
What are the changes to the NDIS and how will it affect those already using it?
Here's what's been announced and what it will mean for Australians accessing the scheme.
The health minister, Mark Butler, announced major changes to the scheme at the National Press Club on Wednesday.
As foreshadowed by the Albanese government after the release of the NDIS review in late 2023, the federal government will establish 'foundational supports' with the help of states and territories to offer more disability support outside the NDIS.
The idea is that if the NDIS is not the only 'port in the storm', as Butler put it, not as many Australians with less severe disabilities will need to access it because other programs will be able to meet their needs.
The concept was agreed upon by the states and territories back in a 2023 national cabinet meeting, but has lacked any real detail until now.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
Butler said the first nationally consistent foundational supports system would be a new program, called Thriving Kids, designed to divert children with mild to moderate levels of developmental delay and autism from the NDIS.
The federal government will put $2bn towards Thriving Kids, a funding commitment that will be collectively matched by all states and territories.
Details of what the program will deliver are still scant but are expected to be worked out over the next few months with the agreement of the states and territories.
Butler flagged changes to Medicare to offer bulk-billed checks for children at three years old to detect developmental delays. Children who require additional support could then access things like occupational, speech or psychosocial therapies through new Medicare allied health items (subsidised appointments).
In an opinion piece for the Nine outlets, Butler said trained practitioners were already facilitating play-based developmental activities in early childhood centres and schools around the country.
The minister said the program will begin to roll out from mid-2026, with plans for it to be fully realised by mid-2027.
But there is genuine concern from disability representative groups about that timing.
The Children and Young People with Disability Australia's chief executive, Skye Kakoschke-Moore, said: 'the government can't seriously expect to set up a fully functional system to replace NDIS supports in under a year'.
The government has indicated that access changes will begin from mid-2027, when Thriving Kids is intended to be fully rolled out.
But Butler emphasised that children on the NDIS with mild to moderate levels of developmental delay and autism would not be removed from the scheme before alternative support is available.
'I want to reassure parents, there is no way I'm going to let children slip between two stools,' Butler told ABC radio.
'If you're on the NDIS now, if you enter the NDIS before 2027, your child will be entitled to remain on the NDIS subject to all of those usual arrangements.'
Under existing arrangements, children on a full NDIS plan under the age of nine are typically re-assessed every 12–24 months.
As part of changes to the NDIS Act, all participants now receive an impairment notice from the NDIA, the agency that administers the NDIS. This determines their primary impairment, rather than their disability diagnosis. Impairment categories include, intellectual, cognitive, sensory, neurological, physical and psychosocial.
The government intends to roll out a new way of delivering plan budgets from September. The new framework will give participants funding for supports based on impairment needs, offering ongoing payments within a specified period rather than an upfront lump sum.
The government has described the Thriving Kids program as the 'first piece of work' to give shape to the foundational supports concept – but flagged there were others on the way.
Butler said the next cohort the government would look at, based on the NDIS review's findings, would include adults with more severe and complex mental illness.
Other cohorts identified by the review include teens and young adults with disability who cannot access the NDIS and are preparing for key life transition points, such as school, employment and living independently.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Australian doctors subjected to vexatious complaints over social media posts on Gaza, GP peak body says
A growing number of Australian GPs have reported being subjected to frivolous or vexatious complaints to the health regulator about social media posts opposing Israel's war in Gaza. Dr Michael Wright, president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), wrote to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) on 14 August about 'concerning reports' from multiple members of the college who had 'publicly expressed views on the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza'. The GPs were subjected to complaints to Ahpra after 'expressing opinions, including those of a political nature, on social media, or participating in activities criticising the treatment of civilians in Gaza', the letter said. The letter said RACGP members advised that the resulting investigations had tied up doctors for months, but ultimately they had incurred no disciplinary action. Noting the 'growing number of complaints about social media activity linked to the conflict in Gaza', the RACGP asked Ahpra to 'commit to fast-tracking the assessment and finalisation of complaints of this nature'. The college also asked Ahpra to elevate the prominence of its guidance on what constitutes reportable social media activity, including making 'a proactive statement' on its complaint information page, which now contains no obvious reference to a practitioner expressing personal views on social media. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The college had longstanding concerns about prolonged Ahpra investigations and the toll unresolved complaints and drawn-out investigations took on the mental health of practitioners, the letter said. 'Every effort must be made to improve the timeliness of investigations to minimise the harm caused to practitioners, particularly where a complaint is made vexatiously or deemed frivolous by Ahpra,' the letter said. This week, Guardian Australia reported that the high-profile physician Dr Stephen Parnis had stepped down from his role as chair of the board of the Medical Insurance Group of Australia (Miga) in an apparent response to concerns about his social media posts opposing the war in Gaza. A letter-writing campaign to Miga in support of Parnis noted that the medical board's code of conduct acknowledged the rights of doctors to express their personal views in line with their ethics, and said the matter raised 'questions about whether … Miga will support its members who are targeted by vexatious complaints'. Miga declined to comment on the circumstances of Parnis's resignation, but its acting chair, Prof Owen Ung, said Miga respected the rights of members to hold and express personal and diverse views, and that it supported, represented and advocated for all its members, regardless of identity. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform. Finally, our guide at lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. Ahpra's social media guidance for medical practitioners says: 'Registered practitioners will not be investigated purely for holding or expressing their views on social media.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion It contains examples of posts that would not usually warrant regulatory action, such as advocating for a peaceful resolution of a war or conflict, urging the protection of health workers and health facilities caught in a conflict or war, or calling for accuracy, truth and impartiality in reporting on a conflict or war. Wright told Guardian Australia prolonged investigation processes by Ahpra could cause 'undue stress and reputational harm' to practitioners. 'The RACGP agrees with Ahpra's statement that practitioners should not be investigated for expressing their personal views on social media,' he said. A spokesperson for Ahpra and its national boards confirmed that it had received the letter from the RACGP, and said notifications had been made to Ahpra about practitioners covering 'a range of political views expressed on social media', including allegations of antisemitism and Islamophobia. 'We are carefully reviewing social media use in line with our assessment process and expect to be able to respond to individual concerns quickly,' the spokesperson said. 'This includes taking into account the significant distress felt by practitioners concerned about the safety of individuals within the Jewish and Palestinian communities in Israel and Gaza.' Do you know more? Contact:


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Another huge Pro-Palestine march to block officonic Australian bridge this weekend - as police issue a warning to protesters
Police are vowing to arrest or charge pro-Palestine protesters if they unlawfully block traffic on a major city bridge after a magistrate denied legal protection for a proposed march. Chief Magistrate Janelle Brassington ruled that Sunday's planned march by up to 10,000 people across Brisbane 's Story Bridge would be declared an unauthorised protest. 'I'm satisfied (Queensland Police Service) has established there is a real and significant risk to persons in this case given the proposed route,' she said on Thursday. Ms Brassington said the planned protest was not unlawful but participants would not have protection against being criminally charged for actions such as obstructing traffic. Rally organiser Remah Naji said outside court that participants would still gather at the march's planned starting point in a nearby park. 'The plan is still to go ahead with a peaceful assembly ... we are considering our options at this stage,' she said. Acting Assistant Commissioner Rhys Wildman said police would act to protect the safety of the community and maintain access for emergency vehicles to the major arterial road crossing the Story Bridge. 'We have to make it quite clear that anyone participating in a protest which is not authorised faces the prospect of enforcement action being taken against them, whether that's on the day or post-event,' he said. 'There are a range of offences that are open to investigators to utilise, and we will have a significant policing presence this weekend to manage whatever response the protest organisers wish to take.' Mr Wildman urged Justice for Palestine to stay in contact with the police major events unit. Justice for Palestine Magan-djin proposed the rally as part of Sunday's nationwide day of action that has been billed as the largest pro-Palestine demonstration in Australia's history. Organisers were still considering a court appeal to authorise the march, Ms Naji said. It comes after tens of thousands of protesters marched on the Sydney Harbour Bridge in the days before Anthony Albanese revealed Australia would recognise a state of Palestine. Authorities believed around 90,000 people arrived at the Harbour Bridge on Sunday afternoon, after authorities went back and forth with organisers about what would be permitted in the weeks leading up to it. Joshua Lees of the Palestine Action Group believed the true attendance was three times greater than police's estimate. 'Absolutely incredible day today… we think we had up to 300,000 people,' he said shortly after the event. After hearing emotionally-charged speeches, protesters began marching towards the Sydney Harbour Bridge. Hundreds of Palestinian flags waved above thousands of attendees as they crossed the bridge shoulder-to-shoulder. 'Confusing' police messages did not lead to any incidents as attendees were warned to double back on the march and return to the CBD. Police later said the march could have quickly become 'perilous'. 'I can honestly say in my 35 years of policing, that was a perilous situation,' Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson said. 'That was a very intense situation. We had more people than I'd ever seen in a small confined space. 'We were overwhelmed by the sheer number of people. We had to make a risky call to halt the crowd with messaging, ensure they stopped, and then redirect them back – and I want to thank everyone for heeding that advice.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Explosive claims emerge about Lisa Wilkinson in court: 'Crafted strategy to maximise the ratings'
Journalist Lisa Wilkinson and Network Ten were trying to fabricate a 'whodunnit' and boost ratings by not identifying Bruce Lehrmann as an alleged rapist, his lawyer has argued. The former federal political staffer - dubbed a 'national joke' by his lawyer on Wednesday - is appealing a civil court finding he raped his colleague Brittany Higgins in parliament house in 2019. The bruising judgment came in April 2024 after Lehrmann sued Ten and Wilkinson for defamation over an interview with Ms Higgins in which she aired the allegations. He was not named in the 2021 broadcast, which Wilkinson has claimed is evidence of how she and Ten acted responsibly when publishing such a serious allegation. But Lehrmann's lawyer contended he wasn't identified because of a plan to provoke a 'buzz' of public scrutiny around the identity of Ms Higgins' alleged assailant. '(It is) viewed as a crafted strategy to maximise the ratings of a story, to achieve an exciting air of mystery akin to a "whodunnit",' Zali Burrows claimed in written submissions for Lehrmann's Federal Court appeal. The 'disingenuous' approach arguably highlighted the 'sensationalism of a complex plot-driven story involving political scandal cover-up of a rape in parliament,' she wrote. 'Although Mr Lehrmann was not specifically named in the program, a sophisticated journalist would be aware when providing enough indica (sic) as to the identity of Mr Lehrmann, is teasing the viewer and inviting greater public engagement and promotion of the story,' Ms Burrows submitted. The trial judge, Federal Court Justice Michael Lee, determined Lehrmann had been identified as the perpetrator of the assault by some viewers, but Wilkinson argues their number was small. Ms Burrows took aim at Wilkinson's defence that she had relied on advice from Ten's legal counsel when preparing the broadcast and a subsequent Logies speech. The journalist was heavily criticised for making the speech in 2022 about Ms Higgins' allegations, which prompted a decision to delay Lehrmann's criminal trial by three months. The trial was later abandoned with no findings against Lehrmann. Wilkinson's speech had been given the green light by Ten's lawyers, the court has been told. But that argument raised the question of whether it was reasonable 'to rely upon legal advice (which) in the face of it is plainly wrong', Ms Burrows wrote. '(The defence) raises the proposition, if a lawyer tells you that you can run a red light, would you do it?' she asked. 'With respect to Ms Wilkinson, a sophisticated highly intelligent and experienced journalist, it appears disingenuous to claim that she would follow the advice of lawyers, notwithstanding it was obviously bad advice.' Justice Lee found the journalist and Ten had acted unreasonably in broadcasting the allegation, in part because they were entwined with claims of a parliamentary cover-up. Ms Higgins claimed she had reported the rape to her superiors at parliament house including her boss, then-senator Linda Reynolds, but little action was taken. But Ms Chrysanthou argued the alleged cover-up should have been considered separately from Ms Higgins' account of sexual assault, because it was not connected to Lehrmann. 'His Honour was distracted by the so-called cover-up when he should have focused on the rape,' she said. The broadcast did not allege there had been a 'cover-up' but rather referred to 'roadblocks to a police investigation', Ms Chrysanthou told the appeal court. Wilkinson and Ten urged the court to uphold Justice Lee's findings that Lehrmann had likely raped Ms Higgins. Among his four grounds of appeal, Lehrmann challenged the definition of rape employed by Justice Lee, contending it was inconsistent with the meaning an ordinary person would understand. He maintains he did not sexually assault Ms Higgins. Lehrmann's appeal hearing had been set down for three days but it finished a day early on Thursday. The appeal judges will hand down their decision at a later date.