logo
AI resurrecting the dead threatens our grasp on reality

AI resurrecting the dead threatens our grasp on reality

Gulf Today08-02-2025
Tribune News Service
A cruel twist of fate led Jason Gowin to make a novel parenting decision. Days after his wife gave birth to their twin boys in 2019, she had a stroke. The doctors gave her two or three years to live. Gowin and his oldest son were devastated, but worse was to come. Months later, Gowin found out he had stomach cancer. Facing the prospect of leaving three children without parents, he got an idea from watching the Superman movie Man Of Steel, where the caped hero walks into the Fortress of Solitude and talks to a simulation of his father. There was something comforting about that possibility, of he and his wife leaving behind talking replicas of themselves for their children.
'I thought, I bet someone has already come up with this,' he remembers. A Google search led Gowin, a 47-year-old actor in Pennsylvania, to about 10 different companies offering to train AI models on personal data — text messages, videos and other digital traces — to create virtual likenesses of people. He signed up as a beta tester with a provider called 'You, Only Virtual,' and today his nine-year-old son occasionally talks to a chatbot they call Robo Dad, an AI simulation that sounds eerily like Gowin. Recently, when his wife mentioned something about putting the dishes away, Robo Dad made the same joke moments after Gowan himself did. Artificial intelligence is beginning to offer a startling new proposition: the chance to keep talking to the dead. While only a small subset of people have tried so-called grief tech tools so far, the technology heralds a profound and disturbing shift in how we process loss. The price of the comfort from these tools could be a further erosion of our collective grip on what's real, and what isn't.
Despite AI's explosive growth, digital resurrections remain rare. 'You, Only Virtual' has about 1,000 users, according to Chief Executive Officer Justin Harrison. A similar firm called 'Project December' reports 3,664 people have tried its service. A few thousand in China have 'digitally revived' their loved ones through an AI firm called 'Super Brain,' using as little as 30 seconds of audiovisual data. These numbers pale against ChatGPT's 300 million weekly users. But as AI becomes cheaper and more sophisticated, these early adopters may signal a change in how we deal with death. The idea isn't totally unprecedented. Millions already seek companionship from chatbots like Replika, Kindroid and Character.ai, drawn by one of generative AI's most surprising capabilities: simulated empathy. These interactions have proven so emotionally compelling that users have fallen in love with their AI companions or, in extreme cases, allegedly been driven to suicide. Others have tried speaking to digital simulations of their older selves to help plan for their future, with more than 60,000 people now using one such tool called Future You.
It's easy to see the allure when so much of our communication today is text-based, and AI has become so fluent. If Gowin's story doesn't move you, ask yourself: Would you chat with a digitized version of a deceased friend or relative if it was trained on their speech? I would struggle to resist the opportunity.
But using generative AI to process grief also encroaches on something inviolate in our values as humans. It's not just the potential of muddying our memories with those of a 'fake' loved one: Did Grandma really say she loved pumpkin pie, or just her avatar? The risks include consent: What if Grandma would have hated being recreated in this way? And it's not just about impermanence or the idea that, when we die, we leave space for the next generation to fill the public discourse with their own voices.
The core danger is how grief tech could accelerate our growing disconnect from the present, a phenomenon already fueled by social media's quantified metrics of human worth and the rise of fake news and echo chambers. Now comes an assault on our appreciation of finality, as technology encroaches on yet another corner of our most personal experiences. Grief tech betrays 'our fundamental commitment to reality,' says Nathan Mladin, a senior researcher at Theos, a London-based think tank. He argues that while humans have always kept relics of the dead — like photos and locks of hair — AI simulations cross an existential boundary because they're interactive, and underpinned by data from across the internet. In a 2024 study, Mladin also warned about the exploitation of grieving people for profit. 'Some people go on these apps for a while, but others stay hooked and continue interacting like that person is still there.'
While grief tech remains fringe, its normalisation seems plausible. That means it will need guardrails, like temporal limits that make AI replicas fade over time, mirroring natural grief. They could also benefit from being integrated with human counselors to keep an eye out for unhealthy dependency. Gowin is grappling with these boundaries. Robo Dad can't discuss controversial topic, but questions for his family remain over how it will handle future, big-subject conversations about relationships and alcohol, or what happens if his son becomes too attached to the system. For now, Robo Dad is good enough for Gowin, even if it does lead to intermingling recollections of the real and digital dad. 'Honestly, human memory is so patchy anyway,' he says. 'The important thing to me is that I know that my AI model has got my essence at its core.'
But preserving someone's essence also risks something fundamental. The Japanese concept of 'mono no aware' suggests that things are beautiful — like cherry blossoms that bloom for just one week each year — precisely because they don't last forever. Stretching out our presence artificially means we don't just lose our appreciation for impermanence, but something even more essential: our collective anchor to what's real. In trying to soften the edges of death through technology, we may gradually weaken our ability to face life itself.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Atlassian Joins Forces with Google Cloud For Multi-Cloud Strategy & AI Collaboration
Atlassian Joins Forces with Google Cloud For Multi-Cloud Strategy & AI Collaboration

Channel Post MEA

timean hour ago

  • Channel Post MEA

Atlassian Joins Forces with Google Cloud For Multi-Cloud Strategy & AI Collaboration

Atlassian has announced a new partnership with Google Cloud, a significant step in building a multi-cloud infrastructure for its customers. This collaboration will see Atlassian's core applications, including Jira, Confluence, and Loom, run not only on Amazon Web Services (AWS), but now also on Google Cloud. This strategic move enables Atlassian to further strengthen its platform and meet the demands of large and complex organizations worldwide. The multi-cloud strategy focuses on increasing resiliency, security, and scalability. Google Cloud customers will have the option to purchase Atlassian cloud applications directly through the Google Cloud Marketplace using their existing spend commitments to simplify procurement. The collaboration goes beyond infrastructure. Atlassian and Google Cloud will develop powerful product integrations, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence (AI). Deepening this integration will lay the foundation for smarter workflows and more powerful AI-powered collaboration. Atlassian's platform, already used by over 300,000 customers, is characterized by its unique Teamwork Graph. This system connects teams, data, and workflows, enabling AI-powered collaboration and breaking down knowledge silos across organizations. With 2.3 million users already using Atlassian AI, the company is committed to further accelerating AI adoption. This is evident in the rapid delivery of new capabilities, such as AI-powered app Rovo, shipped in just six months. Major enterprises like Air France-KLM and Mercedes-Benz rely on Atlassian Cloud for their digital transformation. After upgrading to Atlassian Cloud, Nestlé is experiencing the benefits of automatic maintenance and security fixes as well as streamlined workflows in Jira and Confluence. Their teams now have 60% more time for high-value work. New engineers are onboarding 90% quicker and deploying process and configuration changes 75% faster—all while enjoying 99.95% uptime. Atlassian underscores that its investment in the partnership with Google Cloud is the next step in setting a new global standard for secure, scalable, and intelligent collaboration in the cloud. 'Cloud is a 'when,' not an 'if,'' says Atlassian, which is committed to accelerating every customer's cloud journey.

As AI drives a new nuclear era, US tech giants and China reshape global power
As AI drives a new nuclear era, US tech giants and China reshape global power

Middle East Eye

time21 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

As AI drives a new nuclear era, US tech giants and China reshape global power

As of March 2025, Google, Meta and Microsoft, the three biggest tech companies in the United States, pledged to triple their investments in nuclear energy by 2050. These plans highlight the sector's efforts to address one of the major challenges posed by the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence: its immense energy demands. This renewed interest in nuclear energy marks a new phase in the technology's history. The development of nuclear power began in the late 1930s, as the US and the Soviet Union raced to build the atomic bomb. Shortly after the Second World War, the technology was redirected towards civilian and commercial use, leading companies to begin developing nuclear plants under state supervision. However, by the late 1970s, concerns over safety, the declining cost of other renewable sources such as solar and wind, and the global prevalence of oil led many countries - particularly democracies - to scale back nuclear development. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters China, by contrast, continued to invest. Over the following decades, it steadily expanded its nuclear infrastructure, positioning itself as a global leader just as the rest of the industry languished, with little development and declining appeal. Today, the convergence of China's state-led strategy and the private ambitions of western tech giants marks the beginning of a new nuclear era - one set to transform energy systems, accelerate the AI race, and reshape global power. Driving forces The revival of nuclear energy has been driven by a convergence of technological, economic and strategic factors. First, the astronomical growth in energy demand to power AI has rendered traditional sources increasingly inadequate. Tech companies have turned to nuclear power for its enhanced capacity and relatively low carbon footprint. Meta alone aims to generate 4 gigawatts (GW) of energy - enough to power up to three million US homes - a figure that illustrates the enormous energy needs of today's tech giants. Only the largest corporate players can afford the astronomical costs of nuclear energy - but the promise of AI-driven profits is drawing billions in investment Second, although nuclear energy is relatively inexpensive to operate, the initial capital costs are extraordinarily high and often exceed projected budgets. For example, generating 4 GW of power can cost around $40bn - more than the total energy budget of many countries. Only the largest corporate players can afford such investments. The promise of substantial AI-driven profits is one key incentive, spurring the rise of nuclear energy start-ups and drawing billions in venture capital. Third, since the early 2000s, the industry has seen major technological breakthroughs, including small modular reactors (SMRs), which are easier to transport and assemble, and microreactors, which require less human oversight. Meanwhile, Gen IV reactors can produce more energy through advanced processes. These innovations coincide with AI's increasing energy requirements - and, crucially, some have been made possible by AI itself, which enables large-scale simulations and reduces human interaction with reactors, thereby improving safety. Global stakes China, too, is advancing many of these innovations - but through a centralised, state-led framework for nuclear development that stands in sharp contrast to the market-driven approach of western tech firms. Still, a notable degree of public-private collaboration remains. Full state backing of this technology reduces regulatory hurdles and increases coherence in the entire project. In addition, China has focused on thorium reactors - operationalising its first in April 2025 - in place of uranium, to reduce dependence on western supplies. This was aided by China's early 2025 discovery of sufficient domestic thorium reserves to power its nuclear programme for decades. This unfolding nuclear era carries far-reaching global and political implications, beginning with the growing influence of tech companies in a space once dominated by governments. Their emergence as major players in nuclear development creates friction with US regulatory authorities, as commercial ambitions often run up against stringent licensing and safety protocols. While President Donald Trump has ramped up support for the industry, regulatory oversight remains a critical point of tension - especially given the risk that companies might prioritise speed and profit over caution, a pattern well-documented across the corporate world. Schrodinger's president: Trump's tariffs exist and don't - except on China John Rees Read More » These innovations also intensify the strategic rivalry between the US and China. With tariff wars having intensified since Trump came to power, tensions are already at fever pitch. While the Cold War arms race was measured in warheads, this new nuclear age will likely be defined by the number of reactors built - and the AI technologies they power. Nuclear energy is becoming another front in a widening struggle for global dominance. At the same time, both tech companies and China are now looking to export these innovations, particularly smaller nuclear reactors, to developing countries to help recover costs. While tech firms may face regulatory hurdles in doing so, China could take advantage of its vast trade networks under the Belt and Road Initiative to sell this technology more freely - potentially leading to major geopolitical shifts and further challenging US hegemony. Energy transition The rise of nuclear technology is also expected to have ripple effects across existing energy sources - particularly coal, natural gas and oil, in that order of magnitude. The energy shift underway could redraw political and economic power in the Middle East Coal, already in decline, is expected to lose what remains of its foothold. Gas and oil may follow, as carbon taxes and climate regulations intensify pressure for cleaner alternatives. Over time, this transition could shift the foundations of political and economic power, creating new dynamics in regions such as the Middle East, where many of today's energy giants are based. Nuclear technology, once seen as a Cold War relic, is experiencing a silent resurgence in innovation and funding - one that is set to transform not only energy systems, but the geopolitical landscape for decades to come. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Gwyneth has always been selling what money can't buy
Gwyneth has always been selling what money can't buy

Gulf Today

timea day ago

  • Gulf Today

Gwyneth has always been selling what money can't buy

Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, Gwyneth Paltrow was the platonic ideal of the It Girl and Hollywood nepo-baby, dating Brad Pitt and Ben Affleck and winning the Academy Award for Best Actress for her role in Shakespeare in Love. Then, in 2008, Paltrow engineered a career detour nobody quite saw coming: She launched a website and free weekly newsletter recommending her favorite restaurants, travel destinations, luxury hotels, fashion boutiques and day spas — a Gwyneth Hot List, you could say. Thus was the birth of Goop, a trailblazing platform in wellness, style and beauty that in less than a decade grew into a sprawling media and e-commerce enterprise. It has, at various times, sold clothing, beauty products, homeware and a meal delivery service, and produced travel guides, cookbooks, a newsletter, a podcast, conferences and a Netflix series. Built on Paltrow's 'beauty, charm and pedigree,' Goop became 'the authority on what we put in our bodies (supplements), how we treat our bodies (sleep, detoxes and exercise), and what we put on our bodies (serums and creams),' writes journalist Amy Odell in her new book, 'Gwyneth: The Biography,' published by Gallery Books. Paltrow gave wellness a narrative, and a beautiful, tasteful aesthetic. She repositioned it as a luxury, and showed that it could be monetized beyond charging for facials, massages and beauty products. She spearheaded the transformation of what was known as the 'global spa economy' into Big Wellness, a $6.3 trillion global industry rooted in pseudoscience and specious health claims. Along the way, Odell writes, Paltrow became 'one of the biggest and most polarizing cultural influencers of the 21st century.' 'Gwyneth: The Biography,' by Amy Odell. Tribune News Service In Gwyneth, which is based on more than 220 interviews with Paltrow's childhood pals, film colleagues, close friends and former Goop employees, Odell shows how Paltrow 'helped bring the wellness movement and alternative medicine into the mainstream — to the horror of doctors and academics,' who regularly debunked Goop's declarations in print and on camera. For a long time, both Paltrow and Goop were able to slough off the medical community's criticism like so many dead skin cells, because the brand's customers would buy what she was selling no matter what. Paltrow was Goop's superpower: the company's founder, chief executive and ambassador, who claimed to practice what it preached, and embodied all that it promised. Paltrow connected to her customers and subscribers with her 'straight dope' talk — one of her Goop Gift Guides, for example, was called 'Ridiculous but Awesome,' and she told her 'goopies' that she likes her wrinkles — and assured them that if they bought her message, and the products she hawked on Goop, they could live, and even look, like her. As Odell posits, Paltrow used her fame 'to commodify her taste and lifestyle, and sell it back to us, even though her life is the very definition of something money can't buy.' At the same time, in the business community, the former It Girl came across as the ultimate zeitgeist channeler, able to swiftly adapt to cultural shifts and bail on initiatives that didn't work. She refashioned herself as the Oprah Winfrey and Martha Stewart of the clean living space, creating a new template for celebrity entrepreneurs, such as the Kardashian/Jenners, Rihanna and Hailey Bieber, to follow. With Goop, Odell writes that Paltrow gave 'a master class in commanding the attention economy that now rules culture.' (Her appearance in a video recently as a 'temporary spokesperson' for Astronomer, the company at the center of the Coldplay kiss-cam scandal, only underscores this point.) But all was not well at the wellness brand. Employing the same dogged reporting she brought to 'Anna: The Biography,' her 2022 bestseller on longtime Vogue editor Anna Wintour, Odell discovers that under the veneer of quiet perfection and rarified taste, Paltrow's erratic, aloof and, at times, wicked behavior created a toxic work environment of epic proportions. Tribune News Service

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store