Government 'listens' to widespread concern, delays start of Aged Care Act
The new Minister for Aged Care and Seniors, Sam Rae, released an open letter to aged care providers on Wednesday, June 4, signalling he will defer the start of the Aged Care Act from July 1 to November 1, 2025.
"I have spent my first three weeks as your Minister listening to older people, their families and carers, aged care providers, workers and others in the sector who have generously shared their views and feedback with me," Mr Rae stated.
"You have told us you need more time to prepare your clients, support your workers and get your systems ready for the transition to the new Aged Care Act."
The letter said the extra time would allow the government to finalise key operational and digital processes - something providers have been crying out for - along with implementation guidance and training.
Read more at The Senior:
The decision follows months of widespread criticism over lack of information and transparency by aged care providers and advocates for the aged, with many calling to delay the implementation of the new laws - as reported by The Senior.
Craig Gear, CEO of the Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN), said the four-month delay was the "right decision" as older people did not have the necessary information to make informed choices, especially around the Support at Home program.
"We are also concerned that the appropriate systems aren't yet in place to ensure continuity of care and services for older people during the transition," Mr Gear said.
OPAN has also called for the release of at least 20,000 additional home care packages during the delay to reduce the current 83,000 people waiting up to 11 months to receive the appropriate level of home care.
"This decision is the result of months of intense discussions and calls for practical timelines for the sector. We know that rushed reforms would put levels of care at risk for older people," Ageing Australia CEO Tom Symondson said.
"We fully support the new rights-based Aged Care Act, but the simple truth is we're not ready to introduce all the sweeping reforms by 1 July. Providers have been working around the clock to ensure a smooth transition, but we just haven't received all the information we need in order to proceed."
Mr Symondson said the extra time was a "critical space" to help aged care providers and services finalise agreements with clients, systems and processes - and puts older Australians first.
"This is a win for the 1.4 million older Australians, who rely on aged care," he said.
"We need to do this reform once and do it right. We hope this extension will help us get closer to that goal."
Catholic Health Australia (which represents more than 350 aged care facilities) also welcomed the government's decision, with CEO Jason Kara saying it would ensure a smooth transition.
"Reform of this magnitude and importance should not be rushed," Mr Kara said.
"Much of the detail around how the new program will work is incomplete or in draft," said Mr Kara.
"Requiring providers and residents to sign agreements without key information such as co-contribution amounts and transitional rules would have risked the discontinuation of care, or care being provided without a legal service agreement, posing legal, financial and regulatory risks."
Simon Miller, CEO of Anglicare Sydney, said the delay would help produce "stronger outcomes for everyone".
Share your thoughts in the comments below, or send a Letter to the Editor by CLICKING HERE.
Once-in-a-generation changes to the aged care sector have been put on pause by the federal government to allow more time for service providers and clients to prepare.
The new Minister for Aged Care and Seniors, Sam Rae, released an open letter to aged care providers on Wednesday, June 4, signalling he will defer the start of the Aged Care Act from July 1 to November 1, 2025.
"I have spent my first three weeks as your Minister listening to older people, their families and carers, aged care providers, workers and others in the sector who have generously shared their views and feedback with me," Mr Rae stated.
"You have told us you need more time to prepare your clients, support your workers and get your systems ready for the transition to the new Aged Care Act."
The letter said the extra time would allow the government to finalise key operational and digital processes - something providers have been crying out for - along with implementation guidance and training.
Read more at The Senior:
The decision follows months of widespread criticism over lack of information and transparency by aged care providers and advocates for the aged, with many calling to delay the implementation of the new laws - as reported by The Senior.
Craig Gear, CEO of the Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN), said the four-month delay was the "right decision" as older people did not have the necessary information to make informed choices, especially around the Support at Home program.
"We are also concerned that the appropriate systems aren't yet in place to ensure continuity of care and services for older people during the transition," Mr Gear said.
OPAN has also called for the release of at least 20,000 additional home care packages during the delay to reduce the current 83,000 people waiting up to 11 months to receive the appropriate level of home care.
"This decision is the result of months of intense discussions and calls for practical timelines for the sector. We know that rushed reforms would put levels of care at risk for older people," Ageing Australia CEO Tom Symondson said.
"We fully support the new rights-based Aged Care Act, but the simple truth is we're not ready to introduce all the sweeping reforms by 1 July. Providers have been working around the clock to ensure a smooth transition, but we just haven't received all the information we need in order to proceed."
Mr Symondson said the extra time was a "critical space" to help aged care providers and services finalise agreements with clients, systems and processes - and puts older Australians first.
"This is a win for the 1.4 million older Australians, who rely on aged care," he said.
"We need to do this reform once and do it right. We hope this extension will help us get closer to that goal."
Catholic Health Australia (which represents more than 350 aged care facilities) also welcomed the government's decision, with CEO Jason Kara saying it would ensure a smooth transition.
"Reform of this magnitude and importance should not be rushed," Mr Kara said.
"Much of the detail around how the new program will work is incomplete or in draft," said Mr Kara.
"Requiring providers and residents to sign agreements without key information such as co-contribution amounts and transitional rules would have risked the discontinuation of care, or care being provided without a legal service agreement, posing legal, financial and regulatory risks."
Simon Miller, CEO of Anglicare Sydney, said the delay would help produce "stronger outcomes for everyone".
Share your thoughts in the comments below, or send a Letter to the Editor by CLICKING HERE.
Once-in-a-generation changes to the aged care sector have been put on pause by the federal government to allow more time for service providers and clients to prepare.
The new Minister for Aged Care and Seniors, Sam Rae, released an open letter to aged care providers on Wednesday, June 4, signalling he will defer the start of the Aged Care Act from July 1 to November 1, 2025.
"I have spent my first three weeks as your Minister listening to older people, their families and carers, aged care providers, workers and others in the sector who have generously shared their views and feedback with me," Mr Rae stated.
"You have told us you need more time to prepare your clients, support your workers and get your systems ready for the transition to the new Aged Care Act."
The letter said the extra time would allow the government to finalise key operational and digital processes - something providers have been crying out for - along with implementation guidance and training.
Read more at The Senior:
The decision follows months of widespread criticism over lack of information and transparency by aged care providers and advocates for the aged, with many calling to delay the implementation of the new laws - as reported by The Senior.
Craig Gear, CEO of the Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN), said the four-month delay was the "right decision" as older people did not have the necessary information to make informed choices, especially around the Support at Home program.
"We are also concerned that the appropriate systems aren't yet in place to ensure continuity of care and services for older people during the transition," Mr Gear said.
OPAN has also called for the release of at least 20,000 additional home care packages during the delay to reduce the current 83,000 people waiting up to 11 months to receive the appropriate level of home care.
"This decision is the result of months of intense discussions and calls for practical timelines for the sector. We know that rushed reforms would put levels of care at risk for older people," Ageing Australia CEO Tom Symondson said.
"We fully support the new rights-based Aged Care Act, but the simple truth is we're not ready to introduce all the sweeping reforms by 1 July. Providers have been working around the clock to ensure a smooth transition, but we just haven't received all the information we need in order to proceed."
Mr Symondson said the extra time was a "critical space" to help aged care providers and services finalise agreements with clients, systems and processes - and puts older Australians first.
"This is a win for the 1.4 million older Australians, who rely on aged care," he said.
"We need to do this reform once and do it right. We hope this extension will help us get closer to that goal."
Catholic Health Australia (which represents more than 350 aged care facilities) also welcomed the government's decision, with CEO Jason Kara saying it would ensure a smooth transition.
"Reform of this magnitude and importance should not be rushed," Mr Kara said.
"Much of the detail around how the new program will work is incomplete or in draft," said Mr Kara.
"Requiring providers and residents to sign agreements without key information such as co-contribution amounts and transitional rules would have risked the discontinuation of care, or care being provided without a legal service agreement, posing legal, financial and regulatory risks."
Simon Miller, CEO of Anglicare Sydney, said the delay would help produce "stronger outcomes for everyone".
Share your thoughts in the comments below, or send a Letter to the Editor by CLICKING HERE.
Once-in-a-generation changes to the aged care sector have been put on pause by the federal government to allow more time for service providers and clients to prepare.
The new Minister for Aged Care and Seniors, Sam Rae, released an open letter to aged care providers on Wednesday, June 4, signalling he will defer the start of the Aged Care Act from July 1 to November 1, 2025.
"I have spent my first three weeks as your Minister listening to older people, their families and carers, aged care providers, workers and others in the sector who have generously shared their views and feedback with me," Mr Rae stated.
"You have told us you need more time to prepare your clients, support your workers and get your systems ready for the transition to the new Aged Care Act."
The letter said the extra time would allow the government to finalise key operational and digital processes - something providers have been crying out for - along with implementation guidance and training.
Read more at The Senior:
The decision follows months of widespread criticism over lack of information and transparency by aged care providers and advocates for the aged, with many calling to delay the implementation of the new laws - as reported by The Senior.
Craig Gear, CEO of the Older Persons Advocacy Network (OPAN), said the four-month delay was the "right decision" as older people did not have the necessary information to make informed choices, especially around the Support at Home program.
"We are also concerned that the appropriate systems aren't yet in place to ensure continuity of care and services for older people during the transition," Mr Gear said.
OPAN has also called for the release of at least 20,000 additional home care packages during the delay to reduce the current 83,000 people waiting up to 11 months to receive the appropriate level of home care.
"This decision is the result of months of intense discussions and calls for practical timelines for the sector. We know that rushed reforms would put levels of care at risk for older people," Ageing Australia CEO Tom Symondson said.
"We fully support the new rights-based Aged Care Act, but the simple truth is we're not ready to introduce all the sweeping reforms by 1 July. Providers have been working around the clock to ensure a smooth transition, but we just haven't received all the information we need in order to proceed."
Mr Symondson said the extra time was a "critical space" to help aged care providers and services finalise agreements with clients, systems and processes - and puts older Australians first.
"This is a win for the 1.4 million older Australians, who rely on aged care," he said.
"We need to do this reform once and do it right. We hope this extension will help us get closer to that goal."
Catholic Health Australia (which represents more than 350 aged care facilities) also welcomed the government's decision, with CEO Jason Kara saying it would ensure a smooth transition.
"Reform of this magnitude and importance should not be rushed," Mr Kara said.
"Much of the detail around how the new program will work is incomplete or in draft," said Mr Kara.
"Requiring providers and residents to sign agreements without key information such as co-contribution amounts and transitional rules would have risked the discontinuation of care, or care being provided without a legal service agreement, posing legal, financial and regulatory risks."
Simon Miller, CEO of Anglicare Sydney, said the delay would help produce "stronger outcomes for everyone".
Share your thoughts in the comments below, or send a Letter to the Editor by CLICKING HERE.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
42 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘Terrorism': Neo-Nazi's odd offer to cops
A prominent Australian neo-Nazi claimed that police were seeking to arrest him over a violent confrontation at a rally as he faced court on allegations he sought to intimidate an officer and his wife. Thomas Sewell, 32, disputes the allegations, telling reporters outside the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Monday that it was instead him and his organisation experiencing intimidation and 'terrorism' from police. 'All of these charges come from the fact that we are advocating for white Australians; the government is against us doing that,' he said. It's understood the police investigation relates to an alleged assault on a man in Melbourne's Bourke St Mall in the early hours of Saturday, August 7. Thomas Sewell is facing allegations he sought to intimidate a police officer and his wife. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia About 100 black-clad men held signs and flags, including the Australian flag, the National Socialist Network flag and a sign reading 'White Man Fight Back', as they marched down the shopping mall in the city's CBD. Video from the scene captured a man, believed to be Mr Sewell, brawling with a member of the public. The march was condemned by Victorian Premier Jacinta Allen, who called the group 'goons' and vowed to introduce powers for police to unmask protesters. 'Nazis don't belong in this country and they know it. That's why they hide behind masks in the dark,' she said. Police were called after about 100 members of the National Socialist Network marched through Melbourne's CBD in the early hours of Saturday morning. Outside court, the National Socialist Network (NSN) figurehead showed media several stitches to a cut above his left ear. 'I do have some injuries from an assault on my person about a week ago. We did a large demonstration; we marched down Bourke St Mall about midnight … and I was attacked by a deluded, deranged person,' he said. 'The police have refused to charge the man with assault and instead have threatened to arrest me today.' Mr Sewell was supported in court. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Sewell said he'd offered police to arrest him outside of court but wouldn't attend the Melbourne West police station because he believed it would breach his bail conditions. Victoria Police has been contacted for comment. Mr Sewell was supported by six associates, clad in matching Helly Hansen jackets bearing the NSN's emblem and the Australian flag, including Jacob Hersant, Joel Davis and Nathan Bull. He led the march through Melbourne's CBD. X Credit: Supplied His comments came as a three-day hearing on allegations he sought to intimidate a police officer and their spouse was delayed following an application from the prosecution. Prosecutors allege Mr Sewell intimidated the officer and his partner on both October 21 and November 7 last year. He is also charged with alleged breaches of personal safety intervention orders protecting the couple on November 7 and failing to comply with a direction to provide police with access to an electronic device. The November 7 charges relate to Mr Sewell mentioning on a podcast hosted by Mr Davis and Blair Cottrell that a police officer allegedly attempted to remove a NSN member's face covering during a protest. Thomas Sewell appears on a podcast hosted by Joel Davis and Blair Cottrell. Supplied/ Rumble. Credit: News Corp Australia United Australian Party leader Ralph Babet watched the court hearing via videolink. The hearing was pushed back to September 1 by magistrate Michelle Hodgson after prosecutor Louis Andrews flagged the police officer's wife had expressed reluctance to give evidence. 'The prosecution has to consider whether or not to make an application for that witness to be treated as unavailable,' Mr Andrews said. Mr Sewell asked the court to 'note on the record' that police were seeking to arrest him over the CBD incident. He will return to court on September 1. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Outside court, he vowed to fight the charges, labelling them 'false' and 'political persecution'. 'We have the right as Australian citizens to mention what police do and don't do in terms of their attacks on us and that is the beginning of this incident,' he said. 'Explaining the police's actions to the public and they've kicked my door in, arrested me and intimidated my family'.Mr Sewell will return to court for a hearing on the allegations next month.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Google hit with $55m fine after ACCC took it to court over 'anti-competitive' Android deals with Optus and Telstra
Google Asia-Pacific has agreed to pay a $55m fine after the Australian Competition and Consumer Commissions took the search engine to court for striking a 'anti-competitive' deals with the nation's two largest telcos. The search engine made a deal with Telstra and Optus to only pre-install Google Search, and not other search engines, on Android phones the telcos sold to customers between December 2019 and March 2021. In return for Google's exclusivity on these devices, Optus and Telstra would receive a share of the revenue the search giant earnt from ads on Google it showed to customers on the Android phones. Google admitted that by striking the deal with the telco giants it would likely reduce competition. The search engine's massive fine comes alongside Telstra, Optus and TPG last year agreeing not to enter exclusivity deals with Google. ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said the deal between Google and the telcos posed a detriment to Aussie consumers. 'Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. 'Today's outcome, along with Telstra, Optus and TPG's undertakings, have created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers. 'Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition.' A Google spokesperson said the search engine was "pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns". 'We are committed to providing Android device makers more flexibility to preload browsers and search apps while preserving the offerings and features that help them innovate, compete with Apple, and keep costs low,' the spokesperson said. Ms Cass-Gottlieb lashed out at the deal as she noted the increasing availability of AI search tools allowed consumers opportunities to 'experiment with search services on their mobiles'. Google's fine follows a long investigation by the ACCC and concerns from the consumer watchdog about the contractual arrangements for Google search, which include how ubiquitous it is as the default search engine on devices. The ACCC chair stressed that co-operation with the ACCC is encouraged as it "avoids the need for protracted and costly litigation and leads to more competition'. 'More competition in markets drives economic dynamism, but the reverse is true when markets are not sufficiently competitive,' Ms Cass-Gottlieb said. 'The ACCC remains committed to addressing anti-competitive conduct like this, as well as cartel conduct. Competition issues in the digital economy are a current priority area.' The consumer watchdog settled on this matter with Optus and Telstra in June 2024 and with TPG in August 2024.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Hesitation nation: We have it in us, so let's unleash Australian innovation
Australia can't fix productivity without confronting its innovation hesitation. As the nation launches another national conversation on productivity at Jim Chalmers' roundtable this week, one can't help but notice what's missing. The usual policy levers – tax reform, regulation, infrastructure – are all there. But innovation, long the lifeblood of productivity, is treated as a hopeful byproduct of policy rather than a foundation that needs fostering. This is evident in the Productivity Commission's 21-page white paper, Growth Mindset: How to boost Australia's productivity, which outlines the five proposed productivity inquiries. Terms such as innovation, innovator, innovative are mentioned just six times. In the subsequent interim report on Creating a more dynamic and resilient economy, innovation is positioned as an obvious, almost expected, consequence of the structural reforms, without reference to the necessary educational and cultural reform needed to harness the confidence and mindset to innovate. We can't regulate our way to innovation. Policies enable it, but the Australian people will ultimately be the innovators. Until we prioritise how Australians think about and experience innovation in daily life, reforms will miss their full impact. Loading So why do we too often struggle to innovate? Having taught creativity and innovation for many years at the Stanford and now at Harvard Innovation Labs, I have observed that stagnating individual and societal innovation is often the result of a set of myths and cognitive norms that perpetuate a cautious and risk-averse approach. There are three primary forms of innovation hesitation. We've probably all experienced at least one of these, either at home or in our workplaces. The first is 'innovation mythology'. This is the myth that innovation is only for individual geniuses like Steve Jobs or Elon Musk in world-changing eureka moments. However, innovation is just as likely to come from minor, incremental improvements made by everyday people. There are, in fact, very few singular eureka moments in innovation, and it is often a much more collaborative endeavour than a solitary one. Next is the creativity gap, a false belief that creativity is a rare gift for special people, and that not everyone can be creative. It often resembles impostor syndrome, where people hold themselves back from contributing valuable ideas or participating in initiatives.
