New Zealand at 'significant risk' of missing 2050 climate target, government making it worse
Photo:
Supplied/ Unsplash - Chris Keats
New Zealand is at significant risk of
missing its 2050 climate target
, and the government's actions have increased the risk, according to independent monitoring.
The Climate Change Commission's 2025 emissions reduction monitoring report said New Zealand had made steady progress on reducing its climate pollution, but urgent action was needed to get on track for future goals.
The report had shown the country was likely to meet the government's first emissions budget, which runs from 2022 to 2025, in part due to accounting changes in the way emissions were measured.
However, the risks of missing targets from 2026 onwards had risen in the past year, and the government's plans were insufficient to put the country on track long-term.
Among the specific risks identified was the
increasingly shaky prospect of carbon capture and storage
happening in the gas sector.
The report said although the government's next emissions-cutting plan was not due until 2029, the coalition needed to take action before that because of the long lead-times taken for projects to start reducing pollution.
It gave the example of
NZ Steel's new electric furnace
, which took three years.
Jo Hendy, the commission's chief executive, said while things were broadly on track through to the end of this year, the risk of veering off course after that had increased.
Climate Change Commission chief exectuive Jo Hendy said there was a risk of things veering off course. (File photo)
Photo:
RNZ / Dom Thomas
Real emissions (before counting the carbon sucked in by forests) fell steadily from 2019 to 2023.
2023 was the lowest level of real or gross emissions since 1999 - and provisional figures from Stats NZ suggested emissions kept falling in most sectors through to 2024, except for electricity generation, which rose last year because of power generators burning more fossil fuels when hydro lakes were low.
Overall, the climate pollution trend was down, said Hendy.
"We're seeing more renewable energy generation, process heat conversions, electrification," said Hendy.
"And it's starting to show more in the emissions data. The key now is to build on that momentum - the next steps are crucial for delivery."
"The current policy settings aren't enough to deliver the emissions reductions that Aotearoa New Zealand has committed to. That's why we've recommended specific next steps, because delivery will falter without them."
The commission analysed every major sector, concluding the specific steps that would help the most were strengthening the Emissions Trading Scheme by updating the supply and price of carbon, to give companies more confidence to invest in cutting emissions, and bringing in policies to speed up the shifts to renewable energy, cleaner transport, and low-emissions farming.
It also said the government could save taxpayers money and cut industrial climate pollution by re-thinking the generous freebies given to some large emitters, and choosing a new way to protect manufacturing jobs from carbon pricing instead.
Hendy said many households were doing it tough, and would benefit if the government could capitalise on plunging prices for solar, electric vehicles, and batteries.
"Falling short doesn't just mean missing a target - it means higher costs down the track, lost economic opportunities, and more disruption for communities."
She said delivery was a stated priority for the government and the report provided the independent advice needed to "help them make good on that promise."
The report said technologies for farmers to reduce methane emissions had advanced in the last year and were close to being on the market.
Separately, the commission recommended shrinking the government's carbon budgets because changes to carbon accounting had moved the goal posts so the current budgets can be met with less real emissions cuts than were planned when the budgets were set.
If the government does this, it would be even further off target.
The report said moves by the government in the last year that risked producing more carbon included introducing road user charges for electric vehicles, re-opening oil and gas offshore exploration, and winding down the New Zealand Green Investment Finance fund.
On the flipside, positive moves for the climate included existing government plans to update ETS settings, confirming rail capability for new Cook Strait ferries, and streamlining consenting for new electricity generation from renewable sources.
"Our assessment of risk has increased in the last year, particularly for the third emissions budget," said the commission, referring to the 2031-2035 carbon budget.
"For the second emissions budget, there are moderate risks of not achieving planned reductions in most areas; and some areas of significant risk."
"While the third emissions reduction plan is not due until 2029, current plans are insufficient to meet the third budget and further action is required. There are also significant risks for meeting the 2050 target unless further action is taken."
It said the total of government policies in its latest emissions cutting plan would reduce climate pollution by 3.3 millions from 2026-2030.
Among the risks the commission listed were:
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
4 days ago
- The Spinoff
Butter prices are just a symptom of everything being completely rooted
Butter is the latest in a long line of individual products to be scapegoated for our crushing and ongoing cost of living reality, which shows no sign of abating. Miles Hurrell may have mentally cursed Nicola Willis for believing in him as he sweated through a barrage of media questions last Thursday. The finance minister had told the Fonterra chief executive he'd be great at this, emerging from their meeting two days prior with nothing but praise for his efforts to explain the price of butter. He was 'so good at communicating about this that I've encouraged him that he should provide that information directly to New Zealanders', she'd said. 'And I've been assured that that is something that he will be doing later this week.' Later that week had arrived, and things weren't going as well as expected. 'Do you actually understand what it's like for consumers to go to the supermarket and face these prices?' asked a reporter, her voice betraying an unmistakable hint of being extremely pissed off. 'Absolutely, I was in the supermarket last night,' hazarded Hurrell. Unfortunately, he'd omitted a small detail which may have undercut his attempt at relatability. 'What do you get paid?' the reporter asked. The answer, as it turns out, is nearly $6 million per annum, or enough to buy about 600,000 blocks of Anchor butter. The reaction to the interview wasn't universally positive. Analysts asked whether the dairy cooperative has lost its social licence. Social media users called for boycotts. On the one hand, fair enough. It feels like yesterday farmers were driving their tractors down Queen Street, complaining that climate regulations had made it impossible for them to do business. They won, with the incoming coalition government extending agriculture's exemption from the Emissions Trading Scheme. Now, after securing their own bespoke financial arrangement, they're saying they can't create another one for us sadsacks weeping in the Woolworths aisle. On the other hand, butter is only the latest disgusting boil on a massive pus-bleached body of unaffordability. When he wasn't uttering hexes on the finance minister, Hurrell's mind likely turned to Leviticus 16:21, where the high priest Aaron was commanded to place both his hands on the head of a live goat, and confess over it all the inequities of his people. The scapegoat would then be set free in the wilderness as a wandering representative for the sins of the nation. Butter is our current scapegoat. Before it came along, we had domestic airfares. Before that, fuel prices. Before that, flat whites. For one weird moment in late 2024, we had a collective freakout over the price of bean products. Before that, we had rates. Before that, avocados. All these products serve as a temporary focal point for the broader sense that everything's completely rooted. Butter is guilty of being too brazen about filching from our back pockets, with its roughly 50% price rise year on year, but most household staples are getting way out of hand. Buying enough mince for burgers costs an hour's work on the minimum wage. Cheese toasties are in 'sell your kidney' territory. Most significantly, sour coke lollies are now upwards of $2 a bag. Unless you're earning $6 million as the chief executive of Fonterra, it hurts paying for the basics. Something's got to give. The cost of living crisis has become the cost of living reality, and outside of urban upzoning and some positive noises about increasing supermarket competition, few politicians are proposing changes that could meaningfully alter the problems at the heart of our economic funk. If we want to leave a New World without feeling like we've just been mugged, we need higher wages and fairer tax settings. Instead we'll get rotating media freakouts about individual price spikes. This week a goat has been sent out into the desert, lathered in a 500g block of Anchor salted butter. But even as the castigation subsides, the underlying curse remains. A new representative for our collective failings will have to be selected soon. Have you seen the price of a block of Whittaker's Hazella lately? It's absolutely outrageous.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Carbon Forestry In Auckland: Regional Advice In A National Scheme
Press Release – Forest360 The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is New Zealand's flagship policy for reducing carbon emissions, offering landowners the opportunity to earn carbon credits for eligible forest land. While the scheme applies nationwide, those in Auckland face unique considerations that often go overlooked in national discussions. Auckland's rural and peri-urban zones present both opportunity and complexity when it comes to carbon forestry. For landowners, investors, and farm managers alike, understanding the regional nuances of the ETS is now more important than ever. The Auckland Landscape: Underutilised and Overlooked? Much of Auckland's rural land sits in fragmented parcels, small-scale farms, lifestyle blocks, and marginal pastures where traditional agriculture offers low returns. With rising interest in sustainable land use and long-term passive income, many of these properties are being reassessed for their carbon potential. However, the road to ETS participation isn't as simple as planting trees and waiting for credits. The process involves digital mapping, eligibility verification, regulatory filings, and ongoing emissions reporting. Without sound regional advice, landowners risk either missing out on available income or falling into compliance traps. Regional Challenges Within a National Framework While ETS policy is set at the national level, Auckland landowners must navigate additional layers of complexity: Zoning and district plan overlays that may restrict planting or harvesting Higher land values, making land-use change decisions more financially sensitive Smaller block sizes, which complicate eligibility and carbon stock measurement Urban encroachment and infrastructure proximity, which influence long-term land strategy These factors demand a tailored approach. A carbon project that makes sense in Southland may not be viable, or even permitted, on a 5-hectare block near Pukekohe. In these cases, engaging with experienced carbon and forestry advisory services can help landowners assess eligibility, optimise their land use, and ensure long-term compliance with the ETS. Due Diligence: A Growing Necessity As awareness of the ETS grows, so too does the number of Auckland properties being sold with existing carbon obligations. This introduces another layer of risk. Purchasers may unknowingly inherit liabilities, or find that land registered for carbon sequestration cannot be used for other purposes. Due diligence is critical when buying or selling land tied to the ETS. This includes reviewing: The ETS registration status and associated carbon liabilities Forestry Rights and legal agreements The accuracy of mapped carbon areas and emission returns Any pending obligations under the Final Emissions Return (FER) process Thinking Long-Term: It's Not Just About the Carbon Price Recent price volatility in New Zealand Units (NZUs) has created both caution and confusion among prospective participants. But successful carbon forestry requires a long-term view, one that accounts for forest growth cycles, market trends, and policy shifts. For many Auckland landowners, particularly those not traditionally engaged in forestry, seeking qualified, regionally-informed guidance can ensure that decisions are made with clarity rather than speculation. This includes: Assessing ETS eligibility and projected returns over 10–30 years Understanding registration vs permanent forest status Weighing exotic vs native planting options Exploring insurance, liability, and deregistration implications Getting It Right From the Start The ETS can provide a valuable revenue stream and contribute meaningfully to climate goals, but only when approached strategically. In a region as dynamic and complex as Auckland, that strategy needs to be grounded in both policy understanding and local land-use expertise. Whether you're a farmer rethinking part of your operation, a lifestyle block owner with a vision for reforestation, or a buyer evaluating a registered property, careful planning will make the difference between risk and reward. To ensure you're making informed decisions, it's worth seeking out expert advice on carbon forestry and the NZ ETS tailored to your land and goals. As the scheme evolves and carbon markets mature, Auckland's landowners have a unique chance to be part of the solution, provided they get the right advice.
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Carbon Forestry In Auckland: Regional Advice In A National Scheme
The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is New Zealand's flagship policy for reducing carbon emissions, offering landowners the opportunity to earn carbon credits for eligible forest land. While the scheme applies nationwide, those in Auckland face unique considerations that often go overlooked in national discussions. Auckland's rural and peri-urban zones present both opportunity and complexity when it comes to carbon forestry. For landowners, investors, and farm managers alike, understanding the regional nuances of the ETS is now more important than ever. The Auckland Landscape: Underutilised and Overlooked? Much of Auckland's rural land sits in fragmented parcels, small-scale farms, lifestyle blocks, and marginal pastures where traditional agriculture offers low returns. With rising interest in sustainable land use and long-term passive income, many of these properties are being reassessed for their carbon potential. However, the road to ETS participation isn't as simple as planting trees and waiting for credits. The process involves digital mapping, eligibility verification, regulatory filings, and ongoing emissions reporting. Without sound regional advice, landowners risk either missing out on available income or falling into compliance traps. While ETS policy is set at the national level, Auckland landowners must navigate additional layers of complexity: Zoning and district plan overlays that may restrict planting or harvesting Higher land values, making land-use change decisions more financially sensitive Smaller block sizes, which complicate eligibility and carbon stock measurement Urban encroachment and infrastructure proximity, which influence long-term land strategy These factors demand a tailored approach. A carbon project that makes sense in Southland may not be viable, or even permitted, on a 5-hectare block near Pukekohe. In these cases, engaging with experienced carbon and forestry advisory services can help landowners assess eligibility, optimise their land use, and ensure long-term compliance with the ETS. Due Diligence: A Growing Necessity As awareness of the ETS grows, so too does the number of Auckland properties being sold with existing carbon obligations. This introduces another layer of risk. Purchasers may unknowingly inherit liabilities, or find that land registered for carbon sequestration cannot be used for other purposes. Due diligence is critical when buying or selling land tied to the ETS. This includes reviewing: The ETS registration status and associated carbon liabilities Forestry Rights and legal agreements The accuracy of mapped carbon areas and emission returns Any pending obligations under the Final Emissions Return (FER) process Thinking Long-Term: It's Not Just About the Carbon Price Recent price volatility in New Zealand Units (NZUs) has created both caution and confusion among prospective participants. But successful carbon forestry requires a long-term view, one that accounts for forest growth cycles, market trends, and policy shifts. For many Auckland landowners, particularly those not traditionally engaged in forestry, seeking qualified, regionally-informed guidance can ensure that decisions are made with clarity rather than speculation. This includes: Assessing ETS eligibility and projected returns over 10–30 years Understanding registration vs permanent forest status Weighing exotic vs native planting options Exploring insurance, liability, and deregistration implications Getting It Right From the Start The ETS can provide a valuable revenue stream and contribute meaningfully to climate goals, but only when approached strategically. In a region as dynamic and complex as Auckland, that strategy needs to be grounded in both policy understanding and local land-use expertise. Whether you're a farmer rethinking part of your operation, a lifestyle block owner with a vision for reforestation, or a buyer evaluating a registered property, careful planning will make the difference between risk and reward. To ensure you're making informed decisions, it's worth seeking out expert advice on carbon forestry and the NZ ETS tailored to your land and goals. As the scheme evolves and carbon markets mature, Auckland's landowners have a unique chance to be part of the solution, provided they get the right advice.
