logo
Habeas corpus is line between democracy and tyranny. Trump is blurring that line

Habeas corpus is line between democracy and tyranny. Trump is blurring that line

Yahoo26-05-2025

If you think you see a train coming down the tracks, it's best to assume it's a train.
And right now, President Donald Trump and his inner circle are charging full speed toward stripping Americans their most basic constitutional rights – with working people, immigrants and communities of color tied to the rails.
Multiple media outlets recently reported that President Donald Trump's Senior Advisor Stephen Miller has suggested the administration is 'actively looking at' suspending habeas corpus – a constitutional right dating back to the Magna Carta of 1215, designed to prevent unlawful detention.
Miller's statement is not a political trial balloon. It is a direct threat to every community and person that has historically borne the brunt of unchecked state power; and now many millions more are at risk.
Habeas Corpus: Can Trump administration suspend right to challenge detention?
Habeas corpus – the right to appear before a judge when detained – was embedded in the U.S. Constitution in Article I, Section 9. It may only be suspended in times of 'rebellion or invasion.' We are not at war. This is not a rebellion. But Trump wants to give his agents the unchecked ability to round up whomever they want, whenever they want, without charges or court review.
This isn't immigration policy. It's authoritarianism.
The graves of young Americans who have made the ultimate sacrifice can be found all over the globe. By rolling back our rights, we dishonor the men and women who have died for the freedom of, ultimately, all of us.
Historically, suspensions of habeas corpus have come during national emergencies: Lincoln invoked it during the Civil War. Roosevelt used it to justify Japanese internment camps during World War II. Both decisions were later criticized for violating fundamental rights. But Trump's proposal comes without crisis or justification – only a desire to wield power without oversight.
Let's be honest: we know who suffers when due process is stripped away. It's not the wealthy or well-connected. It's people in neighborhoods like the ones I grew up in – among Arab, Black, poor white and Hispanic families that have always been overpoliced, surveilled and scapegoated. In Detroit, we've lived through COINTELPRO, mass incarceration, and decades of militarized policing. Our communities don't need a history lesson – we've seen what happens when the government throws out the rulebook.
More opinion: I joked about getting deported. In Trump's America, it's not funny.
Conservative icon and retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig recently called Trump's casual disregard for the Constitution 'perhaps the most important words ever spoken by a president.' Trump said he doesn't know if he's obligated to uphold the Constitution. That's not a gaffe. That's a confession. Luttig warns this is 'constitutional denialism' – the belief that the Constitution doesn't apply if the president doesn't like how the courts interpret it.
Just recently, Trump's Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, while testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, was asked by Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-New Hampshire, to define habeas corpus, saying – incorrectly – "habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country."
Under Trump's watch, ICE has detained people with legal status for nothing more than criticizing presidential policies and proposals. We've seen legal residents arrested at courthouses, workplaces, and even outside schools. Ask yourself: what happens if there's no court to turn to? No right to challenge your detention? That's not democracy. That's dictatorship.
As a civil rights attorney, I've defended the wrongfully arrested, the unlawfully detained, and the politically targeted. I've seen how the courts can be both weapon and shield. And I know that the only thing more dangerous than unchecked police power is unchecked police power with no court review at all.
More: Lawyer for U-M protester detained at airport after spring break trip with family
I believe in the power of the Constitution – but only if we recognize and use that power. We cannot sit idly by while a president openly plots to suspend core legal protections. We cannot wait until our neighbors are gone and our rights are stripped before we raise our voices. The train is coming, and it won't stop on its own.
Detroit has always been a city of resistance – against racism, against exploitation, against economic injustice and against authoritarianism. We know how to fight injustice because we've been doing it for generations. From labor strikes to civil rights marches to courtroom battles for justice, our strength is in our refusal to be silent.
So no, suspending habeas corpus is not just some obscure legal issue. It's the line between democracy and tyranny. Between protest and prison. Between freedom and fear.
And if they come for one of us without due process, they can come for all of us.
We must defend habeas corpus – not just as lawyers, but as citizens, as neighbors and as people who know that our rights mean nothing if they don't protect the most vulnerable among us.
Because if we don't fight back now, history will ask why we let it happen again.
Amir Makled is managing partner of the Dearborn-based Hall Makled Law Firm.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Habeas corpus is what stands between democracy and tyranny | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hundreds of NYC students walk out of school to protest Trump after ICE arrests 20-year-old Venezuelan classmate
Hundreds of NYC students walk out of school to protest Trump after ICE arrests 20-year-old Venezuelan classmate

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds of NYC students walk out of school to protest Trump after ICE arrests 20-year-old Venezuelan classmate

About 500 Big Apple students staged a walkout Tuesday after federal immigration agents detained a 20-year-old Venezuelan migrant who had been attending a Bronx high school. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested an Ellis Prep Academy student identified only as Dylan on May 21 when he showed up for a mandatory immigration court hearing, reported. 'It seems like a dirty game on their part,' Raiza, Dylan's mother, told Chalkbeat. 'When someone appears in front of a judge, it's because they don't have any criminal record, they want to do the right thing,' she told the outlet. 'The only thing he wants is to study.' Dylan had graduated high school in Venezuela but was looking to improve his English and prepare for college at the academy, which is a school for English language learners and older students, the outlet said. He had been living with his mother and two younger siblings, who also fled Venezuela, the report said. More than 500 students skipped school at around noon Thursday to attend an anti-Trump protest in Union Square park, blasting the president for his hard-line immigration and border policies. 'A lot of my friends from my school are not citizens or even permanent citizens of the United States and I want to protect them, said Shera Zhou, 18, a senior at Stuyvesant High School. 'I want their voices to be heard even though they can't be here. 'I really think everyone should have the right to stay in the United States because we are a country built on immigrants.' Nava Litt, a Bronx High School of Science senior, said the Trump administration was taking actions that were 'undemocratic,' threatening free speech rights and education. 'We can't just sit by and let that happen,' Litt, 18, said. 'Something that we think is a big concern right now is that students are being detained by ICE for exercising their free speech rights.' Dylan had turned himself in at the US border in April 2024, applying for asylum through the temporary protected status program initiated by the Biden Administration. The Trump administration has since scrapped that program after President Trump campaigned on cracking down on illegal immigration. The courts have blocked or ruled against some deportations that are enforced without adequate notice or due process but the repeal of temporary protected status remains in effect. Chancellor Aviles-Ramos has also called out the detention. 'New York City Public Schools stands firmly with our students, including our immigrant students, and our schools will always be safe spaces for them,' the chancellor said in a statement. 'Our hearts go out to the student who was detained by ICE, and we are deeply saddened for their family. While this incident did not occur on school grounds, we want to reassure our families: we will continue to speak out and advocate for the safety, dignity, and rights of all of our students.' Aviles-Ramos said the city public school system will support 'every child and family — regardless of immigration status' and 'we encourage families to continue to send their children to school.' Mayor Eric Adams sidestepped the controversy during an unrelated news conference Tuesday, declining to question or criticize the student's detention. 'I want to be extremely clear. That did not happen in a school,' Adams said. 'We do not coordinate with ICE on civil detainers. I think that is a question for federal authorities.' ICE had no immediate comment.

Democratic attorneys general outline response to federal government during Seattle town hall
Democratic attorneys general outline response to federal government during Seattle town hall

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democratic attorneys general outline response to federal government during Seattle town hall

Jun. 2—Just over four months into President Donald Trump's second administration, the rate and frequency with which Democratic attorneys general have challenged federal policy has greatly outpaced that of his first term in office. In the past 19 weeks, Washington Attorney General Nick Brown has filed 20 lawsuits against the federal government and indicated more are likely to follow soon. According to Brown, Washington had filed two lawsuits at a similar point in Trump's first term. The lawsuits have frequently been brought by multistate coalitions, with California Attorney General Rob Bonta and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield each joining Washington in more than a dozen of the cases. Ahead of a town hall event Monday, the three attorneys general said the actions are part of a coordinated effort. "A very increased type of action being brought by the states," Brown said during a news conference Monday evening. "That is reflective of one, being extremely prepared for this moment, two, the collaboration amongst the states, and three, a level of lawlessness and recklessness by the Trump administration that was not there the first time. And we as attorneys general need to respond." The Community Impact Town Hall on Monday offered a forum for community members to voice their concerns over the loss of funding or other cuts to federal programs and ask about their state's response to the Trump administration. Audience questions included how states could ensure funds for medical research are properly distributed and what steps the states have taken to restrict local law enforcement from enforcing immigration law. Like Washington, both Oregon and California have long had state laws that limit the amount of information local authorities can provide immigration officials. California's law, Bonta said, was challenged during the first Trump administration, with the state successfully arguing "it was an unlawful violation of the tenth amendment for the Trump administration to try and conscript or commandeer our resources for our local law enforcement to be used for immigration enforcement." In recent months, the Keep Washington Working Act has frequently drawn ire from Republican lawmakers and prompted a Congressional investigation. The 2019 law restricts local law enforcement from using local resources to help federal officials enforce immigration law and prevents local law enforcement from sharing nonpublic information with federal officials, except in certain scenarios. Last month, the three states filed lawsuits against the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Transportation, alleging that both agencies had recently sought to stipulate that a state must cooperate with federal immigration officials to receive federal funding. "When they try to take the funding away to compel action, we will stand in place to protect our sanctuary state laws that exist up and down the West Coast," Rayfield said. "I feel very fortunate, again, to be on the West Coast." It appears that more lawsuits challenging federal immigration efforts could come in the near future. Late last week, the Department of Homeland Security published a list of "sanctuary jurisdictions" that it claimed do not fully cooperate with federal immigration law. Trump, who ordered the publication of the list, has said those on the list risk the loss of federal funds. According to the list, qualification for the list was "determined by factors like compliance with federal law enforcement, information restrictions, and legal protections for illegal aliens." The list, however, received immediate pushback from some of those who appeared on it. On Saturday, Kieran Donahue, president of the National Sheriffs' Association, said in a statement that the list "was created without any input, criteria of compliance, or a mechanism for how to object to the designation. Sheriffs nationwide have no way to know what they must do or not do to avoid this arbitrary label." "This decision by DHS could create a vacuum of trust that may take years to overcome," Donahue said, adding the list should be taken down "immediately." While the list was taken down Sunday, an archived version shows that Washington, along with 35 counties and five cities within the state, were among the more than 500 jurisdictions it mentioned. Both California and Oregon also appeared on the list. On Monday, Brown called the list "laughable" and said it "really adds to the fact that this is arbitrary and capricious action by the Trump administration." "We as attorneys general have to take those threats seriously and reaffirm state sovereignty," Brown said. "Each of our states has adopted different policies over how local and state officials can cooperate with federal immigration enforcement officials. We do that to keep the public safe and make sure that people who are the victims of crime can cooperate fairly and freely with law enforcement without fear of immigration enforcement actions against them."

Two Japanese men killed in northeast China after business dispute
Two Japanese men killed in northeast China after business dispute

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Two Japanese men killed in northeast China after business dispute

TOKYO/BEIJING (Reuters) -China's Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday that two Japanese men killed last month in the northeastern city of Dalian were business partners of the suspect and authorities were investigating. Dalian police confirmed the case in a statement on Tuesday and said a 42-year-old male suspect of Chinese nationality has been arrested. He had lived in Japan for a long time, the statement said. The two victims were business partners of the suspect who had entered China temporarily, police said, adding that the incident was triggered due to business conflicts. Kyodo News had reported the incident earlier on Tuesday, citing the Japanese embassy in China. Chinese police notified the Japanese consulate in Shenyang on May 25 about the killings, the report said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store