean existing trained fraud prevention teams or otherwise demonstrating a commitment to protect consumers through their business practices. Tax Rules For Losses If you are a victim of a scam, while you may not be able to recover your losses, you may be entitled to tax relief. Earlier this year, the IRS Office of Chief Counsel released a memo providing clarification on the deductibility of theft losses for scam victims. The memo was welcome for taxpayers who were confused about limits resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made another tweak. Under the TCJA, for the tax years 2018 to 2025, personal casualty and theft losses are deductible only to the extent that the losses are attributable to a federally declared disaster. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made the limits to losses permanent, with one exception: it has been expanded to include state-declared disasters. That means the theft loss deduction is still available for businesses and individuals who incur losses in transactions entered into for profit. There is no statutory definition of "a transaction entered into for profit." However, courts have determined that to meet the criteria, a primary profit motive is required. Next Steps As scammers develop new schemes to steal money and information from consumers (you can read about a new one here), the commitment to fraud prevention must evolve even faster. Understanding what kinds of scams exist and how they operate, as well as the roles that consumers, law enforcement, and financial institutions can play in mitigation and prevention, are all key. That means that education will continue to be a big part in stopping scammers. You can read the Biocatch global survey here. Forbes FBI Warns Scam Victims To Be On The Lookout For Fake Law Firms Offering To Help Recover Losses By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes IRS Issues Warnings On Tax Scams Driven By Bad Advice Often Found On Social Media By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes Some Scam Victims May Be Able To Deduct Related Losses On Their Tax Returns By Kelly Phillips Erb
