logo
John Mateer earns high praise as Oklahoma enters new era, hoping to return to high Sooners standards

John Mateer earns high praise as Oklahoma enters new era, hoping to return to high Sooners standards

Yahoo2 days ago
ATLANTA (AP) — The Oklahoma Sooners, a storied program with a legacy of seven national championships, have faced uncharacteristic struggles in recent years. After two 6-7 seasons in three years and a 13th-place finish in the SEC under coach Brent Venables, the Sooners hope to get back on track this season.
New quarterback John Mateer, who transferred from Washington State, plays a key role in the program's plan to return to the top. Months into his tenure, he's earning praise from coaches and teammates alike.
'This is a guy that wants to win at the highest level. A connector. A guy that leads from the front. As he plays the game, he looks like he's in fast forward a lot of times. A great competitor. Super athletic. Throws the ball really well on the run. Makes a lot of good decisions,' Venables said at SEC Media Days on Wednesday.
A strong quarterback is a key ingredient in the Sooners' past success. The QB room in Norman has had a star-studded lineup this decade, led by Heisman winners Baker Mayfield and Kyler Murray, Super Bowl MVP Jalen Hurts, first-overall pick Caleb Williams and dominant college QBs Spencer Rattler and Dillon Gabriel. High expectations coupled with an injured receiving corps proved to be an unfavorable combination for freshman Jackson Arnold, who transferred to SEC opponent Auburn after quarterbacking the Sooners' offense in 2024.
Venables chose Mateer and defensive playmakers Robert Spears-Jennings and R Mason Thomas to represent the program at SEC Media Days in Atlanta.
Despite being on different ends of the field, Spears-Jennings and Thomas have identified Mateer's seamless transition into Norman and the traits that make him an ideal leader.
'He's integrated himself into the team smoothly. If he says he's anxious or he was a little nervous, he didn't look like he was to me," Thomas said. "It felt like he'd been here for four years.'
Mateer isn't the only newcomer. Oklahoma picked up key pieces in the transfer portal and added five new coaches. One of those new coaches worked with Mateer as an offensive coordinator and QB coach at Washington State, Ben Arbuckle.
'I feel like with Arbuckle and John, they bring a different type of swag with them. I feel like our whole offense has embodied their swag and energy because once they score a touchdown, their whole side is over there running, celebrating with the guys, and that's what you need. You need energy. I feel like these guys here love playing football," said Spears-Jennings.
Arbuckle is one of the reasons for the quarterback's smooth transition. Instead of learning a new offense, Mateer built relationships with his new teammates.
'I was fortunate because I didn't have to learn a whole new offense. I was able to take time to learn the players that I was going to play with and build relationships with them in the locker room, hang out and help them learn the offense,' Mateer said. 'Building relationships is the most important thing to leading. You can't lead people you don't know.'
___
AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/college-football
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caitlin Clark replaced by Fever teammate Lexie Hull in WNBA All-Star 3-point contest
Caitlin Clark replaced by Fever teammate Lexie Hull in WNBA All-Star 3-point contest

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Caitlin Clark replaced by Fever teammate Lexie Hull in WNBA All-Star 3-point contest

Indiana Fever guard Lexie Hull will replace teammate Caitlin Clark in the 3-point contest during WNBA All-Star weekend Friday night, the team announced Friday morning. Clark announced Thursday that she would not participate in the 3-point contest Friday or the All-Star Game on Saturday due to a right groin injury. Both events will be held at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, which is the Fever's home arena. Hull is shooting 46.8 percent on 3s this season, the fourth-highest mark in the WNBA. She's drained 29 3s overall, tied with Clark for the second-most on the Fever. All-Star teammate Kelsey Mitchell leads Indiana with 49 3-pointers this year. Hull will compete against defending 3-point contest champion and Atlanta Dream All-Star Allisha Gray, Los Angeles Sparks All-Star Kelsey Plum, New York Liberty All-Star Sabrina Ionescu and Washington Mystics rookie Sonia Citron. Clark injured her right groin in the Fever's road win over the Connecticut Sun on Tuesday night. After making a bounce pass to Mitchell, who scored on a layup with 39.1 seconds left in the game, Clark grabbed her right groin. The Sun called a timeout after the play, and tears welled in Clark's eyes as she walked to the bench in discomfort. 'I am incredibly sad and disappointed to say I can't participate in the 3-Point Contest or the All-Star Game. I have to rest my body,' Clark said in a statement. 'I will still be at Gainbridge Fieldhouse for all the action, and I'm looking forward to helping (New York Liberty coach) Sandy (Brondello) coach our team to a win.' Clark has sustained four non-contact injuries this year, resulting in 11 missed games. She was sidelined for five games with a left quad injury, five games with a left groin injury and now one game with a right groin injury. She also missed Indiana's preseason opener due to left leg tightness. Indiana is 4-6 without Clark this season, excluding the Commissioner's Cup Championship victory that does not count toward the team's overall record. The Fever are 12-11 and in sixth place in the WNBA standings. The team's next game is Tuesday at New York. Clark, a two-time All-Star, is averaging 16.5 points, 8.8 assists and 5.0 rebounds in 13 games this season. Before this year, she had never missed a game in her college or pro career, making 181 straight starts across five years. 'It's a big deal to have (the) All-Star (Game) in Indianapolis, and of course, with Caitlin being a focal point of that,' Fever coach Stephanie White said. 'As the coach of the Indiana Fever, it's not a bigger deal than our long-term season, but it's also part of the fun. 'The big picture is most important for her health and wellness long-term and for our team.' This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Indiana Fever, WNBA 2025 The Athletic Media Company

The fantasy football tight ends to draft … and those to avoid
The fantasy football tight ends to draft … and those to avoid

New York Times

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Times

The fantasy football tight ends to draft … and those to avoid

In the final 'Draft Chasms of Doom' installment, we shift our focus from quarterbacks, running backs and wide receivers to tight ends — and look at the significant value drop-offs in my Value Over Replacement Player (VORP) rankings. And man, do they drop. At the top of the rankings are major dips among the top four picks, a sharp decline at No. 5 after Travis Kelce, and then another after TE13. Advertisement However, I don't (and won't) consider Kelce part of Tier 1, despite the projections saying he could be. I put him in the next group, as his best days are behind him. The only caveat would be if Rashee Rice is suspended six games or more. Then my ranks will come closer to the projections shown here. Everyone from Kelce to Mark Andrews could finish as TE4 or miss the Top 10, and it wouldn't be a surprise. That's why, despite Tier 1 showing a solid group of options, I'm unlikely to end up with any of them, as there are similar ceilings with many end-game options. So, it's the same strategy as with the quarterbacks for me: If a Tier 1 tight end is there in Round 3-5, I'll pounce (maybe I'd even use the last pick or two of Round 2 for Brock Bowers). Otherwise, the Tier 2 options would need to reach Round 8 or later for me to draft them, and most don't. LaPorta currently has a Round 5 ADP, while T.J. Hockenson, Kelce, Andrews and Evan Engram range from Rounds 6-7. The chart, which visually depicts the drop-offs, illustrates that Hockenson, Andrews, Engram, and even LaPorta are in the same value tier, while Kelce is in Tier 1 (again, I disagree with the projection). So why reach for LaPorta when the value difference among these players is so little? And that's what we're looking at in this series, where the major cliffs in positional groups are and why drafting the next-best player at a position of need isn't always the best strategy. While rankings show value, they don't show the difference in value between individual players or among a group of players. If I'm looking later in the draft for TEs, some of my favorite late-round fliers include Tucker Kraft, Kyle Pitts (hey, he's free now), Jake Ferguson, Dallas Goedert, Brenton Strange and rookie Colston Loveland. The best part about taking a tight end super late is that the position is 'bleh,' as shown in the positional comparisons chart. It takes a mere 60/500/5 line to crack TE1 status. Whoop-dee-do, Basil! I'm aiming for Top 5 (or close) breakout upside, and if the flier I take misses, I'm off to the waivers for someone who might have it. Jonnu Smith (190 ADP), Zach Ertz (198) and Tucker Kraft (308) were all Top 10 last season and undrafted. Heck, Bowers was TE10-11 in ADP last year! (Photo of Brock Bowers: Ethan Miller / Getty Images)

If the Lerners won't run the Nationals properly, it's time to sell
If the Lerners won't run the Nationals properly, it's time to sell

Washington Post

time29 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

If the Lerners won't run the Nationals properly, it's time to sell

The Lerner family either should run the Washington Nationals properly or sell the team. Because a labor-management battle is likely after the 2026 season, they need to decide in the next year. Are they 'in,' with all the risks attendant on being a competitive team? The price of poker is high. Or are they 'out,' selling the team for about $2 billion on their $450-million purchase price? (They also borrowed $200 million of that initial cost to leverage up their final return, and the team plays home games in a publicly funded park.) Ah, the agony of first-world choices. My preference would be for the Lerners to continue owning the team. The family has deep Washington roots. The late Ted Lerner forever will be the owner who brought D.C. its first World Series championship in 95 years. Legacy and continuity fuel long-term franchise success. But the current Nats, now in their sixth straight season with a sub-.440 record, are in territory that is seldom explored except by expansion teams — or the 1950s Washington Senators. This 'rebuild' is precariously close to becoming a collapse. To be the owners the nation's seventh-largest market should expect, what should the Lerners (or another owner) do? Usually, there is no easy answer to a big question. The aftershock of firing the team's two authority figures, team president Mike Rizzo and manager Dave Martinez, leaves the Nats with a roster of kids mentoring kids, and the trade deadline will subtract even more veteran stability. But the future doesn't have to be bleak. There actually is an answer, if the Nats ownership is serious about competing: Double everything. By Opening Day 2027. If you have three coaches and one trainer at your Class AAA affiliate in Rochester, then double it to six coaches and two trainers. Why? Because your competitors have as many as 11 coaches and three trainers. If you have five major league scouts, then double it to 10. Why? Because a few years ago, the Nats had 14 major league scouts. How can you make smart trades by Aug. 1 if you have just five scouts scouring the 50-plus minor league teams of the dozen clubs that may be deadline buyers? As for grassroots organization-building investments, the small-market Rays dwarf the Nats' commitments. This infernal internal fuss-budgeting about expenses considered essential by well-run teams has made Rizzo, and Stan Kasten before him, beat their foreheads on their office walls for 20 years. It sounds like 'S.O.S.' Now, here comes the big one, though it isn't really big at all: The Nats need to double their payroll for players who are actually on the field on the 26-man roster. Right now, it's a pathetic $60 million to $65 million. By the start of the 2027 season, it should be $130 million. Why is that a reasonable ballpark number? For comparison, what team has the 20th-highest payroll? The Kansas City Royals at $130 million, according to MLB's analysis of the present value of all a team's contracts, which USA Today published in April. The D.C. area population is 6.3 million. K.C. is 2.4 million. The median income here is 43 percent higher. The Nats, with a bad team, are 20th in MLB in attendance this year. They can afford to spend. That same MLB analysis, designed to give a sense of what a team has to pay out in cash this season, showed the Nats with a 2025 payroll of $107.7 million. That includes deferred payments to Stephen Strasburg ($26.7 million a year through 2029) and Patrick Corbin ($10 million). Other smaller or less affluent markets surpass the Nats. The Orioles, Tigers and Twins have present-value payrolls of $162 million (15th), $143 million and $142 million. The Nats are 24th. But when you take out the Strasburg and Corbin payments, what they're spending on the on-field product is even lower. (And no sympathy will be extended for those dead-money costs. Owners, especially in large markets, have to take the ugly deals along with the fabulous ones; that's baseball. If you can't swallow a couple of bad breaks and rotten contracts and still match payrolls with Kansas City, then you shouldn't own an MLB team.) In baseball, for generations, owners may make or lose millions in a given year, but what doesn't change is the escalation of franchise values. Witness the $1.5 billion the Nationals have appreciated by since the Lerners bought them. When your MLB net worth is that much in the black, and you sell 'our rebuild is on track' to ticket buyers, you can't lowball your operational budget so much that your GM is scrounging the discount bin of the pitching market, as Rizzo was. And despite what this gruesome summer would seem to indicate, getting to 'competitive' really wouldn't require a reckless shopping spree. How do you win 88 to 98 games, the range for being a likely wildcard or winning a division? It's a basic question in the analytics age. There is a stat answer, and it can be found in WAR (Wins Above Replacement). A replacement player is a guy you get fast for nothing — a minor-league call up or a trade of nobodies. A team of replacement players, say the math PhDs, wins 48 games. For every win above replacement, add one to that 48. So a roster with a combined WAR of 40 to 50 will win about 88 to 98 games. Almost all of a good team's WAR comes from its best 15 players. The rest of the roster should cancel out to about zero. This isn't a law, just a rule of thumb. But look up the 2012, '14, '16, '17 and '19 Nats. Or any excellent team. You'll find four to six stars with WARs that, as a group, average about 4.5 per player. Max Scherzer, Juan Soto, Anthony Rendon, Harper, Ryan Zimmerman, Jordan Zimmermann, Strasburg and Trea Turner fell between 3.6 and 5.6 WAR per season while with the Nats. On playoff contenders, about five more players average WAR of about 2.5. That's Gio Gonzalez, Ian Desmond, Denard Span, Daniel Murphy, Tanner Roark, Jayson Werth and Adam Eaton. About five more need 1.5 WAR, like Adam LaRoche, Wilson Ramos, Danny Espinosa and Tyler Clippard. Along the way, you may need help from one big season from a Howie Kendrick, Corbin or Doug Fister. From year to year, players bounce from one group to another. They're not stat robots. But add it all up, and in your good years, your team WAR is 40 to 50. The toughest puzzle piece is getting the elite stars — and that's where these current Nats have it easy. This season, James Wood, MacKenzie Gore and CJ Abrams are on pace to combine for 19.1 WAR — all on modest contracts. In their five playoff seasons, the top three Nats totaled 14.2, 15.9, 16.5, 20.0 and 18.3. This is where ownership matters. It's doubtful your baseball people can come up with all the additional players needed to contend solely through draft-and-develop or scout-the-world-and-sign or trade-for-'em. Owners need to buy some, too. Rizzo's trades for low-cost young stars have left the Nats in strong position for free agents. His successor will have plenty of payroll space, if allowed to use it. The way Ted Lerner bought Scherzer, Corbin, Werth and, on shorter deals, Murphy, Span, LaRoche, Rafael Soriano, Aníbal Sánchez and others. Ted Lerner's payroll got above $200 million. The current luxury tax payroll is $241 million. Those levels are light-years away from a 2027 Nats roster that could be put together for $60 million. Who would be on such a cheapest-possible team? The Nats would still have Wood, Gore, Abrams, Dylan Crews, Brady House, Jake Irvin, Jacob Young, Luis García Jr., Jose A. Ferrer, Brad Lord, Cole Henry, Robert Hassell III, Daylen Lile, Cade Cavalli, Alex Call and every prospect now in the minors. So 'doubling it' on the current on-field payroll isn't asking a lot. And that's how you improve record, increase crowds, local TV viewership and every other revenue stream. Risky business. Always has been. How serious do you wanna play? Cycles turn and times for change do arrive. That's where the Nats are now: They're stripped for a sale, or they're lean, mean and ready for hardball — if the Lerners choose. Since Washington had its parade in 2019, the Lerners have been genial folks, perhaps complacent with their lovely rings. They've been frozen by family disagreement about direction and budget. They twiddle, economize and hope. They mean well. But in the big leagues, that's not 'owning.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store