Will China and Russia's WWII narrative resonate with the world?
When Chinese President Xi Jinping
travelled to Moscow , many headlines focused on energy talks, bilateral cooperation and handshakes signalling deeper
China–Russia ties . However, another type of strategy was unfolding behind the formalities, one rooted not in policy, but in narrative.
In their joint statements and ceremonial remarks, Chinese and Russian officials weren't simply affirming mutual interests. They were rewriting the language of legitimacy. History, the United Nations and the actions of the United States and Japan were all interpreted through a lens that
challenges the foundations of the post-World War II global arena.
At the centre of this narrative strategy lies a deliberate reinterpretation of historical events. The
commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II was not used as a moment of unity with the West. Instead, the war was framed as a two-front struggle in which China and the Soviet Union bore the primary burden of defeating fascism.
The US, Britain or Poland and the broader Allied coalition, so central to conventional Western narratives of the war, were absent. There was no mention of the Pacific theatre in the form typically understood in Western histories, and no reference to
D-Day or the Western Front as decisive moments in the conflict.
Instead, the narrative emphasised the Asian and European fronts with China and the Soviet Union standing together, resisting Japanese militarism and Nazi aggression. The defeat of fascism was not only a shared sacrifice but a shared legacy that now justifies the moral authority of both states.
This is not simply a different interpretation of history; it is a claim to contemporary legitimacy that positions China and Russia as inheritors of the true anti-fascist tradition. The main goal is to reshape the post-1989 world order, one in which international law and small- and medium-sized countries function in the system under US hegemony.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Step in right direction as US and China ease trade war tensions
Cautious optimism that China and the United States can further de-escalate the trade row Washington started has peaked and may soon be vindicated. It rose when the two sides, meeting in Geneva last month, agreed on a 90-day pause in new sky-high bilateral tariffs to allow for negotiations, fell with more US tech export bans and rose again after last week's phone call between presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. Advertisement Now hopes have received a major boost after top economic and trade officials from each side, meeting in London, reached agreement in principle on a 'framework' to implement the consensus between Xi and Trump. Indeed that is what Trump alluded to yesterday when he said: 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me.' That, however, is easier said than done, as seen by the extent and acrimony of chilled relations between the two sides. The agreement follows two days of trade talks between top officials in London in the first meeting of what is now called the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism. Vice-Premier He Lifeng led the Chinese delegation. China's top trade negotiator, Li Chenggang, said it was hoped progress at the London meeting would be conducive to increasing trust between China and the US. That achievement on its own would be significant bilaterally, regionally and globally. The world will be watching for final approval of the framework from the top level. Expectations have been shaped by official accounts from both sides of the Xi-Trump call regarding sensitive issues. They include restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earths – an issue that has been resolved according to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick – and US visas for Chinese students. Importantly, the talks have gained momentum without serious setbacks, building on foundations laid on neutral ground in the initial talks in Geneva. News of the 'framework' agreement broke the same day the People's Daily published an interview with the founder of multinational Huawei Technologies, Ren Zhengfei, which seemed more than a coincidence. Ren said Americans overestimated the importance of his company, which owed its success to hard work and research over the years. Advertisement The interview was a timely signal that no matter how the US restricted China's tech development, it would not stop China from developing its own core technology.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong TV stations should boost English content
Hong Kong prides itself as Asia's world city. Yet there is no shortage of examples to show that the city may not live up to that reputation. The glaring inadequacy of television programmes in English for international audiences is a case in point. With a public consultation for the renewal of the three free TV licences due later this year, some lawmakers have called for more local productions in English, saying the current content is diminishing and lacks variety. Advertisement Local TV stations have been running more programmes in Mandarin after the cap for non-English programmes on English channels was raised from 20 per cent to 45 per cent in 2023 following a midterm license review. They may also show programmes in Mandarin with Chinese subtitles on Chinese channels for up to 10 per cent of the total broadcasting time. While it is understandable to show more programmes in Mandarin these days, it also means less content and fewer choices for many non-Chinese speakers. Admittedly, fewer people watch TV these days. The growing popularity of online media is also posing significant challenges to traditional broadcasting. But it remains the responsibility of the broadcasters to fulfil the licensing requirements. Expatriates feel they are increasingly being marginalised or alienated, saying there is little TV content that relates to them. A search on the internet for 'Hong Kong TV programmes in English' yields many results diverting users to watch programmes on overseas live streaming platforms via VPN, or virtual private network. The dearth of local and quality programmes in English is not new. Not only is this unconducive to social integration, it may also weaken Hong Kong's status as an international and inclusive city. Both Chinese and English are official languages in Hong Kong. Together with Mandarin, the biliteracy and trilingual policy is pivotal to the city's international competitiveness and national integration. The coming license review should ensure broadcasters will cater to the needs of all. Separately, some licensing rules are dated. They should be reviewed regularly to reflect present circumstances and enable broadcasters to cope with challenges arising from new technology and changing viewership.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why China remains world's best chance for peace in Ukraine
The International Organisation for Mediation launched in Hong Kong late last month, counting 32 countries as founding signatories. An institution designed to supplement and actualise Article 33 of the United Nations Charter is something the world increasingly needs as Russia's invasion of Ukraine drags into its fourth year. Advertisement Recent peace talks in Istanbul produced no appreciable progress , while swings on the battlefield have long since given way to a grinding impasse. Neither side appears capable of achieving peace, much less victory on the battlefield. Meanwhile, sanctions, weapons deliveries and rhetorical escalation continue to deepen global fragmentation. However, peace could still be in reach if the thorniest issues are addressed. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed openness to direct negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the same time, Russia's ambassador to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia has reiterated Moscow's willingness to support a UN-centred peace initiative for Ukraine, suggesting there is at least an opening. Both parties remain deeply divided. US-led efforts to push the two into accepting a ceasefire have so far failed, and it is little wonder why, given the challenges remaining. Nato does not hold the answer, and neither does the presence of US troops. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has made it clear that deploying US forces to Ukraine in a peacekeeping role is unacceptable. 'Instead, any security guarantee must be backed by capable European and non-European troops,' he told a gathering of transatlantic alliance members in Brussels. Advertisement
