
Leader for life? El Salvador's Bukele headed that way, critics say
There was the time Bukele stormed the legislative assembly with armed soldiers during his first year in office. Or a year after that, when his allies in the congress removed top Supreme Court judges and the attorney general and replaced them with Bukele loyalists.
Then last year, Bukele ran for a consecutive term as president after the new Supreme Court judges reinterpreted the constitution.
But the final tipping point came on Thursday afternoon, when a little-known legislator from Bukele's ruling New Ideas party announced a proposal to amend the constitution to allow indefinite presidential reelection.
Bukele allies lined up one by one to sign a petition that would allow the assembly to vote on the legislation immediately, without it first going to committee for analysis or public debate.
A mere three hours passed from the time the legislation was introduced until the moment it became law. Fifty-seven lawmakers voted in favor, with three in opposition.
Ernesto Castro, the assembly president, framed the vote as a win for democracy. "The people will decide how long they want a leader to remain in office," Castro wrote on X. "With these decisive measures, we are ensuring a stronger, fairer and more efficient democracy."
Marcela Villatoro, one of the three legislators to vote against the measure, countered late on Thursday: "Democracy has died in El Salvador today."
The constitutional change also lengthened the presidential term by a year to six, eliminated runoffs, and moved up the next presidential election by two years to 2027, leaving little room for Bukele's scattered opposition to find a candidate.
Bukele, who swept to power in 2019, is extremely popular in El Salvador because of his strong-arm tactics that have eliminated the country's once-powerful street gangs. That, combined with his effective crackdown on opponents, virtually guarantees that the 44-year-old will remain in office until at least 2033 — and perhaps many years after that.
Human rights groups accuse Bukele of widespread abuses and corruption, and a flood of rights activists and journalists have fled the country in recent months after two outspoken critics were arrested and jailed.
A spokesperson for Bukele did not respond to requests for comment about the constitutional change, whether he plans to run for re-election, or the opposition's assertion that democracy was being destroyed.
In the U.S., El Salvador's constitutional amendment was largely met with silence. Bukele is Trump's strongest ally in Latin America, a relationship cemented by an agreement reached in March for El Salvador to house 238 Venezuelans deported from the U.S. in a maximum-security prison. In April, Trump called Bukele "one hell of a president."
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not respond to a request for comment on the constitutional change.
"The U.S. government is shielding the Bukele regime with its silence," said Gina Romero, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association. "Bukele has complete control of the courts, the congress, the media and the narrative. If that's not autocracy I don't know what is."
In El Salvador, the reaction to Thursday's measure was muted. Democracy is relatively new in the country -- it was established during 1992 peace accords that ended a brutal 12-year civil war -- and many Salvadorans consider it a failure given the power that gangs amassed during that time.
The news appeared on the front pages of the country's most popular papers. But there were no protests, and many people were more focused on getting ready for a week-long vacation, with government offices closed next week.
Many of Bukele's most outspoken critics have fled the country, including an estimated 100 journalists and human rights activists. In July, the country's leading human rights group suspended operations.
Bertha Maria Deleon, a lawyer and activist who worked for Bukele from 2015 to 2019, said Bukele's rise to power was fueled by what she saw at the time as a legitimate desire to improve El Salvador. He promised to end corruption after three consecutive presidents were accused of embezzling millions of dollars of public funds.
Deleon broke with Bukele after he occupied the parliament in 2020. She said everything he has done since then has been an effort to consolidate power.
"Ever since that takeover of parliament, he clearly began to execute the dictators' manual," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Progress by Samuel Miller McDonald review – humanity's greatest myth?
Everything is in decline, argues the geographer Samuel Miller McDonald. Democracy and free speech are in freefall. Inequality is soaring, with the 1% scooping up ever-larger shares of global wealth. These days, the US has a Gini coefficient – the most common international measurement of inequality – on a par with slave-owning Ancient Rome. Maternal mortality rates for American millennials are three times higher than those of their parents' generation – and this in the world's richest society. Global life expectancy is falling. So, too, are food standards. Outside a few bourgeois sourdough enclaves, real bread has vanished. In its place we get mass-produced, spongy, tasteless 'pseudo-bread' – as Guy Debord lamented in The Encyclopedia of Nuisances. In an earlier age, there would have been bread riots. Now? Just muted indigestion. What accounts for our complacency? False consciousness, claims McDonald in this sparky polemic against the myth of progress. We have been hoodwinked by elite propaganda. The 'progress narratives' of the ruling classes assure us that history only moves forward, that we should trust the system and surrender agency to our betters. Even when protests have erupted, they have mostly sought modest tweaks rather than revolution. But progress, argues McDonald, is a false prophet. History hasn't followed a tidy upward arc. Moreover, what counts as progress has often produced huge collateral damage, including ecological devastation. There was a time when human beings had a 'commensalistic' relationship with nature, turning on veneration rather than exploitation. Embracing egalitarianism, most primitive societies didn't have hierarchies of class or gender. Then, around 3000BCE, the 'parasitic' economy emerged. Mesopotamians were the first to behave as though nature was no longer to be communed with but subdued. Religion took the place of animism, preaching dominion over the Earth. For McDonald the Epic of Gilgamesh is the first piece of progress propaganda: in it, the eponymous hero kills the forest guardian, tames the wild, and builds a city, filling it with bread and beer to the unbridled joy of his acolytes. The Book of Genesis follows suit. God commands Adam and Eve to 'subdue' the Earth and tame every living thing. Later, Christianity – by then a far cry from Jesus's radicalism – proved useful to Constantine, who saw in monotheism a handy formula: one god, one empire, one emperor. Fast-forward a millennium, and capitalism picks up the baton. Progress, now secularised, means capital formation: wealth siphoned from the masses to the enlightened few, who return to us the bric-a-brac of modernity – antibiotics and air fryers and suchlike. The logic of extraction remains unchanged; nature and proletariat alike suffer. McDonald's book is a satisfying corrective to the smugness of thinkers such as Steven Pinker, who insist that conditions only ever improve. Yet he oversells his case with sweeping judgments. His account of religion, for instance, amounts to little more than a crude reprise of Marx: it's all opium for the masses, a tool to pacify resentment. But that's far too simple. From the Peasants' Revolt to the Taiping Rebellion, Christianity has supplied radicals with a script for inverting power structures. Equally damaging is McDonald's uncritical endorsement of David Graeber and David Wengrow's vigorously contested claim that Enlightenment ideas came from Indigenous America – specifically from the Wendat diplomat Kondiaronk – a theory historians such as David A Bell have dismissed as fantasy. On the latter's account, the French nobleman Baron de Lahontan wasn't so much lifting his ideas from Kondiaronk as putting his own progressive views into the mouth of a naïf – a common literary device in the early modern period. Readers may find all the doom-mongering a bit much. Indeed, there's a whiff of the swivel-eyed prophet about McDonald. And like all doomsayers, he is sure that the end-times are nigh. 'Climate change and ecological collapse,' we are told, 'are very likely to cause political fragmentation that nullifies legal and cultural precedents like [slavery] abolition … If market economies continue, there is little reason to assume they will not return to trade in indentured human beings.' Very likely? The confidence is grating and ignores the simple fact that we no longer live in a labour-intensive economy. If anything, AI is making the return of slavery less, not more, likely. McDonald's dismissal of the possibility of mass investment in nuclear energy in a 'neoliberal' world has already aged poorly, with enormous sums being poured into small modular reactors this year. All of which goes to show that the predictions business is a tough one: things can just as easily go the other way. Progress: A History of Humanity's Worst Idea by Samuel Miller McDonald is published by HarperCollins (£22). To support the Guardian, order your copy at Delivery charges may apply.


BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
US may demand $15,000 deposit for visas
The US may require foreign nationals from certain countries to pay a $15,000 (£11,300) deposit for a tourist or business 12-month pilot programme aims to curb visa overstays "or where screening and vetting information is considered deficient", according to a notice published by the US state does not specify which countries are covered by the pilot US administration has taken several steps to further President Donald Trump's agenda of stemming illegal immigration. Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his second term to this state department notice, published on Tuesday, says: "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure (B-1/B-2) and who are nationals of countries identified by the Department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering Citizenship by Investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program. "Consular officers may require covered non-immigrant visa applicants to post a bond of up to $15,000 as a condition of visa issuance, as determined by the consular officers."Since coming to office in January, Trump has signed orders to roll back humanitarian programmes for migrants from certain countries who are already in the Republican president has also banned foreign nationals from 12 countries from travelling to the US, and imposed partial restrictions on another seven. His administration has revoked visas for hundreds of international students and detained several others on college campuses across the US, often without any warning or recourse for state department has said it is targeting those who were involved in activities that "run counter" to US national of those targeted have participated in some form of pro-Palestinian there have been other cases where cancellations appear to be connected to those with some sort of criminal record, or legal infractions like driving over the speed limit, immigration lawyers have said.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump firing of statistics chief puts US data credibility at risk, experts warn
Donald Trump's firing of the head of the main agency for producing jobs figures risks propelling the US into the same category as countries notorious for 'cooking the books' such as Argentina and Greece, experts have warned. Donald Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner last Friday, after accusing her agency of 'faking' the latest employment figures for 'political purposes,' which showed the US economy adding a lower-than-expected 73,000 jobs in July. The BLS, the US government official source for labor statistics since 1884, also revised down the estimates of new positions created in May and June by a combined 258,000. Trump provided no evidence for his accusations against McEntarfer, which he reinforced in social media posts on Monday, calling the bureau's latest reports 'rigged' and concocted. But his decision jeopardizes the US's tradition of impartial and reliable statistic collection on which the country's economic stability and international reputation depends, specialists have told the Guardian. Erica Groshen, McEnterfer's predecessor as BLS commissioner during Barack Obama's presidency, warned earlier this year that an impending civil-servant rule change that presaged last Friday's sacking could usher in a 'politicization' of government statistical bodies – whereby experts are pressured to produce massaged numbers that fitted an incumbent president's agenda. She raised the specter of Greece and Argentina, where official statistics became discredited as a result of government-instigated misrepresenting of figures. The International Monetary Fund stopped accepting the Argentinian government's inflation figures in 2013 after officials were found to have deliberately understated the rate for the previous six years. After threatening Argentina – historically one of the IMF's biggest borrowers – with expulsion, the organization did not extend another loan to it until 2018. In the case of Greece, government statisticians were accused of having made inflation and soaring budget deficits 'disappear' in the 1990s as the country sought respectable-looking numbers that would enable to qualify for the single European currency, the euro. Greece subsequently joined the currency, but at an exorbitant long-term price. The 2008 global financial crash plunged its economy into a deep recession, and the government was forced to accept multi-billion dollar bailouts from the IMF and European Union – at the cost of painful cuts to social services. Andreas Georgiou, who became head of Greece's main statistics agency during the crisis, even faced prosecution after he discovered that authorities had been dramatically understating budget deficits for years. Both countries experienced severe political backlashes. In Argentina, after two further IMF loans failed to stabiliize its economy, Javier Milei, a populist economist and ally of Trump, was elected in 2023 promising to take a chainsaw to the governing bureaucracy and many public services. In Greece, a succession of left and rightwing governments have taken office amid a rise in support for radical and populist parties, giving rise to concerns for the health of the country's democracy. Talking to the Guardian, Groshen warned of comparable scenarios following a rule change rolled by the White House's office of personnel management in April. 'Bureau of Labor Statistics leaders could be fired for releasing or planning to release jobs or inflation statistics unfavorable to the president's policy agenda,' she wrote in a briefing paper. The revision altered the category of about 50,000 permanent civil servants to 'policy/career' status, making their removal easier. Originally tabled in April to allow 30 days for comments, it gave agencies the right 'to expeditiously remove career employees in policy-influencing positions for poor performance or misconduct, such as corruption or for injecting partisanship into the performance of their official duties'. The precise roles of officials affected were not defined, but Groshen pointed out that, if implemented, the president would determine who would be reclassified. The change stemmed from an executive order Trump issued on his first day back in the White House on 20 January. It stated that the power of 'policy-influencing' civil servants is 'delegated by the president, and they must be accountable to the president'. Groshen, now a specialist in government statistics at Cornell University, said the changes in civil servant status would make it easier for the government to tamper with numbers it disliked. 'There are a number of changes to the civil service that makes it much easier for the administration to interfere with the activities of statistical agencies and that worries me,' she said. Under increased threat of removal, civil servants in federal statistics bodies 'might also face pressure to change methodologies or reveal pre-release information', she wrote. 'By making it easier to remove employees if a president determines that they are interfering with his or her policies, it increases the potential for passivity or political loyalty to be prioritized over expertise and experience.'