One dead in fourth shooting linked to gang violence in Brussels this week
The latest outbreak of violence in the city happened in the early hours of Friday in the Peterbos neighbourhood in Anderlecht, the Brussels prosecutor's office told the media.
The victim was a man who has yet to be identified, police spokesperson Sarah Frederickx said.
"It is probably linked to rival drug gangs," said a spokeswoman for the Brussels prosecutor's office.
The fatal shooting on Friday follows three other incidents in the last three days.
One person was injured on Thursday in a shooting near the Clémenceau metro station in Anderlecht.
On Wednesday, two men exchanged fire outside the same station, which led to a manhunt in the tunnels of the metro system and a brief shutdown of several stations. The suspects have yet to be caught.
Hours earlier, two people were injured in a shooting on the other side of Brussels, in Saint-Josse-ten-Noode.
Although it is unclear if the incidents are related, they are believed to be linked to territorial disputes between different drug gangs in the capital.
"These are probably reprisals, wars between mafias that are waging a war for territory," Brussels mayor Philippe Close told public radio.
On Thursday, Close said he would convene other mayors of the city's districts to propose a plan to combat drug-related violence, according to Belga News Agency.
The government has said it plans to temporarily merge the six separate Brussels police zones in order to more efficiently deploy officers between different districts.
The new Belgian government, led by Flemish nationalist Bart De Wever, has said that he wants the police zones to be permanently merged to better combat violence in the city.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
Family reunification for migrants in the spotlight in Belgium
The Brussels Immigration office is an imposing building, spread over twelve floors of a concrete block constructed in the 1960s. It's here where the fate of migrants and their families is decided. And now, one service in particular being offered at the centre is in the political spotlight. Last week, MPs passed a government bill restricting access to family reunification. This scheme allows legally resident foreign nationals to bring in one or more family members. Under the new guidelines, refugees will only have six months to submit their application. Beneficiaries of subsidiary protection, those who do not have refugee status, will have to wait two years before they can submit their application. The text also requires greater financial resources. The minimum income required to submit an application has been increased. Migrants now need to earn around €2,300 per month, compared with the €2,100 under the previous regulations. This amount is increased by 10% for each additional family member. "If someone wants to bring in their partner and two children, they have to earn €2,700 net per month," explains Thomas Willekens, policy officer for the Brussels-based NGO Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen. This sum "is enormous and I would say that the average employee in Belgium does not even earn this amount," he adds. A virtual impossibility without a name The Belgian Minister for Asylum and Migration, Flemish nationalist Anneleen Van Bossuyt, has defended these new measures. The minister who originally put forward the proposal said, "We need to reduce the influx of people. Our society is no longer able to bear this burden." The government wants to reduce the number of migrants arriving through family reunification. According to figures from the Immigration Office, last year 20,724 people from countries outside the European Union obtained visas for Belgium under this scheme. Belgian authorities have also decided to increase the application fee for naturalisation, up from €150 to €1,000. For Thomas Willekens, these new rules are above all a covert way of making family reunification impossible, at the risk of plunging these families into an even more dangerous situation. "The consequences for refugees in Belgium will be prolonged separation from their families, which will have an impact on their integration and inclusion in Belgian society. It's difficult to learn the language if you're worried about your partner in Afghanistan, for example," he explains. "As for refugees and countries of origin, while they used to be able to use this safe and legal route to come to Belgium, they no longer have access to it. They will therefore turn to smugglers to come to Europe." A European trend Belgium is not alone in Europe. Last week, Portugal also adopted more stringent measures for granting family reunification. German MPs approved the suspension of the family reunification scheme last month for people with "subsidiary protection," in other words those who do not have refugee status. While Austria has suspended family reunification for a period of six months. In practical terms, applications can be submitted to the Austrian authorities, but will not be processed.
Euronews
17-07-2025
- Euronews
EU budget: Parliament revolts against Commission proposal
The European Parliament's members are deeply unsatisfied with the proposal for a seven-year budget, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) put forward by the European Commission on Wednesday and have threatened at the outset not to enter into negotiations on the paper. The level of information provided by Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin in a briefing to MEPs from the Parliament's Committee on Budgets (BUDG) on Wednesday was deemed unsatisfactory by most. 'Commission President's Ursula von der Leyen is giving a press conference and she is giving to the press more information than you to us,' lamented Belgian MEP Johan Van Overtveldt, the committee's chair. Some of his colleagues underlined the lack of figures, official documents, and explanatory materials from the Commission to prepare for the discussion with the Commissioner. Commissioner Serafin, who acknowledged the discontent, said that he had left the decision-making meeting of the Commission early to be present at the Parliament and to present the proposal there first, "in recognition of [Parliament's] role". MEPs were also very critical of the content of the proposal, which amounts to almost €2 trillion, or 1.26% of the EU's gross national income. 'For sure, this is not a 'historic budget' as the European Commission is attempting to present it. It is at the same level as the budget of the EU in the previous seven years,' Siegfried Mureșan, one of the rapporteurs for the MFF in the Parliament, from the European People's Party (EPP), said during a press conference. 'The attempt of the Commission to convince us that this budget is a significant increase is misleading. The increase is coming only for the adjustment to the inflation rate and it is only coming because we have to pay back the Next Generation EU fund,' he said, referring to the extraordinary funding lines furnished to recover following the COVID-19 pandemic. Like many of his colleagues, Mureșan also believes that key demands from the Parliament have been ignored. One of the most contentious points concerns the so-called 'National and Regional Partnership Plans', under which the EU funds will be disbursed. 'This proposal is an attempt to renationalise the EU,' he told Commissioner Serafin and repeated in the press conference. This opposition to national plans was reiterated in a statement from the leaders of the Parliament's so-called centrist majority groups—EPP, Socialists and Democrats, Renew Europe, and Greens/EFA. They believe that the national plans would give more power to the member states to deal directly with the Commission, bypassing the Parliament's role. 'The European Parliament will not accept any reduction of Parliamentary oversight and the legitimate democratic control and scrutiny over the EU spending,' read the statement. Another problematic issue is the merging of cohesion and agricultural funds, which most MEPs would like to see funded under a separate budget line and legal base. Better received was the proposal on 'own resources'—taxes imposed at the EU level that should generate €58.5 billion per year, according to the Commission. Several MEPs endorsed the idea of increasing revenues by imposing duties on tobacco products and taxing companies with a net annual turnover of at least €100 million. The MFF requires the regulatory consent of the European Parliament in addition to the unanimous consent of the EU member states to be approved: a majority of MEPs must therefore approve the final text for it to enter into force. At this stage, the Parliament may also refuse to enter into talks, the rapporteurs have threatened. MEPs could approve a resolution asking the Commission to withdraw its proposal and present a new basis for negotiations. But this would be a last resort, as co-rapporteur Carla Tavares from the Socialists and Democrats told Euronews. 'We want to put pressure and work with the Commission in order to find a compromise acceptable to all.'
LeMonde
14-07-2025
- LeMonde
Bastille Day military parade showcases 'credibility' of French army
French President Emmanuel Macron marched down the Champs-Elysées on Monday, July 14, before the start of the traditional Bastille Day parade. At the foot of the Arc de Triomphe, the head of state had previously presented the president of the Flame Committee, on the occasion of its centenary, with a sword used to rekindle the flame every evening. Cornflowers were then laid on the tomb of the Unknown Soldier, representing French soldiers who fell in battle. Organized as a "real military operation," according to the military governor of Paris, General Loïc Mizon, this year's parade reflected the seriousness of the threats to the continent's security. Following Macron's announcement on Sunday, in his speech to the armed forces, of a further increase in the defense budget to meet the threats of a "more brutal world," the Bastille Day parade showcased French servicemen and women "ready to go" on operations. The French army intended to highlight its "operational credibility" and "strategic solidarity" with its partners. In 2024, due to the Olympic and Paralympic Games in Paris, the parade was moved to Avenue Hoche. Now back on the Champs-Elysées, this year's parade featured units from the 7 th Armored Brigade. According to Mizon, "the goal [was] to show a combat force that is almost ready to depart, just as it is presented to our fellow citizens on the Champs-Elysées." Paris aims to have the ability to deploy, if necessary, a "war-ready" brigade – over 7,000 personnel with full munitions and logistics – within 10 days. By 2027, the goal is to be able to do the same with a division (over 20,000 personnel) within 30 days. More than 450 Indonesian soldiers To represent France's partnerships, the parade included a joint Belgian-Luxembourg company, the Franco-Finnish binational force that forms the rapid reaction unit of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (FINUL), and the crew of the frigate Auvergne, which has carried out several deployments in the Baltic and Arctic Seas in support of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) operations. This year, the parade put Indonesia in the spotlight, as France has concluded a strategic partnership with the country to strengthen its role in the Indo-Pacific. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto – who hosted Macron in Jakarta at the end of May – attended the festivities alongside his French counterpart. Subianto has announced his intention to acquire more Rafale fighter jets, Scorpène submarines, Caesar artillery systems and light frigates. Preceded by the Patrouille de France air show, more than 450 Indonesian service members, including musicians from a drum band, wearing pilot helmets, lion heads or shark heads depending on their corps, opened the parade on foot. In total, 7,000 men and women took part in the parade, including 5,600 on foot, 65 aircraft (five of which were foreign), 34 helicopters, 247 vehicles and 200 horses from the Garde Républicaine.
