US appeals court upholds West Virginia restriction on abortion pill sales
A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, affirmed a ruling by a U.S. district judge in 2023 despite federal regulators' approval of the abortion pill as a safe and effective medication.
Most Republican-controlled states have enacted or adopted abortion bans of some kind, including restricting abortion pills by default, since the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022 overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that provided nationwide access to abortion. All have been challenged in court. The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
U.S. District Court Judge Robert C. Chambers had ruled that the near-total abortion ban signed by then-Republican Gov. Jim Justice in September 2022 took precedence over approvals from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
'For us to once again federalize the issue of abortion without a clear directive from Congress, right on the heels of Dobbs, would leave us one small step short of defiance,' 4th Circuit Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III wrote for the court.
'One can of course agree or disagree with the Dobbs decision. But that is not the point,' Wilkinson said. 'At a time when the rule of law is under blunt assault, disregarding the Supreme Court is not an option.'
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey, who took office in January, had defended challenges to the abortion law when he served as attorney general.
Wednesdays
Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture.
'Big win out of the 4th Circuit today,' Morrisey said in a statement.
GenBioPro Inc., the country's only manufacturer of a generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, had argued that the state cannot block access to a FDA-approved drug. Chambers had dismissed the majority of GenBioPro's challenges, finding there is 'no disputing that health, medicine, and medical licensure are traditional areas of state authority.'
Appeals judge DeAndrea Gist Benjamin concurred and dissented in part Tuesday, calling it a 'troubling opinion.'
'Put plainly, this law erects barriers to life-saving healthcare for countless West Virginians in ways not envisioned by Congress,' Benjamin wrote.
Not at issue in the appeal was a challenge by GenBioPro concerning a separate West Virginia law that stopped providers from prescribing mifepristone by telehealth. Chambers had allowed that challenge to proceed. The U.S. Supreme Court last year unanimously preserved access to mifepristone, which is used in nearly two-thirds of all abortions in the U.S. in 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Ghislaine Maxwell urges Supreme Court to overturn her conviction
Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted sex trafficker and former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein, is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to take up her pending appeal and overturn her sex-trafficking conviction. 'This case is about what the government promised, not what Epstein did,' Maxwell's lawyers told the justices in a new brief filed Monday, according to Axios reporting, claiming their client was covered by an agreement Epstein previously made with federal authorities that shielded her from prosecution. 'President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal – and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it,' Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, said in a statement. 'We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes, especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted.' Story continues below advertisement Here's our statement about Ghislaine's Reply Brief that we filed in the Supreme Court today: 'No one is above the law—not even the Southern District of New York. Our government made a deal, and it must honor it. The United States cannot promise immunity with one hand in Florida… — David Oscar Markus (@domarkus) July 28, 2025 Maxwell was convicted in 2021 on charges that she helped Epstein sexually abuse underage girls and is serving a 20-year prison sentence in Tallahassee, Florida. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Epstein struck a deal with federal prosecutors in 2008 that shifted his case to Florida state court, where he pleaded guilty to soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. Part of that agreement, Maxwell's lawyers say, included a promise from the government that any of Epstein's co-conspirators would not be charged. At the core of Maxwell's petition for Supreme Court review is her contention that the language of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) specifically limited his protection to the Southern District of Florida, whereas the language of the co-conspirator clause should have been read to prohibit her prosecution in any federal district. Story continues below advertisement The co-conspirator clause stated that if 'Epstein successfully fulfills all of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to' four of Epstein's assistants. Maxwell was not among the four women named. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit had previously denied her appeal, but Maxwell argued that the circuit courts have issued disparate orders about what kind of immunity is granted through non-prosecutorial agreements, like the one Epstein received in 2007, and asked that her case be sent to the Supreme Court. Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Justice urged the Supreme Court to turn away Maxwell's appeal, arguing she should not be covered by the agreement. Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump said he has not considered granting a pardon or commutation for Maxwell. Story continues below advertisement 0:13 Trump 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell but says 'haven't thought' about it His comments came after a second day of interviews with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday, after the Justice Department reached out to her lawyers to see if she had additional information about the case. Markus told reporters she answered questions truthfully, but declined to detail what was discussed. 'The truth will come out about what happened with Mr. Epstein and she's the person who's answering those questions,' Markus said. The interviews were part of an effort by the Trump administration to cast itself as transparent following fierce backlash from parts of Trump's base over an earlier refusal to release additional records in the Epstein investigation. Earlier this month, the Justice Department said it would not release more files related to the Epstein investigation, despite promises that claimed otherwise from Attorney General Pam Bondi. The department also said an Epstein client list does not exist. Story continues below advertisement — with files from Reuters and The Associated Press
Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Manish Tewari, Tharoor not among Congress speakers in Op Sindoor discussion: Sources
New Delhi [India], July 28 (ANI): Congress leaders Shashi Tharoor and Manish Tewari, who were part of the delegations India sent to partner countries to highlight its stand against cross-border terrorism, would not be among Congress speakers during debate on after Operation Sindoor in Lok Sabha, sources said. The sources said while Manish Tewari had sent a request to the party to speak during the debate, Tharoor apparently conveyed unwillingness as his stance during the visit abroad of the delegation would be at variance with the party's strong stance against the government on aspects related to the military operation to hit target infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK. Tharoor led one of the all-party delegations. Sources said the party has picked up some other leaders who will represent it during the 16-hour debate. They said Rahul Gandhi, who is Leader of Opposition on Lok Sabha, is likely to speak tomorrow. Earlier in the day, Tharoor gave a cryptic reply when asked if he would take part in the debate. 'Maunvrat, maunvrat,' Tharoor told reporters. In his remarks during the debate, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that Operation Sindoor marks a new face and a new normal in India's fight against cross-border terrorism. He rejected claims of any third-party mediation in cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan and also said that at no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there 'any linkage with trade and what was going on'. Jaishankar said there are 193 nations in the United Nations and only three countries, apart from Pakistan, opposed Operation Sindoor. The Minister, who gave point by point rebuttal to the points raised by opposition, said India brought out to the international community Pakistan's long-standing use of cross-border terrorism. He rejected opposition criticism of government following US President Donald Trump's repeated claims of mediation in ending hostilities between India and Pakistan. He said there was no call between PM Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump from April 22 to June 17. Jaishankar said that on May 9, US Vice President JD Vance called Prime Minister Narendra Modi, warning of a massive Pakistani attack in the next few hours. 'Prime Minister, in his response, made it very clear that if such an attack happens, it would meet with an appropriate response from us. That attack took place and was foiled by our Armed Forces, and I think the House should collectively appreciate the performance of the Armed Forces in foiling what was a massive attack on the 9th and 10th of May. Our response, which the Prime Minister promised, was delivered, and it was delivered with devastating effect. I don't have to say anything. Every member has seen satellite pictures of Pakistani airfields. You can see from the state of those airfields, which is shown by the pictures, what was our answer,' the Union Minister said. India carried out Operation Sindoor on early on May 7 in response to April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and carried out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK. India repelled subsequent Pakistani aggression and pounded its airbases. Jainshankar said with Pakistan keen on ending military action, India had made it clear that such a request should come from that country's DGMO. 'On the 10th of May, we received phone calls sharing the impression of other countries that Pakistan was ready to cease the fighting. Our position was, if Pakistan was ready, we needed to get this as a request from the Pakistani side through the DGMO channel. That is exactly how that request came. Now, I want to make two things very clear. One, at no stage in any conversation with the United States was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. Secondly, there was no call between the Prime Minister and President Trump from the 22nd of April when President Trump called up to convey his sympathy, and the 17th of June when he called up Prime Minister in Canada to explain why he could not meet,' he added. (ANI)
Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
"They will continue to sit in opposition for next 20 years": Amit Shah slams Congress over interruptions during Jaishankar's speech
New Delhi [India], July 29 (ANI): Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Monday objected to interruptions of Congress members during speech of External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in Lok Sabha and said 'they will continue to sit there for the next 20 years'. Without taking any names, Amit Shah alleged that Congress members have faith in some other country. 'I object to the fact that they (the Opposition) don't have faith in an Indian Foreign Minister, but they have faith in some other country. I understand the importance of 'foreign' in their party, but that doesn't mean their party's policies should be imposed here in this House. That is why they are sitting in the Opposition today, and they will continue to sit there for the next 20 years,' Shah said He sought protection of Chair against interruptions by opposition members during Jaishankar's remarks in the debate on Operation Sindoor. Jaishankar gave point by point reply to issues raised by Congress and said there was no third-party mediation in 'ceasefire' with Pakistan. 'US Vice President JD Vance called the Prime Minister, warning of a massive Pakistani attack in the next few hours. Prime Minister, in his response, made it very clear, that if such an attack happens, it would meet with an appropriate response from our side. Now Sir, that attack took place and was foiled by our Armed Forces, and I think the House should collectively appreciate the performance of the Armed Forces in foiling what was a massive attack on the 9th-10th of May. Now, our response, which the Prime Minister promised, was delivered. And it was delivered with devastating effect. I don't have to say anything, every member has seen satellite pictures of Pakistani airfields. You can see from the state of those airfields, shown by the pictures, what was our answer,' he said. 'On 10th of May, we received phone calls, sharing the impression of other countries that Pakistan was ready to cease the fighting. Our position was if Pakistan was ready, we needed to get this request from the Pakistani side through the DGMO channel. That is exactly how the request came. I want to make two things very clear - one, at no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. Secondly, there was no talk between the Prime Minister and President Trump from the 22nd of April when President Trump called up to convey his sympathy, and the 17th of June, when he called up Prime Minister in Canada to explain why he could not meet,' he added. (ANI)
