Hub71 startup eyes UAE as future hub for cultivated meat
MAYS IBRAHIM (ABU DHABI)With the backing of Abu Dhabi's tech ecosystem Hub71, Orbillion Bio is cooking up a future where the UAE is a leading producer and exporter of meat without the need for cattle, land, or antibiotics.The US-founded startup leverages advanced biotechnology to grow real beef from animal cells without slaughter.
In an interview with Aletihad , Patricia Bubner, CEO and founder of Orbillion Bio, explained the company's production process, which relies on cell culture technology that has long been used in the biopharma industry. This includes extracting cells from a cow and growing them in bioreactors, where they're fed nutrients like amino acids, sugars, and oxygen.The result is real muscle and fat cells that can be harvested and formed into ground beef products, from dumplings and kebabs to burgers and lasagna.Although this process is traditionally expensive, Bubner noted that Orbillion's proprietary BioWare software and computational methods have helped cut production costs by 94%.The company's first cell line came from Wagyu ribeye, chosen with help from a San Francisco butcher."We wanted to start with the best-tasting meat," said Bubner. "And the feedback we've gotten from butchers and food industry partners is that it tastes just like beef, because it is beef."Though cultivated meat is still a relatively new concept for many consumers, Bubner is confident in growing interest across the Middle East."When people understand how it's made and taste it, they're much more open to it," she said. "The key is taste, price, and scale. We don't want people to compromise."Unlike conventional meat, cultivated beef is produced without antibiotics or exposure to pathogens, making it cleaner and healthier, according to Bubner."There's no blood, no contamination, no fecal matter risks. It's a sterile process," she explained. "And we don't need to raise and slaughter animals."This production approach also promises notable environmental benefits. Bubner noted that beef is among the most resource-intensive foods, as cows emit significant methane and require vast land and water resources.Orbillion claims it can cut water usage by up to 90% and land use by more than 90% compared to traditional livestock farming.Scaling Up in Abu DhabiOrbillion Bio began exploring the UAE market after early support from regional investors, opening the team's eyes to its growing focus on food security and climate innovation.Since then, Bubner has made several visits to the region, culminating in the company's recent decision to set up operations in the UAE capital after joining Hub71.Bubner described Abu Dhabi as "an ideal base" for climate-forward startups."We feel very supported. Hub71 is a great environment with access to investors, local producers, and fellow founders. And it's beautiful here."Currently, the startup produces its cultivated beef in Europe while working toward regulatory approval to tap into the UAE market."The UAE imports most of its meat. We can reverse that," she said. "We want to build manufacturing here, create IP, hire from local universities, and scale a new industry. The UAE has the climate goals, the infrastructure, and the vision; it's a perfect fit."
The company aims to begin commercial sales by 2026–2027, with a longer-term goal of reaching commodity-level pricing by 2030 - around $4 per kilogramme.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
3 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Why Narendra Modi Can't Compromise On Market Access To Us On Agri, Dairy?
By Nitya Chakraborty The India-US trade war over Donald Trump's 50 per cent tariff on Indian exports to the USA with effect from August 27 this year has assumed a major political dimension linking the political future of both Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the United States President Donald Trump. For Narendra Modi, the outcome has also personal implications as the decision impacts the future of farmers as also dairy industry in his own state Gujarat. The trade disputes have always have got major political dimensions, but in the current India-US trade talks, five rounds of which have already taken place, the main focus has shifted to the US demand for market access to the Indian agriculture and dairy sectors. The US farmers bodies as also the companies which are involved in agri and dairy products are anxiously waiting as for the first time, the vast Indian market of 1.42 billion population will be opened up to them if Narendra Modi agrees to the Trump pressure in the final round of talks. Why the market access is crucial for the Republican President Donald Trump at the India-US trade talks? The farmers organisations are very powerful in shaping the direction of US politics and they have big political lobbies in the US Congress covering both Republicans and Democrats. The appeasement of the US farmers lobby is a distinct part of the Republicans who depend on the farmers votes in the elections, especially in the swing states. The midterm elections to the Congress and the Senate are due in November 2026. Both Republicans and Democrats are poised for a bitter battle in this crucial poll. The farmers, across the US, especially in the six swing states of the US, will be a determining factor in the 2026 polls. Trump is under tremendous pressure from the US farm lobby which is also a big contributor to the President's election campaign. Any compromise by Trump meaning denial by Narendra Modi of market access to vast agri and dairy sectors in India as also fisheries, will be used by the Democrats in the election campaign terming it as the let down of the farmers by President Trump. Trump can not afford this setback at this hour. That is why the US President is so angry with Prime Minister Narendra Modi since the Indian negotiators in the last round of trade talks in Washington firmly told the US side that no market access to Indian agriculture could be allowed. That is the reason Trump reacted in anger by saying that no further trade talks if tariff issues were not solved. The US team was scheduled to arrive in New Delhi for another round of talks on August 25 this year, but Trump's remarks have cast shadow on the certainty of the Sixth Round of India-US trade talks though till now, the Indian side has got no formal indication for cancellation of the visit. But the signal is clear. The additional 25 per cent tariff due to India's buying of Russian oil is going to take effect from August 27. Trump wants India to indicate two things-first no buying of Russian oil from now and granting market access to the US in Indian agriculture sector. Now for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it is politically suicidal for him to agree to any of the Trump's two demands. The Russian oil tariff issue can be sorted out if there is a sort of agreement between Trump and Putin at the Alaska meeting on August 15. If the final understanding takes a few days more after August 15 following the possibility of a final meeting with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, there is possibility of an escape route on additional 25 per cent tariff if an agreement is reached by the end of the month. But on market access in Indian agriculture issue, the US side is adamant at the directive of Trump. Trump may not agree to the total trade deal if India does not agree to granting US market access in agriculture and dairy industry. Right now as on August 13, two days before the Independence Day address of the Indian Prime Minister, indications are that Narendra Modi has decided to fight President Trump on the agriculture and dairy industry issue. On Thursday, Prime Minister was candid in declaring that he would not compromise farmer's interests and was even ready to pay a heavy personal price to protect the farmers. On Tuesday, the farmers organisations thanked the Prime Minister for his stand to protect the interests of the farmers. Prime Minister in his Independence Day address from Red Fort is expected to take this economic sovereignty and farmers interests issues to a high pitch and try to combat opposition challenge on SIR and Bihar polls. For Narendra Modi, there are some major political compulsions to project him as the protector of farmer's interests and defy Trump pressure on trade and tariff. The agriculture sector has 54.6 per cent of the total Indian workforce while the agriculture and allied activities account for 18.4 per cent of GVA at current prices during 2022-23. Similarly, the dairy market in India is most thriving and its business value in 2024 is estimated at Rs. 18.9 billion. The dairy industry employs eight crore people. Gujarat is the leader along with Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, All are BJP controlled states. As the topmost BJP leader and RSS man, Narendra Modi instinctively can not take any other position. He is getting full backing from the RSS. The US has not only been demanding low tariffs on certain farm products such as corn, soybeans, apples, cotton, almonds and ethanol, but also pitching for allowing entry of its genetically modified produce like maize, soy, canola and cotton into the Indian market. India can not agree to this absurd US demands at the cost of the Indian farmers. The US farmers are highly subsidized by the government. There is a continuous fighting between the farmers of USA and European Union on the extent of subsidy. The EU nations are also known for giving high subsidy to their farmers. New Delhi has traditionally kept agriculture out of Free Trade Agreements with other nations. Granting market access to the US could force India to extend similar concessions to other trading partners. The average Indian farm comprises just 1.08 hectares, compared to 187 hectares in the US. In dairy, the average herd size in India is two to three animals per farmer, compared to hundreds in the US. This difference makes it difficult for small Indian farmers to compete with their US counterparts. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has cautioned that permanent reduction of agricultural tariffs in the India-US free trade agreement could result in subsidised US grains overwhelming Indian markets during global price downturns. Past evidence shows that global grain prices plummeted between 2014 and 2016, with wheat prices falling under $160 per tonne, devastating African farmers. Food security is a major concern in a highly populated country like India. Indian leaders can not opt for a policy which will allow the market to be dominated by the others having no interest in the well being of the Indian farmers. Latest figures indicate Indian exports to USA in 2024 totalled US$ 78 billion. Out of this total, 55 per cent , will be impacted by the Trump tariff of 25 per cent now and 50 per cent from August 27 if there is no India-US understanding. The labour intensive sectors like textiles, apparels, gems and jewellery are the areas which have been impacted most.. Already, one lakh gem jewellery workers have been affected in Surat, the apparels and textile owners fear the adverse impact affecting lakhs of workers since the US is the prime destination of exports for their products. This is a serious situation at a time when the employment situation in the country is already precarious. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to take all the factors into account. If the US does not continue the trade talks further and India has to pay the additional tariff of 50 per cent from August 27, the adverse impact on Indian economy will be felt immediately and it will intensify. PM has to work out an alternative based on hard analysis of the global trade potentialities. For India, this crisis due to Trump's tariff can be turned into an opportunity to rebuild India. On the basis of strategic independence without depending heavily on any nation. Whether the BJP Prime Minister will take the bait, that is the million dollar question. (IPA Service)
Sharjah 24
7 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
UAE, Philippines discuss ways to boost trade and investment ties
Focus on private sector partnerships Discussions focused on building partnerships between business communities on both sides. Dr Al Zeyoudi highlighted the strong economic relationship between the UAE and the Philippines, pointing out that non-oil trade reached approximately US$940 million in 2024. The upward trend continued into 2025, with Q1 figures reaching US$257.7 million. The UAE remains the Philippines' top export destination in the Arab and African regions and ranks as its 17th largest trading partner globally. Commitment to ASEAN and beyond Describing the Philippines as a key partner in the ASEAN region, Dr Al Zeyoudi stated: "Our discussions today aim to explore private sector opportunities, identify areas for greater collaboration, and address challenges faced by Filipino and Emirati businesses alike." The Philippines, one of ASEAN's fastest-growing economies, recorded a 5.6% growth rate in 2024, positioning it as a vital logistics and manufacturing hub in the region. Role of the Filipino community in the UAE The meeting also explored how the Filipino diaspora—active in sectors like construction, healthcare, and hospitality—can contribute further to economic cooperation and shared prosperity. CEPA to drive future growth The UAE-Philippines CEPA is expected to significantly reduce trade barriers, encourage investment, and promote cooperation in critical sectors such as agriculture, financial services, and electronics. Projections show the CEPA will boost the UAE's GDP by US$2.4 billion and increase exports to the Philippines to US$7.62 billion by 2032, making it a pivotal component of the UAE's broader global trade strategy.
Gulf Today
8 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Vietnam aims to become the next Asian tiger economy
Beneath red banners and a gold bust of revolutionary leader Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi's central party school, Communist Party chief To Lam declared the arrival of "a new era of development" late last year. The speech was more than symbolic- it signaled the launch of what could be Vietnam's most ambitious economic overhaul in decades. Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia's next "tiger economy" — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan. The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There's added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam's trade surplus with the US, a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory. In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385. Vietnam's transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing, while the proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections, and investing in tech, green energy. It faces a growing obstacle in climate change. "It's all hands on can't waste time anymore," said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners. Investment has soared, driven partly by US-China trade tensions, and the US is now Vietnam's biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands. Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion trade surplus with the US trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46% US import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20% levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid US trade restrictions. During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam's focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbors and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former US ambassador to Vietnam. "As long as they're in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome," he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed. Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump's tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the "middle-income trap," when economies tend to plateau without major reforms. To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory. But Vietnam's economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can't rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labor is no longer its main advantage. It needs to make "multiple big bets," McClellan said. Following China's lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang. It's also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion North-South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours. Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centers, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes. Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam's 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centers with deeper talent pools. Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past. In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the "most important force" in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies. So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam's exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labor. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favored the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter. "The private sector remains heavily constrained," said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. Again emulating China, Vietnam wants "national champions" to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding. By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms. Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action. After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans. Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. "If the whole world will decide it's a can go very fast," said Jaspaert. When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion in damage, knocking 0.15% off Vietnam's GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country's economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry. Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn't take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12-14.5% of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank. Meanwhile, Vietnam is growing old before it gets rich. The country's "golden population" window — when working-age people outnumber dependents — will close by 2039 and the labor force is projected to peak just three years later. That could shrink productivity and strain social services, especially since families — and women in particular — are the default caregivers, said Teerawichitchainan Bussarawan of the Centre for Family and Population Research at the National University of Singapore. Vietnam is racing to pre-empt the fallout by expanding access to preventive healthcare so older adults remain healthier and more independent. Gradually raising the retirement age and drawing more women into the formal workforce would help offset labor gaps and promote "healthy aging," Bussarawan said. Associated Press
