Fight against squatters could bring faster evictions for all Texas renters
State Sen. Paul Bettencourt, the bill's author, said squatters don't have rights. He points to a case in Mesquite as an example.
The homeowner, Terri Boyette, said her handyman moved in while she was out of town and took over the home. When she called the police, Boyette said she was told it was a civil matter.
"I'm trying to live the American dream and somebody can walk in and destroy everything I have," Boyette said.
Bettencourt said his legislation is aimed at getting squatters out in less time, but critics say it will have devastating consequences for legitimate renters and could lead to increased homelessness.
Dallas eviction attorney Mark Melton testified against the bill in Austin, calling it "extremely and obviously unconstitutional."
Melton told lawmakers he believes the squatter issue has been overblown to make it possible to shorten evictions for all tenants.
"You could evict a tenant in 10 days without a trial? How is there due process in that?" Melton asked.
Lawmakers on the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee pushed back on his comments.
"I don't want people to be kicked out on the streets - no one does," said state rep. Jeff Leach. "But to allow someone to go months and months and months and months without paying rent? To continue to be able to stay there on procedural grounds seems to me to be patently unfair and wrong."
According to the current version of SB 38:
Another bill, SB 1333, would make squatting a crime, meaning property owners could get police involved and avoid the eviction process altogether. The author, state senator Bryan Hughes, said the legislation is more narrowly tailored to address the squatting issue.
"This bill would draw a distinction between folks who have overstayed their leases and not paid rent, and then those who just show up and occupy property without any legal basis whatever," said Hughes.
The debate in Austin happened as an extreme eviction case played out in Dallas.
It involved a couple living in a unit of a small apartment building on Gaston Avenue in east Dallas. The family that owned the property planned to sell the property, but could not go through with the sale until it was vacant.
The family filed the first eviction case against Aries Mitchell in September of 2023. Mitchell and her husband, Robert Mullins, won the first case on a technical issue. The family then filed more cases, which the couple appealed, putting the parties in multiple legal battles.
Mitchell and Mullins said they used to pay weekly, until the landlord stopped taking partial payments. Now she admits, the court filings are just a way to buy them more time in the apartment.
"If I had money to go, I'd go," Mitchell said. "I do not want to be here. I'm only here because I don't have nowhere else to go."
Mitchell had successfully appealed one of the eviction cases all the way up to the 5th Court of Appeals. Once that court set a hearing for April 29, the couple assumed that meant they were allowed to stay in the unit until at least that date. However, a separate case was still playing out in a Dallas County courtroom.
"These tenants were always one step ahead," said Terry McAuley, a member of the family that owns the building. "They're up there reading books, following, like, 'what's another loophole? How can we continue staying in here for free?'"
McAuley's sister, Kelly Medlock, echoed her frustrations.
"They keep going to court appealing... and they keep getting granted," Medlock said.
Last month a judge granted a writ of possession to the family. Twelve days later, the constable's office oversaw the eviction and Mitchell and Mullins were left sitting on the stoop with their belongings piled on the sidewalk, bringing an end to the 18-month fight.
The
shortest timeline for an eviction is typically 30 days
, but the process can take much longer than that.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pritzker says ‘no way' FBI can arrest Texas lawmakers in Illinois
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) in a Wednesday interview said he would block any efforts to arrest Democratic lawmakers in the state who fled Texas to block a GOP effort to pick up five additional House seats in the midterm elections. 'Our state troopers protect everybody in Illinois and anybody who's here in Illinois,' Pritzker said during an appearance on ' News Not Noise ' with Jessica Yellin. 'And so, whether it's federal agents coming to Illinois or state rangers from Texas, if you haven't broken federal law, you're basically unwelcome and there's no way that our state legislators here — the Texas state legislators — can be arrested,' he added. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) urged FBI Director Kash Patel in a letter this week to help return Democrats to the Lone Star State. President Trump on Tuesday said the federal agency 'may have to' get involved, later adding the GOP was 'entitled' to additional House seats. 'We should have many more seats in California. It's all gerrymandered. And we have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas,' the president said during an interview Tuesday on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' 'And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats,' he added. But Pritzker argued Wednesday that any efforts to force the return of Democratic lawmakers are illegal. 'Look, we follow the law and the law is what I just laid it out to be. But, as you know, Donald Trump does not follow the law. Indeed, he's a convicted felon,' Pritzker told Yellin. 'And in Texas, they are also not following the law. They are thwarting the Constitution with the Voting Rights Act and making threats that they can't carry out. John Cornyn, of course, is running against Ken Paxton for his seat in the U.S. Senate; and so they're fighting, bickering over who can be tougher on this topic,' he added.
Boston Globe
10 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Fed up with Beacon Hill, those seeking to change the Legislature turn to 2026 voters for reforms
Kaufman is now leading the charge on two petitions that target stipends lawmakers earn for holding leadership positions. One would eliminate stipends altogether; the other would limit stipends to a certain percentage of a legislative leader's base salary, among other restrictions. The effort emerged after a Such issues 'should have been dealt with in a deliberative process in the Legislature,' said Kaufman, who filed bills to address the stipends only to have legislators ignore them. 'We feel like we have to take democracy back. The Legislature failed us and continues to fail us.' Advertisement Another petition submitted Wednesday would overhaul the election system by allowing open primaries that candidates from all different parties would compete in, an effort to increase competition to incumbents who are often unchallenged. Yet another would extend the state's public records law to the Legislature and governor, which would put Massachusetts in line with most other states. Both petitions are pushed by the Advertisement The petitions, if they make it to the 2026 ballot, build off momentum from the The success of that audit campaign, combined with a changing public perception of Beacon Hill, has fueled new efforts 'to try and pry open information from the Legislature,' said Horowitz, who studies the impact of ballot questions. 'People are recognizing that there is a real opportunity in the ballot question,' he said. Legislator pay has been a recurring topic on ballots nationwide. Peverill Squire, a professor at the University of Missouri who's studied Conversely, among the most common — and unpopular — measures that lawmakers themselves have put before voters are ones to increase their own pay. Squire said there have been nearly 250 such measures over the past 100 years, but the median 'yes' vote sits around 43 percent. Advertisement 'It's a problem that lawmakers are always hoping to tackle,' Squire said during a panel Wednesday at the National Conference of State Legislatures Legislative Summit in Boston. In Massachusetts, lawmakers' pay is automatically adjusted every two years through a complicated process involving two separate mechanisms: one guaranteed by the state Constitution, the other baked into a The constitutionally mandated adjustment is determined by the governor, who every two years must decide whether to raise the annual base salary for legislators. In December, Governor Maura Healey said lawmakers would get an The extra pay lawmakers can earn on top of their salaries also jumped by Some legislative leaders defended the extra pay. House Speaker Ron Mariano said stipends reward those who take on more work and responsibility and helps to 'keep people thinking about this job as a potential career.' He also said legislative leaders are best positioned to determine who receives them. 'Who better to know who shows leadership and puts in effort than the leaders who are trying to move the agenda?' Advertisement The Quincy Democrat did not say whether he'd support subjecting lawmakers to the public records law, arguing it depends on the details of 'what you're opening up' to the public. 'There are some things that are better left to negotiate in private,' he said, 'and I would prefer it that way.' There is a relatively low bar for starting the petition process: submitting just 10 signatures from registered voters and the full text of the law or amendment they wish to have enacted. That signed petition must be filed with Campbell's office, accompanied by certificates of voter registration for each signatory. After that, Campbell's office will review the language and, if deemed acceptable, will certify it and create a summary of the proposed law or amendment that will be printed on the petition forms. Once Campbell announces which petitions are certified for the ballot, typically in early September, campaigns can begin gathering the tens of thousands of signatures necessary to get it on the ballot. Initiative petitions for laws require two separate rounds of signature gathering and submission, and the number of signatures required for each round depends on the number of votes cast for governor at the most recent gubernatorial election. For the 2026 election, campaigns will have to collect a total of at least 87,003 signatures over the two rounds, and no more than one-quarter of the signatures can come from any one county. Other petitions filed Wednesday would allow Committee for Public Counsel Services employees to unionize, reduce the state's personal income tax to 4 percent from 5 percent, overhaul a Advertisement Another initiative that was certified last year and will be on the 2026 ballot would Mariano has been vocal about lawmakers' frustration with the ballot initiative process, saying citizen-written laws can create unintended consequences. Massachusetts lawmakers have also regularly rewritten voter-approved laws, such as slowing the implementation of a reduction in The House just this spring passed a He said he doesn't see the proposals as a rebuke of the Legislature, but rather a demonstration of the 'ease' of getting a measure before voters. 'I see a lot more of these well-financed special interest groups taking advantage of a procedure that I think is way too easy to get a question on the ballot,' he said. 'No one's talking to the voters. They're just getting signatures. It becomes an organizational chore more than anything. And when you see ballot initiatives become law, you see the holes in them.' Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says he will impose 100% tariffs on semiconductors and computer chips
President Donald Trump said he plans to impose 100% tariffs on computer chips and semiconductors, with an exception for companies that have committed to building in the United States."We'll be putting a tariff, approximately 100%, on chips and semiconductors," Trump said at an Oval Office event on Aug. 6 with Apple CEO Tim Cook, who was visiting the White House to announce plans for an additional $100 billion in investment in the U.S. Trump said companies, such as Apple, that have committed to building in the United States would be spared from the tariffs. He did not provide details on when the tariffs would go into effect. "If you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge. Even though you're building and you're not producing yet in terms of the big numbers of jobs… there will be no charge.' The tariffs on computer chips and semiconductors could raise prices on goods such as personal computers, smartphones, electric vehicles, and video game April, Nvidia announced plans to manufacture its AI supercomputers entirely in the United States for the first time, committing to building its advanced chips in Arizona and AI supercomputers in Texas. The White House hailed Nvidia's decision as "the Trump Effect in action.""Onshoring these industries is good for the American worker, good for the American economy, and good for American national security," the White House said in a statement while announcing Nvidia's plans. Trump has currently placed tariffs on various sectors, including 50% on steel, aluminum, and copper, and 25% on imported automobiles. Dozens of countries are also facing country-specific tariffs first announced on April 2, dubbed as Liberation Day by Trump.
