logo
The top 2025 March Madness Cinderella candidates to bust NCAA Tournament brackets

The top 2025 March Madness Cinderella candidates to bust NCAA Tournament brackets

New York Times06-03-2025
If you care about March Madness upsets, you need to start spotting potential Cinderellas now, and we're here to help. With conference tournaments getting underway, this is the time to scout Davids across the country and assess their slingshots. And while it's preliminary, we already have some big news: There are a lot of long shots packing powerful Goliath-killing punches out there this year — far more than in 2024 or 2023.
Advertisement
For the past two decades, we have been using analytics to predict NCAA Tournament upsets. Using our statistical model, Slingshot, developed with the help of the Furman University Mathematics Department, we examine matchups from past tournaments to isolate the factors crucial to underdog victories. Then we identify emerging longshots who carry those traits.
We're beginning with this rundown of mid-majors you should root for now if you want to see as many upsets as possible in the second half of this month. We'll rank them by their Underdog Rating, which is the percentage chance Slingshot gives a squad of beating an average tournament opponent that's at least five seeds higher.
Missouri Valley
Underdog Rating: 58.9
Drake is single-handedly proving that the difference between Division I and Division II isn't nearly as vast as you'd think. First-year coach Ben McCollum won four D-II national championships at Northwest Missouri State, and with the help of three key players from his old squad, he hasn't missed a beat at Drake. The Bulldogs are 27-3, including 17-3 in the Missouri Valley Conference, the top mark in the league.
Even better than the Bulldogs' 27 wins? The way they get them — at least from Slingshot's perspective. They rank among the nation's top 21 teams in forcing turnovers, offensive rebounding and defensive rebounding, which gives them a massive edge in possessions. Drake also plays at the nation's slowest pace, which makes that possession advantage even more pronounced. After all, in a game where each team has the ball less often than usual, each trip up or down the floor matters more.
Add it all up, and Drake profiles as an epic underdog: Their Underdog Rating is nearly twice as high as any team that made last year's field as an 11-seed or lower. Drake will be a nightmare for any opponent … well, maybe except for Lamar.
Advertisement
Mountain West
Underdog Rating: 54.0
Bracketologists have the Aggies pegged around a 9-seed right now (The Athletic has them slotted as a No. 10), meaning they would have to do bracket-breaking damage in the second round. And they definitely have the tools to threaten a top seed. Led by the backcourt of Ian Martinez (17 points per game) and Mason Falslev (14.6 ppg, 6.1 rebounds per game, 3.7 assists per game), the Aggies rank 16th in the nation in offensive efficiency. They score from inside and out, take care of the ball and get a large number of their own misses (33.8 percent offensive rebound rate).
Utah State's defense isn't nearly as good, but its one strength is exactly what Slingshot likes to see: The Aggies force turnovers on more than 20 percent of opponents' possessions. A good number of those are live-ball turnovers, as their 12.5 percent steal rate ranks 29th in the country. They got enough stops to hand St. Mary's one of its four losses, which bodes well against potential NCAA foes.
GO DEEPER
Saint Mary's sports the look of a March Madness Cinderella in the making
Big West
Underdog Rating: 52.5
Four years after moving from D-II to the Big West, the Tritons are finally eligible for the NCAA Tournament. And as absurd as the rules are to require such an extended probation, at least coach Eric Olen put the time to excellent use. Scouring his old stomping grounds across the country, he brought key players to UC San Diego from smaller programs as far-flung as Azusa, Hawai'i-Hilo and Lynn. And he's built a program that has gone from 10 wins to 21 to 26 (and counting) since 2023 and now ranks 53rd in our basic power ratings (and 35th in NET).
If our model knew a florist, it would be sending bouquets to Olen and point guard Hayden Gray, who leads the country with a 6.2 percent steal percentage. Keyed by Gray, the Tritons seize the ball on 23.5 percent of opponent possessions while surrendering it on only 13.4 percent of their own, giving them a historically massive turnover advantage. Their disruptive defense forces opponents the spend an average of 18.3 seconds on each possession (ranking 326th). They also launch 3s on almost half of their shots and hit 36.9 percent of their long-range attempts (ranking 41st).
Bottom line: This is a good team made better by precisely the kind of characteristics (and analytical smarts) that have boosted past Cinderellas. Get to know them now, and root for them in the Big West Tournament while half your fellow bracket-fillers are still confusing them with San Diego State.
Advertisement
Atlantic 10
Underdog Rating: 46.9
Ryan Odom may not be part of the Shaka Smart coaching tree, but his VCU team excels at generating extra possessions in much the same way as Smart's teams in the program's glory years.
The Rams rank 25th in the nation in forcing turnovers (21.1 percent) and grab offensive rebounds on 36.5 percent of their missed shots. They add to their variance by taking tons of 3s (47 percent of field-goal attempts, 27th in the nation) while limiting opponents' long-range shots (35 percent). In other words, the Rams get more bites at the apple, and when you factor in a defense that ranks 20th in adjusted efficiency, you can see why they are 25-5 and very much in the at-large conversation if they don't win the A-10 Tournament.
Southland
Underdog Rating: 38.5
Slingshot thought the Cowboys were the friskiest double-digit seed in last year's tournament, and they promptly got stomped by Gonzaga. But our model isn't backing off after getting burned once; this year, McNeese has an even higher Underdog Rating.
The Cowboys (25-6) went 19-1 in the Southland Conference and lost two tight early-season games against SEC teams: by eight against Alabama and by three against Mississippi State. Most remarkably, they've put together this run of success without transfer guard Alyn Breed, who scored 35 points in two games (including 17 against Alabama) and then injured his knee. He has yet to return.
In his place, coach Will Wade relies on a balanced attack: Seven Cowboys average between 7.1 and 12.6 points per game. Our model loves their emphasis on forcing turnovers (21.8 percent of opponents' possessions, 17th in the country) and offensive rebounding (35.7 percent, 28th). And while they take a below-average number of 3s, they hit them at an above-average clip (35.4 percent), meaning McNeese may have some latent 'Chameleon' ability to up their variance when needed against a better foe.
American
Underdog Rating: 30.1
Four years ago under Grant McCasland, North Texas pulled a huge overtime upset against Purdue in a No. 13 over No. 4 NCAA Tournament shocker. And while McCasland moved on to Texas Tech in 2024, Ross Hodge has kept the team's basic formula intact: Play at a crawl, stay in every game, build possessions and contest the perimeter. The Mean Green lost nine players this season, including their top six scorers, and started 6-3. But they have jelled into a group that does many things well.
North Texas ranks 78th in the country in offensive rebounding percentage and 48th in forcing turnovers. They don't take many 3s — though they've boosted their rate against their toughest opponents — but hit 36.1 percent of their bombs, ranking 65th. They're holding opponents to shooting only 29.6 percent from long range, ranking ninth. And helped by their verrry deliberate pace at both ends (60.4 possessions per game, ranking 362nd), they haven't lost a game by more than five points since Thanksgiving weekend.
Advertisement
The Mean Green have to get by Memphis, whom our model sees as a better team but worse tournament underdog, in the AAC conference tournament. But if North Texas makes the big dance, it will be a very tough out.
Sun Belt
Underdog Rating: 27.1
Every now and then, Slingshot will spot a team that excels at certain key aspects of dragon-slaying, almost to the exclusion of doing anything else well. (When you've got a spare sec, check out the stats for Eastern Kentucky in 2014.) Led by point guard Tayton Conerway, who's second in the nation with a 5.8 percent steal percentage, the Trojans play aggressive perimeter defense, force live-ball turnovers on 14 percent of opponent possessions (ranking seventh), push the ball in transition, hoist 3s on more than 45 percent of their attempts, and crash the boards. Grabbing 39 percent of their own missed shots, Troy has the fourth-best offensive rebounding percentage in the country; who saw that coming?
This is a team that knows how to maximize the quantity and value of its scoring opportunities, which is exactly what a David needs to do in a win-or-go-home scenario. Last week, Troy, one of four teams to share the regular-season championship in the Sun Belt, beat conference foe Texas State despite shooting an awful 5-25 from beyond the arc. How? By amassing 18 offensive rebounds, 11 steals (five by Conerway) and 58 total field goal attempts, nine more than the Bobcats.
This is also a team with serious red flags: Troy is sloppy with the ball, committing turnovers on more than 20 percent of possessions, absent on the defensive glass, and couldn't hit an open 3 with a heat-seeking missile if you set the net on fire (30.5 percent 3P%, ranking 334th). But our model has taught us not to overlook the scruffiest of underdogs. Conerway really is someone to watch. And given the right matchup, he and the Trojans could drive a Goliath crazy.
Southern
Underdog Rating: 20.0
Speaking of driving opponents crazy, Bucky Ball is back! (Though at a slightly lower volume.)
Last year, we were early to sing hosannas to coach Bucky McMillan, who has brought a ferociously high-octane style of play to the Bulldogs. Samford pressures foes more or less continuously, forcing turnovers and creating open shots. Last season, that led to a 29-6 record, a SoCon championship and a 4-point first-round loss to No. 4 seed Kansas. This time around has proven more difficult: Samford lost big man Achor Achor to Kansas State, shed some of its personality when 5-foot-8 PG Dallas Graziani left for D-II Nova Southeastern, and has faced stiffer competition in the conference, where the Bulldogs are seeded just fourth.
But that pressure still forces turnovers on 21.8 percent of opponent possessions, the 18th-best rate in the nation. And Samford still bombs away, taking nearly 47 percent of their shots from downtown, and shoots the lights out (37 percent on 3s, ranking 37th). Slingshot says the Bulldogs' combination of underdog traits boosts their chances of beating a higher seed in a tournament setting by more than 10 points per 100 possessions — by far the most of any SoCon contender.
(Photo of Drake's Bennett Stirtz: Michael Allio / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cowboys 53-man roster prediction after preseason opener: Last 4 in, First 4 out
Cowboys 53-man roster prediction after preseason opener: Last 4 in, First 4 out

USA Today

time22 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Cowboys 53-man roster prediction after preseason opener: Last 4 in, First 4 out

The Cowboys performance in their first preseason game left a lot to be desired. Head coach Brian Schottenheimer promised that he was going to keep things extra vanilla throughout the preseason, including Saturday's opener against the Los Angeles Rams, saving his bullets for when the carnage actually mattered. He certainly didn't send his best into the field of battle, resting starters up and down the lineup. The result was predicatable, a less-than-competitive, 31-21 beatdown that required two fourth-quarter touchdowns to make it seem close on the scrolls. An interesting takeaway from the game though is the number of healthy scratches. Presumably, players who were able to play, but were protected from injury during a meaningless game have an extremely strong chance of seeing the initial 53-man roster. With that in mind, it's time for another stroll the the projection game, trying to see who the last four in and first four out are, to borrow from March Madness. Quarterbacks (3 of 3) Dak Prescott, Will Grier, Joe Milton There's no question the Cowboys are going to protect Milton, but Saturday night shows he may have a long way to go before he can be an in-game replacement for Prescott in case of injury. That's the exact scenario Grier found himself in and he entered Saturday's game late and proved capable of leading a scoring drive. If a roster spot is needed to protect a non-vested veteran, Grier is a perfect player to put on the practice squad (not subject to waivers) and elevate for the first three weeks until a spot opens up due to injury. Running Back (4 of 7) Javonte Williams, Phil Mafah, Jaydon Blue, Hunter Luepke Last 4 In / First 4 Out: Mafah over Miles Sanders For now, seeing how they protected Luepke on Saturday, it's a question as to whether or not Mafah has anything special to his game and this projection leans towards the staff liking his upside more than what Sanders. This is admittedly the least confident of the projections, but Sanders making the practice squad and being elevated in Week 1 is the thought process here. Tight End (3 of 10) Jake Ferguson, Brevyn Spann-Ford, Luke Schoonmaker Last 4 In / First 4 Out: Schoonmaker over Rivaldo Fairweather It still wouldn't shock if the Cowboys try to find a trade partner for Schoonmaker, which would open things up for Fairweather to make the club. With Luepke's versatility, there's an outside shot the Cowboys carry just two natural TE and stock up on practice squadders. Wide Receivers (6 of 16) CeeDee Lamb, George Pickens, Kavontae Turpin, Jalen Tolbert, Jonathan Mingo, Ryan Flournoy Last 4 In: Flournoy The test here will be if the Cowboys try to hide Holden over the next exhibition contests. The down roster battles between these two and Jalen Brooks may go down to the wire. Offensive Line (9 of 25) Tyler Guyton, Tyler Smith, Cooper Beebe, Tyler Booker, Terence Steele, Nate Thomas, Asim Richards, Brock Hoffman, La'el Collins First 4 Out: Hakeem Adeniji The signing this week of the unretiring L'ael Collins seemingly rounds out the plan. There's not necessarily a swing tackle, and Dallas probably goes deep on the practice squad if they can retain the services. It's hard to project a draft pick not making the 53, but who is Anaji Cornelius replacing here? TJ Bass and Saahdiq Charles also land with those the team would try to keep on the PS. Defensive End / Edge (5 of 30) Micah Parsons, Donovan Ezeiruaku, Dante Fowler, Marshawn Kneeland, Sam Williams This rotation assumes that Parsons isn't holding out of the regular season despite his contract issues that currently still exist. The young offensive line could've really used the practice reps against him during camp, but he'll likely hit the ground running when he decides to play. Payton Turner is the fallback option, and may agree to go to the practice squad in such a scenario. Defensive Tackle (5 of 35) Osa Odighizuwa, Perrion Winfrey, Solomon Thomas, Jay Toia, Mazi Smith There's a lot of chatter about just how much of a revalation the UFL import Winfrey has been, with even some comparisons to David Irving. The Cowboys need all the help they can get as this is their weakest position, by far, on the roster. Another drafted rookie to the practice squad in Maryland's Tommy Akingbesote, along with IPP PS-exemption Denzel Daxon. Linebackers (5 of 40) Kenneth Murray, Marist Liufau, Jack Sanborn, Shemar James, Damone Clark This feels light, as the team's best linebacker Demarvion Overshown likely begins the season on PUP with a target of getting back on the field before November hits. Cornerbacks (5 of 45) DaRon Bland, Kaiir Elam, Isreal Mukuamu, Caelen Carson, Zion Childress Last 4 In / First 4 Out: Childress over CJ Goodwin The Cowboys are deep at corner on paper, but not right now. It seems as if neither Trevon Diggs nor Shevon Revel are going to be activated in enough time to get work in before Week 1, so their ramp up might be delayed until October. Josh Butler is also a top-five corner who is still on the shelf from a 2024 injury. Those three, along with Bland and Elam, form a formidable unit, but it's not there now. Childress has impressed in the slot, leaving us to believe Goodwin will be a PS elevation to maintain his ST designation. Safeties (4 of 49) Malik Hooker, Donovan Wilson, Juanyeh Thomas, Markquese Bell Running it back with the same group as last year; no issues here as Mukuamu can go back and forth between the DB groups. Special Teams (3 of 52) Brandon Aubrey, Trent Sieg, Bryan Anger Remaining Roster Spot (1 of 53) The Cowboys are going to grab either a DT or a CB off the street, perhaps both, but definitely leaving room for an addition over the next two weeks. Follow Cowboys Wire on Facebook to join in on the conversation with fellow fans!

Syracuse men's basketball: the 'science' behind how the Orange are building their 2025-26 schedule
Syracuse men's basketball: the 'science' behind how the Orange are building their 2025-26 schedule

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Syracuse men's basketball: the 'science' behind how the Orange are building their 2025-26 schedule

As the Syracuse Orange men's basketball team slowly reveals its schedule for the 2025-26, fans may have noticed some major differences compared to usual. Among them, making decisions like not playing Georgetown or putting its usual yearly games against Cornell and Colgate on hold. Some might think it's odd, but in reality, it could be a key for Syracuse to make the NCAA Tournament for the first time in half a decade. A recent story from sheds light on how Syracuse and the rest of the ACC more tactically constructed their non-conference schedules during the summer. Specifically, how the schedules can reflect better in the NET — a key metric in the Selection Committee's process to see who makes the tournament field. To date, Syracuse's non-conference schedule is close to being fully filled out. It includes a gauntlet in Las Vegas for the Player's Era Tournament, where the Orange are already guaranteed to face two top-20 opponents per Bart Torvik (No. 1 Houston and No. 17 Kansas), plus a third to-be-determined opponent that could very be ranked top-50 in the metrics. Of course, there's the annual SEC/ACC Challenge where 'Cuse will once again be facing Tennessee (No. 13 in Bart Torvik), this time at home. But after that, there's nothing too crazy or scary on paper. For the remaining eight confirmed games on the non-con slate, six are at home. In those home matchups, three of them are opponents Bart Torvik has ranked outside the top-300 in its rankings: Stonehill (No. 318), Mercyhurst (No. 362), Binghamton (No. 332). The other half are teams ranked between No. 188 (Monmouth) and No. 239 (Hofstra), with Northeastern at No. 218 sandwiched in the middle. Syracuse's other two non-games are against St. Joe's (No. 99) and Drexel (No. 265), both neutral-site. And yes, some fans might be thinking: doesn't it make sense to play teams like Colgate and Cornell, in-state opponents where the Orange have a lengthy history competing against. Of course it does, Paul Brazeau — the ACC's senior associate commissioner of men's basketball — told in that story. But, in terms of the NET, absolutely not. This quote in particular stood out: 'Let's take Colgate,' Brazeau said. 'Because at the end of the year, they're gonna be at best a bottom Quad 3. So, you gotta beat them by 40 to make a difference? What are we doing here?' All of these decisions certainly seem calculated. The broader goal coming from the conference down to teams: squeeze every inch of potential out of the NET and avoid scheduling teams that do absolutely nothing for your NET, and to be honest, probably do more harm than good. Take a look at Syracuse's non-con schedule last year, for example. The Orange finished 6-5 in their out of conference slate in 2024-25. The wins came against Le Moyne (by four), Colgate (by two), Youngstown State (by nine in double-overtime), Cornell (by ten), Albany (by 17) and Bucknell (by 12). Here is how those opponents ranked to end the year, per KenPom: Le Moyne: No. 354 Colgate: No. 261 Youngstown State: No. 199 Cornell: No. 129 Albany: No. 275 Bucknell: No. 226 So, Syracuse only had two of the wins come by double-figures, and just one opponent was outside the top-300 in KenPom. How about the losses? Syracuse dropped its games versus Texas (by four, neutral-site), Texas Tech (by five, neutral-site), Tennessee (by 26, road), Georgetown (by four, home) and Maryland (by 27, neutral-site). There was some missed opportunities (particular the Texas and Texas Tech games), but on the flip side, why play G-Town (No. 90 in KenPom) just to maybe win, when 'Cuse can play some team outside the top-300 in the NET, and hope to smoke them by 30 or 40. Again, playing Georgetown every year makes all the sense in the world, from keeping the historic series going to the general interest among fans on both sides. It doesn't for the NET, or for maximizing the Orange's chances at making the NCAA Tournament… for better or worse. Syracuse's 2025-26 schedule was made with a clear strategy: cut out the middle and maximize the periphery. Play those two or three Q1 games and hope to win at least one, then push for matchups that would reflect better in the eyes of the NET, even if the matchups aren't as intriguing or historically relevant. That's also partly why the ACC made the move to trim the number of conference games a year from 20 to 18. Those are two extra games that can go to a team like Syracuse diversifying its resume (aka: schedule Stonehill) over playing a 50-50 matchup against the Florida State's and Notre Dame's of the world. Last year, just four ACC teams made the NCAA Tournament; only Duke was able to get past the First Round. The conference in recent years has received fewer spots to go to the Big Dance. Now, it's hoping teams like Syracuse can not only turn things around by being more efficient with their scheduling, but that doing so will get more teams in the field. Of course, whoever the opponent is, Syracuse will still need to handle business enough times. But unlike recent years, there is clearly a calculated plan here with the schedule, even if it leaves out a few usual opponents.

UFC rights go to Paramount in stunning $7.7 billion deal
UFC rights go to Paramount in stunning $7.7 billion deal

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

UFC rights go to Paramount in stunning $7.7 billion deal

Say goodbye to pay-per-view. Paramount is purchasing the rights to UFC in a landmark $7.7 billion deal over seven years beginning in 2026, the companies announced in a statement Monday, in a move that will eliminate the pay-per-view model. All of the UFC's events will now be accessible with only a Paramount+ subscription, and select numbered events will also air on CBS. 'This historic deal with Paramount and CBS is incredible for UFC fans and our athletes,' UFC president Dana White said in a statement. 'For the first time ever, fans in the U.S. will have access to all UFC content without a Pay-Per-View model, making it more affordable and accessible to view the greatest fights on a massive platform. This deal puts UFC amongst the biggest sports in the world. The exposure provided by the Paramount and CBS networks under this new structure is a huge win for our athletes and anyone who watches and loves this sport.' Getty Images ESPN, UFC's current rightsholder, has been using a pay-per-view model, which TKO Group president Mark Shapiro called 'a thing of the past.' ESPN and Disney owned UFC's rights for the last five years while paying an average of $500 million per year. The deal with Disney expires at the end of this year. With the Skydance-Paramount deal closing this past Thursday, TKO Group — which owns the UFC and WWE — was able to come to an agreement rather quickly, according to CEO David Ellison, who spoke to the Financial Times. Getty Images Paramount and CBS have had a longstanding relationship with the NFL, and this deal should continue to bring mixed martial arts to the forefront of sports programming. 'When you look at the incredible portfolio of sports that Paramount has with the NFL, Uefa, Masters and March Madness, there really was a lull in the summer, and now with the UFC, we really do have a very strong year-long sports offering on both Paramount+ and CBS,' Ellison told the Financial Times. CBS will air the Super Bowl in 2028, when they will be in year two of their deal with the UFC. There was talk earlier this year of UFC potentially linking up with Netflix, not to mention a possible ESPN renewal. In addition to the U.S. rights of UFC, Paramount is said to be 'interested in buying UFC's international rights,' according to CNBC. The UFC deal comes days after WWE landed a five-year, $1.6 billion deal with ESPN to have their premium live events streamed on their new direct-to-consumer app.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store