Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce's Recent Public Appearance Had Unexpected Twist
For the first time in nearly two months, Taylor Swift fans finally got a sighting of the "Forntight" singer out in public. This came in the form of a brunch outing in Philadelphia, during which the couple was photographed by fans who spotted them eating out at Talula's Garden in downtown Philly.
According to a new report by Page Six, Kelce and Swift celebrated Mother's Day with the Chiefs star's mother, Donna Kelce. They were also reportedly joined by his brother, Jason Kelce, and the rest of his family.
However, unlike Travis Kelce and Swift's usual public appearances, their Mother's Day brunch had a bit of a twist. While the couple is usually bombarded by fans and the media whenever they go out with their family and friends, they were treated to an unexpectedly private outing on Sunday.
"Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce got the rare opportunity to experience a low-key outing, as Page Six has learned that the couple was barely bothered while enjoying their Mother's Day brunch," the report from Page Six read.
Page Six's insider also revealed that Swift and Kelce "went almost undetected" during their brunch, as fans opted to let them enjoy their meal in peace.
"According to our insider, the group was not seated in a private room but rather among the many patrons who were dining at the packed restaurant.
"Our source dishes that one young girl noticed Swift and pulled out her phone but seemingly decided not to snap a photo," Page Six reported.
In most cases, avid fans and members of the paparazzi go all out to try and get photos and videos of the couple whenever they're out in public. This is exactly why it must have been a welcome surprise for Swift and Kelce to be able to enjoy their special celebration without the usual frenzy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift Buys Back Her Catalog: How We Got Here
Taylor Swift's years-long saga to win back the rights to her first six albums will go down as one of the most significant storylines in the history of the modern music business, as the dispute brought the complex, often dry world of copyright and master ownership further into the national consciousness. At the same time, the conflict grew her own superstardom to stratospheric heights as the Taylor's Version re-releases became massive hits in their own right. Swift isn't the first artist to re-record her music, though the practice will forever be synonymous with her as she took on the ambitious task of recreating her old albums all over again, while also managing to record and release four new albums (Folklore, Evermore, Midnights and The Tortured Poets Department) and net the highest-grossing concert tour of all time. More from The Hollywood Reporter Taylor Swift Buys Back Rights To Her First Six Albums Years After Scooter Braun Drama Mike Sumler, Kool & the Gang Hype Man, Dies at 71 Who's Who in the Sean "Diddy" Combs Trial: Key Witnesses, Industry Enablers and Victims So Far As Swift announced Friday, she's officially bought bought back ownership of the records, bringing this chapter to a close. With Swift re-united with her original works at last, let's take a look back on how we got here today. June 2019 — Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings Buys Big Machine The saga began on June 30, 2019, when the news dropped that Scooter Braun, then-manager to stars like Justin Bieber and Ariana Grande, had bought Scott Borchetta's Big Machine Label Group for $300 million through his company Ithaca Holdings. With the deal, Ithaca got the rights to music from acts like Florida Georgia Line, Thomas Rhett, Reba McEntire, and of course of Swift, who was Big Machine's biggest act until she left the label for Universal Music Group's Republic Records in 2018. Swift quickly voiced her displeasure with the sale, taking to her Tumblr that day to say she learned of the deal 'as it was announced to the world,' calling it 'my worst case scenario,' while citing 'incessant, manipulative bullying' from Braun for years. 'Any time Scott Borchetta has heard the words 'Scooter Braun' escape my lips, it was when I was either crying or trying not to,' Swift wrote at the time. 'He knew what he was doing; they both did. Controlling a woman who didn't want to be associated with them.' Borchetta responded with a long missive of his own that day, denying Swift's claim that she hadn't heard about the sale before the announcement while also adding he'd 'never experienced' seeing Swift's negative reactions about Braun. August 2019 — Swift Confirms Plans to Re-Record Her Big Machine Era Music Within two months of the sale, Swift confirmed that she planned on re-recording her music so she could gain control of the masters on at least a version of her first six albums. In an interview with Robin Roberts on Good Morning America in front of scores of Swifities, Swift said 'It's something I'm really excited about doing, because my contract says that starting November 2020, I can record albums one through five all over again.' November 2019 — Swift Said Braun and Borchetta Wouldn't Allow Her to Play Old Songs at AMAs Swift took to Twitter on November 14, claiming that as part of the American Music Awards honoring her as artist of the decade, she wanted to perform a medley of her hits, but that Braun and Borchetta were blocking the use of those songs 'because they claim that would be re-recording my music before I'm allowed to next year.' Braun posted that he and his family received death threats, further stating that 'as the world now knows you can and should perform any song you would like at the AMAs. I have never and would never say otherwise. You do not need anyone's permission to do so legally but I am stating it here clearly and publicly so there is no more debate or confusion.' Swift played the medley at the AMAs. 2020: Ithaca Sells Swift's Catalog to Shamrock Capital On Nov. 16, 2020, Shamrock, a private equity firm founded by Roy Disney, purchased Swift's catalog from Braun and Ithaca for about $300 million, netting Braun as much as he paid for the entirety of Big Machine the year prior. Swift came forward about the sale that day, writing that 'this was the second time my music had been sold without my knowledge.' Swift claimed that her team had attempted to enter into negotiations with Scooter Braun, writing: 'Scooter's team wanted me to sign an ironclad NDA stating I would never say another word about Scooter Braun unless it was positive, before we could even look at the financial records of BMLG (which is always the first step in a purchase of this nature). So, I would have to sign a document that would silence me forever before I could even have a chance to bid on my own work.' As Shamrock sold the catalog to Swift nearly five years later, Swift thanked the company Friday for 'being the first people to ever offer this to me.' That assertion has come under scrutiny by people with knowledge of the initial Shamrock acquisition, with a source close to Braun telling The Hollywood Reporter, 'There's documented proof, by way of verified emails, confirming Taylor Swift was offered the opportunity to buy back her masters prior to Shamrock Capital's acquisition. This has been reported on at length over the last several years.' A 2023 report from Music Business Worldwide also revealed conversations between Braun and Swift's camps for a deal before going to Shamrock, though that clearly never happened. 2021 — 2023: The 'Taylor's Version' Era Takes Over On Feb. 11, 2021, Swift confirmed that Fearless, her first No. 1 album, would be the first album she'd re-record from the Big Machine era, launching her famed 'Taylor's Version' series. 'I've spoken a lot about why i'm remaking my first six albums, but the way I've chosen to do this will hopefully help illuminate where i'm coming from,' Swift wrote at the time. 'Artists should own their own work for so many reasons, but the most screamingly obvious one is that the artist is the only one who really knows that body of work.' Fearless (Taylor's Version) officially released in April of 2021. She released Red (Taylor's Version) that same year, then released Speak Now (Taylor's Version) and 1989 (Taylor's Version) in 2023. The re-recordings became immensely successful as well; 1989 (Taylor's Version) managed to sell 1.3 million units in the first week alone, besting 1989's debut from a decade prior, even as record sales have fallen since then amid the streaming era. According to Luminate, in the U.S. alone, Fearless (Taylor's Version) has sold 3 million units, Red (Taylor's Version) sold 5.2 million, Speak Now (Taylor's Version) has sold 2.7 million and 1989 (Taylor's Version) has sold 4.9 million. May 30, 2025: Liberation Day Swift rocked the industry once again Friday as she announced she'd closed the deal with Shamrock, bringing 'my entire life's work' back into Swift's possession. Swift didn't disclose financial details of the sale. Billboard reports the deal was worth about $360 million, while a Page Six report from earlier this suggested it could be worth twice that. 'I've been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found out that this is really happening,' Swift said. 'I really get to say these words: All of the music I've ever made… now belongs… to me.' Following the reveal, Braun told THR he was 'happy for her.' As for the two remaining Taylor's Version albums, Swift revealed in her letter that she hadn't recorded more than a quarter of Reputation (Taylor's Version), but that the remake of her debut album was done. 'Those 2 albums can still have their moments to re-emerge when the time is right, if that would be something you guys would be excited about,' Swift wrote. 'But if it happens, it won't be from a place of sadness and longing for what I wish I could have. It will just be a celebration now.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift's Old Album Streams More Than Double on Spotify After Catalog Deal
Taylor Swift finally gained ownership of her first six albums in a momentous deal she announced to the world last Friday, and with the superstar officially reunited with her music, Spotify streams on her Big Machine-era recordings quickly skyrocketed that day. According to figures Spotify shared with The Hollywood Reporter, streams on all of the original versions of her older albums at least doubled on Friday, May 30, compared to the albums' average daily streams from April 1 through May 29. (Spotify didn't disclose specific streaming numbers themselves, only percentage changes.) More from The Hollywood Reporter Rick Astley's "Never Gonna Give You Up" Passes 1 Billion Spotify Streams Pusha T Says Def Jam Tried to Censor Kendrick Lamar Verse On Upcoming Clipse Album Due To Drake Beef Sean "Diddy" Combs' Ex-Aide Says She Was "Brainwashed" When She Sent Loving Texts Years After Rape Speak Now had the biggest individual spike, with streams rising 430 percent globally. Interestingly, Swift's 2006 eponymous debut and 2017's Reputation — neither of which have a 'Taylor's Version' released yet — came in second and third, as Taylor Swift streams jumped 220 percent, while Reputation streams rose 175 percent. Fearless climbed 160 percent, Red jumped 150 percent and 1989 got a 110 percent boost. Swift is one of the most-listened-to artists on the platform with over 82 million monthly Spotify listeners, and her streams overall jumped 40 percent Friday. Prior to announcing the purchase on Friday, Swift's first six albums had been subject of one of the most significant controversies in recent music industry history after music executive Scooter Braun bought Swift's old record label Big Machine in 2019, gaining ownership of Swift's music in the process. Swift called the deal 'my worst case scenario,' while citing 'incessant, manipulative bullying' from Braun for years. Braun sold Swift's music to private equity firm Shamrock Capital a year later for about as much as he spent on all of Big Machine, before Swift bought the music from Shamrock last week. 'I've been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found out that this is really happening,' Swift wrote last week of purchasing the catalog. 'I really get to say these words: All of the music I've ever made… now belongs… to me.'Before the purchase, Swift had of course released the 'Taylor's Versions' on four of her six Big Machine albums as she sought to gain control of her musical legacy. Those versions became hits themselves, selling millions of copies and topping the album charts, while helping Swift further strengthen her own superstardom. While the original albums still garnered sales and streams, it had become a common sentiment among some of Swift's fans not to listen to the older versions as the singer looked to win back her music rights. But now that Swift has her music back, an interesting question becomes which albums Swifties will listen to more in the future. And with two albums left that fans were originally expecting 'Taylor's Versions' for, fans are still asking what's next. In announcing the acquisition last week, Swift had revealed that she'd only re-recorded less than a quarter of Reputation, though she confirmed that she's already completed the re-recording of her debut record. 'Those 2 albums can still have their moments to re-emerge when the time is right, if that would be something you guys would be excited about,' Swift wrote on Friday. 'But if it happens, it won't be from a place of sadness and longing for what I wish I could have. It will just be a celebration now.'Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Insider Reveals Update On Taylor Swift And Blake Lively's Friendship After Dropped Subpoena
is putting her legal stress behind her, but not all of the fallout has been so easy to shake. The pop icon reportedly feels 'an immense sense of relief' now that she's no longer entangled in the high-profile legal dispute between longtime friend and actor-director Taylor Swift had been subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni's legal team earlier this month, but it was confirmed on May 22 that the summons was dropped after her team voluntarily provided information. While the Grammy winner is said to be 'not talking about the case' and 'has moved on,' insiders say the same can't be said about her once-close bond with Lively. 'There's been radio silence between Taylor and Blake since the subpoena was dropped,' a source told Us Weekly, adding that their previously tight-knit friendship has 'stalled' under the weight of 'legal tension.' According to the insider, the emotional fallout has created enough distance that 'they won't pick up where they left off.' The legal battle began in December 2024 when Lively filed a lawsuit accusing Baldoni, her "It Ends with Us" co-star and director, of sexual harassment, a hostile work environment, and an alleged smear campaign. Baldoni has denied all allegations and responded with his own $400 million countersuit against Lively and her husband, actor , claiming defamation, civil extortion, and more. Swift became embroiled in the dispute when her song 'My Tears Ricochet' was featured in the film. Although she wasn't involved in any creative or production aspects of the project, Baldoni's legal team alleged that Lively pushed Swift to delete years of text messages, prompting the subpoena. Swift's rep quickly shut down speculation, stating that the singer 'never set foot on the set,' had no input on casting or editing, and didn't even see the movie until after its release. 'The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song,' the statement read, calling the subpoena a tactic meant to 'draw public interest' by leveraging Swift's name for 'tabloid clickbait.' Lively, for her part, publicly expressed satisfaction over the dropped subpoenas, calling them 'harassing' and unnecessary. Despite this latest report, Daily Mail previously shared that Swift was left blindsided after being briefly subpoenaed and allegedly mentioned in sensitive messages tied to Lively's explosive lawsuit against Baldoni. The pop icon, who once publicly supported Lively, now reportedly feels 'exploited' by the actress, believing their friendship was used for personal leverage in a case that had nothing to do with her. 'Right now, if Taylor had one wish, it would be that she never met Blake,' one insider told the outlet at the time. 'Although there were good times, the issues around the Baldoni case have outweighed them. When Taylor looks back, she sees all the red flags she missed. It just wasn't worth the stress.' The source went on to reveal that Swift often felt pressured to 'tone Blake down' and maintain harmony within their A-list circle of friends, but that loyalty came at a personal cost. 'She always wanted to be the leader of the pack,' the insider said, adding, 'Taylor's relieved the relationship is over. She put up with Blake's antics for too long because she's loyal, but this drama pushed her too far.' What makes the rift even more complicated is Swift's role as godmother to Lively and Reynolds' three daughters. While neither star has commented publicly on how the tension may affect their children's relationships, fans are left wondering whether the once-close family bond can survive the public fallout. In a major development in the ongoing legal battle between Lively and Baldoni, a federal judge ruled in Lively's favor to strike a controversial claim involving Taylor Swift. On Thursday, May 15, Judge Lewis J. Liman approved a motion to remove allegations that Lively's lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, had threatened to release Swift's private text messages unless the singer publicly supported Lively in her lawsuit against Baldoni. With conflicting reports continuing to swirl, the true status of their friendship remains unclear, and likely won't be known for sure until Swift and Lively speak out themselves.
