
Anti-Islamophobia charity loses UK funding even as incidents soar
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
The 130th Constitution Amendment Bill Is Aimed At Pushing India To One Party Rule
By Arun Srivastava The bill to remove a prime minister, chief minister or any other minister in jail for 30 days, without conviction is awell-designed plot to accomplish the RSS-BJP mission of pushing India to one nation-one party rule. This is one of the alternate choices like the SIR to have saffron idea turn into reality. It would be naive to construe that this instrument in future would not be misused. The timing of moving the bill in Parliament ought to be seriously taken note. Home minister Amit Shah moving the bill coinciding with SIR virtually on the verge of collapse, has wider implication. Like SIR, the instrument would strengthen and empower the rightist forces and deprive the centrist and secular of the political space they deserve. According to sources, like all other programmes, the RSS in collusion with the BJP had drew the strategy long back, precisely after comprehending the mood of the people that they have turned anti-BJP. By this time the basic ingredients were already being implemented. He bill on conviction was an alternative idea to the SIR. The bill seeks to remove a prime minister, chief minister or any other minister in jail for 30 days, without conviction. It will empower its agencies, ED, CBI and others to act recklessly. People are yet to forget the manner in which opposition chief ministers Arvind Kejriwal and Hemant Soren were arrested and made to languish in jail without trial. While granting bail to Soren, Supreme Court had observed; 'We don't want to observe anything more, if we observe you might be in difficulty' It is a well-known fact that Narendra Modi and Amit Shah had used the judiciary and the judicial provisions during their eleven year rule to scare and finish the opposition leaders. Almost all opposition leaders across India had to become the victim of weaponisation of the judicial process. In this backdrop how any one could subscribe to the Modi or Amit Shah's explanation that the latest instrument was only meant to check corruption. Some rightist advocates and academics plead that the arrested persons can apply for bail within the period of 30 days and get released before the expiry of the term. These people no doubt are trying to mislead the people and help the evil design of Modi. We have before us examples of many academics and intellectuals and social activists languishing in the jails without even serving them the chargesheet. Father Stan Swamy died in jail without trial. On 8 October 2020, Swamy was arrested and charged by the National Investigation Agency under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, for his alleged role in the 2018 Bhima Koregaon violence and links to the Communist Party of India (Maoist). Judiciary rejected his bail request multiple times. Incarcerated, his health deteriorated and died on 5 July 2021. Omar Khalid is languishing in jail for more than five years. He was arrested in September 2020, Mr Khalid for being accused as 'key conspirator' in violent clashes in Delhi that killed 53 people, mostly Muslims. The February riots in Delhi had occurred amid massive months-long protests against a contentious citizenship law. Two police cases were lodged against Khalid. One case has been dropped, while in the other, he hasn't been charged in court yet, and the trial hasn't begun. What has come as a rude shock is the fact that while Supreme Court speaks of bail as right, it has ignored the fact that Khalid has been in jail for more than five years. What is worse he has been arrested under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) – a notorious anti-terror law. There are numerous such cases. These two are rare cases. Moving the bill yesterday in the Parliament, that is too in the midst of country witnessing massive agitation against SIR, exposes the wicked design of RSS and Modi government. Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde holds: 'The disqualification is temporary and to the extent until which the person is in jail. One can resume office after release.' But at the same time admits; 'However, there is a great possibility of misuse. I foresee strong governments in the Centre misusing it against strong governments in the states.' Going by Hegde's observation, by the time the arrested person gets the bail, the game will be over and the political career of the poor guy is finished. This is precisely the intention of Modi and Shah behind bringing the bill. They intend to finish the political career of the opposition leaders and make India a country of one party, one nation and one election. SIR in reality was brought in vogue with this aim. But Rahul's expose has turned it redundant. Now they are trying to experiment with the conviction bill. Senior Supreme Court advocate Indira Jaising is right in her observation: 'In a country where criminal law is used for persecution, not prosecution, and as a tool for eliminating all Opposition parties, the proposed constitutional amendment is also weaponising the Constitution itself. When the ED and the CBI are under the direct control of the central government, federalism gets destroyed.' Saffron ecosystem claim of exterminating corruption by bringing in constitutional amendment is purely a farce and meant to fool people. It once again enforces the fact that Modi and Amit treat the Indians as idiots and fools. It is an open secret that Amit Shah has been instrumental in allowing passage and inducting the corrupt politicians into BJP. All these turncoats by virtue of their closeness to Amit Shah have been ruling the roots in their states, whether it is Maharashtra, Bihar, UP, Bengal or MP. They dictate the political course of the party in their states. A common phrase moves around in the political circle: BJP is a washing machine for all the corrupt politicians'. Really it is outrageous to think that Modi and Amit Shah would eradicate corruption. This constitution amendment bill simply aims at turning India a meadow for the saffron brigade. With all the opposition or even rebel BJP leaders in jail or disqualified, Modi and Amit will help RSS to implement its plan of one-party rule. Their track record of punishing the so called people makes it explicit. Out of 193 cases registered by the ED against political rivals of the BJP, only two have ended in conviction, proving that 191 cases are false and foisted for political reasons. Satyendra Jain of AAP had to spend two years in jail without any charge. Bracketing the prime minister along with chief ministers and other ministers is the biggest joke cracked by RSS and BJP. The saffron ecosystem played to this gallery gimmick only to convince the people of its sincerity and seriousness. Can anyone imagine that a prime minister would be arrested for helping Adani or any other big corporate honcho. For arresting prime minister, the sanction has to be obtained from the President that is too on the advice of the Union cabinet. Is it feasible? Can the cabinet ministers bell their leader? With the passing of the bill, India will turn into a police state in which constitution is irrelevant. AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi was correct in saying that the bills were aimed at creating a Gestapo, the secret police of Nazi Germany. India will also cease to have a criminal justice system with judiciary failing to muster courage to confront the political rulers. West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee banged the Constitutional Amendment Bill as a move 'more than a super Emergency' and 'a Hitlerian assault on the very soul of Indian democracy'. While proclaiming that the dangerous outreach ought to be resisted, she described the bill as 'death knell for democracy and federalism in India which seeks to empower the Union to intrude upon the mandate of the people, handing sweeping powers to unelected authorities (ED, CBI – whom the Supreme Court has described as 'caged parrots') to interfere in the functioning of elected state governments.' According to her, 'It is a step to empower the Prime Minister and the Union home minister in a sinister manner at the expense of the basic principles of our Constitution and strip the judiciary of its constitutional role.'.She was speaking the truth. (IPA Service)

Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Under US pressure, Lebanon begins disarming Palestinian factions in refugee camps
Lebanon's move to disarm Palestinian factions within the 12 refugee camps in the country began on Thursday with the Burj al-Barajneh camp in Beirut, the prime minister's office announced. The move stems from a 21 May meeting between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, during which they agreed that only the Lebanese state should bear arms. But it is also a result of US pressure on Lebanon to consolidate all weapons under the purview of the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), and away from groups that directly threaten Israel, chief among them being Hezbollah. It is ultimately also a condition of the ceasefire Lebanon signed with Israel in November, despite Israel's continued bombing campaigns in southern Lebanon which violate the ceasefire. A senior Palestinian Fatah commander in Burj al-Barajneh, Sobhi Abu Arab, told the Lebanese al-Jadeed broadcaster on Thursday that the weapons that are being immediately handed over are "illicit weapons" that his men have rounded up in the camp, and not their own. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Fatah is the Palestinian party whose members form the largest part of the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah, in the occupied West Bank. When asked where these weapons came from, Abu Arab responded: "From all over... but what would you want with that information?" He gave no indication that the state had specifically asked for the disarmament of Fatah fighters in the camp. What happens in these camps since Palestinians were ousted from their homes in 1948 during the ethnic cleansing campaign for the creation of the Israeli state, has largely fallen outside Lebanese jurisdiction. Abu Arab insisted that the Lebanese public should "rest assured" that "the Lebanese and Palestinians are one", and that he has coordinated the weapons handover with the Lebanese intelligence and security establishment. Crackdown During his visit to Paris last month to meet President Emmanuel Macron, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam came to realise that Lebanon's situation was far more precarious than many believed, Middle East Eye reported this week. France, long known for mediating Lebanon's political crises, made it clear to Salam that the country could not survive without implementing reforms, particularly the disarmament of non-state actors, namely Hezbollah, under international supervision. Lebanon: Inside the efforts to disarm Hezbollah Read More » There would be no renewal of the UN peacekeeping force Unifil's mandate, as France could not bear the full cost without US funding; no donor or reconstruction conference without Saudi participation; and no security stability, given Israel's determination to disarm Hezbollah by force if Lebanese authorities failed to do so themselves. Salam briefed President Joseph Aoun and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, and moved to convene a cabinet session to discuss a US proposal for Hezbollah's disarmament. Less than two weeks later, Salam returned to Baabda Palace, away from the media, determined to approve the US proposal, presented by envoy Thomas Barrack, in full with a timetable, as a way to "shield the state from the next wave of international escalation". But Hezbollah accused Salam of breaking his official commitments, saying: "When Prime Minister Nawaf Salam adopts the American envoy's roadmap, he is going against all the commitments he made in his ministerial statement, as well as those in the president's inauguration speech." Hezbollah denounced the government's move as a "grave sin" that strips Lebanon "of the weapon of resistance" against Israel, and vowed to disregard it.


Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Police make 630 arrests in Washington as Trump federal takeover ramps up
US Attorney General Pam Bondi announced on Thursday that 630 people have been arrested in Washington DC over a 10-day period, as the Trump administration considers ramping up its federal takeover of the US capital. Just under half of those arrested were undocumented immigrants, the White House told local news station ABC7 on Wednesday. Videos have circulated on social media for days now showing masked agents in bulletproof vests that only say "police" on the back hauling people out of their cars or ambushing them as they ride their bicycles or scooters. Many don't speak English, and are tackled to the ground as they scream for help. The agents do not identify themselves or explain why someone has been stopped, searched or arrested. The takeover has caused a chilling effect across a highly diverse city, where some immigrant families have already told local news station NBC4 that they will not be sending their kids to school when the new term begins. The refusal stems from fear they may be separated from their children as the Department of Homeland Security pushes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents to meet certain quotas for arrests and deportations. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Small business owners have also complained that their business is down as foot traffic slows, with many DC residents choosing to stay home, including US citizens who fear they will be racially profiled and harassed. This comes as President Donald Trump revealed he would be out on patrol with the federal agents and members of the National Guard that he has ordered into the city. He said the operation, overall, was in a bid to bring down the crime rate. "I'm going to be going out tonight, I think, with the police, and with the military, of course," Trump told radio host Todd Starnes on Thursday. So far, the National Guard has deployed 2,400 personnel to Washington, with another 700 members on their way from West Virginia, South Carolina and Ohio - all states led by Republican governors supportive of the president. The National Guard cannot make arrests, and critics have slammed the administration for using the soldiers in a performative role, costing taxpayers millions of dollars to move them into a small city where their mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles (M-ATV) can intimidate residents. Immigrants and homeless targeted The federal takeover began on 11 August, when Trump invoked Section 740 of the Home Rule Act, which gives the president the authority to take over the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) in Washington for 30 days. He insisted that the city's violent crime rates were too high, and that the mayor and city council were not acting in the city's best interests. The mayor - who is almost entirely reliant on federal funding from a Republican-controlled Congress that is loyal to the president - tried to push back. 'Alligator Alcatraz': Trump administration builds Florida detention centre for deportees Read More » "We know that crime has gone down in our city, and it has gone down precipitously over the last two years because of a lot of hard work, changes to our public safety ecosystem, including changes to the law, and we know those facts don't comport to what some people are saying," Muriel Bowser said on Wednesday. But the Department of Justice has already launched its own investigation into what it believes are manipulated crime figures by the MPD. The District of Columbia (DC) is not a state. It was created to house the federal government, and is only about 68 square miles (176 sq km) in size. It has no voting representation in the House of Representatives and no senators. Congress decides how much money the city gets. Washington has long been a solid blue Democratic district, but its more than 700,000 mostly African-American residents vote on ballots that hardly make a dent in federal elections. Their longtime motto is "Taxation Without Representation". Trump has said that only now are friends of his, both Republicans and Democrats, able to feel safe enough to go out to dinner in the city. While residents acknowledge there are pockets of pervasive gun crime in the city, as well as widespread car break-ins, they say Washington is not any more particularly crime-ridden than similar cities across the country. Different rankings show Washington DC as ranked between the 11th and 19th most violent city in 2024, and in January of this year US government statistics showed that violent crime was at a 30-year low during that same time period. The president, however, has been aggrieved by images of homeless encampments in the parts of the city that he sees en route to his golf course in next door Virginia. He has ordered the people in those camps to be forcibly moved to temporary shelters, and bulldozers have been seen razing their personal belongings. There is no evidence that links the vast majority of crime in DC to homelessness. On Wednesday, DC City Councillor Trayon White told ABC7 that when he went to the courthouse to examine what was happening to many of those arrested, "most of it was no paper", meaning prosecutors declined to file charges in most cases. "A lot of frivolous charges, not really arrests targeting people committing crimes," White added, expressing "concern about the type of policing" occurring right now.