
With Cook County Jail's population again on the rise, officials weigh the reasons
Early in the morning outside Cook County Jail, a group of new detainees stepped out of a Chicago police wagon and walked bleary-eyed into the bright sunlight before lining up inside against a brick wall.
Brought in from the police districts, the men were among the newest bookings to the jail, where they would wait until a judge ruled on whether they would be admitted or released while their charges were pending.
And the jail, busy during the early morning hours as police brought in overnight arrestees and deputies shuttled detainees to court appearances, may only grow more bustling: After a decline following statewide bail reform — and years of reductions prior to that — the county's jail population has begun to tick up once again.
In an internal report obtained by the Tribune via a public records request, the Cook County sheriff's office found that the average daily jail population has risen by about 12% in recent months, reaching its highest level in eight months at the end of March. The report also found sharp increases in detention for some charge types for which State's Attorney Eileen O'Neill Burke has implemented policy changes.
Many factors can influence the ebb and flow of the jail's population, and experts pointed to a number of potential considerations when evaluating it, including arrest rates and judicial decision-making.
The sheriff's office's analysis, the report said, sought to understand the impact of the policies of Burke, who was ceremonially sworn in on Dec. 2.
Sheriff Tom Dart, in an interview with the Tribune, made clear that he supports policies that keep high-risk defendants incarcerated, but said he is concerned about how long inmates remain in jail as court cases move sluggishly through the system.
In 2023, the Tribune's Stalled Justice series documented how Cook County murder cases were taking longer than ever to conclude, and longer than in any other major court system that could be studied. Reporters uncovered multiple chokepoints that were stalling cases long before the pandemic, in a system overseen by judges who allowed cases to languish and court leaders who ignored repeated recommendations for fixes.
The county jail is meant to be a temporary waypoint for defendants until their case is finished, and lengthiness of proceedings can contribute to jail population levels.
In other quarters, the jail's spike raised questions about whether prosecutors were considering the nuance of cases amid Burke's more hardline detention policies than her predecessor Kim Foxx, who was elected in 2016 with a reform mandate on a wave of anger over the killing of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald by a Chicago police officer.
But Yvette Loizon, chief of policy at the state's attorney's office, said that prosecutors are only one piece of the detention mechanism.
'When people want to lay the uptick in the jail population at our feet, that's a fundamental misapprehension of the process,' she said, adding that judges ultimately make the decision and defense attorneys can offer evidence that refutes or mitigates the need for jailing. 'I would submit that because we are doing a better job of presenting relevant and necessary and important information to the judiciary … judges have more information and better information upon which to make the decision.'
Chief Judge Timothy Evans' office declined to comment, saying that jail matters are under the purview of the sheriff's office.
Regardless of political viewpoints on detention, the rising jail numbers have not gone unnoticed by city and county stakeholders, as the phenomenon — especially if it continues into the traditionally more violent summer months — could come with complications such as cost increases and more difficulty with crowd management.
And though the new state's attorney is an obvious consideration when studying the recent influx, experts said the reasons are likely multifaceted.
'It's probably not a simple explanation,' said David Olson, co-director of Loyola University Chicago's Center for Criminal Justice Research.
By the numbers
Since the 2010s, the county's jail population has fallen significantly, cut nearly in half from typical average populations around 10,000 in that era. It started decreasing after Evans in 2017 reformed county policies around bail and was reduced further after the Pretrial Fairness Act in September 2023 eliminated cash bail in Illinois.
After the measure took effect, the jail numbers fell to under 5,000 for much of 2023 and 2024, reaching levels not seen since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic when some lower-risk inmates were diverted from the jail for public health reasons.
When Burke took office in early December, the jail's population was around 5,200, having increased slightly at the end of Foxx's term, according to data from the sheriff's office. As of Friday, the population had grown to just over 5,600.
The sheriff's office plans to produce a monthly analysis with the goal of tracking the impact of Burke's policies on the jail, according to the first such report in March.
Among the findings of the April report:
Monthly admissions for people ordered detained had increased 47% as of the end of March, compared with admissions during the month prior to the start of Burke's term.
Admissions for domestic battery and felony retail theft-related offenses saw the largest increases, 81% and 32% respectively, compared with November of 2024.
Olson said the theft-related increase caught his eye because such charges are generally not an offense prosecutors are allowed to seek detention on, though defendants can be detained if there are other charges or violations involved.
'That there's a big increase in people coming in on a theft charge seems odd because theft offenses are not eligible for pretrial detention at the first stage,' he said. 'The fact that those have gone up so much suggests that it might be people who were on pretrial release that then got charged for a new crime that the state is now seeking to detain them.'
During a swearing-in speech last year, Burke announced that prosecutors would automatically ask judges to order defendants detained while awaiting trial if they faced certain charges. By contrast, Foxx's office had said it reviewed each case individually before making a decision about whether to seek detention.
Burke also reversed a policy by Foxx that raised the threshold to charge retail theft as a felony to $1,000, reverting back to the legal bar of $300. She also has ordered prosecutors to seek prison sentences in more gun cases.
Impact on the ground
On Wednesday morning, inmates lined up to wait for buses to take them to court appearances in courthouses across Cook County. In all, about 500 were ushered out, to return later in the afternoon.
Cook County Jail sits on one of the largest single-site complexes in the country, though some of it is unused amid the population shrinkages over the years.
Dart said the population increase is 'very manageable' noting the unused space, but he said that staffing shortages might mean personnel challenges if the trend continues. He called for better court case management to allow for more timely resolutions for cases.
'I want violent people off the street so if that number is 5,100, fine, if it's 5,700, fine, if it's 6,000 fine … whatever that number is, that's what my job is, that's what the jail is for,' Dart said. 'That other overriding thing, length of stay, that just factors in because it causes so many additional problems and there's no reason for it.'
Other stakeholders said they noted the increase with some alarm.
Sharlyn Grace, senior policy adviser at the Cook County public defender's office, said the city has not experienced rising crime levels to correspond with the increasing jail population.
'I think it does raise a lot of questions about public safety and what the impact is going to be because we know many people who are subject to pretrial detention will come home,' she said. 'Research shows that detaining people is going to lead to less employment, less stable housing … a higher likelihood of re-arrest.'
Matthew McLoughlin, campaign coordinator for the Illinois Network for Pretrial Justice, said Burke's detention policy is contrary to the spirit of reforms to the county's pretrial system, adding that the group believes it's the primary driver of the jail's spike.
'I would say the blanket detention policies that she's put forward since taking office … are not in line with the goals of the Pretrial Fairness Act,' he said. 'It was really designed to make sure court stakeholders were taking time with each individual case.'
Loizon, though, said line prosecutors are presenting judges with a 'very thorough and fulsome explanation of the details of the crime.'
'We're not walking away from our detention policy and the state's attorney's office absolutely owns the fact that we are ensuring our ASAs are presenting all the information that they can present so that a judge can make an informed decision based on the relevant facts,' Loizon said. 'We absolutely own that piece of it because that is a priority for us.'
Slow-moving justice
The longest-waiting detainee in Cook County — Augustin Toscano — has been jailed more than 14 years without a trial, since midway through the first Obama administration.
He's awaiting trial on allegations he was part of a drug and robbery crew blamed for more than a dozen slayings from 2009 to 2011. His wait offers a case study of how Cook County's system can get gummed up, with court records showing yearslong waits to gather and share evidence, then yearslong, slow-motion arguments over what evidence can be shown at trial, with delays also blamed on the pandemic, the case judge's own arrest on a gun charge and both sides blaming the other for stall tactics. Toscano also dismissed his attorney to argue on his own behalf.
'Literally there is no case that gets better as it gets older,' Dart said.
The length of stay for inmates at the jail has long been a prime issue for the sheriff, who noted it again now in light of rising jail numbers.
'Theoretically if cases were moving through the system more readily, then additional people coming would not be much of a notice because we'd be moving people out just as well,' he said.
The Cook County state's attorney's office hasn't recently updated its disposition data, which the Tribune previously used to calculate how long murder cases were taking. (The courts don't publish their own data.) But in looking at daily jail logs published by the Cook County sheriff's office, the data suggests progress in some measures but not in others — and shows Cook County still struggles far more to take cases to trial than the busier New York City court system.
Some national advocates call for detainees to wait no more than a year for a trial. As of the most recent data, the county jail housed nearly 1,800 people waiting at least a year. That's down from roughly 2,000 two years ago, but still about 400 higher than the number in New York City's system waiting at least a year for a trial, according to a Tribune analysis of both systems' jail data.
The county struggles even more with longer waits. Nearly 190 people have been waiting at least five years for a trial in Cook County — about 50 less than two years ago. But that's still dramatically higher than in New York City, which only had 18 detainees waiting that long, at last count.
And Cook County still grapples with perhaps the most notorious statistic: the number jailed at least a decade without trial. In the spring of 2021, there were six people waiting in jail for at least 10 years. By April 2023, that figure had doubled. And two years later, it's even higher, with 15 detainees now waiting at least that long for a trial. New York City, by comparison, has no one waiting a decade. At worst, the longest-waiting inmate in New York City's system has been there 7 ½ years.
In Toscano's case, he's asked a judge to throw out the charges because of how long the case has taken, blaming both prosecutors and his former attorney, arguing that it's now practically impossible for him to track down witnesses from so long ago.
No trial date has been set.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wake up, Floridians: Our politicians don't respect or represent us
Are the older folks of Florida just going to sit back while protecting their wallets? The nation is facing an economic and social crisis. Our elected officials at all levels are hiding out, potentially allowing the most vulnerable citizens to lose vital services and assistance. Our leaders are so out of touch with the average Americans' needs, instead moving toward assisting the wealthy to get wealthier. I'll leave the social issues for another letter. Wake up, Floridians, you're being taken for a sad ride while potentially sucking the fumes of the Big 'Bad' Bill. Think of the impact on your grandchildren – or maybe you don't care! Robert Richard, Sarasota This article originally appeared on Sarasota Herald-Tribune: Wake up, Floridians: Our politicians do more harm than good | Letters

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Carbondale to consider referendum for home rule charter update
Carbondale residents could have the opportunity to vote in November on a referendum modernizing personnel policies in the city's home rule charter. Carbondale City Council will consider adopting an ordinance during its June 16 meeting to add a referendum question to the Nov. 4 ballot addressing the personnel section of the city's home rule charter, according to Mayor Michele Bannon and a public notice published Friday in The Times-Tribune. If approved, the referendum will ask city voters whether to amend Article IX of Carbondale's home rule charter concerning its municipal personnel system, according to the notice. The charter is the city's governing document. The potential referendum comes as city officials are working to update their legislation, namely Carbondale's 1974 home rule charter, Bannon said. 'Government always needs to be transparent,' Bannon said. 'We always need to be responsive, and we need to be aligned with the evolving needs of our community.' Enacted in 1972, Pennsylvania's Home Rule Law increased local autonomy, according to the state Department of Community and Economic Development. Home rule charters transfer the basic authority to act in municipal affairs from state law to a local charter that is adopted and amended by voters, according to the DCED. The goal in Carbondale is to modernize its charter, clarify outdated language and 'ultimately enhance our operational efficiency within municipal government,' Bannon said. Elements of Carbondale's home rule charter don't reconcile with each other, Bannon said, which prompted her to speak with city council, their solicitor and members of the public. 'It's obviously clear that we need to make some changes in the charter, so we figured we'd start with personnel, simply because that's the heart and soul of who we are,' she said. 'The city of Carbondale provides service to our residents, so we want to make sure everything is lined up there and … that our staff gives our residents the best service they possibly can.' Councilman Dominick Famularo, who introduced the ordinance, echoed Bannon. 'The language of our charter is 50 years old, and there are many spots throughout the charter where either the understanding of the passage has changed or the language seemed inappropriate,' Famularo said. Carbondale last amended its home rule charter in 2004 when residents approved a referendum allowing the mayor to fill the position of managing director if he or she met the qualifications. Amending the home rule charter has to be done by referendum, Bannon said. According to the draft ordinance, there would be amendments to three items under the personnel section. First, appointments and promotions of subordinate officers and employees within departments shall be made by the mayor/managing director, not the department head. That conflicts with other parts of the charter, and the mayor/managing director already handles appointments and promotions, Bannon said. Second, any employee who files a petition for election of office would have to obtain a positive opinion from the State Ethics Commission and any other relevant agency. Currently, the charter stipulates that no city employee shall serve as an officer of a political party; any city employee who files a petition for election to a partisan political office and does not withdraw shall be required to take a leave of absence for the duration of the campaign. If not elected, the employee shall promptly be restored to the previously held position without losing any rights, according to the current charter language. While campaigning for mayor in 2023, Bannon had to take a leave of absence from her longtime position as city clerk. That became an issue for the city, Famularo said. 'She had to leave her position for several months during the campaign, and of course what happens then is we have a gap in leadership in the city,' he said. 'I really don't think that was anyone's intention when they wrote the charter.' Third, the amendment would remove 'cumbersome language' regarding civil service, Bannon said. According to the proposal, the home rule charter would only say, 'All full-time police and fire employees of the city shall be covered by civil service,' deleting a line saying, 'with the exception of the managing director, the city solicitor, department heads and the city clerk.' City council will meet June 16 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall, 1 N. Main St.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies Michael Madigan's motion for new trial, setting stage for high-stakes sentencing Friday
A federal judge on Monday denied a motion by former House Speaker Michael Madigan seeking to overturn his recent conviction on bribery and other corruption counts, setting the stage for a high-stakes sentencing hearing later this week. Madigan, 83, was back in the federal courtroom for the first time since a jury convicted him nearly four months ago. But unlike his marathon trial, Monday's hearing was brief. After both sides waived oral arguments on the defense motion, U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey announced he was denying it, though his ruling, which he said is more than 100 pages long, won't be made public for some time. Madigan sat through the 15-minute hearing without comment and walked out carrying an umbrella. Blakey is holding another hearing Tuesday to go over issues on the sentencing guidelines in Madigan's case, which hinge partly on how much money ComEd stood to gain because of legislation the speaker helped usher through the legislative process. Madigan's attorneys are also asking Blakey to strike language from a prosecution filing last Friday revealing for the first time publicly that Madigan 'has amassed a personal fortune of more than $40 million' — a disclosure reported by the Tribune over the weekend. The defense wrote in a motion filed ahead of Monday's hearing that Madigan served the public as a legislator and lawyer for more than 60 years and 'chose frugality over extravagance, remaining in the same modest home for more than fifty years while making prudent savings and investment choices.' 'The government offers zero evidence—absolutely nothing—to justify broadcasting specific details about his net worth,' the motion stated. 'The government's decision to splash his personal financial information across a public filing represents a gross breach of the rules.' Blakey said he'd take up the issue on Tuesday. Madigan's sentencing, set for Friday afternoon, is one of the most highly anticipated hearings in years at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse. Prosecutors have asked for a hefty 12 1/2 year prison term and $1.5 million fine, while the defense is seeking probation along with a period of home confinement. Madigan's defense team filed a motion in March arguing for a new trial in his corruption case, saying prosecutors failed to prove the then-powerful Democrat knew about a scheme by ComEd to pay off his associates and alleging Blakey made a series of mistakes in his evidentiary rulings. The 73-page motion alleged those errors tainted the jury with highly prejudicial evidence, and asked Blakey to reverse the jury's verdict on certain guilty counts and grant a new trial on others. Among the missteps that Madigan's legal team says warrants a new trial: letting in a now-infamous FBI wiretap where Madigan tells his longtime confidant, Michael McClain, that some ComEd contractors 'made out like bandits' for little work; allowing the jury to hear prejudicial testimony about sexual harassment allegations; and including a recorded phone call between McClain and the speaker's son, Andrew Madigan, about another public utility, Peoples Gas, being forced to make political hires. The defense filing also argued that despite the jury's guilty verdict, prosecutors failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Madigan knew about any scheme to enrich his friends or that there was a 'this-for-that' agreement to help shepherd ComEd's legislation in Springfield. 'Michael Madigan is not corrupt. He never exchanged his duty to serve his constituents for private benefit — the essence of corruption,' the filing stated. 'For decades, Madigan sought to ensure ComEd did not get away with ripping off consumers in Illinois. Madigan's primary purpose was to work hard for his community and the Democratic party.' Such post-trial motions are routine and rarely granted. But the filing provides a blueprint for a likely appeal to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Madigan's trial capped one of the most significant political corruption investigations in Chicago's checkered history. It also cemented an extraordinary personal fall for Madigan, the longest-serving state legislative leader in the nation's history who for decades held an iron-tight grip on the House as well as the state Democratic Party. After 11 days of deliberation, the jury's final verdict was mixed. Madigan was convicted of 10 of 23 counts, including marquee allegations that he agreed to squeeze lucrative, do-nothing contracts from ComEd for pals such as former Alds. Frank Olivo and Michael Zalewski and precinct captains Ray Nice and Edward Moody, all while the utility won a series of major legislation victories. Madigan was also convicted on six out of seven counts — including wire fraud and Travel Act violations — regarding a plan to get ex-Ald. Daniel Solis, a key FBI mole who testified at length in the trial, appointed to a state board. Jurors deadlocked on all six counts related to Madigan's co-defendant McClain. jmeisner@