Opinion - Trump must not fall for Iran's nuclear shell game
Team Trump has a growing Iranian problem. Tehran's latest purported nuclear offer — a farcical proposal to pause uranium enrichment for a year in exchange for the release of Iranian frozen funds and Washington's recognition of Iran's right to enrich uranium for civilian and energy purposes — is an obvious strategic non-starter for both the U.S. and Israel.
As Freedom for the Defense of Democracies President Mark Dubowitz posted on X, 'Do [the Iranians] think we're that stupid?' Apparently so.
Despite President Trump's assertion that talks between Iran and the U.S. might produce 'good news' this week, it is clear Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is intent on playing him for the fool.
Iran has been allowed to play this dangerous nuclear shell game for far too long. It has proven repeatedly that it cannot be trusted, and Israel is done playing Iranian games.
The White House must forcefully push back and disabuse Tehran of the notion that Trump can be played or that a slightly revised present-day rehash of the ill-advised Obama-era nuclear deal with Iran is even remotely acceptable.
Iran's strategic objective is apparent. Tehran is hell-bent on retaining its uranium enrichment capacity — a rapidly growing capacity that we have repeatedly warned would permit Iran to immediately produce five nuclear weapons within one week and exponentially many more nukes thereafter given Tehran's substantial centrifuge capacity to spin 90 percent weapons-grade highly enriched uranium.
Yet Iran's nuclear shell game is becoming even darker. It is no longer simply the ultimate manifestation of Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' war against Israel. Rather, it is now also Tehran's key staying card in Russian President Vladimir Putin's 'Axis of Evil.'
To preserve its status in both — especially given Iran's growing strategic standing with Putin as a primary supplier in his 'Arsenals of Evil' — Tehran is desperate to find ways to buy time to thwart any U.S. or Israeli military strikes against its nuclear weapons program.
Enter Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. His two-day state visit to Muscat, Oman earlier this week was a multifaceted attempt to do just that.
Accompanied by Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, Pezeshkian met with Haitham bin Tariq Al Said, the Sultan of Oman, ahead of a proposed sixth round of nuclear negotiations between Washington and Tehran.
Pezeshkian's regional Middle East gambit is to persuade Oman — who is serving as a negotiating mediator between the U.S. and Iran (and negotiated the U.S.-Houthi rebel ceasefire) — to sanction Iran's proposal to freeze uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief and U.S. recognition of Tehran's right to enrich uranium going forward.
One of Pezeshkian's main regional goals is to obfuscate the issue of uranium enrichment. Earlier, in mid-May, in the lead up to his state visit to Oman, Tehran proposed that Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and other interested countries in the Persian Gulf region form a nuclear consortium to enrich uranium for commercial purposes.
Uranium enriched at levels below 5 percent — the amount required for hospital equipment and medical experiments — would be produced under the supervision of Iranian engineers. Iran's goal is obvious — to obtain the backing and support of fellow Gulf States.
Although their interests in procuring low-enriched uranium are legitimate, the Sunni Arab Gulf states are not likely to sign on to Tehran's proposal. First, it would put Doha, Dubai and Riyadh in direct conflict with Washington's zero-enrichment negotiating position. Second, it would potentially put them in Israel's crosshairs, should any Iranian-controlled production facilities be physically located in their countries.
Intentionally or no, Israel sent a message to Iran and the Gulf States during Pezeshkian's visit that it was a bad idea when it again struck Houthi targets in Yemen — Oman's neighbor in southwest Arabia. To underscore the point, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu forcefully declared that 'Iran is responsible' for aggression against Israel from Yemen.
Notably, there was an even darker transregional element to Pezeshkian's meetings in Oman. While he was meeting with the Sultan, Iran was also slated to participate in an 'Axis of Evil' military summit being hosted in Moscow by Sergei Shoigu, the former Russian defense minister. Military and security officials from North Korea and Iran were in attendance. Disconcertingly, the United Arab Emirates was in attendance as well.
That meeting in Moscow is a timely reminder that Russia has a vested interest in disrupting any nuclear negotiations between Washington and Iran. It is also working to deter any U.S. military action against Tehran and its nuclear, ballistic missile or drone production facilities spread out throughout the country.
Khamenei, presently, is a key supplier of ballistic missiles and drones to Moscow – the importance of which was recently underscored when Iran's parliament recently approved a 20-year strategic partnership with Moscow. Iran is doing its best to leverage its relationship with Putin to safeguard its nuclear ambitions. They are connected in that Trump's Special Envoy Steven Witkoff is negotiating this and the Russian ceasefire deal in Ukraine.
That pact, notably, comes on top of a free trade agreement that went into effect in mid-May under the auspices of the Eurasian Economic Union.
Israel sees all of this for what it is: a highly dangerous nuclear shell game being played against Jerusalem and Washington by Tehran and Russia. Significantly, it is equally clear that Israel is likely nearing a military strike on Iran's nuclear weapons program as evidenced by Trump's acknowledgement on Wednesday that he asked Netanyahu to wait.
The Israeli prime minister is short on patience with Iran these days given its support for Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthi rebels.
It is time Team Trump saw this the same way and with the same level of clarity. Tehran, like its Russian ally, is attempting to play him for a fool. The White House needs to send a clear message to Khamenei, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and by extension Putin and his 'Axis of Evil' allies, including China, that Washington is nobody's fool.
Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan E. Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Forget tacos, can Trump have his tariff cake and eat it too? Wall Street's biggest bull thinks so
If President Donald Trump's tariffs settle around 10%, that could still allow the Federal Reserve to cut rates later this year while they generate revenue that helps with the massive budget deficit, according to Wells Fargo's Christopher Harvey, who thinks a levy at that level could be split between importers, corporations, and consumers. There has been much talk lately about President Donald Trump and tacos, but another food entering the tariff conversation could be cake. While his 'Liberation Day' announcement roiled markets, he has largely pulled back from his most aggressive stance since then, though on Friday night he said he will double steel tariffs to 50%. The overall direction of travel remains positive for Chris Harvey, Wells Fargo Securities' head of equity strategy, whose S&P 500 price target of 7,007 makes him Wall Street's biggest bull. 'The Trump administration does want to move things forward,' he told CNBC on Friday, hours before the steel announcement. 'They appear to want to push the ball forward, and I think that's a positive. We're now at the point where I think we're going to start to hear some real tangible results over the next couple of weeks.' Harvey added that he thinks stocks could jump by double digits in the second half of the year. His S&P 500 forecast implies an 18.5% surge from Friday's close. A key piece to his thesis is Fed Governor Christopher Waller's recent statement that if tariffs end up around 10%, then the central bank could be in a position to cut rates in the second half of the year. Tariffs are generally seen as inflationary and could force the Fed to hold off on monetary easing. But if consumers treat them as one-off price hikes and keep their longer-term inflation expectations anchored, then there could still be leeway to lower rates. For now, the effective tariff rate remains above 10%, though estimates differ. The Budget Lab at Yale put it at 17.8% last month, while Fitch put it at 13%. Harvey expects tariffs to settle in the 10%-12% range and said that even as clients express anxiety about all the uncertainty, they are still comfortable with the economy's fundamentals. That prompted CNBC's Scott Wapner to ask if Trump can have his cake and eat it too, namely, moving ahead with his tariff agenda and getting the Fed rate cuts that he's been demanding. 'I think so,' Harvey replied. 'So the reason why we said 10% is with 10% we think a third will be eaten by the importer, a third eaten by the corporation, and a third will be eaten by the consumer. That's not a big impact.' At the same time, he added that the tariffs will generate revenue that can help with the federal budget, which has seen massive deficits in recent years. Fears that deficits will worsen under Trump's proposed budget working its way through Congress have led to volatility in borrowing costs as bond market jitters have jolted Treasury yields. Meanwhile, as trade talks continue, it's more important for the Trump administration to reach deals with India, Japan and the European Union, Harvey said, adding that China is less critical since the U.S. is in the process of disintermediation from it anyway. But if tariff uncertainty stretches into June and July, then companies may start resizing their payrolls and then 'things start to fall apart,' he warned. That's why it's necessary to make progress on trade and reach deals with big economies like India, Japan and the EU, Harvey said. That way, markets can focus on next year, rather near-term tariff impacts. 'Then you can start to extrapolate out,' he explained. 'Then the market starts looking through things. They start looking through any sort of economic slowdown or weakness, and then we start looking to '26 not at '25.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Ernst posts snarky reply after telling town hall ‘we all are going to die'
Sen. Joni Ernst, an Iowa Republican facing reelection in 2026, flippantly dismissed voters' concerns in recent days that people could die if Republicans cut Medicaid as they've promised to do in President Donald Trump's sprawling immigration and tax package. Speaking at a town hall in Butler County, Iowa, on Friday, Ernst was explaining how the bill would affect Medicaid eligibility when one audience member yelled out that individuals who lost coverage due to the cuts could die.
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Zelensky salutes drone attack on Russia: ‘Absolutely brilliant result'
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Sunday touted the 'absolutely brilliant result' of the large-scale drone attack on Russian strategic bombers. 'Head of the Security Service of Ukraine Vasyl Maliuk delivered a report regarding today's operation. An absolutely brilliant result,' Zelensky said in an afternoon post on X. 'A result achieved solely by Ukraine. One year, six months, and nine days from the start of planning to effective execution. Our most long-range operation,' he continued. A military official told The Associated Press that the drones hit 41 planes stationed at military airfields on Sunday afternoon, including A-50, Tu-95 and Tu-22M aircraft. Moscow has previously used Tupolev Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers to launch missiles at Ukraine, while A-50s are used to coordinate targets and detect air defenses and guided missiles, the AP reported. The military source said the complex attack included smuggling of first-person view drones into Russia, where they were then placed in mobile wooden houses. 'Later, drones were hidden under the roofs of these houses while already placed on trucks. At the right moment, the roofs of the houses were remotely opened, and the drones flew to hit Russian bombers,' the official told the AP, speaking on condition of anonymity to disclose details of the military operation. Zelensky said Ukrainian officials involved in planning of the operation were withdrawn from Russia with enough time to spare. 'Of course, not everything can be revealed at this moment, but these are Ukrainian actions that will undoubtedly be in history books,' Zelensky added in his post. 'Ukraine is defending itself, and rightly so — we are doing everything to make Russia feel the need to end this war. Russia started this war, Russia must end it. Glory to Ukraine!' he continued. The attack comes a day ahead of the next scheduled ceasefire talks in Turkey with Russia. Reuters reported on Sunday that it had obtained a copy of Ukraine's demands in the talks, which include 'full and unconditional ceasefire' and not making Kyiv stay diplomatically neutral, among other issues.
