Woman stabbed more than 25 times in attack by husband while pushing baby in pram
A mother suffered more than 25 knife injuries in a 'ferocious' attack by her husband while she was pushing their baby in a pram, a court heard.
Kulsuma Akter, 27, was confronted in the street by Habibur Masum, 26, who had tracked her to a refuge in Bradford where she was staying to escape his 'violence, jealousy and controlling behaviour'.
On Wednesday, a trial heard Ms Akter sustained at least 26 knife injuries in the attack, which happened in front of their seven-month-old son, who she had been walking in his pram.
Pathologist Dr Kirsten Hope said she found 15 stab wounds and at least 11 incised wounds on Ms Akter's face, body and arms.
An incised wound is longer than it is deep, while a stab wound is deeper than it is wide.
Dr Hope said some of the injuries to Ms Akter's arm and hand appeared to be defensive injuries which happened while she was trying to protect her face from the weapon.
She told Bradford Crown Court the cause of death was a wound to Ms Akter's neck, which penetrated both the windpipe and a major vein, causing massive blood loss.
The witness also said that 'at least moderate force' would have been used to inflict the injuries.
A statement from Pc Christopher Goodwin, who attended the scene, said the knife was found in a car park behind a shop near where the attack had taken place on April 6 last year.
Jurors have heard Ms Akter had been moved from her home in Oldham to a refuge in Bradford in January after telling police Masum had assaulted her, held a knife to her throat and threatened to kill her over a 'completely innocuous' message from a male colleague.
Opening the case to jurors on Monday, prosecutor Stephen Wood KC said Masum had tracked his wife to her new accommodation and confronted her while she was walking with their baby in the street, launching a 'ferocious and deadly attack'.
Masum denies murdering Ms Akter but has pleaded guilty to manslaughter and possession of a knife.
He also denies two charges of assault, one count of making threats to kill and one charge of stalking.
The trial continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Woman who phoned 999 and told operator her husband had killed himself is found guilty of murder
A woman who overpowered her husband and attacked him before telling a 999 operator he had taken his own life has been found guilty of his murder. Amy Pugh, 34, told a jury at Stafford Crown Court that she had found her husband hanging when she opened the back door of her family home in Newport, Shropshire, on the evening of March 22, 2022. Kyle Pugh, 30, had suffered compression to the neck and fractures to the structure of the neck, as well as a fractured nose and eye socket and died at the Princess Royal Hospital in Telford surrounded by his family on March 23, 2022. Pugh, who wore a white top and black suit, put her hands to her mouth in the dock after the jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder on Thursday after more than 11 hours of deliberations. The court heard Pugh had called her father before dialling 999 20 minutes after 'gaining the upper hand' over her husband, from whom she was separated, in a fight in the kitchen and attacking him. She told the emergency call handler her husband had taken his own life and could be heard saying: 'Kyle, wake up, why have you done this.' Mr Pugh had been in a new relationship with another woman but was at the family home in Aston Drive, to visit his children on the night of the incident. While they were initially in the kitchen listening to music, Pugh told the court she had 'lost composure' after finding out her estranged husband's new partner may be pregnant and they had an argument. She had claimed her husband had left the house and she later opened the back door to let the dog into the garden and found him hanging before dragging him inside. But prosecutor Julian Evans KC told the trial that the story was a 'complete fiction' and that Pugh had inflicted the injuries on her husband herself. The court heard the two had a 'volatile, turbulent and abusive' relationship which would involve physical violence to each other and was often fuelled by drink or drugs. Mr Evans said Pugh was aware her husband had 'vulnerabilities', had a history of self-harm and had made previous suicide attempts and had 'quite deliberately and quite callously sought to use them to her own advantage'. Pugh had told the court the two were like 'lovestruck teenagers' when they first began a relationship in 2012 but the relationship became toxic, with Mr Pugh breaking her jaw and her arm in two separate incidents. The defendant said she would initially push her husband away when he hit her, but as the years went on, the violence got worse so she started to fight back. By the time of the incident, Pugh admitted they would both drink and smoke cannabis heavily. When paramedics arrived at the scene, they managed to restore Mr Pugh's pulse but he died in hospital the next day. Judge Kristina Montgomery KC thanked the jury for their work on the trial and said Pugh, of Stafford Road, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, would be sentenced on September 5.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Boy who met Prince and Princess of Wales and caught William's attention after asking a sweet question about Prince George killed himself after getting into trouble with police, inquest hears
A teenager who met the Prince and Princess of Wales after winning a design competition at the age of 10 has taken his own life after getting into trouble with the police, an inquest has heard. Zak Kay met the royal couple in July 2016, when they were in Portsmouth, Hampshire, to cheer on Sir Ben Ainslie's America's Cup team. Then a pupil at St Paul's Catholic Primary School in Portsmouth, he had won the contest to design a trophy for the Portsmouth leg of the America's Cup World Series (ACWS). His winning design featured the sails of an AC45 catamaran with the star and crescent emblem of Portsmouth on it. He gained national attention after he asked William what his son George had received for his third birthday, which had been two days earlier. The Prince had replied: 'I am not telling, he got too many things, he's far too spoilt, he's not into boats yet.' An inquest into his death heard that on July 2 last year, Mr Kay, then 18, took his own life by hanging while staying at the home of a friend in Southampton. He had left a letter saying: 'I couldn't take being hurt bad again. I am sorry I couldn't get past this s**t. Sorry that I wasn't strong enough.' Coroner Jason Pegg told the Winchester hearing that he was taken to Southampton General Hospital but had suffered brain damage because of cardiac arrest caused by the hanging. He said that a decision was taken by medics on July 7 to withdraw treatment and Mr Kay died. Mr Pegg said that Mr Kay, who was diagnosed with ADHD, had been placed in foster care in July 2017, having experienced 'significant instability' and 'chaotic early years' with a 'lack of appropriate male role models'. He added: 'Whilst with foster carers, Zak could be violent towards them, leading to him having several foster care moves.' Mr Pegg told the hearing, which was not attended by any family members, that in May 2024 Mr Kay was being investigated for several alleged offences, including selling cocaine and heroin, and he had breached bail conditions. He added that Mr Kay had made a previous attempt on his life in January 2024, but had failed to respond to approaches by the adult mental health team. Recording a conclusion of suicide, Mr Pegg said: 'Zak had a chaotic and troubled childhood which resulted in Zak being cared for by various foster parents in the Portsmouth area. 'Zak's conduct towards them meant he had various moves. Zak, at the time of his passing, was being investigated for a number of alleged offences, some of which were serious.' When Mr Kay met the royal couple, his mother, Kelly, had said: 'I don't think words can explain how proud I am of Zak. 'He was hugely excited to meet Kate and I was really, really excited and proud of him. I could cry. 'He is very talented and hopefully this will help boost his confidence.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Michelin chef wins £20,000 payout after boss ranted about 'unreliable Mexicans' and 'threatened to call the Home Office'
A head chef has won £20,000 for racial and sexual orientation harassment after his boss ranted that 'Mexicans were not reliable people'. A tribunal heard the comments came after head chef Cesar Omar Perez Vargas walked out of a busy Sunday shift because he had been given an 'unreasonable' 60 customers to cook for - more than he was contracted to serve. Musician and then owner of the business Francis Rockcliff said that he would call the Home Office to make sure he was 'sent back to the country that you belong'. He also said he would tell officials that 'you have been sexually harassing all the male staff.' Mr Perez Vargas took the upmarket Pot Kiln gastropub in Thatcham, West Berkshire, to a tribunal. During the proceedings, Mr Rockcliff denied that a social media post referring to Michelin trained chefs as 'people with sautéed egos' was 'directed' at the chef. But a panel found that anyone who was aware of the circumstances around the end of the chef's employment may consider that this is 'exactly who they were referring to'. The judge upheld Mr Perez Vargas' complaints of unfair dismissal and race and sexual orientation harassment and awarded him £20,444.24 in compensation. The tribunal, held in Reading, heard that Mr Perez Vargas starting working as a chef for the Pot Kiln in November 2019. But in April 2022 an 'extra burden' was placed on kitchen staff when the Pot Kiln went from having four chefs to two. Mr Perez Vargas said things 'came to a head' on a busy shift that August. The tribunal panel heard that after walking out, Mr Rockcliff followed the chef outside and the pair ended up having a heated conversation on the street which left Mr Perez Vargas feeling 'shocked, threatened, insecure'. The chef claimed his boss told him: 'I knew that you Mexicans were not reliable people. I will call the Home Office and make sure that they send you back to the country that you belong. I will also tell them that you have been sexually harassing all the male staff.' He also alleged Mr Rockcliff told him that he will 'make sure that no one will give you a job anymore'. Mr Rockcliff - a musician who goes by the professional name of 'Rocky Rockcliff' - denied making those comments. That evening, Mr Rockliff went to the chef's home and collected his keys. Reading employment tribunal, where a panel upheld Mr Perez Vargas' complaints of unfair dismissal and race and sexual orientation harassment and awarded him £20,444.24 in compensation The following day, Mr Perez Vargas - who felt as if staff were being 'overworked' - handed in a letter of resignation. It was heard that Mr Rockcliff sent a text message to staff the following day on how he was 'changing the kitchen culture'. 'I finally lost all the dinosaurs/old brigade chefs to my great relief,' he wrote. The director also wrote that he was 'not sure that Eastern Europeans or Latin Americans have an innate understanding of English regional cookery and/or Mediterranean classic cuisine'. It was heard that Mr Rockliff also made a social media post referring Michelin trained chefs as 'people with sautéed egos who have lost their mojo for the love of cooking and who have overcooked their wallets for fame over food'. During the hearing, Mr Rockcliff was 'emphatic in stating that he is not racist'. The tribunal said that while Mr Rockliff has a 'tendency to talk about people in stereotypical terms', they concluded he did not discriminate against the chef. Employment Judge Andrew Gumbiti-Zimuto said that while the way the boss had expressed himself was 'problematic' and 'offensive, he added: 'We are quite satisfied that the reaction that Mr Rockcliff had to the events on 7 August was a sort of reaction that he would have had with anybody regardless of their race or sexual orientation. 'It was, in our view, a natural response on the part of Mr Rockcliff to be offended by the fact that an employee had walked out on the service.' But, they said that his behaviour after Mr Perez Vargas walked out of the shift could amount to harassment and was 'conduct which had the effect of violating' the claimant's dignity. EJ Gumbiti-Zimuto said that because those comments were clearly related to his race, 'we are satisfied that it related to the protected characteristic of race'. He added: 'Because the comments made reference to (Mr Perez Vargas') sexually harassing all male staff, that it also made reference to his sexual orientation and therefore, in our view, was related to sexual orientation.'
