
Smaller planes, big questions: Why regional airlines are under the spotlight
Smaller planes, big questions: Why regional airlines are under the spotlight
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Common flight maneuvers that might feel unsettling but are normal
Here are three surprising flight maneuvers that feel dangerous but are completely safe.
Regional airlines are smaller carriers that typically operate shorter flights and connect to a larger airline's hub.
These airlines are subject to the same safety regulations as major carriers, but statistically have a higher incident rate.
Passengers may not always be aware they are booked on a regional airline, as flights are often marketed under the main carrier's brand.
Regional airlines are in the public consciousness lately in a way that usually only avgeeks think about them.
This year, three high-profile aviation safety incidents involved regional jets: a fatal collision between an American Airlines/PSA Airlines jet and an Army Black Hawk helicopter near Washington, D.C.; a Delta Air Lines/Endeavor Air regional jet that flipped over just after touching down at Toronto's Lester B. Pearson International Airport, and another Delta/Endeavor Air regional jet that clipped its wing against the runway at LaGuardia International Airport in New York.
As a result, many travelers are taking a closer look at their airline tickets and wondering what, exactly, these regional carriers are. At the end of the day, they are regulated the same way as the mainline airlines (American, Alaska, Delta and United) that they're affiliated with, but that doesn't mean they're exactly the same.
Here's what you need to know if your next trip involves a regional airline.
What is a regional airline?
Regional airlines are carriers that generally operate smaller planes in smaller markets to feed traffic to an airline's hub. The aircraft themselves are often painted to look like part of the major carrier's fleet, and are branded with names like American Eagle, Delta Connection or United Express. Flights under those brands can be operated by a number of companies, which are usually either wholly-owned by the larger airline or under contract with the carrier.
'In today's environment, it is an airline with generally smaller aircraft up to 76 seats that operates on behalf of a major carrier, or in some cases, several major carriers. And they do so in their livery and with their service standards," Robert W. Mann Jr., a former airline executive officer and current president of R.W. Mann and Co., an independent airline consultancy, told USA TODAY. "From the airline's perspective, they want you to have the same experience on an airplane operated by one of their partners as you do on one of their airplanes.'
These are the major regional partnerships of U.S. airlines:
American Airlines (American Eagle)
Envoy Air (wholly owned by American)
Piedmont Airlines (wholly owned by American)
PSA Airlines (wholly owned by American)
Republic Airways (third-party contractor)
SkyWest Airlines (third-party contractor)
Alaska Airlines
Horizon Air (wholly-owned by Alaska)
SkyWest Airlines (third-party contractor)
Delta Air Lines (Delta Connection)
Endeavor Air (wholly-owned by Delta)
Republic Airways (third-party contractor)
SkyWest Airlines (third-party contractor)
United Airlines (United Express)
CommuteAir (third-party contractor)
GoJet Airlines (third-party contractor)
Mesa Airlines (third-party contractor)
Republic Airways (third-party contractor)
SkyWest Airlines (third-party contractor)
For many travelers, it can be easy to miss whether a flight is operated by the main airline or one of its regional partners. Even for the third-party contractors, the airline that sells the ticket does everything from setting the price to processing the charge and likely, handling your check-in.
"The average passenger does not realize that they are flying on Endeavor or SkyWest or what have you," William J. McGee, senior fellow for aviation and travel at the American Economic Liberties Project and former airline dispatcher, told USA TODAY. "You are booking on (the major carrier's) branded website, your credit card is charged to that major carrier, you tell the taxi driver or the Uber driver that you are going to that carrier's terminal, everything in the airport is branded with that major carrier's branding."
Regional carriers fill what could otherwise be a gap in the aviation network, especially in smaller markets.
Decades ago, under a different regulatory framework in the U.S., independent so-called "commuter" carriers often fed traffic to major airlines from smaller cities. When the airline industry was deregulated in the 1970s and 80s, major airlines shifted their network structure and placed greater value on more direct control over those feeder flights. Many of the commuter carriers folded, but the ones that remained evolved into today's regional airlines, according to Mann.
Staff at regional airlines are often compensated at lower rates than their mainline counterparts, meaning those flights are frequently cheaper to operate for the larger company. While pilot wages at regional airlines have increased in recent years, cabin crew and ground staff wages are still usually significantly lower.
Are regional airlines safe?
The short answer is yes.
According to Mann, regional airlines are under the same regulations as mainline carriers, so there's "a single level of safety" between the two.
"I don't have any concerns about flying a regional airline partner," he said. 'It just happens to be a smaller airplane, and generally flown in a smaller market."
McGee agreed that he doesn't get nervous flying on regional airlines but acknowledged that he does try to keep things in context.
"We all know statistically how safe the system is, but it's incumbent upon us if we want to continue to have a safe system, that we look where there could be problems," he said. "There is a higher accident rate with regionals ... that is a statistical fact that we've had more problems on the regional side."
Is flying safe? Here's what the experts say about the number of accidents.
Still, McGee doesn't want travelers to worry the next time they fly on a regional jet. He believes it is important for the industry to be transparent about the operator, ensuring that travelers are fully informed about the context of regional flying. Especially after close together, high-profile incidents that involved regional jets, McGee said now's a good time to take a closer look at this aspect of the industry.
"Cumulatively, these events indicate that we need to be more watchful than ever as far as standards: as far as aircraft maintenance, as far as piloting standards, all of this," he said. "My two bullets are: there are more problems at the regionals than the mainlines, that's a statistical fact. The other is, we don't want an erosion of standards," so keeping regionals under the same regulations as mainline carriers going forward is an important way to ensure continued safety, according to McGee.
How do I know if my flight is operated by a regional airline?
Airlines and third-party booking platforms are required to disclose what carrier is operating a flight when you book, though it may not always be obvious or easy to spot on the booking page. For the most part, because onboard service standards tend to be similar, for many travelers, it may not matter who the operator is.
"I think a lot of people don't know until they get there, and it's not a 747 they're boarding," Mann said. "The degree of knowledge, especially of infrequent travelers, is limited."
As a consumer advocate, McGee expressed hope that airlines will display their disclosures more prominently and that travelers will become better informed about the distinctions between regional and mainline airlines.
"In 2025, we still have a long way to go for complete transparency on when you are flying on one of the three mainlines and when you are flying on one of their partners," he said.
Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@usatoday.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
21 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
PensionBee Survey Reveals Nearly Half of Americans Have Less Than One Year of Retirement Savings
NEW YORK, June 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nearly one in three Americans (30%) couldn't survive more than six months on their retirement savings if they had to stop working tomorrow, while 42% have less than one year of savings total, according to new data from PensionBee's Q2 Happy Retirement Report. Just one in ten Americans believes they can live off their savings for 10 years or more. These findings reveal more than a retirement problem—they expose a survival crisis hiding in plain sight. With traditional pensions declining and Social Security facing potential cuts, Americans across all generations are more dependent on personal savings than ever before. Yet most are lacking basic financial resilience. 'Low saving levels among older workers are particularly troubling,' said Romi Savova, CEO of PensionBee. 'In an economy where companies are cutting costs and older workers often face the longest unemployment periods, inadequate savings isn't just about retirement, it's about basic survival. Too many people are one layoff away from being forced into a retirement they can't afford. With AI poised to reshape entire industries, this financial vulnerability becomes an existential threat for millions of American families.' The Actions Behind the Numbers But here's what separates financial confidence from financial fantasy: specific, measurable actions. The survey reveals that confidence isn't built on hope—it's built on behavior. Among respondents who feel 'very positive' about retirement, 61% have structured retirement plans, half with professional guidance, and 25% have consolidated multiple accounts. In stark contrast, just 9% of Americans who feel 'very negative' about retirement have any structured retirement planning in place. Americans who felt 'very negative' about their retirement were also twice as likely (41%) to have delayed saving until age 30, compared to just 20% of those who reported a 'very positive' outlook. The data reveals the specific actions that separate confident savers from worried ones: starting early, maximizing employer benefits, consolidating old retirement accounts, and, when it makes sense, working with financial advisors. These aren't just nice-to-haves—they're the foundation of financial security in an uncertain economy. Retirement Preparedness Across Generations Gen Z: Building Financial Foundation Despite Early Challenges At 43%, Gen Z reports the second-highest retirement optimism, yet their behavior suggests financial vulnerability. Nearly one in five (19%) have already taken hardship withdrawals from retirement accounts—a concerning trend for a generation just starting their careers. However, they're also the most proactive: 25% plan to seek financial advice this year, and 29% are embracing online planning tools. Their challenge isn't awareness—it's building financial resilience while navigating an increasingly expensive economy. Millennials: Navigating Multiple Financial Priorities Millennials show clear signs of economic pressure from competing priorities. They report the lowest retirement confidence (41%) and are most likely to be managing student debt, aging parents, and childcare. Nearly one in four (22%) cash out their 401(k)s when changing jobs, compared to just 14% of Baby Boomers. Having entered the job market during the Great Recession, many developed financial habits that prioritize immediate needs over long-term wealth building. At 29%, they're most likely to delay starting retirement savings, missing crucial years of compound growth. Gen X: Managing Time Constraints and Competing Demands Gen X faces significant time pressure: 36% have less than one year of savings with fewer than 10 years until retirement age. Supporting both aging parents and college-bound children, they're working to build adequate retirement funds within a compressed timeframe. Further, only 23% consistently contribute enough to receive full employer matching funds, representing missed opportunities that could meaningfully improve their retirement outlook. Baby Boomers: Confident Outlook with Limited Savings Baby Boomers report the highest optimism (51%), though this confidence may not fully align with current retirement trends showing later retirement ages and continued reliance on part-time work. Despite being around retirement age, nearly half (49%) of Baby Boomers reported having five years or less of savings. This generation's optimism reflects a different economic era—one with pensions, affordable healthcare, and more predictable career paths. What Comes Next Despite these challenges, the survey reveals reason for optimism: half of Americans plan to increase contributions this year, suggesting growing awareness of the problem. 41% of Americans reported a positive retirement outlook in Q2—down over 10% from Q1's survey . This declining confidence seems to reflect not only the market volatility but perhaps a growing awareness that individual effort alone cannot solve a systemic problem. 'The widespread lack of retirement preparedness we're seeing isn't something workers can solve alone,' added Savova. 'Employers have a critical role beyond just offering a 401(k). When workers are cashing out accounts during job changes and missing employer matches, that's a clear signal that current benefit structures aren't working. We need to reform our system and take active steps: automatic enrollment, better education, and support systems that help departing employees preserve their savings rather than lose them.' About PensionBee PensionBee is a leading online retirement provider, helping people easily consolidate, manage, and grow their retirement savings. The company manages approximately $8 billion in assets and serves over 275,000 customers globally, with a focus on simplicity, transparency, and accessibility. Survey Methodology* Participation Details: The survey data was gathered and sent out by Attest between May 9, 2025 and May 13, 2025 to a total of 1,000 Americans across the 18 – 100 age groups. Voluntary Participation: Participation in the survey was voluntary. Respondents were free to decline participation or skip any questions they chose not to answer. Your investment can go down as well as up. This survey is provided solely for informational and educational purposes and should not be relied upon as sole decision-making tools. Nothing presented here constitutes tax, legal, financial or investment advice. This information does not take into account the specific financial, legal or tax situation, objectives, risk tolerance, or investment needs of any individual investor. All information provided is based on publicly available data and research at the time of posting. This information, and any associated customer testimonial or third party endorsement, does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy or sell any securities or investments. Your investment is at risk. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Media Contact: Adela McVicarSR PR Manager [email protected]
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump travel ban hits immigrant family coming to U.S. amid bloody civil war in Myanmar
A Burmese American woman was eager to bring her siblings over to the U.S. from Myanmar amid a more than 15-year wait for visas. She'd been hoping to reunite with them since the 1990s, during military rule in her home country, so her brother's family could start a life in the U.S. But a day after she bought the plane tickets, President Donald Trump ordered a travel ban that included Myanmar. The woman, 51, and her husband, who were granted anonymity due to fear of retaliation, had sponsored her brother and sister-in-law to immigrate to the U.S. The siblings were then were hoping to bring their own adult kids, too, so that they wouldn't have to fulfill mandatory military service in the country's active civil war. With the travel ban in effect Monday, they said the policy has a heightened impact on people from war-torn countries like Myanmar who had hopes of finding sanctuary in the U.S. 'It's really frustrating because we were on the cusp of securing their safety to leave that situation,' said her husband, 57, adding he felt like a 'rug got pulled out from under us in an instant.' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Trump's policy is in the 'best interest of the American people and their safety.' 'His commonsense, country-specific travel restrictions include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' Jackson said. 'The restrictions fulfill the President's day one promise to protect American citizens from dangerous foreign actors who may come to the United States and cause us harm.' The travel restrictions, announced on Wednesday, completely bar entry to the U.S. for people from Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, in addition to those from Afghanistan, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Other countries, including Cuba, Laos and Venezuela, are under partial travel restrictions. According to Trump's proclamation, several of the countries on the list had declined to accept the repatriation of their nationals while others had visa overstay rates that the administration deemed 'unacceptable.' A few countries lacked 'the competence of the central authority' for issuing passports, the proclamation said. Jackson also pointed out a section in the proclamation that allows for applications for refugee status. 'Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, refugee status, withholding of removal, or protection under the [international Convention Against Torture], consistent with the laws of the United States,' the proclamation said. However, after he took office, Trump limited refugee admissions for almost all countries including Myanmar. And in May, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of more than 500,000 immigrants that was granted by the Biden administration. Those immigrants came from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela and are now subject to deportation. Myanmar was among the nine countries in the latest proclamation that Trump also targeted during his first term. In fiscal year 2023, the U.S. issued 13,284 visas to the country, with business and tourism permits making up the most common types of visas. Myanmar recorded 1,384 overstays that fiscal year, equating to an overstay rate of almost 30%. The new travel ban comes as Myanmar's violent military regime fights to hold on to power after it seized control from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. Since then, violence has escalated across the region as the military clashes with ethnic minority rebel groups and pro-democracy militias. 'Junta forces have slaughtered thousands of civilians, bombed and burned villages, and displaced millions of people,' Tom Andrews, United Nations special rapporteur on the human rights situation in Myanmar, said in a press release earlier this year. 'More than 20,000 political prisoners remain behind bars. The economy and public services have collapsed. Famine and starvation loom over large parts of the population.' Under the new travel ban, anyone who obtained a visa prior to the policy is still able to come to the U.S. But there's confusion over how the restrictions will be implemented and enforced. The Burmese American woman and her husband are among those with concerns, particularly as there have been several cases of lawful permanent residents and citizens being swept up in the dragnet of Trump's immigration policies. 'It's terrifying to think that they could be randomly picked up because somebody had a bad day at the office, or somebody didn't do their job or didn't believe that their visa was true,' the woman's husband said. 'It's quite frankly terrifying.' For the woman, reunification with her brother has been a long time coming. She became a citizen in the late 1990s and began the process to help bring her sibling over a few years later. At the time, Myanmar had been under the control of a strict military junta that held power from the 1960s until 2011, and for decades had kept the country in a state of extreme isolation and deprivation. She said her brother, whose children were just a few years old then, hoped to come over and root his family in more stability. 'Their circumstances in Myanmar at that time were very, very bad. That was the system that I grew up in. There was no future for them, no prosperity,' the woman said. 'My brother was concerned for his children's future and education.' Amid moves and address changes, the couple said they never received the standard letter notifying them that the woman's brother had been able to progress in his visa process. They assumed the wait was a product of notorious immigration backlogs. It wasn't until the situation in Myanmar intensified again in recent years that the couple found out that the brother was close to finally being able to immigrate. But by then, the woman said, her brother's kids had aged out of the system. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, those who turn 21 before being approved for legal permanent resident status are no longer considered a child for immigration purposes and need to file an entirely new application, prolonging the green card process. At this point, the woman said, her brother and sister-in-law said they were willing to risk possible detention to come to the U.S., particularly if it meant easier access to the American immigration system that would enable them to fight to get their children to come over as well. However, with Myanmar's military draft in effect, the family is particularly concerned for their safety now that the travel ban adds another barrier to leaving. 'The reason they wanted to come here was for their kids,' the woman said of her brother and sister-in-law. 'Now, it's really hard to bring my nephews here to save their lives.' Quyen Dinh, executive director of the Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, said the bans are ultimately another part of 'the engine of Trump's mass deportation machine.' 'It's focused on demonizing immigrant families and communities by denying them family reunification, that we all rightfully deserve to be whole — especially now, when the world is more dangerous than ever,' Dinh said. Rather than protecting individuals' safety, Dinh said, she believes Trump's policy punishes those who need an escape from dangerous conditions. 'It perpetuates the violence that is happening across the world, as opposed to creating conditions for peace or humanitarian relief, and for these families who've been separated,' Dinh said. She also said she views the ban as evidence that the U.S. is misunderstanding its role as a humanitarian leader. 'We've got people who are legitimately trying to escape a civil war,' the woman's husband said. 'Now, because of some arbitrary decision by the Trump administration to pick a certain number of countries … without consideration of the actual cases, without an exception policy, it hurts them. They've done nothing wrong.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta is making a frightening foray into military technology
Under CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Meta is plunging headfirst into the world of military technology. Literally. Last month, in a joint statement, the social media and technology giant announced it's working with defense contractor Anduril to develop virtual reality devices that will deploy artificial intelligence to train military service members. According to The Wall Street Journal, which interviewed Anduril founder, Palmer Luckey, the devices include "new rugged helmets, glasses and other wearables that provide a virtual-reality or augmented-reality experience." The outlet reported: The system, called EagleEye, will carry sensors that enhance soldiers' hearing and vision — detecting drones flying miles away or sighting hidden targets, for instance. It will also let soldiers operate and interact with AI-powered weapon systems. Anduril's autonomy software and Meta's AI models will underpin the devices. But the deal, and Meta's apparent eagerness to wet its beak under the seemingly endless spigot of U.S. defense spending, raises a question for all to consider. That is: Should a company that's been tied to various disinformation scandals, even admitting at one point that its platform was used by violent extremists to promote genocidal propaganda, be given such access and influence when it comes to training the American military? In comments to Bloomberg last week, Meta's chief technology officer, Andrew Bosworth, described a "silent majority" within the tech industry eager to pursue such projects: Meta Platforms Inc. Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth said that the 'tides have turned' in Silicon Valley and made it more palatable for the tech industry to support the US military's efforts. There's long existed a 'silent majority' who wanted to pursue defense projects, Bosworth said during an interview at the Bloomberg Tech summit in San Francisco on Wednesday. 'There's a much stronger patriotic underpinning than I think people give Silicon Valley credit for,' he said. Silicon Valley was founded on military development and 'there's really a long history here that we are kind of hoping to return to, but it is not even day one,' Bosworth added. For the record, that history Bosworth speaks of — which includes Silicon Valley's development of nuclear weapons — isn't as glowing as he suggests. In fact, journalist Malcom Harris' book, 'Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World,' helps chronicle the death and plunder that have historically undergirded the relationship between Silicon Valley and the defense industry. And Meta itself has repeatedly been used as a tool to promote propaganda and misinformation. In 2018, the company publicly acknowledged that its executives didn't do enough to prevent the spread of hate speech that helped fuel the genocide of the Rohingya people living in Myanmar. And in 2019, a bipartisan Senate report concluded that various social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, had been used by Russian officials to suppress the Black vote in 2016 to benefit Donald Trump's presidential campaign. The fact that Meta is currently facing Senate scrutiny over allegations it sought to develop censorship tools for China's autocratic regime in the past certainly doesn't inspire confidence that patriotism is its guiding light. A Meta spokesperson downplayed the company's development of those tools in comments to The Washington Post, saying the news had been "widely reported beginning a decade ago" and that the company "ultimately opted not to go through with the ideas we'd explored, which Mark Zuckerberg announced in 2019.' Nonetheless, one could say Meta has a blemished record of upholding human and civil rights that makes its foray into defense technology for an antidemocratic Trump administration all the more unnerving. It's not hard to imagine any number of horrifying things a virtual reality military helmet could train its users to do in the hands of a Trump administration led by a man who A) brazenly uses political propaganda against his perceived enemies, foreign and domestic, B) opposes efforts to root discriminatory bias out of artificial intelligence tools, and C) has threatened to deploy the armed forces against American citizens. In lieu of much needed regulation designed to rein in artificial intelligence, Americans ought to keep close watch of this Meta partnership, perhaps to ensure it isn't deployed in ways that undermine human rights and civil society — just as our previous president warned AI, in the wrong hands, could do. This article was originally published on