logo
Historic crime branch building to be redeveloped

Historic crime branch building to be redeveloped

Hindustan Times06-06-2025
MUMBAI: The ground-plus-two-storey building inside the Mumbai police headquarters in Fort, which has served as the office of the crime branch since 1909, will soon be demolished as it is dilapidated and beyond repair. The crime branch will temporarily shift to the Bawla compound in Chinchpokli and the new building in the commissioner's office till a six-storeyed building comes up in place of the earlier structure, said sources in Mumbai police.
'The building's front-end made of stone is still in proper condition, but the iron beams at the back have rusted and are becoming increasingly unsafe by the day,' a senior Indian Police Service (IPS) officer told Hindustan Times. Structural auditors who examined the century-old building recommended that it be demolished because of the weak back-side, he said.
'Besides, the overall strength of the city police force has increased and we are facing a severe space crunch at the headquarters,' the officer said. Apart from the crime branch, the new, six-storeyed building will house the CCTV monitoring centre, the administrative branch and meeting rooms, the officer noted.
Historical building
When Mumbai was rocked by demonstrations in 1908 in light of the arrest of nationalist leader Bal Gangadhar Tilak on charges of sedition, the colonial government turned its attention to gathering intelligence on political activists. On June 8, 1909, it set up the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), which replaced the detective branch and started functioning as an elite organisation placed under the control of a deputy commissioner of police.
The two-storeyed building, which was used to house Haj pilgrims for a few weeks, was allotted to the newly-formed CID of the Imperial Police in June 1909 itself. Referred to as the GBCB (Greater Bombay Crime Branch) CID, it investigated crimes of sensitive, political and religious nature – its mandate being largely similar to the current crime branch.
The Special Branch, which gathered political intelligence and information about political activists and foreigners visiting India, was carved out of the CID in 1920. It moved to a building close to St Xavier's School around ten years later while the CID continued operating out of its earlier premises.
In recent decades, the two-storey building has witnessed the interrogation of several hardened criminals and celebrities. Their ranks include terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab, who had landed in the city along with nine other members of the Pakistani terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba on November 26, 2008 and held the city to siege over the next 72 hours, killing 164 people.
Bollywood actor Sanjay Dutt was interrogated in the building by former police commissioner Rakesh Maria, in connection with the March 1993 serial blasts in Mumbai. Underworld dons Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje aka Chhota Rajan, Arun Gawli, Abu Salem and Ejaz Lakdawala were also detained and interrogated in the building by crime branch officers.
The demolition of the building will begin in another month or two, said a senior police officer.
'Some sections of the crime branch will be shifted to a 15-storey building in Bawla Compound in Chinchpokli till the new building is ready,' the officer said. 'However, the joint commissioner police (crime) and some other officers will move to the fourth floor of the new building in the commissioner's office.'
The Chinchpokli building houses the office of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) across three floors, the officer added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan cuts mobile data in Balochistan to disrupt militant coordination
Pakistan cuts mobile data in Balochistan to disrupt militant coordination

Hindustan Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Pakistan cuts mobile data in Balochistan to disrupt militant coordination

Pakistan has suspended cell phone data services for three weeks in the restive southwestern province of Balochistan in a bid to block communications among separatist insurgents behind a surge in recent attacks, an official and the government said. Officials said there are 8.5 million cell phone subscribers in Balochistan, Pakistan's largest province by size, which borders Afghanistan and Iran.(REUTERS) Separatist militants demanding a bigger share of profits from the resources of the mineral-rich province have stepped up attacks in recent months, particularly on Pakistan's military, which has launched an intelligence-based offensive against them. In an order on Wednesday seen by Reuters, the government said the services would be suspended until the end of the month because of the law and order situation in the province, home to key Chinese Belt and Road projects. "The service has been suspended because they (militants) use it for coordination and sharing information," Shahid Rind, a spokesperson for the provincial government, said on Friday. Officials said there are 8.5 million cell phone subscribers in Balochistan, Pakistan's largest province by size, which borders Afghanistan and Iran. But it is thinly populated, with just 15 million from a national population of 240 million. The news follows Pakistan's ban on road travel to Iran late last month, citing security threats. The insurgency by the separatists, who accuse Pakistan's government of depriving them of their share in regional resources, has roiled the province for decades. They primarily attack Pakistani military or Chinese nationals and their interests, but have recently started targeting senior army officers. The military said an officer and two soldiers were killed in a roadside blast set off by the militants on Tuesday. The attack targeting a vehicle was claimed by the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), the strongest of the area's insurgent groups, which has also claimed responsibility for several attacks on senior officers in recent weeks. The region is home to the Gwadar Port, built by Beijing as part of a $65-billion investment in Pakistan in the Belt and Road programme designed to expand China's global reach. Islamabad accuses arch-rival India of funding and backing the insurgents in a bid to stoke instability, as Pakistan seeks international investments in the region, a charge New Delhi denies. In March, the BLA blew up a railway track and took hostage more than 400 train passengers in an attack that killed 31, including 23 soldiers.

Madras HC Division Bench stays single judge's order favouring allotment of Kalaignarin Kanavu Illam houses to Tamil writers
Madras HC Division Bench stays single judge's order favouring allotment of Kalaignarin Kanavu Illam houses to Tamil writers

The Hindu

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Madras HC Division Bench stays single judge's order favouring allotment of Kalaignarin Kanavu Illam houses to Tamil writers

A Division Bench of the Madras High Court on Friday (August 8, 2025) stayed the operation of an order passed by a single judge who had quashed a Government Order (G.O.) issued on March 4, 2024, for cancelling the allotment of houses in Shenoy Nagar and Anna Nagar in Chennai to noted Tamil writers Maraimalai Ilakkuvanar and G. Thilagavathy, also a retired IPS officer, under the Kalaignarin Kanavu Illam scheme. The Bench comprising Justices J. Nisha Banu and M. Jothiraman granted the interim stay following a writ appeal filed by the State government against the single judge's order. In the meantime, two new writ petitions filed by lyricist R. Vairamuthu and Tamil scholar M. Rajendran, challenging the cancellation of similar allotments, were listed for admission before Justice N. Anand Venkatesh on Friday. The judge ordered notices to the government in the two new writ petitions and adjourned them to be decided after the writ appeals get disposed of finally.

Trump tariff a low point in India-US ties, but Delhi remains Washington's best bet
Trump tariff a low point in India-US ties, but Delhi remains Washington's best bet

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Trump tariff a low point in India-US ties, but Delhi remains Washington's best bet

Targeting India with a 50 per cent tariff will only push it closer to Russia and China—a move counterproductive to the US' interests read more What started out as reciprocal tariff negotiations by Trump 2.0 has now snowballed into an almost isolated attack by the US leadership on India. India was one of the first countries that Trump 2.0 got into trade negotiations with, signifying the deep ties and strategic potential of the US-India relationship. Prime Minister Narendra Modi was one of the first world leaders to have an audience with President Donald Trump, only a few weeks into the latter taking office. It is pertinent to evaluate circumstances which catalysed the deterioration of this relationship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Soon after the trade negotiations between India and the US began, India avenged the attack by Pakistani terrorists on Hindu tourists in Kashmir by striking Pakistan's terror camps. The skirmish further escalated as India struck Pakistani airbases as Pakistan attempted to send armed drones and loaded missiles towards Indian cities. The Indian strikes halted when Pakistan requested a ceasefire from India in direct, bilateral communication with the Indian military. Had Pakistan not called India directly, in the absence of a bilateral request, India would have continued its mission to wipe out all terror infrastructure in Pakistan. This is because of India's unflinching policy of not accepting international mediation on any Kashmir-related issue in particular or India-Pakistan matters in general. India burnt its hands in the early days of its birth when the first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, took the Kashmir issue to the United Nations on the insistence of the outgoing British government. India witnessed how the international frameworks and multilateral bodies were manipulated by Pakistan and other vested powers to disturb India's internal peace and security. Thus, at the first chance it got after the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War with Pakistan, the then Indian prime minister, Indira Gandhi, along with the Pakistani leadership, negotiated and signed the Simla Agreement of 1972, confirming that any issues between India and Pakistan would henceforth only be solved bilaterally. This agreement also confirmed all previous international interventions as closed, established an agreed-upon Line of Control (LoC) and stipulated that all future solutions would only be discussed and sought after in bilateral negotiations. While Pakistan repeatedly violated this agreement, with no real success, once again in 1999 the Lahore Declaration between the leadership of both countries enforced the understanding of solving conflicts only through bilateral mechanisms. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In this context, when President Trump made repeated claims about having successfully mediated the India-Pakistan conflict, it put India in a difficult spot. While Prime Minister Modi and President Trump shared a warm camaraderie since Trump 1.0, India simply could not accept the US' mediation in its most sensitive Kashmir issue. As India began to clarify its stance that there was no US mediation, Pakistan used its international lobbies to use this opportunity to create distrust amongst the US leadership towards India. India's reluctance to accept mediation was not personal, but its long-standing national policy. Pakistan offered its strategic assets to the United States; its field marshal, Asim Munir, dined with Trump, particularly when the US was in a direct conflict with Iran. And Islamabad, in a few weeks, also closed the trade deal with Washington. With new negative emotions created within the US' leadership circles compounded with the roadblocks that the US and India teams negotiating the trade deals were hitting, the relationship between the two countries became mired in complexities. A 50 per cent tariff announcement by Trump and his recent statements on the Indian economy being 'dead' hit a new low point in the US-India relationship, which has taken decades of work on both sides to build. India and the US are strategic partners — both need each other for several security, trade and other important objectives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India is a reliable partner for the US in the Asia-Pacific, and India has increasingly looked to the US as a strong ally. Targeting India, which has cautiously increased its business with the US gradually, with a 50 per cent tariff will only push it closer to Russia and China—a move counterproductive to the US' interests. If the US wants to maintain its foothold in the Global East, India is its best bet because only India has the size and consumption power to purchase and use the US' goods and services in significant volumes. While Nato and the EU, as well as the US, continue to consume Russian goods and energy, the Trump administration's punitive tariffs on India don't seem fair. They certainly seem biased and almost personal. The leadership of both countries needs to consider the impact of interpersonal emotions driven by lobbies surrounding them and act in a responsible manner in the interest of global stability and growth. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The author is the director and founder of the VishwaMitra Research Foundation – a geo-economic, foreign policy think tank in Mumbai. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store