Apple is bringing back a feature at the center of a big Apple Watch legal battle
The feature, which is meant to help people understand their respiratory health, will come to Apple Watch Series 9, Series 10 and Ultra 2 models in the US currently missing the functionality through a software update, Apple said in a statement Thursday. It marks the latest development in a years-long saga that saw Apple temporarily yank its popular smartwatches from US store shelves during the critical holiday season nearly two years ago.
In 2023, the International Trade Commission ruled that Apple had violated a patent from digital health company Masimo related to its pulse oximeter technology. Apple said at the time that it 'strongly disagrees with the order.'
When the order was issued, it applied only to new Apple Watches in the United States, meaning those who already owned an Apple Watch with the feature were unaffected. Apple Watches sold outside the United States were also unaffected by the order. Still, the Americas, which incudes the United States, is Apple's biggest market.
Apple has positioned the Apple Watch has being a potentially life-saving device, and the company is said to be exploring more ambitious health efforts like noninvasive glucose monitoring, according to Bloomberg.
Pulse oximeters shine light through the skin to calculate a wearer's blood oxygen saturation, similar to the finger-clip devices used in clinical settings. Apple introduced the feature on the Apple Watch Series 6 in 2020 in the early stretch of the pandemic.
While blood oxygen monitoring may not be a selling point for consumers, health features like these could be critical in helping Apple cement its position ahead of the competition as its rivals increasingly pour resources into digital health.
Samsung, Apple's chief rival in the consumer electronics space, is charging ahead on the digital health front by introducing features to its smartwatches meant to help users remain healthy as they age. And Google is widely expected to release a new version of its Pixel Watch next week.
The update coming on Thursday will bring a 'redesigned' version of the blood oxygen feature to US users who currently don't have access to it. Apple Watch owners will have to update to software version watchOS 11.6.1 and pair their device with an iPhone running on iOS 18.6.1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Draft of Trump's Health Blueprint Avoids Industry Crackdown
(Bloomberg) -- A draft of the Trump administration's highly anticipated blueprint on health policy takes a softer approach to regulating companies than many had feared, a relief for industry and setback for environmental activists. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain The draft report, which has been reviewed by Bloomberg News, has parts that go beyond previous announcements. They are mostly about boosting research in areas such as the risks of microplastics and how antidepressants are prescribed for children. It also refers to plans to boost fertility rates and getting whole milk into public schools. The draft was dated Aug. 11, but could still see changes before it's finalized, according to people familiar with the discussions who weren't authorized to speak publicly on the matter. In particular, the report's tone around pesticides is far less critical than Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his allies have been in the past. That raised concerns earlier this week from some of his supporters in the so-called Make America Healthy Again movement, according to the people. The policy agenda is the second installment in a two-part process to carry out an executive order that President Donald Trump signed in February. The first report detailed research about what the administration viewed as the root cause of chronic disease among children, and the second was intended to lay out policies to address those root causes. The strategy was due to be submitted to the president on Aug. 12, but hasn't been publicly released. The White House declined to confirm the draft's authenticity, but industry officials said it was largely in line with what they had been briefed on by the administration. Still, the report appeared in flux before its public release, with the debate centered on the wording of the pesticide provisions. 'Until officially released by the White House and MAHA Commission, any documents purporting to be the second MAHA Report should be disregarded as speculative literature,' said White House spokesman Kush Desai. The document aligns with the administration's strategy to create change by pressuring industries, rather than through new regulations or laws. Officials have employed the strategy with food companies, health insurers and pharmaceutical producers so far. Pesticides Approach The draft takes a lighter touch on pesticides, after a backlash from the agricultural community before the first report's release prompted an internal debate over the issue. The document calls for continually evaluating the current framework to 'ensure that chemicals and other exposures do not interact together to pose a threat to the health of our children.' It references measuring the 'cumulative exposure' to chemicals. That could rankle farmers and agriculture firms, which say that pesticides are safe to use and disputes language that suggests they could be harmful to Americans. Kennedy has been skeptical of some vaccines, and the document calls for more research on vaccine injuries. The draft has vague pronouncements such as 'ensuring scientific and medical freedom' and making sure Americans have the 'best' vaccination schedule. The agency will launch a 'MAHA education campaign' to promote the early adoption of lifestyle changes that may increase fertility rates among men and women, including through new partnerships with federally funded family planning facilities, according to the draft, which didn't provide specific examples of what would be taught. Kennedy has repeatedly raised concerns over declining sperm counts and testosterone rates, especially among teenage boys, to explain declining US birth rates. Processed Foods The draft report criticizes 'highly processed foods,' listing poor diet among the top drivers of children's chronic diseases, but didn't propose any significant new restrictions on the industry. The administration has already begun the process of defining 'ultra processed foods,' which it said will be used to develop future research funding and policies. The report refers to highly processed foods more often than ultra-processed foods and doesn't distinguish between the terms. Ultra-processed foods typically involve some industrial steps or ingredients, unlike whole foods such as fruits and vegetables. Many packaged foods are generally considered ultra-processed. The report also pointed to forthcoming revised dietary guidelines, which Trump officials have estimated will be released in the fall. Kennedy has said those guidelines will encourage people to eat 'whole foods,' and will be simple and easy to understand. The draft report previews several public health awareness campaigns it plans to launch, including a 'Real Food First' push to 'prioritize whole, minimally processed foods over packaged and highly processed alternatives.' Whole Milk Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary has indicated the dietary guidelines will take a new approach toward saturated fat. The draft report included one hint of what could be coming, by specifically calling to remove the restrictions around serving whole milk in schools. Because the current dietary guidelines recommend limiting consumption of foods high in saturated fat to less than 10% of calories daily, schools serve only skim and 1% milk. The draft calls for increased oversight and enforcement of advertisements for direct-to-consumer drugs. The report suggests that social media influencers and telehealth companies – categories that have historically fallen into a regulatory gray area – should be subject to greater oversight when promoting drugs. Lawmakers have been pressuring the federal government to take action on the influx of advertisements from telehealth companies that offer copycat weight-loss medications. That includes allegations that Hims & Hers Health Inc. omitted safety information in advertising. --With assistance from Ilena Peng, Charles Gorrivan and Madison Muller. What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Steve Jobs' first Silicon Valley boss turned down an offer to buy a third of Apple for $50,000—today, his share would be worth nearly $1 trillion
Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell turned down his former employee, the late Steve Jobs, when he was offered to buy a third of Apple for $50,000 in the 1970s. With the iPhone titan now standing at $3.1 trillion, the video gaming pioneer missed out on making $1 trillion from his relatively small investment. But he isn't troubling himself with regret, reasoning he might not be as happy—and Apple may not have been as successful—if he accepted the deal. Many people may be kicking themselves for not buying Bitcoin or investing in Nvidia stock sooner—but few will have missed out on a bigger deal than Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell, the first Silicon Valley boss of the late Steve Jobs. A young Jobs offered the gaming mogul an eye-popping deal: buy a third of Apple for just $50,000. What might come as a shock to many is that Bushnell turned it down. Apple has since grown into a $3.1 billion sensation with over a billion iPhones sitting in people's back pockets, and over 100 million Mac users worldwide—and if Bushnell had taken the deal, his cut would have made him $1 trillion today. But Bushnell isn't crying over the missed opportunity Bushnell first witnessed Jobs' potential as a businessman in the 1970s, when the college dropout joined Atari as a technician and games designer before moving into entrepreneurship. Jobs was an essential engineer 'solving problems in the field' at Atari, Bushnell recalled, but his leadership mentality also meant some tension at the office. The Atari cofounder strategically employed Jobs during nightshifts, knowing that Wozniak would also join and help out on projects like the brick-breaking game 'Breakout.' But Jobs would also barge into his office to tell Bushnell that the other employees weren't good at soldering, offering to instruct them. Bushnell recognized that Jobs was a genius—albiet, a complicated one. 'He was a difficult person,' Bushnell told ABC News in 2015. 'He was very smart. Often he was the smartest person in the room, and he would tell everybody that. It's generally not a good social dynamic.' But years later, the tech pioneer isn't quietly simmering over his choice to reject the offer. 'I could have owned a third of Apple computer for $50,000, and I turned it down,' Bushnell said in the interview. 'I've got a wonderful family, I've got a great wife, my life is wonderful. I'm not sure that if I had been uber, uber, uber rich that I'd have had all of that.' In fact, Bushnell even thinks Apple may not have been so successful if he had taken the deal. And his potential payout may not have soared to that trillion-dollar height. 'I'm still an Apple fan and you know I think that hindsight is 20/20,' he told Tech Radar in 2013, when asked about his decision to say no. 'I can go through a thread very easily which, by me turning Steve down led to me introducing him to Don Valentine, and he introduced him to Mike Markkula who is as responsible for Apple's success as Steve Woz[niak] and Jobs.' He's not the first tech boss to have missed out on billions Bushnell isn't the only one who missed out on critical business opportunities that would launch them into billionaire status—there are even others who blew it on big deals with Apple. Ronald Wayne, the lesser-known third Apple cofounder, was also working at the electronics company Atari when he stepped up as Jobs' friend to help convince Wozniak of formalizing Apple's launch. Wayne even typed up the contract, penning that he would receive a 10% share in the tech company, while Jobs and Wozniak would each be awarded a 45% stake. However, less than two weeks after drafting up the document, Wayne sold his stake for just $800, also reaping $1,500 to forgo any claim to the company. Looking back, it's a massive misstep as his 10% share could now be worth between $75 billion and $300 billion today. His wasted opportunity isn't as stark as Bushnell's—and the decision mainly came from a desire to have financial stability in his life. 'Jobs and Woz didn't have two nickels to rub together,' Wayne told Business Insider in 2017. 'I, on the other hand, had a house, and a car, and a bank account—which meant that I was on the hook if that thing blew up.' YouTube's cofounders, Chad Hurley, Steven Chen and Jawed Karim could also be sitting in a sizable nest egg today if they didn't sell their company so early. The YouTube creators sold their popular video platform to Google for $1.65 billion in fall 2006—each receiving millions of dollars worth of stock. Hurley got company shares worth around $345 million, according to The New York Times, while Chen accepted about $326 million worth. Karim, who left the business early to go back to school, got $64 million of shares. They were ecstatic about the deal in the beginning, but the buyer's remorse would potentially creep up less than 20 years later. Today, YouTube is valued at $550 billion—333 times higher than its market cap from nearly two decades prior, adjusted to inflation. If Hurley and Chen accepted the same stock deal today that they did in 2006, each could have more than $100 billion in their bank accounts. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Apple CEO Tim Cook Says the Technology They're Developing Will Be ‘One of the Most Profound Technologies of Our Lifetime'
In Apple's fiscal Q3 2025 earnings call, CEO Tim Cook doubled down on the company's commitment to artificial intelligence (AI), framing it as both a transformative technology and a natural extension of Apple's product philosophy. Cook's remarks position AI not as a standalone product line, but as a deeply integrated layer across Apple's ecosystem — powered by its own silicon and fortified by its privacy-first principles. 'We see AI as one of the most profound technologies of our lifetime,' Cook said. 'We are embedding it across our devices and platforms and across the company. We are also significantly growing our investments.' More News from Barchart UnitedHealth Stock Soars as Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Discloses $1.57B Stake Palantir CEO Alex Karp Sees More Gains Ahead With America-Focused Growth Strategy, Calls U.S. The 'Leader of the Free World' Lucid Motors Is Caught in a Tariff Trap. Is LCID Stock More Likely to Hit $1 or $7 in 2025? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. AI as a Core Growth Driver The remarks come as Apple (AAPL) continues to face a rapidly evolving competitive landscape in AI, with rivals like Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOGL) (GOOG), and OpenAI pushing cloud-based generative AI tools to the forefront. Apple's strategy, however, appears to hinge on on-device intelligence — leveraging its custom Apple silicon chips to run advanced AI models directly on iPhones, iPads, and Macs without relying solely on the cloud. Cook emphasized that Apple's approach is about making advanced technology accessible, echoing a familiar refrain in the company's history from the Macintosh to the iPhone. He specified, 'Apple has always been about taking the most advanced technologies and making them easy to use and accessible for everyone. And that's at the heart of our AI strategy.' Apple Intelligence: Early Rollout and Upcoming Features Apple's branded AI initiative, Apple Intelligence, has already delivered more than 20 features, including visual intelligence, photo cleanup, and advanced writing tools. Cook noted the company is also making 'good progress' on a more personalized Siri — a feature he says is slated for release in 2026. The underlying technology runs primarily on-device, thanks to the efficiency and performance of Apple silicon. For more demanding AI tasks, Apple's private cloud compute — also powered by its own chips — handles the processing, allowing for greater capabilities while still preserving user privacy. Privacy as a Differentiator Cook was clear in positioning privacy as a central pillar of Apple's AI value proposition. The private cloud compute architecture, designed to minimize the amount of user data leaving the device, is a counterpoint to competitors that require extensive cloud data processing. The CEO argued that this hybrid approach — balancing on-device AI with selective, secure server-based computing — offers 'the best way for users to experience the full potential of generative AI' without sacrificing security or personal data integrity. Investment and Market Implications While Apple did not disclose specific dollar figures for its AI investments during the call, Cook's comment that the company is 'significantly growing' its AI spend suggests an accelerated development roadmap. Analysts see Apple's AI integration as a potential catalyst for device upgrade cycles, particularly as consumers begin to associate premium smartphones and computers with advanced personal AI capabilities. This push could also help Apple defend its high-margin hardware business against a backdrop of slowing global smartphone growth. If successful, AI-powered features could extend the lifecycle of Apple devices in the market and strengthen the ecosystem lock-in that has been key to Apple's long-term profitability. Looking Ahead Apple's next major software releases in 2026 will be a critical test of whether its AI strategy resonates with consumers and developers alike. The integration of AI into Siri, along with more contextually aware and personalized device interactions, could reshape how users engage with their devices on a daily basis. In the near term, investors will be watching to see if these AI advancements translate into tangible revenue growth — either through device sales, services expansion, or entirely new monetization channels. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
