
Mayor Brandon Johnson on the record: The full Tribune interview as he hits 2 years in office
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson sat down Wednesday for a wide-ranging interview with City Hall reporters Alice Yin and Jake Sheridan. Here is the full transcript of the interview, lightly edited for clarity:
Q: Thank you so much for making the time, mayor. We're going to get started right away: What are the main ways you're proud of your second year?
A: Well, I think it's a culmination of not just one year. But I'm just incredibly proud of the coalition that shifted the political dynamics in this city, where the control and the dominance had been concentrated into the hands of a few people.
So, I'm proud that, as the most pro-worker city in America, we have been able to successfully ensure that workers are respected and seen, paid time off. I don't think it's a time to stop celebrating the fact that we abolished the subminimum wage, particularly at a time where cities are being forced to revert back to the painful days of not respecting workers. The $1.25 billion bond investment that has produced one of the most innovative approaches toward building more affordable homes with the Green Social Housing ordinance. We're also very proud that I promised that we would prioritize public safety in this city, and in the month of April was the fewest shootings as well as the fewest homicides since 1962.
So between building a safe and an affordable big city, which is really unheard of outside of Chicago, I'm very proud that we have put ourselves in a position to be the leading example of how to center workers and build, again, a safe and affordable big city.
Q: You've compared yourself before to Harold Washington. What do you think is the main way you two are different?
A: Well, I don't think I've compared myself to Mayor Harold Washington. I think what I've said is that since Mayor Harold Washington, many of the things that we are pushing were either eliminated, eroded or, quite frankly, just dismantled. We are in a slightly different political context right now, where the way information spreads and moves, it doesn't have to be accurate in order for it to be news. That's just the political climate that we're in, because everybody believes that they get to report and break a story, right? So you have social media influencers now, right? We're just in a much different sort of communications apparatus.
I believe what's most important though is that the coalition I've described, that was the coalition that made it possible for many of the transformative measures that were taken a generation ago. And it's requiring that same coalition to build a safe, affordable big city. I think we're all different because we're all uniquely designed for the particular time period in which we've been called to serve. I don't have to be anyone else in order to be effective. I just have to be myself. And that's what's different about me. I'm who I am.
Q: You talked about some of the opposition you've faced. Do you think this time period has a Burke, a Vrdolyak? Who do you think those people are?
A: Well, it's clear that there is an entire financial interest that is attempting to intimidate working people. This recent pack of millionaires who don't have a vision for Chicago, right? The only thing that they want is to regain control and power so that the interests of the ultra-wealthy in this city and this country can be maintained. That is the operation of the federal government right now, where billionaires have unfettered access to power.
And their formation, where they are pointing their direction right at me, it's clearly not an attempt to make our city safer, because we're doing that. Whatever the motives are, it's not about building more affordable homes, because I'm doing that. It's not about investing in young people and mental, behavioral health, because I'm doing that. What I am ascertaining from a group of incredibly rich individuals is that they are the ones who are intimidated by the fact that we have a far more robust approach to how we govern in this city. And I'm not going to back down from millionaires and billionaires. As working people, we have to come together to ensure that we have a safe and affordable city.
I will say this last point, though, is I've said from the very beginning that the democracy and government that we've inherited will not be the one that we pass on. So, there are far more voices that speak independently than we probably have ever had. But in the midst of all of that, we have still been able to build homes, to stand up for workers, to ensure that we're investing in public education. And so you had an era where there was rubber stamp and it was absolutely chaotic: massive school closings, shutting down mental health clinics, dismantling and destroying public housing, disrupting the financial apparatus and stability of our city. All of that chaos happened under rubber stamp. All of it. And what we've been able to do by opening up spaces where people can have real dissent, it's how we're able to move the city forward, and I'm humbled that we've been able to do that.
Now, I do regret that I have not effectively communicated with the people of Chicago of the work that we've done. I have to put that same amount of effort that I put forth to get things done in this city, I have to put that same effort toward communicating with the people of Chicago, and I'm going to do a much better job of that moving forward.
Q: To that point, you said notably last fall it's natural for people to feel 'uncomfortable' because, 'If I were behaving in status quo, things would seemingly feel steady, but it would be a steady path on destruction.' How much longer do you think Chicagoans can tolerate feeling uncomfortable, though, before they lose patience?
A: I think the way in which I would answer that is that, here's a question that I've asked myself: How long do people have to wait in order for government to actually see them and show up for them? They don't have to wait anymore for that. They don't, because it's here.
You saw that we were able to pass Green Social Housing, something that I ran on. And people have been waiting for this type of transformation for years in this city. I don't know if I would necessarily say that folks have been patient, but it certainly is a virtue. But think about how long we've waited for a mayor to actually believe in public education. We've had to wait decades for that, and now that you have someone who believes in public education, so much so that I send my own children to our public schools. The proof is that we were able to settle a contract where there are more critical investments for neighborhoods all across the city than we've seen in any other contract.
Now, look, respectfully, I do understand the frustration, because of some of the crises that I inherited certainly had an impact on the pace of transformation. I share in that frustration. But it took years for the city of Chicago to be dismantled in a way where, certain parts of the city we're still excavating the rubbish and the ashes from the dismantling and disinvesting in our neighborhoods. And so I share in that frustration, the things that I have wanted to do, I have not been able to do them as fast as I would like. And moving into these next couple of years, it is proof positive that everything that I set out to do — we're going to hire more young people, we're going to hire more detectives, we're going to drive violence down in the city, we're going to stand up for working people, we're going to build more affordable homes — we've been able to do that.
And we have to do a better job at effectively communicating, because what I did miscalculate was the extent in which those who oppose my vision, the extent to which they would go to and through to define me or to distort our work. It's like the lesson that I've been working through in Bible study, where Jesus warned of the yeast of the Pharisees and Herod, that if you're not speaking emphatically about the work that you're doing, that people who oppose you, who do not believe in you, they're going to spread and rise dissent in order to undermine and dismiss the work that you have been doing.
So something that I'm doing now with 'Lakeside Chats,' and going to senior homes, and talking to our high school students, and talking more to the business community, doing town hall meetings, all of that work. While I was working to stand up government, one of the things that I did miscalculate was my responsibility to make sure that we're standing up the very coalition that elected me.
Q: Some of that dissent has come increasingly from progressives in the City Council. They've raised issues like transparency, the way you handle transit, ethics. What's your message to them?
A: Well look, there's, again, no secret that there's been some degree of frustration with some members of the City Council. There's nothing surreptitious about my administration. But what I have to do a better job at is engaging City Council members more frequently and earlier. And we're doing that.
Q: You have notably avoided detailing your September conversation with Pedro Martinez. What's the reasoning behind not wanting to get in front of his narrative?
A: My father taught me something that was important. He said leaders should not seek — I'll try to say this as direct as I possibly can — that true leaders don't just simply seek praise. You seek results. That's how you're defined. And there's conversations that have happened in these walls for generations. There's something sacred about having conversations that are meant to be private. He's got a family. I have a family. Why would I speak of a private conversation and break that trust and confidence? Now, we obviously have our disagreements, but he's another human being.
Q: But you did say his version of what happened is not true. So wouldn't you want to provide details on what actually happened to gain trust?
A: To gain trust with who?
Q: Well, if Chicagoans want to believe your statement that his version of events isn't true, wouldn't you want to back it up with what actually happened?
A: It was a private conversation. There's something sacred about that. When I was asked directly, was it true or not, of course I had to speak the truth. I'm not going to go into details and break confidence and trust in the people who come to me in confidence, that somehow, if they share something with me, that Mayor Johnson will break those rules. Do you understand, I have multiple conversations with so many people all over the city, where people share things with me in confidence and they want to be able to work through those things. Just because someone breaks that confidence doesn't give me permission to do the same.
Q: Why didn't you replace him in May 2023?
A: I wanted to demonstrate that we could work with people. I've answered that question multiple times. I mean, I could have, but this was the nature of my approach, that I wanted to give people an opportunity to demonstrate that they can stand alongside me. Now, obviously that wasn't the case. It's a lesson learned and it was an error on my part to believe that someone giving me their word, that they would keep it.
Q: Is it true that you two had an earlier mutual understanding that he would gracefully step aside if it ever came that you two disagreed?
A: Everyone who serves this city and works under my direction have all made it very clear that if there ever came a point where such a thing could not exist, that they would gracefully move on.
Q: As mayor of Chicago, you certainly have the authority to hire and fire who you choose. But why have so many firings been difficult or controversial when the time comes?
A: It's a great question, Alice. It's a great question. It gives me something to think about.
Q: Do you think the controversy is all external, or is this an area of being an executive that you think you could use improvement with?
A: Improvement on firing people?
Q: Yeah, there is a method, a strategy to doing it. There is a way to move about firings that can elicit or not elicit media attention or detractors from other areas of government.
A: There is. Many people have not stayed here. There are folks who have been dismissed, and no one ever knows about it.
Q: When it comes to hiring, we hear there have been some notable candidates rejecting top jobs — Kam Buckner, Clayton Harris, and this nationwide search for CTA has not appeared to generate results. Why has it been hard to attract talent?
A: We just put forth two incredible names, Frank (Francisco Velez) and Mike (Michael McMurray). Frank is going to head up OEMC, and Mike is going to head up Aviation. Very talented individuals. We are breaking ground across the city building more affordable homes. Between Commissioners (Lissette) Castañeda and (Ciere) Boatright, these are incredibly talented individuals. When I appointed Superintendent (Larry) Snelling, there were many people who praised that decision. And Dr. (Olusimbo) Ige established a playbook for how the entire country would respond to congregate settings and outbreaks of diseases. Chief (Sendy) Soto is building out an homelessness operation that, as of date, there's not a single person who is on a waiting list looking for shelter, not a single family. That's just to name a few.
The talent that we have amassed, you're not driving violent crime down in the city of Chicago, and at the same time investing in ways that we have seen that have clearly been unprecedented without talented people. Our administration is one of the most diverse administrations in the history of Chicago. Now I'm not sure this is what you were getting at, but 45% of my administration is Black. I think they're incredibly talented. 25% are Brown, incredibly talented. 8% Asian, highest you've probably seen ever, incredibly talented. 30% white, incredibly talented public servants.
We're not transforming the city in the way in which we're doing it without talented people who deeply care and love this city. So I would argue, not only have we attracted some of the most talented people, but people do want to work for this administration, and those that we have selected have demonstrated their power, their love, their influence, and, yes, their talent.
Q: Your chief of staff has been criticized for how she presided over HR issues, including how long she took to fire staffers, or her suggestion of peace circles for someone accused of harassment. How does that engender faith in her potentially being the next interim leader of our school district?
A: We have worked internally incredibly hard to create a working environment that speaks to our values. I have not made a decision on who will lead the school district, but what I can say emphatically is that, as someone who has served on the Illinois State Board of Education, someone who was duly elected as a state senator and someone who has been chief of staff of an administration that is the most diverse, progressive, talented, loving people, it is a clear demonstration of her skill set. Are we perfect? We're human. We're human, and we continue to be humbled by this position, but it doesn't cause us to cower or fret or panic in the midst of controversy.
My chief of staff, essentially, was the project manager that responded to a global crisis that no one in the country had an answer for, helped operationalize the chaos at the border, where there were 4,000 human beings sleeping on the floors in police districts. Someone had to help lead that. And then not only did we rectify that attack that we were under by the governor of Texas, we built a 'One System' initiative that opened us up to a 126% increase in shelter beds. It takes a pretty special person to be able to help pull that off.
Q: Looking forward to the next budget, if you do propose a property tax hike for your next budget after the $300 million pitch last time got nixed, how would you be able to persuade alderman that this time, it's necessary?
A: I put together this working group, because it's going to take all of us to respond to the financial malfeasance that for too long was the accepted form of how we do finances, financing and budgeting in the city of Chicago. We're taking a different approach. We're bringing people together, because that's what it's going to take in order for us to create economic security. And the business community, the philanthropic community, labor, community-based organizations, my office, all of us will participate and be part of coming up with solutions. And there's not just one solution. There are multiple solutions that I believe we have to not just explore, but work to communicate to the people of Chicago the 'why' as well as the 'what.' And we have started that process much earlier, meeting with respective caucuses within the City Council. We've already put potentially 40 revenue ideas on the table. And I fully anticipate a very robust, lively conversation around all of this. The expectation is that we all work hand in hand, stand shoulder to shoulder and show up for working people in the city.
Q: What are your biggest priorities in the next year?
A: I truly believe that we can have something that's unique. Right now, if you look at what's happening in other major cities, the average prices homes in New York and Los Angeles, we're talking $1.1 million, $800,000, $900,000. I want to build the safest, most affordable big city in America, and I'm going to continue to prioritize working people in this city to ensure that actually becomes the reality. Thank you both.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - How Democrats can win back male voters: start by respecting them
Let me start with a confession. A few years ago, when I was mayor of Ithaca, New York, I climbed onto the roof of City Hall and caught one of my interns vaping. He froze. I froze. We both knew the moment was loaded. I could've scolded him — I was the boss, the elected official, the health policy nerd. But instead, I just said, 'Well… better than actually smoking.' He exhaled (literally), and we had a real conversation about risk, addiction and choices. That, my friends, is harm reduction. And if Democrats are serious about winning back male voters — and winning back the majority — we need a whole lot more of that energy. Unfortunately, too often, Democrats sound like that one nosy Ned Flanders type of neighbor you would avoid at the block party as a teenager. 'Pull up your pants. Pull up your mask. Fix your posture. Stop vaping. Stop swearing. Did you know football causes concussions? Mixed martial arts is bad. Cars are bad. Stoves are bad. You're bad. Everything is bad.' COVID pandemic public health measures were necessary, but the heavy impact of broad restrictions alienated voters and made Democrats seem overbearing. We're supposed to be the party of compassion, progress and personal freedom, but somewhere along the way, we got saddled with the vibe of a hall monitor with a clipboard. And voters, especially men, have noticed. In 2024, Trump won 54 percent of the male vote. Among Latino men, he flipped a 23-point deficit from 2020 into a 10-point lead. Ouch. We didn't just lose them on policy. We lost them on attitude. If we want to reconnect, we need to stop trying to parent grown men. Nobody wants to be told what to do — they want to be understood. That's where harm reduction comes in. Harm reduction says, 'Hey, we get it. People aren't perfect. Let's keep them alive, healthy and safe anyway.' It's cooler, and it works. Let's talk facts. Drugs: Syringe exchange programs are wildly effective. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says they cut HIV and Hepatitis C transmission, connect people to treatment and don't increase drug use. Tobacco: Nicotine pouches like Zyn aren't risk-free, but they're way safer than cigarettes. If every cigarette smoker in America switched to vaping or Zyns tomorrow, we'd save hundreds of thousands of lives. Environmental Policy: Environmental harm reduction means helping people transition to cleaner energy without punishment or shame. Instead of banning gas stoves, we should subsidize heat pumps and electric vehicles, like the Inflation Reduction Act does, making low-carbon choices more accessible. It's not about moral purity, it's about practical progress that meets people where they Harm reduction in housing starts with Housing First, a model that provides people experiencing homelessness with stable housing without requiring sobriety or treatment first. It's proven to reduce chronic homelessness and lower public costs by cutting emergency room visits and jail time. It's simple: People can't recover if they're sleeping on concrete. Stability comes first — everything else follows. I have watched Democrats fall into the same trap over and over again: we know the data, we know what's safest, we know what people should do — and then we tell them. Loudly. Sometimes a little smugly. The intention is good, but the effect? Too often, it sounds like scolding. Let's trade the wagging finger for the open hand. Let's be the party that says: 'We want you healthy and happy — even if you mess up sometimes.' Let's be the party of second chances, not second guesses. Most people, in my experience, especially men, don't want to be preached at. They want to be respected. They want to be safe. They want freedom to make their own choices as long as they aren't harming others. They want to know the people in charge are practical, not paternalistic. By embracing harm reduction, we can shift the Democratic posture from one of judgment to one of care. We can be the party that doesn't say 'do as I say,' but says, 'we've got your back.' That's how you win elections. And more importantly, that's how you govern well. Svante Myrick is president of People For the American Way. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Who's telling the truth? Searching for a shared reality amid L.A. protests
The notion of a shared, definitive reality remained elusive Monday in Los Angeles, as anti-ICE protests roiled the city for a fourth day. Had the city descended into lawless pandemonium, as Fox News proclaimed? Or were there pockets of havoc amid largely peaceful protests — with both concentrated in a relatively narrow geographic area, while workaday business continued as usual on a warm spring weekend across the rest of our sprawling metropolis? After spending the day in and around downtown's Civic Center, where sign-carrying demonstrators overflowed from Gloria Molina Grand Park east to various, newly graffitied federal buildings, I would argue that the latter description hews far closer to the truth. But after more than a decade as a reporter, I would be the first to admit that objectivity is in the eye of the beholder. And even then, it's largely a mirage. A few collected facts A handful of city workers began their morning outside the towering Art Deco edifice of Los Angeles City Hall, assessing the damage from Sunday night's protests. Graffiti, with one ubiquitous expletive preceding the word 'ICE' in about a dozen places, marred the granite exterior, with roughly a dozen broken windows on the south and west sides of the building. Chaos flared in other parts of downtown Los Angeles over the weekend, leaving sidewalks littered with shattered glass, and scattered buildings boarded up in anticipation of more trouble. At least 74 people were arrested across the region on suspicion of vandalism, looting, violence and more across the region, authorities said. The detritus visible Monday morning was ugly, but not dissimilar from what I saw after covering dozens of downtown protests over the years, particularly during the first Trump administration. By noon Monday, thousands of union members, immigrant rights activists and supporters filled the grassy knoll overlooking City Hall at a boisterous —but peaceful — rally demanding the release of SEIU California President David Huerta, who was arrested and injured during Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids last week. At one point, the crowd danced and sang along to 'La Bamba,' with an emcee declaring, 'I want to hear the loudest 'Bamba' ever heard in this damn town,' over a loudspeaker. Huerta was released hours later. 'I think folks are choosing to amplify images of chaos instead of images of love and solidarity and community building,' Assemblymember Isaac Bryan said Monday afternoon, standing with a gaggle of clergy outside the federal court building where Huerta was being arraigned. 'I was out in the streets yesterday, and what I saw was street vendors serving protesters who were dancing, with calls for freedom and to be safe in their own communities.' Further military escalation By late afternoon, the federal government announced that it would be sending 700 Marines to Los Angeles — another staggering and historic escalation, amid a series of staggering and historic escalations. California Gov. Gavin Newsom also said Monday afternoon that the Trump administration would be sending an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to the region, a move that Newsom characterized as 'reckless' and 'pointless.' 'This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego,' Newsom said. The mayor's version of events Addressing the public on Monday evening from the city's emergency operations center, Mayor Karen Bass spoke to the raw panic that the surprise raids were fueling in a region where hundreds of thousands of people live without legal authorization and mixed-status families are common. 'I can't emphasize enough the level of fear and terror that is in Angelenos right now, not knowing if tomorrow or tonight, it might be where they live. It might be their workplace. Should you send your kids to school? Should you go to work?' Bass said, referring to the raids. The mayor also took aim at the dueling visions of reality at play, saying she had read a troubling description of Los Angeles as a place 'invaded and occupied by illegal aliens,' where 'violent insurrectionist mobs were swarming and attacking our federal agents. 'I don't know if anybody has seen that happen, but I've not seen that happen,' Bass declared. 'Obviously there has been violence, and the violence is unacceptable,' the mayor continued. But so were the descriptions of the 'migrant invasion' and 'migrant riots' in the city, she suggested, and the supposition that order would be restored if those same migrants were expelled. 'How is this a description? This is a despicable description of our city,' Bass said. 'Our city needs to come together now and not accept this, and not allow us to be divided.' A poem to start your Tuesday Email us at essentialcalifornia@ and your response might appear in the newsletter this week. Today's great photo is from Friends of Big Bear Valley in Big Bear Lake where Gizmo, the second eaglet of a family of eagles monitored by a 24-hour webcam, flew from its nest this weekend. Julia Wick, staff writerKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on

Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Daywatch: Not your grandparents' City Council
Good morning, Chicago. When Ald. Scott Waguespack started his City Council career as an opponent of Mayor Richard M. Daley, it was mostly at the wrong end of a bunch of lopsided votes. But his days as one of five aldermen who said no to Daley's infamous parking meter deal or a quixotic early thorn to Mayor Rahm Emanuel are long gone. Now, when the Northwest Side alderman butts heads with Mayor Brandon Johnson, he is often one of many across a relatively broad political spectrum, and sometimes he even gets his way. 'You see more accountability and more responsibility that's shared now than in the past,' he said. 'I think you're seeing people kind of trust in each other.' It's a sea change that grew under Mayor Lori Lightfoot, and is gaining momentum in City Hall with Johnson: The City Council, long derided as a mayoral puppet, is increasingly operating independent of the fifth floor. The shift follows the demise of Chicago's infamous machine politics. It also tracks with the ascension of the aldermanic Progressive Caucus and the 'Common Sense Caucus' formed in part to oppose it, both shifting groups that bring more ideological force into debates. Read the full story from the Tribune's Jake Sheridan. Here are the top stories you need to know to start your day, including the never-built migrant tent encampment the state agreed to pay $1.3 million for, what's next on the docket for former House Speaker Michael Madigan after he was denied a motion for a new trial and our picks for where to go in Chicago for Father's Day. Today's eNewspaper edition | Subscribe to more newsletters | Asking Eric | Horoscopes | Puzzles & Games | Today in History Another 2,000 National Guard troops along with 700 Marines are headed to Los Angeles on orders from President Donald Trump, escalating a military presence local officials and Gov. Gavin Newsom don't want and the police chief says creates logistical challenges for safely handling protests. Editorial: MAGA morphs into Make America Cruel Again Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. yesterday removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. Used in COVID shots, mRNA may help rid the body of HIV Despite assurances from Gov. JB Pritzker that state taxpayers would not end up footing the bill for a migrant tent encampment in Chicago that was never built, the state recently agreed to pay $1.3 million to the project's contractor. A federal judge yesterday denied a motion by former House Speaker Michael Madigan seeking to overturn his recent conviction on bribery and other corruption counts, setting the stage for a high-stakes sentencing hearing later this week. Michael Madigan, ComEd and corruption: How the investigation into the ex-Illinois Speaker unfolded Speaking from the witness stand nearly a decade after her 7-year-old son was shot and killed, Amber Hailey said every court date has tested her resolve. Her son, Amari Brown, was gunned down on the Fourth of July in 2015 in an act of violence that spurred national news coverage and calls for change. Those calls heightened just months later after the targeted killing of another child, 9-year-old Tyshawn Lee. 'Amari was an innocent child who had his whole life ahead of him,' Hailey said, breaking down in tears. 'He had his dreams, aspirations.' The nascent sports network finally joined the Comcast lineup Friday, but on the higher-priced Ultimate tier, which costs an additional $20 per month, on top of the $20.25 regional sports network fee charged to Chicago-area subscribers each month. In the wake of the deal, CHSN abruptly pulled the plug on local TV affiliates in Chicago, Rockford, Peoria, and Fort Wayne and South Bend, Indiana. The Indianapolis Colts are moving forward with the late Jim Irsay's transition plan for ownership, which calls for his three daughters to take charge of the club. The team said that Carlie Irsay-Gordon, Casey Foyt and Kalen Jackson each would continue to hold the title of owner, which they have done since 2012 when they were named vice chairs. Irsay-Gordon is now CEO, and Foyt is executive vice president. Jackson will be chief brand officer. Southern Baptists meeting this week in Dallas will be asked to approve resolutions calling for a legal ban on pornography and a reversal of the U.S. Supreme Court's approval of same-sex marriage. The proposed resolutions call for laws on gender, marriage and family based on what they say is the biblically stated order of divine creation. They also call for legislators to curtail sports betting and to support policies that promote childbearing. Most big collections have only a fraction of their items on display, with the rest locked away in storage. But not at the new V&A East Storehouse, where London's Victoria and Albert Museum has opened up its storerooms for visitors to view — and in many cases touch — the items within. Anyone can book a one-on-one appointment with any object, from a Vivienne Westwood mohair sweater to a tiny Japanese netsuke figurine. Most of the items can even be handled, with exceptions for hazardous materials, such as Victorian wallpaper that contains arsenic. While Mother's Day celebrations traditionally involve breakfast in bed or brunches with free-flowing mimosas plus gifts of flowers, it can be a little harder to figure out what to do for Father's Day. Luckily, local bars and restaurants are making planning easier by offering a wide range of events and specials with an emphasis on big steaks, beer and whiskey. Whether you think your dad would love a multi-course dinner with plenty of time to talk or to show off his skills in a putting competition, these 39 spots make it easy to enjoy some quality time together.